Phala sruthi for lalitha sahasranamam in english

[Guest guest]

Hello Tanvir and others,

 

Can someone kindly oblige, and tell me where I can

find the full english version of Phala sruthi (of

lalitha sahsranamam) online

 

Thank you,

Sel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- monmuk111 <monmuk111 wrote:

> Hello Jay and other members:

>

> Is there any way to invite Mr. Rohini Ranjan to this

> board. His

> readings, writings and thinking related to Vedic

> astrology are the

> most pragmatic I've ever seen. His writings exhude a

> certain

> originality and freshnesh that just tickles the

> mind. Also, the great

> thing about him is that he stays with the "original"

> priciples just

> like Sanjay and PVR rather then invent "new" crap

> like the Systems

> approach.

>

> Mukund

>

> vedic astrology, "J.Weiss"

> <jayhw@t...> wrote:

> > Dear list members,

> >

> > Today's morning email brought me among others one

> from the

> old 'Jyotish list',

> > that the Canadian astrologer Rohini Ranjan replied

> to ("subject:

> Ashtakavarga

> > useful tool or not").

> > It is the second part that many may find

> interesting about

> astrology in today's world.

> >

> > After some consideration I decided to share his

> mail with you (with

> his permission),

> > for the purpose of general information and view of

> just another

> Vedic astrologer,

> > who is not a member of this list.

> >

> > Kind regards

> > Jay Weiss

> >

> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> > I am really heartened by Shri Rao's message about

> ashtakavarga

> being a

> > useful tool. Statements from giants of his stature

> in modern

> jyotish about a

> > given technique or his endorsement of a software

> carry a lot of

> weight in

> > the modern quigmire that jyotish has become since

> its recent

> revival mostly

> > in and through the west (Praise the Lord Internet

> and pass on the

> weed! I am

> > sorry guys!!

> >

> > Truth be told, software produced in 80s and 90s

> some of which

> simply died on

> > the way, even though endorsed by Beacons of those

> times, died

> because

> > it was incorrect and inadequate BUT not

> necessarily unimportant!

> Incorrect

> > in simple baby algorithms like for shadbala,

> vimshopakbala.

> calculation of

> > longitudes! And when we get into more intricate

> things like dashaas

> and

> > Jaimini parameters on which even experts vary in

> opinions about how

> to

> > calculate, then we are entering a dark magical

> forest that is better

> > illuminated by the words of Madame Rowlings with

> an active

> imagination and

> > all the jealousy surrounding her fame than someone

> as factual as

> Einstein or

> > Narlikar or maybe even by that Economist of the

> times, Allan

> Greenspan who

> > gets more immediate attention than Parashara or

> those consultants

> who the

> > software programmers were depending upon. I am

> sorry but if one

> cannot get

> > the simple phasic uchcha bala worked out in the

> first go or the

> 19th version

> > for that matter, I wonder what else is going on!

> >

> > Jyotish of modern times, or even astrology in all

> its shades and

> forms

> > probably intensively touches the lives of a

> maximum of 100 million

> in this

> > world of 6.7 billions or more. Probably 100 times

> as many read their

> > newspaper forecasts and move on to a cup of coffee

> at Tim Hortons or

> > wherever -- GET real folks, they are NOT touched

> by astrology

> regardless of

> > what we think of their karma and spiritual

> elevation! Wake up to

> the fact

> > that t-h-a-t represents only about 2% of world's

> population. Even

> if it were

> > 10% -- half a billion, it would be an

> insignificant proportion of

> the

> > world's total current population! Astrology, in

> other words,

> touches FAR

> > less than 10% of humanity. Touches -- as in being

> significant

> enough to

> > actually change their lives or to make them

> e-v-e-n look at it

> seriously.

> > The statistics can be challenged to save face, but

> really something

> that are

> > for all of us astrologers to think about, and

> consider -- rightly or

> > wrongly -- about the R-E-A-L impact of OUR

> love and life (One

> thing no

> > one will get an argument from me on is that we

> astrologers are one

> dedicated

> > bunch who really truly believe in what we believe

> in even if we

> cannot

> > prove it to others satisfactorily and that

> includes the guy

> (strangely

> > there have not been too many gals, other than K.N

> Saraswathy on the

> jyotish

> > scene but more on the western astrology side of

> things) who thinks

> he has

> > proved it to all for all times to come! Of course

> astrologers are

> fully convinced, as

> > individuals or as a collective group). Our 75 to

> 80 % claims of

> success

> > notwithstanding, some with the help of japa and

> yogic powers which

> throw in yet

> > another variable in the mix. The borscht tastes

> delicious and

> fulfilling,

> > but can it be sold as a written recipe, yet?

> >

> > None of us can entirely shed our biases of THIS

> lifetime and will

> even

> > justify those R-A-T-I-O-N-A-L-L-Y!

> > But thanks to Ben and Charles and similar folks in

> cyber-reality,

> we the

> > minority (those who REALLY believe in astrology!)

> have this chance

> to

> > interact and progress, mostly individually. This

> is how it was

> right from

> > the beginning. Look at the very different and

> distinctive outlooks

> expressed

> > by Parashara, Varahamihira, Garga, Satya, Mukuna

> Vallabha, Kalidasa

> (now he

> > was one rebel!) and all others right through

> Raman, Seshadri Iyer

> and KN Rao.

> > What does it tell you? The facts are all there,

> but there is NO

> ONE SINGLE

> > INTERPRETATION, just a plethora of certificates

> and gurus and sub-

> gurus by

> > the dozen!

> >

> > The Hamilton project (cold, double blinded

> readings

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

http://sbc.