To Raveendra

[Guest guest]

Dear Ms.Sushmita(Hope this makes you feel better!)

 

Sorry for responding so late to your wonderful mail.I was away on holiday and

when I returned,the web was kaput.So why does a lady like you dislike being

attached to the madam prefix?I thought it was neutral,non-offensive and

courteous.And you shot that one down!§Q$*+!

No,I am not the Rajinder nath whose article you admired about practical karma on

the street,but don't you think that,being an astrologer,you should consider the

karmic and astrological aspects of the sniper instead of focussing on the fact

that he was a vegetarian and a teetotaller?I mean the fact that he was veg and

tee is too shallow for astrologers to take a peep into his karma and link his

actions to his diet.

Correct me if I am wrong but I am an amateur who is still frolicking at the feet

of the Godess of learning.

May wisdom shine on us all!(and me in particular!)

Warm Regards

Raveendra nath

P.S:You are right.Mr.Narasimha and Mr.Gauranga das haven't come out of hiding

yet!My,you are quite ferocious!Sushmita S <sushmita34 > wrote:

Dear Raveendra,

 

So nice of you to write to me. except by calling me madam, u made me sound like

an office executive, an almost like ancient, oh joking once again. Do call me

Sushmita, I hope Narasimha took my email nicely since after that both him and

Gauranga have avoided writing on the list from some reason and not even

responded to me.

Thanks for avoiding the word ji, and I thank you once again in understanding where I come from.

Where you the gentleman who wrote on lal kitab and tamasic remedies some months

back, I mean there was one mail from either you or a person called Rajendra

Nath who said so clearly that by reciting mantras one doesn't become a good

human but by his actions and also that even the sniper in America was a veg,

non alcoholic but he still commmitted many murders without any reason.

 

I really liked that mail, exemplifying that actions are better than just rituals

without pure intention.

 

Well, I got to go now. Thanks for writing to me, your email cheered me up.

 

God bless us all.

 

Warm regards,

 

Sushmita

 

raveendra yasarapu <ravastro (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

Madam Sushmita (I' ve avoided the Ji if you can notice!)!

 

I appreciate the way you reacted to Mr.Narasimhaji's mail on addressing you as

Ji.That is the spirit of the Indian Woman.Nothing artificial.100% Indian.My

compliments.May the light of Wisdom shine on everyone.

Regards

Raveendra Nath

sushmita34 <sushmita34 > wrote:

Dear Narasimha,Thats really nice of you to spread the light, it really helps

knowing that tantrik need not necessarily mean tamasik and what tantra is all

about. ofcourse there is more to it and i need to learn it slowly.Thanks for

giving an example on it.If can take the liberty, maybe you should write a

detailed article in the lessons section so that we all can learn more from it

and not form easy opinions before studying it, I tend to form opinions very

fast.U said: > I am younger than you and so I called you ji.> > Just trying to

make you feel old... :-)Now, that's just what a woman needs, someone to make

her feel old ), oh, I was just joking. I am sure at the end of the day its

only inner beauty that counts. I do understand the indian tradition of

attaching the word 'ji' to give respect, also I do agree to that - to some

extent and I don't shun the practise. Let me clarify my earlier statement and

hope it doesn't cast a scandal ), well these days I am on the trip of

unconditional love one could say, mmm I am sincere about it, I would rather

prefer you and everyone loving me rather than respecting me (if ofcourse the

word ji is used in terms of respect), somehow I feel or maybe am trying to

feel/experience that Love is more better/preferable than respect.I am sorry I

am not addressing you and the seniors in this list with the added syllable of

"ji", but let me assure you that I gather your essense and have each one of you

in the magnificience of your light and the great work that you all are doing to

spread this science and not just boost of self image.As I know this is not a

personal forum so I will limit my already big letter.Warm regards,Sushmita---

In vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" wrote:> Namaste

Sushmita ji,> > One quick comment before I go to sleep: I see some confusion

between tantrik and tamasik.> > Tantrik doesn't necessarily mean tamasik.

Tantra is simply a procedure/method/system that is associated with a mantra.

