Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

VRY?-dear Nandan and list

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

dear nandan

 

why i asked the question back was because you had quoted by rote.

learnt some lessons and anwered that if x,y,z are there in some rasi

there is some effect. i know that you are trying very hard and are

infact a great mercurian. Being a jovian myself i appreciate your

learning ability and ability to question. My mercury in dhanu lagna

has a role for this appreciation.

 

Now coming to your question, see i cannot agree that three fellows

namely jupiter, mars and venus in 9th for taurus lagna can give VRY.

the basic condition for VRY is that the planets that are forming

should be mutilated and bruised in wars and thus the third party

winning.

 

If we take the classical VRy where weak dusthana lords in a dusthana

say for virgo lagna mars and jupiter in 12th weak. this may cause

real VRY. i disagree with you regarding sustenance point. If they are

forming in kendras or konas there is long term sustencace and if in

dusthanas and weak is not giving sustenance is really far fetched.

 

NTR was not from a brilliant and rich backgroung. Saturn is the best

yogakaraka for librans. then why is it that saturn in 12th gave him

raja yoga and extraordinary fame. that too in saturn dasa. Not

because saturn is 4th cum 5th lord, it is due to SATurn being a

natural significator of all that is hardship and suffering.(Read as

6th, 12th etc)

 

coming back to taurus query, infact jupiter and mars are ok, what

about venus, i think venus is spoiling VRY. OK OK, lagna lord

conjoing or aspecting, AK conjoining or aspecting rule should not be

forgotten. But the problem here is that it is kona and jupiter and

mars for this specific lagna should rise above the ashes and make

venus also rise above the ashes. ALl the three should be strong.

venus rises with the rise of other two. WHAT A RARITY.

 

If it is a dusthana no problem, but in kona or kendra????

well well well, it is nearly a herculian task to see your enemies

rising and you also rising. is it plausible. So it brings back the

fundamental question. who is gaining. who is losing. venus should

gain right. so ask dr.banerjee to provide the full details of the

chart and see who is the srongest, if it is venus then there is a

chance for VRY.

 

regards

partha

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, Nandan Chakraborty <nanadhan> wrote:

> Dear Gurus & friends

>

> I have been reading a very enlightening book by R Lakshmanan, who

is/

> used to be a very reputed astrologer 2-3 decades back. 1/4 way thru.

> Got stuck at his comment that "badhak in 9= sadhak"= RY= rise to the

> top. He was talking about St L10/11 in Sg for Ar Lg. But in the

> reference, I understood that he was talking in general for badhak

in 9,

> & taking this case only as an example.

>

> Most of the rest of the book is VERY good, replete with example-

charts

> on each page, to cover EACH & EVERY concept in the text (unlike many

> modern authors who only collect aphorisms, so that most of their

books

> are a monotone of serial nos, of X in Y+ Z assoc by T= wicked

mother).

> So I cant ignore this statement, just b'cos I cd not understand it.

>

> What I understand is that badhakesh should ideally be weak (in

dusthan,

> esp in 12= excellent, debilitated, combust, etc). Any clues?

>

> Gurudev said that if I meditate every morning, & start looking at

> charts, all my answers will start coming to me. Well, much noise is

> being made in the mornings, as daily mantras are being full-

throatedly

> recited(thank u Karen Sloker, for the clarification & VRA ref).

Tho, as

> for meditation, Gurus, please give me a little more time - its not

> really happening properly (hyperactive mind). But somehow, all these

> seemingly easy answers (like gainer/ loser in VRY, & Zoran's famous

> doubel negatives, & now this one) continue to elude me.

>

> St conjoins my Jp, slowing wisdom's effort in reaching me. But

> slowneasy wins the race, says St, ie if the audience is still awake/

> alive by the time u reach the finishing line.

>

> =====

>

> Best wishes

>

> Nandan

>

>

>

____________________

__

> Looking for a job? Visit India Careers

> Visit http://in.careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear Doctor banerjee

 

Analysing for a small child is not correct. But certainly i dont

think there is VRY.

 

Venus is stronger compared to mars and jupiter. He will rise but not

due to VRY but due to his own initiatives.

 

See his lagna lord is in bhagya sthana. This boy is master of his own

fate. He would be very hard pressed to work under someone.

 

VRY is not there i repeat, but he will gain in course of time.

 

regards

partha

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "Dr.D.Banerjee" <drdilip@s...> wrote:

> JAY JAGANNATH

> -------------

> Dear Partha , Nandan Babu and the List,

> Namaste

>

> I have been watching with great interest the discussion between you

on this baffling VRY.Partha, you have asked the details of the chart.

I am attaching it here. I have not yet been able to understand the

real meaning of the three dusthana lords in a kona. One more question

here, all the three planets also own three more houses, i.e. Lagna,

7th house , and 11th house. What will happen to the indications of

these houses due to this occurence of VRY in 9th house?

>

> As the discussion has not reached to any conclusive turns yet, may

I request our Gurus to intervene and help the list to understand VRY

in a proper way.

