Doubt in Crux of Vedic Astrology (divisional charts)

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

 

I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri Sanjay

Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great field of

astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can be made.

 

In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill Gates

was used.

 

The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in the 6th

house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it was in

lagan in the d-10 chart.

 

My question is as follows

 

1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart, does

the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

 

2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts should

be consulted and for what reasons.

 

For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the 10th lord,

and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and dasamsa

chart. These are the planets of interest.

 

Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA chart

also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

 

IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets strenght in

rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa for

profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone and not in

NAVAMSA?.

 

3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned with the

area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi chart, but

good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact?.

(example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi, but good

in dasamsa)

 

4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in the

appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th lord of

rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord debilitated in

dasamsa)

 

5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are examining should

the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

 

I have read some posts in this group, but not able to formulate an

idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few weeks.

 

Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

 

Regards

Sudarsan

[Guest guest]

Dear Sudarsan,

 

The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be deciphered after

examining their rashi and concerned divisional position jointly. Consider the

strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-chart and arrive

at a mean position.

 

Sarbani

 

harisuds2002 wrote:

 

> Dear All,

>

> I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri Sanjay

> Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great field of

> astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can be made.

>

> In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill Gates

> was used.

>

> The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in the 6th

> house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it was in

> lagan in the d-10 chart.

>

> My question is as follows

>

> 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart, does

> the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

>

> 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

> tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts should

> be consulted and for what reasons.

>

> For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the 10th lord,

> and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and dasamsa

> chart. These are the planets of interest.

>

> Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA chart

> also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

>

> IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets strenght in

> rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa for

> profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone and not in

> NAVAMSA?.

>

> 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned with the

> area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi chart, but

> good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact?.

> (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi, but good

> in dasamsa)

>

> 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in the

> appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th lord of

> rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord debilitated in

> dasamsa)

>

> 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are examining should

> the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

>

> I have read some posts in this group, but not able to formulate an

> idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few weeks.

>

> Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

>

> Regards

> Sudarsan

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

[Guest guest]

Dear Sarbani and All,

 

Thanks for your explanation.

 

I have two questions

 

a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi chart,

will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

 

i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted in the

corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this planet

 

Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

 

b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the planet

exalted/debilitated/medium

 

I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider in the

above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

understanding correct?.

 

 

b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make use of

vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

 

 

Regards,

Sudarsan

 

 

vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> Dear Sudarsan,

>

> The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

deciphered after

> examining their rashi and concerned divisional position jointly.

Consider the

> strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-chart

and arrive

> at a mean position.

>

> Sarbani

>

> harisuds2002 wrote:

>

> > Dear All,

> >

> > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri

Sanjay

> > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great

field of

> > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can be

made.

> >

> > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill

Gates

> > was used.

> >

> > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in the

6th

> > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it was

in

> > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> >

> > My question is as follows

> >

> > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart, does

> > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

> >

> > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

> > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts

should

> > be consulted and for what reasons.

> >

> > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the 10th

lord,

> > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and

dasamsa

> > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> >

> > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA

chart

> > also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

> >

> > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets strenght in

> > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa for

> > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone and

not in

> > NAVAMSA?.

> >

> > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned with

the

> > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi chart,

but

> > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the

impact?.

> > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi, but

good

> > in dasamsa)

> >

> > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in the

> > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th lord

of

> > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord debilitated in

> > dasamsa)

> >

> > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are examining

should

> > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> >

> > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to formulate an

> > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few weeks.

> >

> > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

> >

> > Regards

> > Sudarsan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannatha

Dear Sudarsan,

We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution you that Iam a

beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that in perpective. In my

little experience I have found that the divisional charts like D-10 are to be

focused on as if you are analyzing a separate chart. Let me give you an

example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10 th Lord and placed in the 4th, but it

does little to explain my career. In my D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio

debilitated and he is the 8th lord in the 12th. At present I am running his

bukthi and Rahu the Maha Dasa lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused

an awakening of deep interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my

mainstream career I am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my

D-10 Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo in the 10th

aspected by Mercury from Gemini. The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no

clues. Now the last two months have been mildly difficult in the career front

with some fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by D-10. This

problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is the Badhaka for

Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for several instances in the past

when my career ran into some trouble and Mercury was involved.

This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited experience suggests

that we would be better off focusing on D-charts in their individuality to

arrive at answers to very specific questions. Atleast for a beginner like me

this focus has helped as opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also

double-checked my inferences by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari,

Narayana etc and arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the

probability of success with the approach. There was a certain consistency which

IMO is very crucial.

Though my comments are not a specific answer to your queries I hope this helps

and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned members to correct me.