Many mantras have some tantra associated with them.> > While some tantrik

methods are highly tamasik and hence avoidable (unless one is in desperation),

it is not necessarily true of all.> > For example, suppose you pray to Vyasa

with Praanaayaama with the mantra "[start inhaling]Om Jum Sah [hold breath]Vyam

Vyaasadevaaya Namah [start exhaling] Sah Jum Om". Then your praanaayaama or

control of breath becomes the tantra that makes the mantra more effective. But

is this an undesirable tantra? Of course, not!> > So don't look down upon all

tantras.> > > On a personal note, pls don't called me 'ji', I am just 34,> > I

am younger than you and so I called you ji.> > Just trying to make you feel

old... :-)> > May Jupiter's light shine on us,> Narasimha> > > Dear

Rageshwari,> > > > Such a nice and warm reply from you. Well, I am a learner

too, infact > > a beginner with too many wierd questions, so I was under the >

> impression that tantric remedies are also based on Gods and > > Goddesses. I

understand from this list that Lal Kitab remedies are > > not appropriate, but

I was referring to ancient tantric remedies > > written by some current

authors.> > > > On a personal note, pls don't called me 'ji', I am just 34, I

hear > > too many ji's in my profession and atleast here I would prefer people

> > loving me more, rather than just respecting me. > > > > Ofcourse this is my

personal opinion and it need not & cannot be > > imposed on anyone.> > > > If I

remember, correctly in one of your recent posts, you had > > mentioned that you

are passing through sadesati, Learned Gauranga has > > mentioned that we can

take up a example chart, would you like your > > chart to be discussed, as it

makes more sense to discuss Sadesati > > when the chart's native is already

going through it. > > > > I await your response.> > > > Warm regards,> > > >

Sushmita------------------------ Sponsor

---------------------~-->Get a FREE REFINANCE QUOTE - click

here!http://us.click./2CXtTB/ca0FAA/i5gGAA/.8XolB/TM---~->Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......Your use

of is subject to

Catch all the cricket action. Download Score tracker

The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

Catch all the cricket action. Download

Score tracker

[Guest guest]

Dear Raveendra,

 

Sorry, I have been out and couldn't reply to your post earlier.

Although this isn't a personal forum to write personal messages i.e

non astrological, what I was trying to say is that the gentleman who

had written that post was trying to make a point that being a veg and

non-smoker or non- drinker need not make one a good or better human

(contrary to the sniper), I guess he was responding to posts on

tamasic and rajasic ways of lifestyle.

 

As to why I dislike being called a madam, since it sounds a bit

official and since manners and etti... are ever evolving, nowadays

people do prefer being a bit more personal and humane.

That's what my logic and belief is, I need to get back to serious

astrology and need to find Sarbani's & Mr Rao's post on sadesati, I

had one small doubt on the Chamaka Mantra. It's tough finding

previous posts in our list too much of activity.

 

Warm regards,

 

Sushmita

 

vedic astrology, raveendra yasarapu

<ravastro> wrote:

> Dear Ms.Sushmita(Hope this makes you feel better!) Sorry for

responding so late to your wonderful mail.I was away on holiday and

when I returned,the web was kaput.So why does a lady like you dislike

being attached to the madam prefix?I thought it was neutral,non-

offensive and courteous.And you shot that one down!§Q$*+!No,I am not

the Rajinder nath whose article you admired about practical karma on

the street,but don't you think that,being an astrologer,you should

consider the karmic and astrological aspects of the sniper instead of

focussing on the fact that he was a vegetarian and a teetotaller?I

mean the fact that he was veg and tee is too shallow for astrologers

to take a peep into his karma and link his actions to his

diet.Correct me if I am wrong but I am an amateur who is still

frolicking at the feet of the Godess of learning.May wisdom shine on

us all!(and me in particular!)Warm RegardsRaveendra nathP.S:You are

right.Mr.Narasimha and Mr.Gauranga das haven't come out of hiding yet!

My,you are quite ferocious!Sushmita S <sushmita34> wrote:Dear

Raveendra, So nice of you to write to me. except by calling me madam,

u made me sound like an office executive, an almost like ancient, oh

joking once again. Do call me Sushmita, I hope Narasimha took my

email nicely since after that both him and Gauranga have avoided

writing on the list from some reason and not even responded to me.