>

> With warm regards

> Dilip Banerjee.

>

> -

> partvinu5

> vedic astrology

> Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:32 PM

> [vedic astrology] VRY?-dear Nandan and list

>

>

> dear nandan

>

> why i asked the question back was because you had quoted by rote.

> learnt some lessons and anwered that if x,y,z are there in some

rasi

> there is some effect. i know that you are trying very hard and

are

> infact a great mercurian. Being a jovian myself i appreciate your

> learning ability and ability to question. My mercury in dhanu

lagna

> has a role for this appreciation.

>

> Now coming to your question, see i cannot agree that three

fellows

> namely jupiter, mars and venus in 9th for taurus lagna can give

VRY.

> the basic condition for VRY is that the planets that are forming

> should be mutilated and bruised in wars and thus the third party

> winning.

>

> If we take the classical VRy where weak dusthana lords in a

dusthana

> say for virgo lagna mars and jupiter in 12th weak. this may cause

> real VRY. i disagree with you regarding sustenance point. If they

are

> forming in kendras or konas there is long term sustencace and if

in

> dusthanas and weak is not giving sustenance is really far fetched.

>

> NTR was not from a brilliant and rich backgroung. Saturn is the

best

> yogakaraka for librans. then why is it that saturn in 12th gave

him

> raja yoga and extraordinary fame. that too in saturn dasa. Not

> because saturn is 4th cum 5th lord, it is due to SATurn being a

> natural significator of all that is hardship and suffering.(Read

as

> 6th, 12th etc)

>

> coming back to taurus query, infact jupiter and mars are ok, what

> about venus, i think venus is spoiling VRY. OK OK, lagna lord

> conjoing or aspecting, AK conjoining or aspecting rule should not

be

> forgotten. But the problem here is that it is kona and jupiter

and

> mars for this specific lagna should rise above the ashes and make

> venus also rise above the ashes. ALl the three should be strong.

> venus rises with the rise of other two. WHAT A RARITY.

>

> If it is a dusthana no problem, but in kona or kendra????

> well well well, it is nearly a herculian task to see your enemies

> rising and you also rising. is it plausible. So it brings back

the

> fundamental question. who is gaining. who is losing. venus should

> gain right. so ask dr.banerjee to provide the full details of the

> chart and see who is the srongest, if it is venus then there is a

> chance for VRY.

>

> regards

> partha

>

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, Nandan Chakraborty <nanadhan>

wrote:

> > Dear Gurus & friends

> >

> > I have been reading a very enlightening book by R Lakshmanan,

who

> is/

> > used to be a very reputed astrologer 2-3 decades back. 1/4 way

thru.

> > Got stuck at his comment that "badhak in 9= sadhak"= RY= rise

to the

> > top. He was talking about St L10/11 in Sg for Ar Lg. But in the

> > reference, I understood that he was talking in general for

badhak

> in 9,

> > & taking this case only as an example.

> >

> > Most of the rest of the book is VERY good, replete with example-

> charts

> > on each page, to cover EACH & EVERY concept in the text (unlike

many

> > modern authors who only collect aphorisms, so that most of

their

> books

> > are a monotone of serial nos, of X in Y+ Z assoc by T= wicked

> mother).

> > So I cant ignore this statement, just b'cos I cd not understand

it.

> >

> > What I understand is that badhakesh should ideally be weak (in

> dusthan,

> > esp in 12= excellent, debilitated, combust, etc). Any clues?

> >

> > Gurudev said that if I meditate every morning, & start looking

at

> > charts, all my answers will start coming to me. Well, much

noise is

> > being made in the mornings, as daily mantras are being full-

> throatedly

> > recited(thank u Karen Sloker, for the clarification & VRA ref).

> Tho, as

> > for meditation, Gurus, please give me a little more time - its

not

> > really happening properly (hyperactive mind). But somehow, all

these

> > seemingly easy answers (like gainer/ loser in VRY, & Zoran's

famous

> > doubel negatives, & now this one) continue to elude me.

> >

> > St conjoins my Jp, slowing wisdom's effort in reaching me. But

> > slowneasy wins the race, says St, ie if the audience is still

awake/

> > alive by the time u reach the finishing line.

> >

> > =====

> >

> > Best wishes

> >

> > Nandan

> >

> >

> >

>

____________________

> __

> > Looking for a job? Visit India Careers

> > Visit http://in.careers.

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

JAY JAGANNATH

-------------

Dear Partha , Nandan Babu and the List,

Namaste

 

I have been watching with great interest the discussion between you on this

baffling VRY.Partha, you have asked the details of the chart. I am attaching it

here. I have not yet been able to understand the real meaning of the three

dusthana lords in a kona. One more question here, all the three planets also

own three more houses, i.e. Lagna, 7th house , and 11th house. What will happen

to the indications of these houses due to this occurence of VRY in 9th house?

 

As the discussion has not reached to any conclusive turns yet, may I request our

Gurus to intervene and help the list to understand VRY in a proper way.