Hare Krishna

Sudharsan

harisuds2002 wrote:

Dear Sarbani and All,Thanks for your explanation. I have two questions a) if

the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi chart, will a good

position in the divisional chart help?. i.e the planet may be debilitated

in rasi, but exalted in the corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we

consider this planetDebilitated/Exlated/Medium b) If a planet is exalted in

rasi chart, but weak in the corresponding divisional chart what should we say

about the planetexalted/debilitated/mediumI assume by "mean" you are saying

that we should consider in the above two cases the strength of a planet as

medium. Is this understanding correct?. b) Once having arrived to such a

conculsion, how to make use of vimsopak bal and shadbal?.Regards,Sudarsan--- In

vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:> Dear Sudarsan,> >

The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be deciphered after>

examining their rashi and concerned divisional position jointly. Consider the>

strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-chart and arrive>

at a mean position.> > Sarbani> > harisuds2002 wrote:> > > Dear All,> >> > I

am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri Sanjay> > Rath. it

is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great field of> > astrology and

was amazed at the kind of predictions that can be made.> >> > In one of the

exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill Gates> > was used.> >> > The

chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in the 6th> > house, and

was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it was in> > lagan in the d-10

chart.> >> > My question is as follows> >> > 1) Though the planet was badly

placed in rasi, navamsa chart, does> > the good positioning in the dasamsa

chart help? for profession> >> > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles

"Kalachakra dasa> > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional

charts should> > be consulted and for what reasons.> >> > For example if we

want to analyse 10th house, we see the 10th lord,> > and the stira and chara

karak strength placement in rasi and dasamsa> > chart. These are the planets of

interest.> >> > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA

chart> > also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.> >> > IN

a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets strenght in> > rasi chart

and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa for> > profession etc,

foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone and not in> > NAVAMSA?.> >> > 3)If a

planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned with the> > area of life

which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi chart, but> > good in the

appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact?.> > (example:

professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi, but good> > in dasamsa)> >> >

4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in the> >

appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th lord of> > rasi

chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord debilitated in> > dasamsa)> >> >

5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are examining should> > the

planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen> >> > I have read some posts in

this group, but not able to formulate an> > idea. this question has been eating

up my mind for a few weeks.> >> > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me

this clarified.> >> > Regards> > Sudarsan> >> >> > Archives:

vedic astrology> >> > Group info:

vedic astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE:

Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...> >> > ....... May Jupiter's

light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to

Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Do You

?

HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

[Guest guest]

Dear Sudarsan,

 

Thanks a lot for your reply.

 

I have a question for you.

 

If in your analysis you find that the 10th lord (as in D-10) is

placed fine in the D-10 chart, but weak in rasi chart what will be

your conclusions?.

 

Similarly if the 10th lord of D-10 is weak in navamsa what will be

your conclusions.

 

Regards,

Sudarsan

 

vedic astrology, Sudharsan Srinivasan <sudhar108>

wrote:

>

> Hare Rama Krishna

> Jaya Jagannatha

> Dear Sudarsan,

> We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution you that

Iam a beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that in

perpective. In my little experience I have found that the divisional

charts like D-10 are to be focused on as if you are analyzing a

separate chart.

> Let me give you an example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10 th Lord

and placed in the 4th, but it does little to explain my career. In my

D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio debilitated and he is the 8th lord in

the 12th. At present I am running his bukthi and Rahu the Maha Dasa

lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused an awakening of deep

interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my mainstream career I

am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my D-10

Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo in the

10th aspected by Mercury from Gemini.

> The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no clues. Now the last

two months have been mildly difficult in the career front with some

fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by D-10. This

problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is the

Badhaka for Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for several

instances in the past when my career ran into some trouble and

Mercury was involved.

> This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited

experience suggests that we would be better off focusing on D-charts

in their individuality to arrive at answers to very specific

questions. Atleast for a beginner like me this focus has helped as

opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also double-checked my inferences

by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari, Narayana etc and

arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the probability of

success with the approach. There was a certain consistency which IMO

is very crucial.

> Though my comments are not a specific answer to your queries I hope

this helps and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned

members to correct me.

> Hare Krishna

> Sudharsan

> harisuds2002 wrote:Dear Sarbani and All,

>

> Thanks for your explanation.

>

> I have two questions

>

> a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi chart,

> will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

>

> i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted in the

> corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this planet

>

> Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

>

> b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

> corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the planet

> exalted/debilitated/medium

>

> I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider in the

> above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

> understanding correct?.

>

>

> b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make use of

> vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

>

>

> Regards,

> Sudarsan

>

>

> vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> > Dear Sudarsan,

> >

> > The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

> deciphered after

> > examining their rashi and concerned divisional position jointly.

> Consider the

> > strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-

chart

> and arrive

> > at a mean position.

