Please clarify--->To Sanjay Ji and Narayana Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay Ji and Narayana Ji,

 

While I am studying the Narayana Dasa Book and Varga

Chakra Book, I have come across two places, where you

have mentioned the Sign with a benefic/malefic

property/characteristics!.

 

Honestly, I am struggling to understand the basics

here and I need your guidance, as my understanding so

far was that, sign's does not have Malefic/Benfic

Property.

 

Looks like I am wrong here, and my foundation is not

strong yet.

 

Please find the following page references regarding my

question:-

 

Varga Chakra Book:-

==================

Chapter 15: Page 247:-

 

Firstly, Mercury is retrograde and hence his tendency

will be to stretch it and secondly Mercury's

dispositor Jupiter is afflicted by the nodes in a

malefic sign of Aries.

 

Here you have mentioned "malefic sign of Aries". How

did you determined Aries is a malefic sign in this

context.

 

Narayana Dasa Book:-

===================

 

Page 14: Third Paragraph, and also just below the

Figure 7:

 

There are no planets in the third house let alone

malefic planets. This sign in the third house is also

a beneficial sign ( Taurus ). Thus, Special argala

(A3) does not exist.

 

Here you have mentioned "beneficial sign ( Taurus )".

How did you determined Tarurus is a beneficial sign in

this context.

 

Thanks for your help in advance.

 

Regards

Rao

 

 

 

 

SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

http://sbc.

[Guest guest]

|Hare Rama Krishna|

Dear Rao,

If you had gone through the basic lessons on the SJC-Achyuta Gurukul - List,

then you would know that signs lorded by benefics are benefic in nature, whilst

opposite for malefic lorded signs.

 

Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana:

http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

-

Rao Nemani

Vedic Astrology Group

Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:01 PM

[vedic astrology] Please clarify--->To Sanjay Ji and Narayana Ji

Dear Sanjay Ji and Narayana Ji,While I am studying the Narayana Dasa Book and

VargaChakra Book, I have come across two places, where youhave mentioned the

Sign with a benefic/maleficproperty/characteristics!.Honestly, I am struggling

to understand the basicshere and I need your guidance, as my understanding

sofar was that, sign's does not have Malefic/BenficProperty. Looks like I am

wrong here, and my foundation is notstrong yet.Please find the following page

references regarding myquestion:-Varga Chakra Book:-==================Chapter

15: Page 247:-Firstly, Mercury is retrograde and hence his tendencywill be to

stretch it and secondly Mercury'sdispositor Jupiter is afflicted by the nodes

in amalefic sign of Aries.Here you have mentioned "malefic sign of Aries".

Howdid you determined Aries is a malefic sign in thiscontext.Narayana Dasa

Book:-===================Page 14: Third Paragraph, and also just below

theFigure 7:There are no planets in the third house let alonemalefic planets.

This sign in the third house is alsoa beneficial sign ( Taurus ). Thus, Special

argala(A3) does not exist.Here you have mentioned "beneficial sign ( Taurus

)".How did you determined Tarurus is a beneficial sign inthis context.Thanks

for your help in advance.RegardsRaoDo you

?SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!http://sbc.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-........ May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Visti Ji,

 

Thank you for a very precise and simple answer to a beginner with a

few months of knowledge in Vedic Astrology.

 

I must read one more time the basic lessons today.

 

Thanks once again for the quick answer and which helped me in going

forward from here.

 

Regards

Rao

 

 

vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen" <vishnu@l...>

wrote:

> |Hare Rama Krishna|

> Dear Rao,

> If you had gone through the basic lessons on the SJC-Achyuta

Gurukul - List, then you would know that signs lorded by benefics are

benefic in nature, whilst opposite for malefic lorded signs.

>

> Best wishes

> Visti

> ---

> Sri Jagannath Center: http://.org

> Bhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org

> iTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

> -

> Rao Nemani

> Vedic Astrology Group

> Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:01 PM

> [vedic astrology] Please clarify--->To Sanjay Ji and

Narayana Ji

>

>

> Dear Sanjay Ji and Narayana Ji,

>

> While I am studying the Narayana Dasa Book and Varga

> Chakra Book, I have come across two places, where you

> have mentioned the Sign with a benefic/malefic

> property/characteristics!.

>

> Honestly, I am struggling to understand the basics

> here and I need your guidance, as my understanding so

> far was that, sign's does not have Malefic/Benfic

> Property.

>

> Looks like I am wrong here, and my foundation is not

> strong yet.

>

> Please find the following page references regarding my

> question:-

>

> Varga Chakra Book:-

> ==================

> Chapter 15: Page 247:-

>

> Firstly, Mercury is retrograde and hence his tendency

> will be to stretch it and secondly Mercury's

> dispositor Jupiter is afflicted by the nodes in a

> malefic sign of Aries.

>

> Here you have mentioned "malefic sign of Aries". How

> did you determined Aries is a malefic sign in this

> context.

>

> Narayana Dasa Book:-

> ===================

>

> Page 14: Third Paragraph, and also just below the

> Figure 7:

>

> There are no planets in the third house let alone

> malefic planets. This sign in the third house is also

> a beneficial sign ( Taurus ). Thus, Special argala

> (A3) does not exist.

>

> Here you have mentioned "beneficial sign ( Taurus )".

> How did you determined Tarurus is a beneficial sign in

> this context.

>

> Thanks for your help in advance.

>

> Regards

> Rao

>

>

>

>

> SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

> http://sbc.

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

>

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.