 

With warm regards

Dilip Banerjee.

 

-

partvinu5

vedic astrology

Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:32 PM

[vedic astrology] VRY?-dear Nandan and list

dear nandanwhy i asked the question back was because you had quoted by rote.

learnt some lessons and anwered that if x,y,z are there in some rasi there is

some effect. i know that you are trying very hard and are infact a great

mercurian. Being a jovian myself i appreciate your learning ability and ability

to question. My mercury in dhanu lagna has a role for this appreciation.Now

coming to your question, see i cannot agree that three fellows namely jupiter,

mars and venus in 9th for taurus lagna can give VRY. the basic condition for

VRY is that the planets that are forming should be mutilated and bruised in

wars and thus the third party winning.If we take the classical VRy where weak

dusthana lords in a dusthana say for virgo lagna mars and jupiter in 12th weak.

this may cause real VRY. i disagree with you regarding sustenance point. If they

are forming in kendras or konas there is long term sustencace and if in

dusthanas and weak is not giving sustenance is really far fetched.NTR was not

from a brilliant and rich backgroung. Saturn is the best yogakaraka for

librans. then why is it that saturn in 12th gave him raja yoga and

extraordinary fame. that too in saturn dasa. Not because saturn is 4th cum 5th

lord, it is due to SATurn being a natural significator of all that is hardship

and suffering.(Read as 6th, 12th etc)coming back to taurus query, infact

jupiter and mars are ok, what about venus, i think venus is spoiling VRY. OK

OK, lagna lord conjoing or aspecting, AK conjoining or aspecting rule should

not be forgotten. But the problem here is that it is kona and jupiter and mars

for this specific lagna should rise above the ashes and make venus also rise

above the ashes. ALl the three should be strong. venus rises with the rise of

other two. WHAT A RARITY.If it is a dusthana no problem, but in kona or

kendra????well well well, it is nearly a herculian task to see your enemies

rising and you also rising. is it plausible. So it brings back the fundamental

question. who is gaining. who is losing. venus should gain right. so ask

dr.banerjee to provide the full details of the chart and see who is the

srongest, if it is venus then there is a chance for VRY.regardspartha--- In

vedic astrology, Nandan Chakraborty <nanadhan> wrote:> Dear Gurus &

friends> > I have been reading a very enlightening book by R Lakshmanan, who

is/> used to be a very reputed astrologer 2-3 decades back. 1/4 way thru.> Got

stuck at his comment that "badhak in 9= sadhak"= RY= rise to the> top. He was

talking about St L10/11 in Sg for Ar Lg. But in the> reference, I understood

that he was talking in general for badhak in 9,> & taking this case only as an

example. > > Most of the rest of the book is VERY good, replete with

example-charts> on each page, to cover EACH & EVERY concept in the text (unlike

many> modern authors who only collect aphorisms, so that most of their books>

are a monotone of serial nos, of X in Y+ Z assoc by T= wicked mother).> So I

cant ignore this statement, just b'cos I cd not understand it.> > What I

understand is that badhakesh should ideally be weak (in dusthan,> esp in 12=

excellent, debilitated, combust, etc). Any clues?> > Gurudev said that if I

meditate every morning, & start looking at> charts, all my answers will start

coming to me. Well, much noise is> being made in the mornings, as daily mantras

are being full-throatedly> recited(thank u Karen Sloker, for the clarification &

VRA ref). Tho, as> for meditation, Gurus, please give me a little more time -

its not> really happening properly (hyperactive mind). But somehow, all these>

seemingly easy answers (like gainer/ loser in VRY, & Zoran's famous> doubel

negatives, & now this one) continue to elude me. > > St conjoins my Jp, slowing

wisdom's effort in reaching me. But> slowneasy wins the race, says St, ie if the

audience is still awake/> alive by the time u reach the finishing line.> >

=====> > Best wishes> > Nandan> > >

______________________>

Looking for a job? Visit India Careers> Visit

http://in.careers.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

Attachment: (application/octet-stream) example.jhd [not stored]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Dilip,

I

have been watching with great interest the discussion between you on this

baffling VRY.Partha, you have asked the details of the chart. I am attaching

it here. I have not yet been able to understand the real meaning of the

three dusthana lords in a kona. One more question here, all the three planets

also own three more houses, i.e. Lagna, 7th house , and 11th house. What

will happen to the indications of these houses due to this occurence of

VRY in 9th house?

ZORAN:

This is the real case of Viprita with transfer of power to LAGNA LORD

SHUKRA. So sudden shifts of fortune would result after or in the course

of some calamity... This may be expected around 25/26 Venus natural years..Shukra

is pitrukarak, while Rahu is matrukarak... The family front is in trouble.

The first 9 years of life are dangerous to mother, simha being in trines

to Matru rudra. Rahu as matrukarak is supposed to guard mother during the

first nine years, yet, mangal and shukra dristi would surely bring some

pain..

Best wishes,

Zoran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...