> >

> > Sarbani

> >

> > harisuds2002 wrote:

> >

> > > Dear All,

> > >

> > > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri

> Sanjay

> > > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great

> field of

> > > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can be

> made.

> > >

> > > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill

> Gates

> > > was used.

> > >

> > > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in

the

> 6th

> > > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it

was

> in

> > > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> > >

> > > My question is as follows

> > >

> > > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart,

does

> > > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

> > >

> > > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

> > > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts

> should

> > > be consulted and for what reasons.

> > >

> > > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the 10th

> lord,

> > > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and

> dasamsa

> > > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> > >

> > > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA

> chart

> > > also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

> > >

> > > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets strenght

in

> > > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa for

> > > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone and

> not in

> > > NAVAMSA?.

> > >

> > > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned

with

> the

> > > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi

chart,

> but

> > > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the

> impact?.

> > > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi, but

> good

> > > in dasamsa)

> > >

> > > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in

the

> > > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th

lord

> of

> > > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord debilitated

in

> > > dasamsa)

> > >

> > > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are examining

> should

> > > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> > >

> > > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to formulate

an

> > > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few weeks.

> > >

> > > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Sudarsan

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> > >

> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > >

> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

>

>

>

>

> HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

[Guest guest]

Jai Shri Jagannath!

 

Dear Sudharshan,

 

I am also a learner like you...so please understand my thoughts

could be erroneous...

 

Generally, What is seen from Rasi chart prevails. If a Lord of a

particular house is exalted in Rasi but debilitated in a varga, say D-

10, then he goes thru what is called RajaBangaNeecha Yoga, meaning,

his benefic results are cancelled(Banga) as far as that division is

concerned. Similarly, if a lord is Debilitated in Rasi chart but

Exalted or well placed in a divisional chart, then it is called

NeechaBangaRaja Yoga, meaning even thought his many other

indications/significations may suffer due to his bad placement in

Rasi, he may still provide benefic results as far as the Divisional

chart is concerned.

 

Among all the Varga charts, D-9 is considered very important and a

planet's debilitation/exaltation in D-9 is considered as making

(confirming)/breaking(reversing) what is seen in the Rasi chart.

 

Hopwe this helps.

 

Regards,

-Suresh.

 

vedic astrology, "harisuds2002" <harisuds2002> wrote:

> Dear Sudarsan,

>

> Thanks a lot for your reply.

>

> I have a question for you.

>

> If in your analysis you find that the 10th lord (as in D-10) is

> placed fine in the D-10 chart, but weak in rasi chart what will be

> your conclusions?.

>

> Similarly if the 10th lord of D-10 is weak in navamsa what will be

> your conclusions.

>

> Regards,

> Sudarsan

>

> vedic astrology, Sudharsan Srinivasan <sudhar108>

> wrote:

> >

> > Hare Rama Krishna

> > Jaya Jagannatha

> > Dear Sudarsan,

> > We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution you

that

> Iam a beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that in

> perpective. In my little experience I have found that the

divisional

> charts like D-10 are to be focused on as if you are analyzing a

> separate chart.

> > Let me give you an example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10 th

Lord

> and placed in the 4th, but it does little to explain my career. In

my

> D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio debilitated and he is the 8th lord

in

> the 12th. At present I am running his bukthi and Rahu the Maha Dasa

> lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused an awakening of

deep

> interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my mainstream career

I

> am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my D-10

> Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo in the

> 10th aspected by Mercury from Gemini.

> > The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no clues. Now the last

> two months have been mildly difficult in the career front with some

> fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by D-10. This

> problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is the

> Badhaka for Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for

several

> instances in the past when my career ran into some trouble and

> Mercury was involved.

> > This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited

> experience suggests that we would be better off focusing on D-

charts

> in their individuality to arrive at answers to very specific

> questions. Atleast for a beginner like me this focus has helped as

> opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also double-checked my

inferences

> by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari, Narayana etc and

> arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the probability of

> success with the approach. There was a certain consistency which

IMO

> is very crucial.

> > Though my comments are not a specific answer to your queries I

hope

> this helps and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned

> members to correct me.

> > Hare Krishna

> > Sudharsan

> > harisuds2002 wrote:Dear Sarbani and All,

> >

> > Thanks for your explanation.

> >

> > I have two questions

> >

> > a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi

chart,

> > will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

> >

> > i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted in

the

> > corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this

planet

> >

> > Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

> >

> > b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

> > corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the planet

> > exalted/debilitated/medium

> >

> > I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider in the

> > above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

> > understanding correct?.

> >

> >

> > b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make use of

> > vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

> >

> >

> > Regards,

> > Sudarsan

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > >

> > > The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

> > deciphered after

> > > examining their rashi and concerned divisional position

jointly.

> > Consider the

> > > strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-

> chart

> > and arrive

> > > at a mean position.

