Guest guest Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 ---Om Brihaspataye Namah--- Dear Chandrasekhar and Partha, My thinking is that the UL has nothing to do with the consummation or non-consummation of the marriage. Is it correct? regards Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2003 Report Share Posted July 1, 2003 Dear Hari, If we accept the premise that the Padas are perception of what people think about one, this is the only logical inference. Chandrashekhar. ---- ---Om Brihaspataye Namah---Dear Chandrasekhar and Partha,My thinking is that the UL has nothing to do with the consummation or non-consummation of the marriage. Is it correct?regardsHariArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-........ May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... __ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Attachment: (image/gif) IMSTP.gif [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2003 Report Share Posted July 1, 2003 Om namah shivaya Dear Chandrashekhar ji and Hari Padas are the only reality, the tangibles in this world of Maya. This was clarified by Narasimha in his earlier messages. regards partha om tat sat vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Hari, > If we accept the premise that the Padas are perception of what people think > about one, this is the only logical inference. > Chandrashekhar. > > ---- > > vedic astrology > Tuesday, July 01, 2003 08:10:49 AM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Re: Upapada when the spouse -dear Anu > > ---Om Brihaspataye Namah--- > Dear Chandrasekhar and Partha, > > My thinking is that the UL has nothing to do with the consummation > or non-consummation of the marriage. Is it correct? > > regards > Hari > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2003 Report Share Posted July 1, 2003 ---Om Brihaspataye Namah--- Dear Shri Chandrasekhar and Partha, Thanks for elucidating the basics of "this whole world is maya". I can understand how the 2nd from UL is used to see the longevity of the relationship with spouse. Is the chemistry of the couple then seen in the 7th from UL? Fructification of this chemistry in the 8th from UL or 5th from UL? A7 will show the type of people one interacts with (depends on which divisional we are seeing). It is very interesting... regards Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2003 Report Share Posted July 2, 2003 Dear Partha, Are you certain,? I remember Sanjayji saying what I indicated(About pada being perception). And here is what narasimharaoji says verbatim " Use of arudha lagna Lagna is satya peetha or the seat of truth. Arudha lagna is maya peetha or the seat of illusion. Both stand for self, but they stand for different shades of self. Lagna stands for true self and arudha lagna stands for perceived self. Arudha lagna stands for "self, as peceived by this maya world".Perhaps Narasimharaoji and Sanjayji would like to comment. Regards, Chandrashekhar. ---- Om namah shivayaDear Chandrashekhar ji and HariPadas are the only reality, the tangibles in this world of Maya. This was clarified by Narasimha in his earlier messages.regardsparthaom tat satvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Hari,> If we accept the premise that the Padas are perception of what people think> about one, this is the only logical inference.> Chandrashekhar.> > -------Original Message-------> > vedic astrology> Tuesday, July 01, 2003 08:10:49 AM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Upapada when the spouse -dear Anu> > ---Om Brihaspataye Namah---> Dear Chandrasekhar and Partha,> > My thinking is that the UL has nothing to do with the consummation > or non-consummation of the marriage. Is it correct?> > regards> Hari> > > Sponsor> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ........ May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > Terms of Service.Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-........ May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... __ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Attachment: (image/gif) IMSTP.gif [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2003 Report Share Posted July 3, 2003 ---Om Brihaspataye Namah--- Dear Shri Chandrasekhar, Yes, I agree with your comments. Vedic astrology has a lot of parameters to "play around" with and unless the meaning & context of these parameters is understood properly, then only will they be applied correctly. Again, to summarise your thinking, I agree that it is better to use a few basic principles and stick to them in explaining how events connected to these principles materialize. For example, I went abroad in the mahadasha of the 9th lord. Most people get married in the mahadasha or antardasha of the 7th lord. And so on. But the other side of the coin is when the events dont fit a basic understanding of the jataka, what should we do? regards Hari vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Hari, > I might attract some flak, but I must say that the interpretation of Padas > has not been exhaustively researched as they appear in only Two major texts > at some length. Of these Jamini sutra's 2 adhyayas are only available, and I > doubt if the other two are yet located. It is very easy to use them for > explaining some event which has happened as so many of them are there. It is > otherwise when one tries to predict from them. An example is to resort to > Upapada, if it fails then Darapada and if both fail to go on to Darapada or > upapada in divisional charts or go on to 7th house in Natal or Divisional > charts to show a link between happening of an event, when other > expalinations are not working. > Of course this is my personal wiew, and if I hurt anyone's sentiments; I > seek their pardon in advance. > > Chandrashekhar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2003 Report Share Posted July 3, 2003 Dear Hari, What I meant was, one should apply the concepts that are not exhaustively dealt with by the Ancients only if one understands the logic behind it thouroughly. When one does not understand why a particular event has not happened, applying the standard procedure, one should try to find out whether one's application of principles is correct. Usually what happens is that one forgets the exceptions given in standard texts. If you read Varaha Mihira and Kalyanvarman's texts you will find that they have said that they are writing the texts so that confusion caused due to multiplicity is removed from Astrologer's mind. Chandrashekhar. onlyhari wrote: ---Om Brihaspataye Namah--- Dear Shri Chandrasekhar, Yes, I agree with your comments. Vedic astrology has a lot of parameters to "play around" with and unless the meaning & context of these parameters is understood properly, then only will they be applied correctly. Again, to summarise your thinking, I agree that it is better to use a few basic principles and stick to them in explaining how events connected to these principles materialize. For example, I went abroad in the mahadasha of the 9th lord. Most people get married in the mahadasha or antardasha of the 7th lord. And so on. But the other side of the coin is when the events dont fit a basic understanding of the jataka, what should we do? regards Hari vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Hari, > I might attract some flak, but I must say that the interpretation of Padas > has not been exhaustively researched as they appear in only Two major texts > at some length. Of these Jamini sutra's 2 adhyayas are only available, and I > doubt if the other two are yet located. It is very easy to use them for > explaining some event which has happened as so many of them are there. It is > otherwise when one tries to predict from them. An example is to resort to > Upapada, if it fails then Darapada and if both fail to go on to Darapada or > upapada in divisional charts or go on to 7th house in Natal or Divisional > charts to show a link between happening of an event, when other > expalinations are not working. > Of course this is my personal wiew, and if I hurt anyone's sentiments; I > seek their pardon in advance. > > Chandrashekhar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.