REQUEST: Clarification of this combination for Raj Yog

[Guest guest]

Dear Members:

 

In BPHS, Sage Parashara states under Ch. 39 Shloka 12:

 

Even, if a single Grah gives a Drishti to the natal Lagn, or Hora

Lagn, or Ghatik Lagn, the native will become a king.

 

Now what I heard about this was that the grah giving drishti to HL or

GL has to establish some kind of relationship

(drishti/ownership/conjoin) with lagna without which this yog would

not be formed. However, the language of the shloka translation above

states something different.

 

So how exactly should one interpret this combination for Raj yog?

 

Namaste.

 

Rageshwari.

[Guest guest]

Dear Rageshwari,

Brihat parashara Hora sara was written by collecting shlokas by Pt. Oza, if I

remember right. These were caried from generatio to generation and it is

possible that some Apabhransha(Incorrect pronounciations or mutation of the

original words) might have crept in. There is also another shloka which says

that a single planet has to aspect Hora Lagna Ghatika Lagna and Natal Lagna for

rajyoga to take place.

Again in chapter 24 shloka 7 BPHS states"7. If Lagn’s Lord is a malefic and is

placed in Yuvati Bhava, the native’s wife will not live (long). If the Grah in

question is a benefic, one will wander aimlessly, face penury and be dejected."

Here a planet would be aspecting the Lagna, and the indication is contra to what

is said in the shloka reffered by you.

It is also a practice to rationalise when two apparent contrary statements are

noticed attributed to the sages, and treating the yoga to be cased by a planet

aspecting all three i.e. Hora lagna, Ghatika lagna and Natal Lagna would be

appropriate.

Chandrashekhar.

-

rageshwari75

vedic astrology

Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:37 AM

[vedic astrology] REQUEST: Clarification of this combination for Raj Yog

Dear Members:In BPHS, Sage Parashara states under Ch. 39 Shloka 12:Even, if a

single Grah gives a Drishti to the natal Lagn, or Hora Lagn, or Ghatik Lagn,

the native will become a king.Now what I heard about this was that the grah

giving drishti to HL or GL has to establish some kind of relationship

(drishti/ownership/conjoin) with lagna without which this yog would not be

formed. However, the language of the shloka translation above states something

different.So how exactly should one interpret this combination for Raj

yog?Namaste.Rageshwari.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekarji,

 

Thank you very much for providing me with your insights.

 

Namaste.

 

Rageshwari.

 

vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar"

<boxdel> wrote:

> Dear Rageshwari,

> Brihat parashara Hora sara was written by collecting shlokas by Pt.

Oza, if I remember right. These were caried from generatio to

generation and it is possible that some Apabhransha(Incorrect

pronounciations or mutation of the original words) might have crept

in. There is also another shloka which says that a single planet has

to aspect Hora Lagna Ghatika Lagna and Natal Lagna for rajyoga to

take place.

> Again in chapter 24 shloka 7 BPHS states"7. If Lagn's Lord is a

malefic and is placed in Yuvati Bhava, the native's wife will not

live (long). If the Grah in question is a benefic, one will wander

aimlessly, face penury and be dejected."

> Here a planet would be aspecting the Lagna, and the indication is

contra to what is said in the shloka reffered by you.

> It is also a practice to rationalise when two apparent contrary

statements are noticed attributed to the sages, and treating the yoga

to be cased by a planet aspecting all three i.e. Hora lagna, Ghatika

lagna and Natal Lagna would be appropriate.

> Chandrashekhar.

> -

> rageshwari75

> vedic astrology

> Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:37 AM

> [vedic astrology] REQUEST: Clarification of this

combination for Raj Yog

>

>

> Dear Members:

>

> In BPHS, Sage Parashara states under Ch. 39 Shloka 12:

>

> Even, if a single Grah gives a Drishti to the natal Lagn, or Hora

> Lagn, or Ghatik Lagn, the native will become a king.

>

> Now what I heard about this was that the grah giving drishti to

HL or

> GL has to establish some kind of relationship

> (drishti/ownership/conjoin) with lagna without which this yog

would

> not be formed. However, the language of the shloka translation

above

> states something different.

>

> So how exactly should one interpret this combination for Raj yog?

>

> Namaste.

>

> Rageshwari.

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.