Guest guest Posted July 21, 2002 Report Share Posted July 21, 2002 >They are friends of mine, and the question for the Quiz I would like to >propose: find out the differences in regard to married life. > >Data: July 12th, 1979, 17:36 and 17:39 resp., 22:55 E, 54:06 N, Time zone >1, DST +1. I forgot to mention: they are both female. Your sishya, Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2002 Report Share Posted July 21, 2002 Dear Dhira Krsna, The lady with 17:36 time (1) is more prone to anger (& hence fights) than the one with 17:39 time (2). Hence the married life of (1) will be more smooth than (2). (This is from D-60). As far as D-7 , With 17:36 (1), Jupiter (karaka for children ) is in badhaka stana . Venus is debilitated . With 17:39 (2), Jupiter is in 10th house from lagna and Venus gets some neechabanga due to Jupiter and Mercury in quadrant. In this case , the spouse is probably more supportive as far as children are concerned. This is my first attempt in trying to use > D-27 charts ... regards, Shriram vedic astrology, "Krsna Shakti TVS" <Krsna.Shakti.TVS@p...> wrote: > Hello to all, > > Namaste. > > Here we have an interesting twin, they got engaged and married around the > same time. They look exactly the same and had very similar experiences in > their childhood. They are friends of mine, and the question for the Quiz I > would like to propose: find out the differences in regard to married life. > > Data: July 12th, 1979, 17:36 and 17:39 resp., 22:55 E, 54:06 N, Time zone > 1, DST +1. > > Navamsa and most of the divisional charts are the same, however there > occurs a difference from D-40 on, plus also D-7 is different. So the > question is: how does this affect their married life respectively? > > I'll post the answer to the question next week Monday. > > Have fun! > > Your sishya, > Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2002 Report Share Posted July 23, 2002 Namaste Dhira Krishna, After looking at both charts, here are my conclusions. The first native, born at 17:36, has two Yogadas planets in D9 (Sun and Venus), whereas the other doesn't have any. So according to me, the first native has a very happy married life, and the second one doesn't have a very happy married life. Regards. Lucas. _______________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2002 Report Share Posted July 23, 2002 Dear Dhira Krsna, I made an error in my previous post. The following is the corrected statement: "The lady with 17:36 time (1) is more prone to anger (& hence fights) than the one with 17:39 time (2). Hence the married life of (1) will be less smooth than (2). (This is from D-60)." The previous error part was : Hence the married life of (1) will be *more* smooth than (2). regards, Shriram vedic astrology, "shris1" <shris1> wrote: > Dear Dhira Krsna, > The lady with 17:36 time (1) is more prone to anger > (& hence fights) than the one with 17:39 time (2). Hence the married > life of (1) will be more smooth than (2). (This is from D-60). > > As far as D-7 , With 17:36 (1), Jupiter (karaka for > children ) is in badhaka stana . Venus is debilitated . > > With 17:39 (2), Jupiter is in 10th house from lagna > and Venus gets some neechabanga due to Jupiter and Mercury in > quadrant. In this case , the spouse is probably more supportive as > far as children are concerned. > > This is my first attempt in trying to use > D-27 charts ... > > regards, > Shriram > > vedic astrology, "Krsna Shakti TVS" > <Krsna.Shakti.TVS@p...> wrote: > > Hello to all, > > > > Namaste. > > > > Here we have an interesting twin, they got engaged and married > around the > > same time. They look exactly the same and had very similar > experiences in > > their childhood. They are friends of mine, and the question for the > Quiz I > > would like to propose: find out the differences in regard to > married life. > > > > Data: July 12th, 1979, 17:36 and 17:39 resp., 22:55 E, 54:06 N, > Time zone > > 1, DST +1. > > > > Navamsa and most of the divisional charts are the same, however > there > > occurs a difference from D-40 on, plus also D-7 is different. So the > > question is: how does this affect their married life respectively? > > > > I'll post the answer to the question next week Monday. > > > > Have fun! > > > > Your sishya, > > Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2002 Report Share Posted July 30, 2002 Dear Lucas and Sriram, Hare Rama Krsna! As promised, here is the result of my Twin Quiz: the first native, with time 17:36 has indeed a happy marriage, though sometimes a little tension is there. The second native of the twins, with 17:39 as her time, doesn't have a happy marriage at all, and factually got divorced from her husband recently. Funny enough, they both got married around the same time with two boys who were friends before, needless to say they aren't friends anymore now... >The first native, born at 17:36, has two Yogadas planets in D9 (Sun and >Venus), whereas the other doesn't have any. > >So according to me, the first native has a very happy married life, and >the