> > >

> > > Sarbani

> > >

> > > harisuds2002 wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > >

> > > > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri

> > Sanjay

> > > > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great

> > field of

> > > > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can

be

> > made.

> > > >

> > > > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill

> > Gates

> > > > was used.

> > > >

> > > > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in

> the

> > 6th

> > > > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it

> was

> > in

> > > > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> > > >

> > > > My question is as follows

> > > >

> > > > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart,

> does

> > > > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

> > > >

> > > > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

> > > > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts

> > should

> > > > be consulted and for what reasons.

> > > >

> > > > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the

10th

> > lord,

> > > > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and

> > dasamsa

> > > > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> > > >

> > > > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA

> > chart

> > > > also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

> > > >

> > > > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets

strenght

> in

> > > > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa

for

> > > > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone

and

> > not in

> > > > NAVAMSA?.

> > > >

> > > > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned

> with

> > the

> > > > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi

> chart,

> > but

> > > > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the

> > impact?.

> > > > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi,

but

> > good

> > > > in dasamsa)

> > > >

> > > > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in

> the

> > > > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th

> lord

> > of

> > > > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord

debilitated

> in

> > > > dasamsa)

> > > >

> > > > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are

examining

> > should

> > > > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> > > >

> > > > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to

formulate

> an

> > > > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few

weeks.

> > > >

> > > > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Sudarsan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Group info: vedic-

> astrology/info.html

> > > >

> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > > >

> > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Your use of is subject to

> >

> >

> >

> > Sponsor

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> > Terms of

> Service.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

[Guest guest]

Dear Suresh,

 

The uccha and neecha bhanga, if I recall correctly, occurs only for navamsa.

This does not apply to the other divisional charts.

 

Sarbani

 

crsureshbabu wrote:

 

> Jai Shri Jagannath!

>

> Dear Sudharshan,

>

> I am also a learner like you...so please understand my thoughts

> could be erroneous...

>

> Generally, What is seen from Rasi chart prevails. If a Lord of a

> particular house is exalted in Rasi but debilitated in a varga, say D-

> 10, then he goes thru what is called RajaBangaNeecha Yoga, meaning,

> his benefic results are cancelled(Banga) as far as that division is

> concerned. Similarly, if a lord is Debilitated in Rasi chart but

> Exalted or well placed in a divisional chart, then it is called

> NeechaBangaRaja Yoga, meaning even thought his many other

> indications/significations may suffer due to his bad placement in

> Rasi, he may still provide benefic results as far as the Divisional

> chart is concerned.

>

> Among all the Varga charts, D-9 is considered very important and a

> planet's debilitation/exaltation in D-9 is considered as making

> (confirming)/breaking(reversing) what is seen in the Rasi chart.

>

> Hopwe this helps.

>

> Regards,

> -Suresh.

>

> vedic astrology, "harisuds2002" <harisuds2002> wrote:

> > Dear Sudarsan,

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your reply.

> >

> > I have a question for you.

> >

> > If in your analysis you find that the 10th lord (as in D-10) is

> > placed fine in the D-10 chart, but weak in rasi chart what will be

> > your conclusions?.

> >

> > Similarly if the 10th lord of D-10 is weak in navamsa what will be

> > your conclusions.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Sudarsan

> >

> > vedic astrology, Sudharsan Srinivasan <sudhar108>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Hare Rama Krishna

> > > Jaya Jagannatha

> > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution you

> that

> > Iam a beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that in

> > perpective. In my little experience I have found that the

> divisional

> > charts like D-10 are to be focused on as if you are analyzing a

> > separate chart.

> > > Let me give you an example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10 th

> Lord

> > and placed in the 4th, but it does little to explain my career. In

> my

> > D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio debilitated and he is the 8th lord

> in

> > the 12th. At present I am running his bukthi and Rahu the Maha Dasa

> > lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused an awakening of

> deep

> > interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my mainstream career

> I

> > am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my D-10

> > Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo in the

> > 10th aspected by Mercury from Gemini.

> > > The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no clues. Now the last

> > two months have been mildly difficult in the career front with some

> > fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by D-10. This

> > problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is the

> > Badhaka for Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for

> several

> > instances in the past when my career ran into some trouble and

> > Mercury was involved.

> > > This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited

> > experience suggests that we would be better off focusing on D-

> charts

> > in their individuality to arrive at answers to very specific

> > questions. Atleast for a beginner like me this focus has helped as

> > opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also double-checked my

> inferences

> > by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari, Narayana etc and

> > arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the probability of

> > success with the approach. There was a certain consistency which

> IMO

> > is very crucial.

> > > Though my comments are not a specific answer to your queries I

> hope

> > this helps and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned

> > members to correct me.

> > > Hare Krishna

> > > Sudharsan

> > > harisuds2002 wrote:Dear Sarbani and All,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your explanation.

