Guest guest Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 Dear all, Like to add my view here :-) We have to remember that exalted actually means 'fully strong' while in debilitiation planets lose their strength. If a planet makes a very bad yoga, then debilitation of the planet is good in that sense not to feel the effect of the bad yoga. On the other hand exalted planet does everything it promisses - both good and bad. Since it is very strong and powerful. All planets have some fixed significations and for that sense exalted planets will be good to promote those significations. But again, exalted planet will give some of it's bad qualities, too. Like exalted Sat will give some grief, separation, delay, mostly depending what is aspects and joins. Like RK Jee mentioned exalted Su in lagna gives very strong ego. This is a clear example that exalted planet give it's (Some of) bad qualities. Su rules ego and being exalted (Powerful) in lagna (self, nature) might give very strong ego. Similarly exalted Sat gives grief through what it aspects/joins. Though when Sat is yoga karaka then it is not very strongly felt like for Taurus and Libra natives. But some of it will surely be there. A functional malefic / natural malefic being exalted will surely give some bad this way or that way. Similarly, a debilitated planet can not be good in it's fixed significations. Say debilitated Ve must give serious marital problems does not matter how well placed the 7th lord is. Also the bad effect will be upon the house the debilitated planet is - there is no doubt. I can not agree that debilitated planets can not have any malefic effects. There must be maleficness of a debilitated planet unless neecha bhanga is there. To comment on debilitated planets, we must make sure that there is not neecha bhanga happening - there are so many rules for that! On the other hand exalted Ve will give union with more than one female / wife since Ve rules these. So it is not that debilitated planets are 100% bad, or 100% good. Or exalted planets are 100% good, or 100% bad. Both have their merits and demerits. But to me, it is always a lot better to have a planet exalted than having it debilitated. Debilitated planets have really very little to offer compairing what is destroys (Unless neecha bhanga). This is my view and other learned members surely have different opinions, I respect each and every view. Regards,Tanvir "What can not happen, can never happen.Which is mine, is forever mine." Tanvir Chowdhurytanvir (AT) siriusbb (DOT) comhttp://www.geocities.com/king_tanvirhttp://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro - Rup Krishen Baqaya vedic astrology Friday, May 02, 2003 8:46 AM Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Left hand Well it is not always that debilitated planets give bad results.In respect of a debilitated venus in the 2nd house for leo ascendant,Bhrigu says that the native lives his life like a lord.Even a debilitated saturn in the 5th house for saggitarius ascendant is not bad.For that matter Mars in cancer in the 7th house is not supposed to be mangli dosha.Please understand astrology is infinite.You cannot simplify astrology by merely saying that debilitated is bad and exalted is good.An exalted Sun in the lagna gives too much ego,which isolates the man and makes him many enemies.There was one astrologer in Maharashtra,very very famous late Mr.katway,he died in 1949.He was of the view that exalted planets give bad results and debilitated planets give good results.In order to balance your outlook,i suggest that you read his series of books on each planet. RK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.