Tithi Ashtottari Antardasa Sequence Clarification

[Guest guest]

Namaste Waldemar,

 

I got it confirmed by Pt. Sanjay Rath. He said that he too uses what I

taught in the TA dasa tutorial that I posted recently. About the quote from

his book "Vimsottari & Udu Dasas", he said that it should be an error due to

finishing the book fast. He said that he uses the standard interpretation,

but wanted to spell out the other option also and ended up only mentioning

the other option.

 

Bottomline: Sanjay and I use the same approach - what I taught in the TA

dasa tutorial. However, this need not be the final word (as always).

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

 

> Namaste Waldemar,

>

> You pay attention to what you read!

>

> I had implemented antardasas this way 3 years back, when Sanjay

> taught me TP and TA dasa. I had implemented it in consultation with

> Sanjay and both of us have been using the software during this time.

>

> However, when I referred Sanjay's latest book, I did see what you

> mentioned. Clearly there is a discrepancy here. Let me get this

> clarified by him and change my tutorial and software if needed.

>

> Thank you very much for paying attention and bringing this to my

> attention!

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> > Dear Narasimha,

> >

> > Your article about TP chart & Tithi Astottari dasa is great.

> However, for

> > count of antardasa you are not following exactly the teaching of

> Sanjay in

> > its "Vimshottari and Udu dasa's". You wrote:

> >

> > "Antardasas start from the planet after dasa lord and go in the

> order of

> > dasas. For example, in Saturn dasa, the first antardasa will be

> that of

> > Jupiter. Antardasas will go as Jupiter, Rahu, Venus, Sun, Moon,

> Mars,

> > Mercury and Saturn."

> >

> > S.Rath write for antardasa in Ashtottari dasa (p.179):

> > "since Ketu is the governor of the Ashtottari dasa, the antardasa

> shall be

> > reckoned in the reverse to established practice" and

> > "the first antardasa is of the planet preceding this" following by

> an

> > example

> > "for Sun dasa, the first antaradasa is Venus, next of Rahu, next of

> Jupiter

> > and so on".

> > For Tithi Ashtottari he writes (p.187):

> > " the dasa, antardasa and other sub-periods as well as their order

> is

> > exactly the same as the Ashtottari dasa"

> >

> > Is yours opinion different from this statement?

> >

> > With best regards

> >

> > Waldemar