> > >

> > > I have two questions

> > >

> > > a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi

> chart,

> > > will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

> > >

> > > i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted in

> the

> > > corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this

> planet

> > >

> > > Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

> > >

> > > b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

> > > corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the planet

> > > exalted/debilitated/medium

> > >

> > > I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider in the

> > > above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

> > > understanding correct?.

> > >

> > >

> > > b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make use of

> > > vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

> > >

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Sudarsan

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > >

> > > > The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

> > > deciphered after

> > > > examining their rashi and concerned divisional position

> jointly.

> > > Consider the

> > > > strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant D-

> > chart

> > > and arrive

> > > > at a mean position.

> > > >

> > > > Sarbani

> > > >

> > > > harisuds2002 wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear All,

> > > > >

> > > > > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by Sri

> > > Sanjay

> > > > > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this great

> > > field of

> > > > > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that can

> be

> > > made.

> > > > >

> > > > > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of Bill

> > > Gates

> > > > > was used.

> > > > >

> > > > > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It was in

> > the

> > > 6th

> > > > > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But it

> > was

> > > in

> > > > > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> > > > >

> > > > > My question is as follows

> > > > >

> > > > > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa chart,

> > does

> > > > > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for profession

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra dasa

> > > > > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional charts

> > > should

> > > > > be consulted and for what reasons.

> > > > >

> > > > > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the

> 10th

> > > lord,

> > > > > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi and

> > > dasamsa

> > > > > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> > > > >

> > > > > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in NAVAMSA

> > > chart

> > > > > also even though we are examining other divisional charts?.

> > > > >

> > > > > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets

> strenght

> > in

> > > > > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say dasamsa

> for

> > > > > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone

> and

> > > not in

> > > > > NAVAMSA?.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is concerned

> > with

> > > the

> > > > > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi

> > chart,

> > > but

> > > > > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the

> > > impact?.

> > > > > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi,

> but

> > > good

> > > > > in dasamsa)

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but bad in

> > the

> > > > > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact? (10th

> > lord

> > > of

> > > > > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord

> debilitated

> > in

> > > > > dasamsa)

> > > > >

> > > > > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are

> examining

> > > should

> > > > > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> > > > >

> > > > > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to

> formulate

> > an

> > > > > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few

> weeks.

> > > > >

> > > > > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this clarified.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Sudarsan

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > astrology/info.html

> > > > >

> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > > > >

> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Your use of is subject to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sponsor

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > >

> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Terms of

> > Service.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

[Guest guest]

Jai Shri Jagannath!

 

Dear Sudarshan,

 

Yes. That's correct. Navamsa placement conforms/reverses a

Planet's overall indications. But, I was assuming the same holds true

even in other divisional charts, but relevant in only the aspects

indicated by the divisional chart.

 

Dear Gurus and others, please correct our understanding.

 

Regards,

-Suresh.

 

vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> Dear Suresh,

>

> The uccha and neecha bhanga, if I recall correctly, occurs only for

navamsa.

> This does not apply to the other divisional charts.

>

> Sarbani

>

> crsureshbabu wrote:

>

> > Jai Shri Jagannath!

> >

> > Dear Sudharshan,

> >

> > I am also a learner like you...so please understand my thoughts

> > could be erroneous...

> >

> > Generally, What is seen from Rasi chart prevails. If a Lord of

a

> > particular house is exalted in Rasi but debilitated in a varga,

say D-

> > 10, then he goes thru what is called RajaBangaNeecha Yoga,

meaning,

> > his benefic results are cancelled(Banga) as far as that division

is

> > concerned. Similarly, if a lord is Debilitated in Rasi chart but

> > Exalted or well placed in a divisional chart, then it is called

> > NeechaBangaRaja Yoga, meaning even thought his many other

> > indications/significations may suffer due to his bad placement in

> > Rasi, he may still provide benefic results as far as the

Divisional

> > chart is concerned.

> >

> > Among all the Varga charts, D-9 is considered very important

and a

> > planet's debilitation/exaltation in D-9 is considered as making

> > (confirming)/breaking(reversing) what is seen in the Rasi chart.

> >

> > Hopwe this helps.

> >

> > Regards,

> > -Suresh.

> >

> > vedic astrology, "harisuds2002" <harisuds2002>

wrote:

> > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > >

> > > Thanks a lot for your reply.

> > >

> > > I have a question for you.

> > >

> > > If in your analysis you find that the 10th lord (as in D-10) is

> > > placed fine in the D-10 chart, but weak in rasi chart what will

be

> > > your conclusions?.

