Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 Om Vishnave Namah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dear Narasimha, Pranaams - Thank you as always for your illuminating discussions re: Vedic conclusions, and worship of Shiva and Vishnu. God bless you for invoking discussion which draws the mind further and further to the Ishta-devata of all Vaishnavas, Lord Sri Krsna. Since you have re-opened this subject, I wish to quote some scripture from my own memory, which serves to not only illuminate the mind, but also embrace the conclusions of all Vedic scriptures. Please permit me to do so, as follows: eko vedah shad--angani chandhamsi vividhah surah sarvam ashtaksarantahstham Yac canyad api vanmayam sarva-vedanta sararthah samsararnava-taranah “All Vedic rituals, mantras and understanding are compressed into eight words: Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare. These transcendental sound vibrations enable one to cross over the ocean of repeated births and deaths. ” -- Sri Narada Pancharatra Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare Hare Rama, hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare iti shodashakam namnam kali-kalmasa nasanam natha parataro-payah, sarva vedesu drsyate " The 16 words of the Hare Krsna Maha mantra ,are especially meant to counteract the contaminations of the age of Kali. All the the Vedic scriptures declare, that to save oneself from the contamination of Kali, there is no alternative but the chanting of these sixteen words." - Kali Santarana Upanishad Krite yad dhyayato vishnum tretayam yajato makhaih dwapare paricaryayam kalau-tad-hari kirtanant "Whatever result was obtained in Satya-yuga by meditating on Vishnu, in Treta-yuga by performing sacrifices, and in Dvapara-yuga by serving the Lord’s lotus feet, can be obtained in Kali-yuga simply by chanting the Hare Krsna maha-mantra." -- Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.52 Dvapariyair janair vishnuh pancaratrais tu kevalaih kalau tu nama matrena pujyate bhagavan harih “In the Dvapara-yuga people should worship Lord Vishnu only by the regulative principles of the Narada-Pancaratra and other such authorized books. In the Age of Kali, however, people should simply chant the holy names of the Supreme Personality of Godhead Hari (Vishnu).” -- Mundaka Upanishad kaler dosha nidhe rajan asti hy eko mahan gunah kirtanad eva krsnasya mukta sangam param vrajet " My dear King, although Kali-yuga is an ocean of faults, there is still one good quality about this age: Simply by chanting the Hare Krsna maha-mantra, one can become free from material bondage and be promoted to the transcendental kingdom." -- Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.51 And finally, from Sri Caitanya Charitamrta: kali-yuge, yuga dharma, namera prachara tathi lagi, pita-varna, caitanyavatara " The religious practice for the Age of Kali is to broadcast the glories of the holy name of Krsna. Only for this purpose has the Lord, in a yellow color, descended as Lord Sri Caitanya Mahabrabhu." -- Sri Caitanya Charitamrta Adi-lila, 3.40 Best wishes, Robert ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer Faculty Member, SJC and ACVA visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> and, http://www.jyotishdiscovery.com or Ph: 541.318.0248 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2003 Report Share Posted April 25, 2003 I truly enjoyed the posting by Shri Naramsimha Rao and would compare it to a supernova in terms of brilliance! regards Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 Om Haum Namah Shivaya Ÿþ˜na× sarvavidy˜n˜mŸþvara× sarvabh¨t˜n˜Õ brahm˜dhipatirbrahmaõo'dhipatirbrahm˜ þivo me astu sad˜þivom||(21st Anuvak, Mahanarayana Upanishad) Dear Narasimha, Thank you for your lovely post. Some SJC members from India have written to me privately stating that they are so distressed at this sacrilege that is being committed against their religion, but they have been holding their horses for fear of igniting the list! Did you know that the Garuda Purana itself has a lot on Shiva mantras and Shiva pujas? There are at least 6 chapters devoted to Shiva puja and archana, replete with beautiful mantras, all of them imparted by Lord Hari. As I mentioned in a mail earlier to Swee, Sri Hari tells us that Shiva should be worshipped with the mahamantra "haum", which is the akasha beeja. Hari also teaches that the atma is shivaswarup: Shivo daata shivo bhokta shivahsarvamidam jagat shivo jayati sarvatra yah shivah sohameva cha. (G.P., Purva Khandam, 23:28) It is in the Garuda Purana, that Sri Hari narrates how Garuda had given the mrityunjaya mantra Om Jum Sah to Kashyapa (G.P., Purva Khandam, 18). Above all, Garuda Purana has the beautiful trinity mantra, Om Hrim Hrum. Om is Brahma beeja, Hrim