What sages didnt say about Lagna Lords

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krsna.

 

Jaya Jagannath!

 

>More than often one can safely

>rule out Rahu and Ketu as lagna lords since most of the times they

>bestow the effects of the depositor or whoever is strongly

>influencing them and hence can't be lord of anything.

 

It's teached that when Rahu or Ketu are in own sign, then take the other

lord of the sign. What if Rahu or Ketu are in conjunction with a lot of

planets, while the other lord is alone or with less planets, thus being

weaker? I have a doubt in regard this one, if Rahu or Ketu are in own

sign, then why will they not act as the lord of their sign? After all,

when someone is at home, he will feel home, and thus will feel as the lord

of the home, or not? While if one is not at home, will one identify

oneself that much as the lord of the home?

 

Your sishya,

Dhira Krsna dasa