second one doesn't have a very happy married life. You were right, Lucas. Please explain the difference in Yogadas, since they both have the same D-9. Sriram wrote: >"The lady with 17:36 time (1) is more prone to anger > (& hence fights) than the one with 17:39 time (2). Hence the married > life of (1) will be less smooth than (2). (This is from D-60)." That's also correct to some extent, however the second one (17:39) got divorced due to her husbands desire. Please explain your reasoning from D-60. Yours sincerely, Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2002 Report Share Posted August 1, 2002 In D9, for both sisters, Guru joins UL, but it is in Marana Sthana which causes destruction of UL. It is not conducive for a happy married life. But if we want to look at problems in their marital lives in depth, we have to admit that the number of yogadas in D9 is the main difference between the two sisters. D9 for 17:36 +----------------------+| | | | || | | Sun GL | Mar || Ket | | | || | | HL | Glk || | | | ||-------------|---------------------------|-------------|| | | || | | || Ven | | || | | || | | ||-------------| N A V A M S A |-------------|| | | || | | || | | || | | || | | ||-------------|---------------------------|-------------|| | | | Sat || Jup | | | || | Moo | Asc | Rah || Mer | | | || | | | Mnd |+----------------------+ The elder one has GL and HL in Taurus. Sun is with HL, GL and aspects Lagna with Rasi Drishtis. Venus owns Lagna, HL and GL, Mars owns 7th from Lagna, 7th from HL and 7th from GL. Rahu aspects Lagna, HL and GL by Graha Drishtis. So, we have 4 yogadas here. In the D9 of the younger sister (born at 17:39), GL changes : it is in Gemini. Mars is in it, so it is still a yogada. Rahu aspects GL by Rasi Drishtis and is still a yogada. But Sun and Venus don’t aspect neither GL nor its 7th, so they aren’t yogadas in this chart. Sun and Venus are the only planets aspecting Navamsa Lagna. So the elder sister with Sun and Venus being Yogadas is much luckier in her married life then the younger one. I think that marriage of both sisters should have happened before the Vimshottari Mahadasa of Jupiter (in marana sthana), i.e. in Rahu/Mars. Rahu is in Nakshatras Parivartana with Venus, and Mars is also in Nakshatras Parivartana with Moon. So we can treat dasa/bukhti of Rahu/Mars as if it was Venus/Moon. Venus is Karaka for marriage and Moon is Darakaraka. Best regards. Lucas.Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2002 Report Share Posted August 3, 2002 Dear Lucas, Hare Rama Krsna! >Sun and Venus are the only planets aspecting Navamsa Lagna. So the elder >sister with Sun and Venus being Yogadas is much luckier in her married >life then the younger one. Thanks for the explanation on Yogadas, I see now. >I think that marriage of both sisters should have happened before the >Vimshottari Mahadasa of Jupiter (in marana sthana), i.e. in Rahu/Mars. >Rahu is in Nakshatras Parivartana with Venus, and Mars is also in >Nakshatras Parivartana with Moon. So we can treat dasa/bukhti of >Rahu/Mars as if it was Venus/Moon. Venus is Karaka for marriage and Moon >is Darakaraka. No, it is Jupiter that caused the marriage. Look at how Jupiter, 5th lord in 9th in rasi chart aspects on Mars, lagna lord and Moon-Ketu in UL. Also in Navamsa Jupiter aspects on UL, and it was Saturn, 8th lord from UL and aspecting UL and 2nd from Navamsa lagna that caused the divorce for the younger one in it's antardasa. For the older one, it will have been Sun and Venus as yogadas that aspect 2nd from UL and Navamsa lagna which will have protected the marriage. However, even for the older one heavy times have been there, since they were bestolen and wandered around searching for livelihood and shelter. Your sishya, Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2002 Report Share Posted August 5, 2002 Dear Krsna Dasa, >No, it is Jupiter that caused the marriage. Look at how Jupiter, 5th lord >in 9th in rasi chart aspects on Mars, lagna lord and Moon-Ketu in UL. I agree, but I was looking on Varshaphal of 17th and 18th year of life also. I assume that marriages occurred in the beginning of Jupiter dasa? >However, even for the older one heavy times have been there, since they >were be stolen and wandered around searching for livelihood and shelter. The dasa of a planet in Marana Sthana can’t be very good. Fortunately, there were other factors, like presence of yogadas, to counteract this. With best regards. Lucas. _______________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 Dear Lucas, Hare Rama Krsna. >I agree, but I was looking on Varshaphal of 17th and 18th year of life >also. I assume that marriages occurred in the beginning of Jupiter dasa? Could you tell me a little how to interpret Varshphal charts? I don't know so much yet about it. Yes, marriage date was 5 Apr 1999. Just now the older sister told me that her time is actually 17:45 instead of 17:36 which she had given me earlier. Her sister is about 3-5 min. later. Your sishya, Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.