is Vishnu rupa and Hrum is Shiva svraupa: Omkaaro brahmabeejam syat hrimkaaro vishnureva cha Hrumkaarashcha shivah shule trishaakhe tu kramaannyaset. (G.P., Purva Khandam, 20:3) And it is the same Vyasa who penned the Bhagavat and the Garuda Purana, who also wrote the Devi Bhagavatam, the Devi Purana and the Markandeya Purana. . Check out the following lines form the Vishwanathashtakam written by the great Vyasa: Vaachaamagocharamanekagunasvarupam Vaagishavishnusurasevitapaadapitham Vaamena vigrahavarena kalatravantam Varanasipurapatim bhaja vishvanatham ----Vyasa (Worship Vishwanatha, the Lord of Varanasi, who is beyond speech, the embodiment of various attributes, whose feet are worshipped by Brahma, Vishnu and other Gods, and who has his wife (Gauri) on his left side.) Actually, the atma is nirantara, and it takes the various rupas of Vishnu, Shiva, Devi which every Hindu knows about. All of Mahamaya Devi's prayers state that everything begins and ends in Her. And when each of us pray to either of the Gods and Goddesses, we visualise each of them in their absolute Parabrahma rupa. I suppose these things are ingrained in every Indian and difficult for outsiders to grasp. It is very interesting to see people quote from Chaitanya Charitamrita ad lib and out of context. I am fortunate that its in my mother tongue, and the pages that are devoted to Chaitanya dev's discourses on the dwaita and adwaita principle are tremendous. Chaitanya Charitamrita clearly depicts Mahaprabhu as an advaitavad and interestingly that's why Madhav's group were not accepting him and did not accord him a warm welcome when he visited the South. Also Chaitanya dev visited all the Shiva and Devi mandirs of fame...and was specially delighted with his puja and pradakshina at the jyotirlinga, Sri Mallikarjuna Swami of Sri Shailam and Devi Kumarika at Kanyakumari, and that he lived in Kashi for a great length of time is a well know fact. Chaitanyadev had come across the Brahma Samhita in the south and had considered it as one of the founding scriptures upon which he based his teachings. Brahma Samhita has shlokas in praise of Durga as do Srimad Bhagavat. In fact Narada Panchratra says that She who is Katayayani in Vraja Dham, is Bhadrakali in Dwarka. During Durga puja, in Puri, Vimala Devi is worshipped as the main shakti of the Dasa Mahavidya in a 15 day grand festival. At this time a small idol of Lord Jagannath is placed in Vimala devi's temple and is worshipped as Durgamadhav. Also in Skanda Purana, there stutis and hymns in adoration of Subhadra can rate among the best of shakti stavas. In Navadwip, the presiding deity is Shyama (Kali), and during Her puja, offerings used to be regularly send from the Goswami prabhus. But as you said, there is no contradiction. These are but the various rupas in which the Lord is perceived at different times and worshipped accordingly. Best regards, Sarbani Narasimha P.V.R. Rao [pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net]Saturday, April 26, 2003 8:46 AMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Vishnu and Shiva (To Chandrashekhar ji) -----------------"You don't see the Lotus feet of the Lord. Why are you fighting over what his face looks like?" -- His Highness Chandrashekhara Saraswati ----------------- Om Hariharaabhyaam Namah Namaste Chandrashekhar ji, I have addressed these points in the past, but they keep coming up every now and then. But I cannot keep quiet because some very wrong notions are being popularized by some biased people. Giving quotes from a Purana showing that God X is superior to God Y serves no purpose. Quotes from puranas are a double edged sword! If a Vaishnava gives a quote from Garuda Purana saying that Vishnu is supreme, a Shaiva can give a quote from Linga Purana saying that Shiva is supreme. Linga purana says that Vishnu, Brahma and the entire universe came from Shiva. It also contains an interesting story. According to that story, an argument arose between Brahma and Vishnu on who was superior. They were arguing. Then Shiva expressed in front of them as a brilliant Jyotirlinga (column of light and fire) that extended in two directions. Brahma and Vishnu wanted to find the ends of the Jyotirlinga. They went in the upward and downward directions (that is why dasamsa rulerships include Brahma and Achyuta/Vishnu in addition to the rulers of the 8 directions). They agreed that whoever found the end first would win. Brahma and Vishnu went in their respective directions and searched for the end for days. Neither found the end after many days and finally they both gave up, agreeing that neither of them is supreme and it is *Shiva* who is the supreme one! Shiva then appeared in front of them and taught them,"we three are part of the same supreme Parabrahman that pervades this