> Thanks for avoiding the word ji, and I thank you once again in

understanding where I come from.Where you the gentleman who wrote on

lal kitab and tamasic remedies some months back, I mean there was one

mail from either you or a person called Rajendra Nath who said so

clearly that by reciting mantras one doesn't become a good human but

by his actions and also that even the sniper in America was a veg,

non alcoholic but he still commmitted many murders without any

reason. I really liked that mail, exemplifying that actions are

better than just rituals without pure intention. Well, I got to go

now. Thanks for writing to me, your email cheered me up. God bless us

all. Warm regards, Sushmita

> raveendra yasarapu <ravastro> wrote:Madam Sushmita (I' ve

avoided the Ji if you can notice!)! I appreciate the way you reacted

to Mr.Narasimhaji's mail on addressing you as Ji.That is the spirit

of the Indian Woman.Nothing artificial.100% Indian.My compliments.May

the light of Wisdom shine on everyone.RegardsRaveendra Nathsushmita34

<sushmita34> wrote:Dear Narasimha,

>

> Thats really nice of you to spread the light, it really helps

knowing

> that tantrik need not necessarily mean tamasik and what tantra is

all

> about. ofcourse there is more to it and i need to learn it slowly.

>

> Thanks for giving an example on it.

>

> If can take the liberty, maybe you should write a detailed article

in

> the lessons section so that we all can learn more from it and not

> form easy opinions before studying it, I tend to form opinions very

> fast.

>

> U said:

> > I am younger than you and so I called you ji.

> >

> > Just trying to make you feel old... :-)

>

> Now, that's just what a woman needs, someone to make her feel

> old ), oh, I was just joking. I am sure at the end of the day its

> only inner beauty that counts. I do understand the indian tradition

> of attaching the word 'ji' to give respect, also I do agree to

that -

> to some extent and I don't shun the practise. Let me clarify my

> earlier statement and hope it doesn't cast a scandal ), well

these

> days I am on the trip of unconditional love one could say, mmm I am

> sincere about it, I would rather prefer you and everyone loving me

> rather than respecting me (if ofcourse the word ji is used in terms

> of respect), somehow I feel or maybe am trying to feel/experience

> that Love is more better/preferable than respect.

>

> I am sorry I am not addressing you and the seniors in this list

with

> the added syllable of "ji", but let me assure you that I gather

your

> essense and have each one of you in the magnificience of your light

> and the great work that you all are doing to spread this science

and

> not just boost of self image.

>

> As I know this is not a personal forum so I will limit my already

big

> letter.

>

> Warm regards,

>

> Sushmita

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

>

> wrote:

> > Namaste Sushmita ji,

> >

> > One quick comment before I go to sleep: I see some confusion

> between tantrik and tamasik.

> >

> > Tantrik doesn't necessarily mean tamasik. Tantra is simply a

> procedure/method/system that is associated with a mantra. Many

> mantras have some tantra associated with them.

> >

> > While some tantrik methods are highly tamasik and hence avoidable

> (unless one is in desperation), it is not necessarily true of all.

> >

> > For example, suppose you pray to Vyasa with Praanaayaama with the

> mantra "[start inhaling]Om Jum Sah [hold breath]Vyam Vyaasadevaaya

> Namah [start exhaling] Sah Jum Om". Then your praanaayaama or

control

> of breath becomes the tantra that makes the mantra more effective.

> But is this an undesirable tantra? Of course, not!

> >

> > So don't look down upon all tantras.

> >

> > > On a personal note, pls don't called me 'ji', I am just 34,

> >

> > I am younger than you and so I called you ji.

> >

> > Just trying to make you feel old... :-)

> >

> > May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> > Narasimha

> >

> > > Dear Rageshwari,

> > >

> > > Such a nice and warm reply from you. Well, I am a learner too,

> infact

> > > a beginner with too many wierd questions, so I was under the

> > > impression that tantric remedies are also based on Gods and

> > > Goddesses. I understand from this list that Lal Kitab remedies

> are

> > > not appropriate, but I was referring to ancient tantric

remedies

> > > written by some current authors.

> > >

> > > On a personal note, pls don't called me 'ji', I am just 34, I

> hear

> > > too many ji's in my profession and atleast here I would prefer

> people

> > > loving me more, rather than just respecting me.

> > >

> > > Ofcourse this is my personal opinion and it need not & cannot

be

> > > imposed on anyone.

> > >

> > > If I remember, correctly in one of your recent posts, you had

> > > mentioned that you are passing through sadesati, Learned

Gauranga

> has

> > > mentioned that we can take up a example chart, would you like

> your

> > > chart to be discussed, as it makes more sense to discuss

Sadesati

> > > when the chart's native is already going through it.

> > >

> > > I await your response.

> > >

> > > Warm regards,

> > >

> > > Sushmita

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||

>

> Your use of is subject to

 

>

>

> Catch all the cricket action. Download Score tracker

>

>

>

>

>

> The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

> Catch all the cricket action. Download Score tracker