> > >

> > > Similarly if the 10th lord of D-10 is weak in navamsa what

will be

> > > your conclusions.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Sudarsan

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Sudharsan Srinivasan

<sudhar108>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hare Rama Krishna

> > > > Jaya Jagannatha

> > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > > We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution you

> > that

> > > Iam a beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that in

> > > perpective. In my little experience I have found that the

> > divisional

> > > charts like D-10 are to be focused on as if you are analyzing a

> > > separate chart.

> > > > Let me give you an example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10 th

> > Lord

> > > and placed in the 4th, but it does little to explain my career.

In

> > my

> > > D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio debilitated and he is the 8th

lord

> > in

> > > the 12th. At present I am running his bukthi and Rahu the Maha

Dasa

> > > lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused an awakening of

> > deep

> > > interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my mainstream

career

> > I

> > > am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my D-10

> > > Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo in

the

> > > 10th aspected by Mercury from Gemini.

> > > > The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no clues. Now the

last

> > > two months have been mildly difficult in the career front with

some

> > > fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by D-10.

This

> > > problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is

the

> > > Badhaka for Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for

> > several

> > > instances in the past when my career ran into some trouble and

> > > Mercury was involved.

> > > > This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited

> > > experience suggests that we would be better off focusing on D-

> > charts

> > > in their individuality to arrive at answers to very specific

> > > questions. Atleast for a beginner like me this focus has helped

as

> > > opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also double-checked my

> > inferences

> > > by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari, Narayana etc

and

> > > arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the probability

of

> > > success with the approach. There was a certain consistency which

> > IMO

> > > is very crucial.

> > > > Though my comments are not a specific answer to your queries I

> > hope

> > > this helps and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned

> > > members to correct me.

> > > > Hare Krishna

> > > > Sudharsan

> > > > harisuds2002 wrote:Dear Sarbani and All,

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for your explanation.

> > > >

> > > > I have two questions

> > > >

> > > > a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi

> > chart,

> > > > will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

> > > >

> > > > i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted in

> > the

> > > > corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this

> > planet

> > > >

> > > > Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

> > > >

> > > > b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

> > > > corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the

planet

> > > > exalted/debilitated/medium

> > > >

> > > > I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider in

the

> > > > above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

> > > > understanding correct?.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make

use of

> > > > vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Sudarsan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...>

wrote:

> > > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > > >

> > > > > The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

> > > > deciphered after

> > > > > examining their rashi and concerned divisional position

> > jointly.

> > > > Consider the

> > > > > strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the relevant

D-

> > > chart

> > > > and arrive

> > > > > at a mean position.

> > > > >

> > > > > Sarbani

> > > > >

> > > > > harisuds2002 wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Dear All,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology" by

Sri

> > > > Sanjay

> > > > > > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this

great

> > > > field of

> > > > > > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions that

can

> > be

> > > > made.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart of

Bill

> > > > Gates

> > > > > > was used.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It

was in

> > > the

> > > > 6th

> > > > > > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart. But

it

> > > was

> > > > in

> > > > > > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > My question is as follows

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa

chart,

> > > does

> > > > > > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for

profession

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra

dasa

> > > > > > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional

charts

> > > > should

> > > > > > be consulted and for what reasons.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see the

> > 10th

> > > > lord,

> > > > > > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in rasi

and

> > > > dasamsa

> > > > > > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in

NAVAMSA

> > > > chart

> > > > > > also even though we are examining other divisional

charts?.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets

> > strenght

> > > in

> > > > > > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say

dasamsa

> > for

> > > > > > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3) alone

> > and

> > > > not in

> > > > > > NAVAMSA?.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is

concerned

> > > with

> > > > the

> > > > > > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in rasi

> > > chart,

> > > > but

> > > > > > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be the

> > > > impact?.

> > > > > > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in rasi,

> > but

> > > > good

> > > > > > in dasamsa)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but

bad in

> > > the

> > > > > > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact?

(10th

> > > lord

> > > > of

> > > > > > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord

> > debilitated

> > > in

> > > > > > dasamsa)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are

> > examining

> > > > should

> > > > > > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to

> > formulate

> > > an

> > > > > > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few

> > weeks.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this

clarified.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards

> > > > > > Sudarsan

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > > astrology/info.html

> > > > > >

> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

@e...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Your use of is subject to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sponsor

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> > > >

> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > > >

> > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Terms of

> > > Service.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

[Guest guest]

Jai Gurudev,

 

Respected Guru's and Senior members

 

Does the neechabanga raja yoga apply for the divisional charts also

esp. Navamsa? In the principle of Neechabanga raja yoga, does

debiliation of Mercury for Gemini, Virgo, Sagg. & pisces lagna

constitute neecha banga raja yoga, as Mercury itself its exaltation

lord and its in Kendra from lagna? How does it affect the lagna

lordship for Gemini & Virgo.