universe. We three have three specific roles. We should not fight with each other on who is superior." Also, there is a story in Mahabharata written by Vyasa (see Drona parva). Narayana engaged in an extreme penance (tapas) for 60,000 years. Then Shiva was happy with the penance and came before Narayana along with Parvati to give a great boon to Narayana in the form of Nara. Later, Narayana and Nara took the forms of Krishna and Arjuna. In that penance episode, Shiva was described as "the Lord of all gods" (sarvadevairapeeswaram) and as "smaller than the smallest sub-atom and greater than the greatest entity" (aNeeyasaamaNeeyaamsam brihadbhyascha brihattaram). The detailed description there lauds Shiva as the greatest and supreme deity of the universe. Of course, one can find many more examples where one god or the other is said to be the supreme one. In Scriptures and religious literature, it is customary to find glorification of each god (Vishnu, Shiva and Shakti) saying that the rest of the gods came from that particular god and they all pray to him/her and bow at his/her feet. All these should make any intelligent person aware that pursuing this concept of "superiority" to its logical end, as if we were taking about simple human beings, is quite childish. After all, Skandopanishat says "yatha shivamayo vishnur evam vishnumayah shivah" (thanks to Sarbani for the quote). It means "just as Vishnu is filled with Shiva, so is Shiva filled with Vishnu". Vishnu has been depicted as a worshipper of Shiva. His avataras such as Rama and Krishna also worshipped Shiva. Shiva, on the other hand, has been depicted as a great worshipper of Vishnu. The name "Shiva" appears in Vishnu's 1000 names. The names "Vishnu" and "Hari" appear in Shiva's 1000 names. All these things and the contradictory scriptural references should make one think. Overall, looking at all the scriptural references, we can conclude the following: Vishnu is superior to Shiva. Shiva is superior to Vishnu. Vishnu worshipped Shiva and was blessed by Shiva. Shiva worshipped Vishnu and was blessed by Vishnu. Vishnu is a superset of Shiva. Shiva is a superset of Vishnu. Does it make sense? Or, does it sound contradictory? If so, perhaps you need to change your way of thinking. After all, every assertion made above has scriptural support!! To enable you to come to terms with the apparent contradiction, I'll go back to my favorite analogy. Even though it sounds simplistic, it's very profound and is the perfect analogy here. In the world of finite numbers, x > y, x = y and x < y cannot be true simultaneously. Only one of them can be correct. But, in the world of infinite numbers, they all can be true simultaneously! If x and y are two infinite numbers, then x can be greater than y, equal to y and less than y, all at the same time! Human beings are similar to finite numbers. The concept of god or divinity is akin to the concept of infinity. Don't expect your simplistic finite thinking to capture the realities of divinity perfectly. If you don't realize this and expect some simplistic and rigid hierarchy among gods, you are only kidding yourselves. You will then have to ignore some scriptures and stick to some scriptures (which will make all your arguments meaningless). That is what Gauranga and others are doing. They are ignoring some scriptures and heavily quoting other scriptures and yet seem to think that their arguments are conclusive (they aren't, for the reasons I have outlined). Now, a few miscellaneous comments on a few points made recently: (1) Lord Ganesha is the one who should be worshipped first. Most Hindu priests (whether Vaishnava or Shaiva) start Vedic rituals with Ganesha's worship with the following mantra: om ganaanaam tvaa ganapatim havaamahe kavim kaveenaamupamasravastamam jyeshtharaajam brahmanaam brahmanaspata aa nah srinvannootibhisseedasaadanam (2) Shiva represents tamas, as he is completely devoid of passion. But it does not mean worshipping Shiva is tamasik. The 3 gunas (primordial natures) were never intended to be classified as good and bad gunas. If rajas and tamas had been "bad" gunas, they would not have found place in the creation of God. Tamas has been interpreted by most scholars simply as dullness. But that is only one aspect of it. On the positive side, it stands for a completely stable state where there is no passion whatsoever. The three gunas and the trinity of gods represent three eseential (and good) natures. Looking down upon tamas and hence upon Shiva is not right. There are a lot of misconceptions. (3) If you are faced with tamasic problems in life, there is no better way than worshipping Shiva. Recital of Maha Mrityunjaya mantra, Rudra Namakam and Rudra Chamakam do have the sanction of great sages. ALL people can read them when