Cricket CUP 2003

[Guest guest]

Best Regards

Srinagesh

venkateshwara srinagesh <sri999 > wrote:

Namaste Narshimaji !!!

Astrology is a probabilistic science and only the Creator knows what is going to happen for sure.

I do agree with it ,& also when we are cricket fans & also when we little are

biased yes ........ :-) Best Regards Srinagesh "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:

Namaste friends,

 

If any Indian cricket fans had raised their hopes on reading my prediction and

hence been more devastated by the result than they otherwise would have been, I

am sorry for raising the hopes with a false prediction. I was as disappointed

with the result as any other India cricket fan. But, hey, Indians played very

well throughout the tournament and "went home with their heads held high" as

the Indian captain said. To the Australian fans, congratulations! Aussies

played like champs and deserve to be the champs! Current Aussie team is

undoubtedly the best team ever to play oneday cricket. Even Steve Waugh's

Australians did not look so invincible when they lifted the Cup four years ago.

 

I accept my shortcomings with humility and will try to improve my techniques

(and data too) in future predictions.

 

Astrology is a probabilistic science and only the Creator knows what is going to

happen for sure. We can only speculate with varying degrees of confidence. The

only good astrological techniques I know are related to individual horoscopy

and the cricket predictions were based on extrapolating the principles to

countries. As such, there was no basis to deem them infallible.

 

Still, if you read the original predictions I gave more than a month back, there

was definitely some success. Clearly, there is some worth in the method used,

but it is not fully reliable.

 

When Indian fans were rioting in India to protest the terrible rout of Feb 15, I

predicted a turn-around from the England match and that India would play

excellently since then. That did happen. In just two weeks, the much-booed

Indian team was so much transformed that all the critics called India the only

team capable of upsetting the Aussies when the second round started. It was a

prediction with a low probability of happening and it did happen. I predicted

the hosts, Proteas, who were rated number two just behind Aussies originally,

to do very poorly and they indeed did so. Against all expectations, the only

team that was to give Aussies a run for their money, did not even qualify for

the super sixes. Again, it was a bold prediction with a very low probability of

happening and it did happen. I predicted Sri Lanka to do very well in the

initial league round and lose steam after March 6. That too happened. Sri Lanka

topped their pool on March 4 after losing only one game out of six games, but

won only one out of the four games they played since March 6. Thus, I did well

with these three teams. With the other two teams I attempted originally, I

failed with two. I misjudged Pakistan's poor period until March 6 and could

reconcile easily later.

 

I originally wrote only that India will do very well after a turn-around on Feb

26 and that they "even had some chances" of winning the cup. I was balanced

then. I got carried away later. This partly had to do with a comparison of the

India chart with that of Australia, which may not be accurate.

 

Perhaps my methods are not perfect. And/or perhaps the data I used is not right.

For example, I used 1:30 pm as the birthtime of Australia, as given by Imran

bhai. Anne gave some other data for Australia. If you go back to the last five

world cup wins that I analyzed, only the Indian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan wins

make perfect sense. The logic given for the Aussie wins of 1987 and 1999 is not

so clean. Perhaps the data I used for Australia is not right.

 

But I do not want to do any post-mortem now or analyze the Australia charts and

find the right one. I am too exhausted after watching the final to attempt any

post-mortem or post-match analysis now.

 

Regarding the Sachin Tendulkar chart, I was concerned about transit Moon in the

12th house from natal Moon. When Moon transits in the 8th and 12th houses from

natal Moon, disappointments are possible. But, as a big Sachin fan, I brushed

aside the concerns and did not talk about the Moon transit. In any case, it was

a special day in his career yesterday, because he received the "man of the

tournament" trophy from the hands of Sir Garfield Sobers, undoubtedly the

greatest cricketer alive today. All the nice transits from natal arudha lagna

clearly explain why this was a great phase in his career. But, clearly,

predicting on which day he will do well and on which day he will do poorly is

not easy.

 

I will learn my lessons from the predictions that came true and, more

importantly, the predictions that went wrong. Again, I am sorry if I gave false

hopes to any Indian cricket fans.

 

Thanks for reading,

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Best

RegardsVenkateshwara SriNagesh Mungamuru Mobile >>>9849033435Contact

>>>9127806081www.gtllimited.comNetworking Engineer

Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your

desktop! Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Best

RegardsVenkateshwara SriNagesh Mungamuru Mobile >>>9849033435Contact

>>>9127806081www.gtllimited.comNetworking Engineer

Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!