 

Appreciate the replies and thanks

Babu

vedic astrology, "crsureshbabu" <suchandr@h...> wrote:

> Jai Shri Jagannath!

>

> Dear Sudarshan,

>

> Yes. That's correct. Navamsa placement conforms/reverses a

> Planet's overall indications. But, I was assuming the same holds

true

> even in other divisional charts, but relevant in only the aspects

> indicated by the divisional chart.

>

> Dear Gurus and others, please correct our understanding.

>

> Regards,

> -Suresh.

>

> vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...> wrote:

> > Dear Suresh,

> >

> > The uccha and neecha bhanga, if I recall correctly, occurs only

for

> navamsa.

> > This does not apply to the other divisional charts.

> >

> > Sarbani

> >

> > crsureshbabu wrote:

> >

> > > Jai Shri Jagannath!

> > >

> > > Dear Sudharshan,

> > >

> > > I am also a learner like you...so please understand my

thoughts

> > > could be erroneous...

> > >

> > > Generally, What is seen from Rasi chart prevails. If a Lord

of

> a

> > > particular house is exalted in Rasi but debilitated in a varga,

> say D-

> > > 10, then he goes thru what is called RajaBangaNeecha Yoga,

> meaning,

> > > his benefic results are cancelled(Banga) as far as that

division

> is

> > > concerned. Similarly, if a lord is Debilitated in Rasi chart but

> > > Exalted or well placed in a divisional chart, then it is called

> > > NeechaBangaRaja Yoga, meaning even thought his many other

> > > indications/significations may suffer due to his bad placement

in

> > > Rasi, he may still provide benefic results as far as the

> Divisional

> > > chart is concerned.

> > >

> > > Among all the Varga charts, D-9 is considered very important

> and a

> > > planet's debilitation/exaltation in D-9 is considered as making

> > > (confirming)/breaking(reversing) what is seen in the Rasi chart.

> > >

> > > Hopwe this helps.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > -Suresh.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "harisuds2002" <harisuds2002>

> wrote:

> > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > >

> > > > Thanks a lot for your reply.

> > > >

> > > > I have a question for you.

> > > >

> > > > If in your analysis you find that the 10th lord (as in D-10)

is

> > > > placed fine in the D-10 chart, but weak in rasi chart what

will

> be

> > > > your conclusions?.

> > > >

> > > > Similarly if the 10th lord of D-10 is weak in navamsa what

> will be

> > > > your conclusions.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Sudarsan

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, Sudharsan Srinivasan

> <sudhar108>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Hare Rama Krishna

> > > > > Jaya Jagannatha

> > > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > > > We share the same first name. At the outset let me caution

you

> > > that

> > > > Iam a beginner and my thoughts should only be taken with that

in

> > > > perpective. In my little experience I have found that the

> > > divisional

> > > > charts like D-10 are to be focused on as if you are analyzing

a

> > > > separate chart.

> > > > > Let me give you an example. In my rasi chart Moon is my 10

th

> > > Lord

> > > > and placed in the 4th, but it does little to explain my

career.

> In

> > > my

> > > > D-10 I have the Moon in Scorpio debilitated and he is the 8th

> lord

> > > in

> > > > the 12th. At present I am running his bukthi and Rahu the

Maha

> Dasa

> > > > lord is placed in the 8th.This period has caused an awakening

of

> > > deep

> > > > interest in the occult area(8th house) Now in my mainstream

> career

> > > I

> > > > am involved in the stock-market and that is reflected by my

D-10

> > > > Lagna Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter being placed in Virgo

in

> the

> > > > 10th aspected by Mercury from Gemini.

> > > > > The Rasi chart atleast in my opinion gives no clues. Now

the

> last

> > > > two months have been mildly difficult in the career front

with

> some

> > > > fluctuation in finances etc. This is better expalined by

D-10.

> This

> > > > problem is due to my running Rahu/Moon/Mercury and Mercury is

> the

> > > > Badhaka for Sagittarius Lagna in D-10. I have run checks for

> > > several

> > > > instances in the past when my career ran into some trouble and

> > > > Mercury was involved.

> > > > > This is true for my other D-n charts as well. But my limited

> > > > experience suggests that we would be better off focusing on D-

> > > charts

> > > > in their individuality to arrive at answers to very specific

> > > > questions. Atleast for a beginner like me this focus has

helped

> as

> > > > opposed to creating a pot-pourri. I also double-checked my

> > > inferences

> > > > by trying different Dasa systems like Vimsottari, Narayana

etc

> and

> > > > arrived at the same result thereby strentgthing the

probability

> of

> > > > success with the approach. There was a certain consistency

which

> > > IMO

> > > > is very crucial.

> > > > > Though my comments are not a specific answer to your

queries I

> > > hope

> > > > this helps and without a doubt I request the Gurus and Learned

> > > > members to correct me.