they have to overcome tamaic problems in life. Often people talk about only moksha (BTW, Shiva can grant moksha too. He grants moksha as Maheswara). But don't forget that dharma, artha and kaama are as important. If unfinished karma remains, moksha cannot come. As far as dharma (duty) is concerned, it comes in 4 forms - duty towards self, duty towards family, duty towards society and duty towards universe (Drigdasa allows us to measure how much of each duty is followed at a given point of time). Protection of body is the most basic duty. If you have tamasik problems impeding you in your duties, you better pray to Shiva to remove them. (4) People often equate "worship of Shiva" to "worship with desires". That's not right. Shiva can remove tamas and give desires, but he can be worshipped without desires too. He too can grant moksha. (5) The bottomline: Whether one is a Vaishnava or a Shiava does not really matter. If one completely surrenders to the Supreme Divinity of the universe (whether one calls it as Krishna or SadaShiva or AdiShakti or Parabrahman or by whatever name) and overcomes the six enemies within, one will attain moksha. Whether one is a devotee of Vishnu or Shiva, that is the final goal anyway. * * * The only reason I spoke out is that some so-called-Vaishnavas who to a fanatic school of thought that ignores the basic Vaishnava traits of compassion and humility are unfairly creating a feeling of guilt among sincere Shiva devotees on this list with their constant barrage of biased scriptural quotes that belittle Shiva worship one way or the other. Let me end this discussion with a nice quote from Vedas. One should note that Puranas are meant for teaching advanced concepts in a simple and understandable way to laymen, while Vedas put the ultimate truths in a crisp language without any compromises or creative liberties. ekam sadvipraa bahudhaa vadanti [RigVeda, 1.164.46] "The One Supreme Lord, who is infinitely beyond the infinite scope of superlatives, is called by different names by the learned men." May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 Dear Narasimharaoji, Thank you for supporting my views.As you are no doubt aware, I desist from writing on things religious. However, when I saw some wrong concepts being propogated, I could not resist responding.I may not be a practicing Hindu, but am proud of the deep philosophy and open mind on which my religion is based. I also happen to believe that the sages wanted us to live our rreligion rather than playing one god against another without understanding the true nature and form of the Paratman.I trust you will pardon me as I just could not resist responding. With warm regards, Chandradhekhar. - Narasimha P.V.R. Rao vedic astrology Saturday, April 26, 2003 8:45 AM [vedic astrology] Vishnu and Shiva (To Chandrashekhar ji) -----------------"You don't see the Lotus feet of the Lord. Why are you fighting over what his face looks like?" -- His Highness Chandrashekhara Saraswati ----------------- Om Hariharaabhyaam Namah Namaste Chandrashekhar ji, I have addressed these points in the past, but they keep coming up every now and then. But I cannot keep quiet because some very wrong notions are being popularized by some biased people. Giving quotes from a Purana showing that God X is superior to God Y serves no purpose. Quotes from puranas are a double edged sword! If a Vaishnava gives a quote from Garuda Purana saying that Vishnu is supreme, a Shaiva can give a quote from Linga Purana saying that Shiva is supreme. Linga purana says that Vishnu, Brahma and the entire universe came from Shiva. It also contains an interesting story. According to that story, an argument arose between Brahma and Vishnu on who was superior. They were arguing. Then Shiva expressed in front of them as a brilliant Jyotirlinga (column of light and fire) that extended in two directions. Brahma and Vishnu wanted to find the ends of the Jyotirlinga. They went in the upward and downward directions (that is why dasamsa rulerships include Brahma and Achyuta/Vishnu in addition to the rulers of the 8 directions). They agreed that whoever found the end first would win. Brahma and Vishnu went in their respective directions and searched for the end for days. Neither found the end after many days and finally they both gave up, agreeing that neither of them is supreme and it is *Shiva* who is the supreme one! Shiva then appeared in front of them and taught them,"we three are part of the same supreme Parabrahman that pervades this universe. We three have three specific roles. We should not fight with each other on who is superior." Also, there is a story in Mahabharata written by Vyasa (see Drona parva). Narayana engaged in an extreme penance (tapas) for 60,000 years. Then Shiva was happy with the penance