> > > > > Hare Krishna

> > > > > Sudharsan

> > > > > harisuds2002 wrote:Dear Sarbani and All,

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for your explanation.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have two questions

> > > > >

> > > > > a) if the planet is weak/debilitated/inimical sign in rasi

> > > chart,

> > > > > will a good position in the divisional chart help?.

> > > > >

> > > > > i.e the planet may be debilitated in rasi, but exalted

in

> > > the

> > > > > corresponding divisional chart. HOw should we consider this

> > > planet

> > > > >

> > > > > Debilitated/Exlated/Medium

> > > > >

> > > > > b) If a planet is exalted in rasi chart, but weak in the

> > > > > corresponding divisional chart what should we say about the

> planet

> > > > > exalted/debilitated/medium

> > > > >

> > > > > I assume by "mean" you are saying that we should consider

in

> the

> > > > > above two cases the strength of a planet as medium. Is this

> > > > > understanding correct?.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > b) Once having arrived to such a conculsion, how to make

> use of

> > > > > vimsopak bal and shadbal?.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > > Sudarsan

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@v...>

> wrote:

> > > > > > Dear Sudarsan,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The composite strengths/weaknesses of the planets must be

> > > > > deciphered after

> > > > > > examining their rashi and concerned divisional position

> > > jointly.

> > > > > Consider the

> > > > > > strength of a planet in the rashi and then in the

relevant

> D-

> > > > chart

> > > > > and arrive

> > > > > > at a mean position.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sarbani

> > > > > >

> > > > > > harisuds2002 wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear All,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am going through the book "Crux of Vedic Astrology"

by

> Sri

> > > > > Sanjay

> > > > > > > Rath. it is a tremendous book. I am a newcomer to this

> great

> > > > > field of

> > > > > > > astrology and was amazed at the kind of predictions

that

> can

> > > be

> > > > > made.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In one of the exmaples for the 10th house, the chart

of

> Bill

> > > > > Gates

> > > > > > > was used.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The chart of Bill Gates has Moon as the 10th lord. It

> was in

> > > > the

> > > > > 6th

> > > > > > > house, and was in the 8th house in the navamsa chart.

But

> it

> > > > was

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > lagan in the d-10 chart.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My question is as follows

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 1) Though the planet was badly placed in rasi, navamsa

> chart,

> > > > does

> > > > > > > the good positioning in the dasamsa chart help? for

> profession

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 2) I saw from one of the very good articles "Kalachakra

> dasa

> > > > > > > tutorial" by P. V.Narasimha Rao on what all divisional

> charts

> > > > > should

> > > > > > > be consulted and for what reasons.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > For example if we want to analyse 10th house, we see

the

> > > 10th

> > > > > lord,

> > > > > > > and the stira and chara karak strength placement in

rasi

> and

> > > > > dasamsa

> > > > > > > chart. These are the planets of interest.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Should the strenght of these planets be consluted in

> NAVAMSA

> > > > > chart

> > > > > > > also even though we are examining other divisional

> charts?.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > IN a general way, is it enough to conslut the planets

> > > strenght

> > > > in

> > > > > > > rasi chart and the appropriate divisional chart (say

> dasamsa

> > > for

> > > > > > > profession etc, foreign residence D-4, siblings D-3)

alone

> > > and

> > > > > not in

> > > > > > > NAVAMSA?.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 3)If a planet which is of interest (the planet is

> concerned

> > > > with

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > area of life which we are seeing) is badly placed in

rasi

> > > > chart,

> > > > > but

> > > > > > > good in the appropriate divisional chart, what will be

the

> > > > > impact?.

> > > > > > > (example: professoin: 10th lord of rasi chart bad in

rasi,

> > > but

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > in dasamsa)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 4) IF a planet is nicely placed in the rasi chart, but

> bad in

> > > > the

> > > > > > > appropriate divisional chart, what will be the impact?

> (10th

> > > > lord

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > rasi chart exalted in rasi, but the same 10th lord

> > > debilitated

> > > > in

> > > > > > > dasamsa)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 5) Irrespective of the divisional chart which we are

> > > examining

> > > > > should

> > > > > > > the planets strenght in the navamsa chart be seen

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have read some posts in this group, but not able to

> > > formulate

> > > > an

> > > > > > > idea. this question has been eating up my mind for a few

> > > weeks.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Would greatly be happy if experts could get me this

> clarified.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards

> > > > > > > Sudarsan

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > > > astrology/info.html

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> @e...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu

||

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Your use of is subject to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sponsor

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Group info: vedic-

> astrology/info.html

> > > > >

> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic-astr

ology-@e...

> > > > >

> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Terms of

> > > > Service.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > HotJobs, a service - Search Thousands of New Jobs

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Group info: ved

ic-astrology/info.html

> > >

> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-@e...

> > >

> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

>