and came before Narayana along with Parvati to give a great boon to Narayana in the form of Nara. Later, Narayana and Nara took the forms of Krishna and Arjuna. In that penance episode, Shiva was described as "the Lord of all gods" (sarvadevairapeeswaram) and as "smaller than the smallest sub-atom and greater than the greatest entity" (aNeeyasaamaNeeyaamsam brihadbhyascha brihattaram). The detailed description there lauds Shiva as the greatest and supreme deity of the universe. Of course, one can find many more examples where one god or the other is said to be the supreme one. In Scriptures and religious literature, it is customary to find glorification of each god (Vishnu, Shiva and Shakti) saying that the rest of the gods came from that particular god and they all pray to him/her and bow at his/her feet. All these should make any intelligent person aware that pursuing this concept of "superiority" to its logical end, as if we were taking about simple human beings, is quite childish. After all, Skandopanishat says "yatha shivamayo vishnur evam vishnumayah shivah" (thanks to Sarbani for the quote). It means "just as Vishnu is filled with Shiva, so is Shiva filled with Vishnu". Vishnu has been depicted as a worshipper of Shiva. His avataras such as Rama and Krishna also worshipped Shiva. Shiva, on the other hand, has been depicted as a great worshipper of Vishnu. The name "Shiva" appears in Vishnu's 1000 names. The names "Vishnu" and "Hari" appear in Shiva's 1000 names. All these things and the contradictory scriptural references should make one think. Overall, looking at all the scriptural references, we can conclude the following: Vishnu is superior to Shiva. Shiva is superior to Vishnu. Vishnu worshipped Shiva and was blessed by Shiva. Shiva worshipped Vishnu and was blessed by Vishnu. Vishnu is a superset of Shiva. Shiva is a superset of Vishnu. Does it make sense? Or, does it sound contradictory? If so, perhaps you need to change your way of thinking. After all, every assertion made above has scriptural support!! To enable you to come to terms with the apparent contradiction, I'll go back to my favorite analogy. Even though it sounds simplistic, it's very profound and is the perfect analogy here. In the world of finite numbers, x > y, x = y and x < y cannot be true simultaneously. Only one of them can be correct. But, in the world of infinite numbers, they all can be true simultaneously! If x and y are two infinite numbers, then x can be greater than y, equal to y and less than y, all at the same time! Human beings are similar to finite numbers. The concept of god or divinity is akin to the concept of infinity. Don't expect your simplistic finite thinking to capture the realities of divinity perfectly. If you don't realize this and expect some simplistic and rigid hierarchy among gods, you are only kidding yourselves. You will then have to ignore some scriptures and stick to some scriptures (which will make all your arguments meaningless). That is what Gauranga and others are doing. They are ignoring some scriptures and heavily quoting other scriptures and yet seem to think that their arguments are conclusive (they aren't, for the reasons I have outlined). Now, a few miscellaneous comments on a few points made recently: (1) Lord Ganesha is the one who should be worshipped first. Most Hindu priests (whether Vaishnava or Shaiva) start Vedic rituals with Ganesha's worship with the following mantra: om ganaanaam tvaa ganapatim havaamahe kavim kaveenaamupamasravastamam jyeshtharaajam brahmanaam brahmanaspata aa nah srinvannootibhisseedasaadanam (2) Shiva represents tamas, as he is completely devoid of passion. But it does not mean worshipping Shiva is tamasik. The 3 gunas (primordial natures) were never intended to be classified as good and bad gunas. If rajas and tamas had been "bad" gunas, they would not have found place in the creation of God. Tamas has been interpreted by most scholars simply as dullness. But that is only one aspect of it. On the positive side, it stands for a completely stable state where there is no passion whatsoever. The three gunas and the trinity of gods represent three eseential (and good) natures. Looking down upon tamas and hence upon Shiva is not right. There are a lot of misconceptions. (3) If you are faced with tamasic problems in life, there is no better way than worshipping Shiva. Recital of Maha Mrityunjaya mantra, Rudra Namakam and Rudra Chamakam do have the sanction of great sages. ALL people can read them when they have to overcome tamaic problems in life. Often people talk about only moksha (BTW, Shiva can grant moksha too. He grants moksha as Maheswara). But don't forget that dharma, artha and kaama are as important. If unfinished karma remains, moksha cannot come. As far as dharma (duty) is concerned, it comes in 4 forms - duty towards self, duty towards family, duty towards society and duty towards universe (Drigdasa allows us to measure how much of each duty is followed at a given point of time). Protection of body is the most basic duty. If you have tamasik problems impeding you in your duties, you better pray to Shiva to remove them. (4) People often equate "worship of Shiva" to "worship with desires". That's not right. Shiva can remove tamas and give desires, but he can be worshipped without desires too. He too can grant moksha. (5) The bottomline: Whether one is a Vaishnava or a Shiava does not really matter. If one completely surrenders to the Supreme Divinity of the universe (whether one calls it as Krishna or SadaShiva or AdiShakti or Parabrahman or by whatever name) and overcomes the six enemies within, one will attain moksha. Whether one is a devotee of Vishnu or Shiva, that is the final goal anyway. * * * The only reason I spoke out is that some so-called-Vaishnavas who to a fanatic school of thought that ignores the basic Vaishnava traits of compassion and humility are unfairly creating a feeling of guilt among sincere Shiva devotees on this list with their constant barrage of biased scriptural quotes that belittle Shiva worship one way or the other. Let me end this discussion with a nice quote from Vedas. One should note that Puranas are meant for teaching advanced concepts in a simple and understandable way to laymen, while Vedas put the ultimate truths in a crisp language without any compromises or creative liberties. ekam sadvipraa bahudhaa vadanti [RigVeda, 1.164.46] "The One Supreme Lord, who is infinitely beyond the infinite scope of superlatives, is called by different names by the learned men." May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2003 Report Share Posted April 29, 2003 JAYA JAGANNATHA! Dear Sarbani, Namaste. It is very interesting to see people quote from Chaitanya Charitamrita ad lib and out of context. I am fortunate that its in my mother tongue, and the pages that are devoted to Chaitanya dev's discourses on the dwaita and adwaita principle are tremendous. Chaitanya Charitamrita clearly depicts Mahaprabhu as an advaitavad and interestingly that's why Madhav's group were not accepting him and did not accord him a warm welcome when he visited the South. Also Chaitanya dev visited all the Shiva and Devi mandirs of fame...and was specially delighted with his puja and pradakshina at the jyotirlinga, Sri Mallikarjuna Swami of Sri Shailam and Devi Kumarika at Kanyakumari, and that he lived in Kashi for a great length of time is a well know fact. I'm very interested to see the quotes from Chaitanya Charitamrita that would support Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu being an Adwaita-vadin. Maybe you slipped over His discourses with Prakashananda Saraswati, the leader of the Kashi Shankarites, or with Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya in Puri, one of the leading exponents of Sankara's Vedanta at His time. In both cases Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu defeated these great impersonlaists and convinced them to surrender to Krishna. So you may speak Bengali, but under which Guru's direction did you study this great scripture? Also, according to the biographies Sri Caitanya spent only a few months in Kasi. He spent 24 years in Navadwip, 18 years in Puri, and went on pilgrimage in between. He visited Shiva and Devi sthanams as well, but in order to purify those holy places from the sin accumulated by the visits of materialistic and sinful people. In the same way, Lord Balarama toured all the holy places 5000 years ago to purify them. This is one quote from Madhya-lila 9.68: Siva-kanci asiya kaila Siva darasanaprabhave ‘vaisnava’ kaila saba Saiva-gana TRANSLATIONArriving at Siva-kanci, Caitanya Mahaprabhu visited the deity of Lord Siva. By His influence, He converted all the devotees of Lord Siva into Vaisnavas. Slokas 175-176 from the same chapter: Siva-durga rahe tahan brahmanera vesemahaprabhu dekhi’ donhara ha-ila ullase TRANSLATIONIn Sri Saila Lord Siva and his wife Durga lived in the dress of brahmanas, and when they saw Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, they became very pleased. tina dina bhiksa dila kari’ nimantrananibhrte vasi’ gupta-varta kahe dui jana TRANSLATIONLord Siva, dressed like a brahmana, gave alms to Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and invited Him to spend three days in a solitary place. Sitting there together, they talked very confidentially. Yours, Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net Jyotish Remedies: WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET Phone:+36-309-140-839 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.