Guest guest Posted April 7, 2003 Report Share Posted April 7, 2003 Dear Moderator, I share the feelings of Deepakji. Please delist Rajeev at the soonest possible. He is not contributing anything anyway to the list. And people like myself and many others come to these lists for learning and not to take sarcasm or "oh see how smart I am" attitude! Namaste. Rageshwari. vedic astrology, Deepak Singh <deepak_28_2> wrote: > > Rajeev, > I do not know how to start or proceed. But I do not understand why are you here when you trickily disrespect a very important branch of vedic astrology. > > I have read about you, if I quote what you have written about you - > > "I am an astrologer but NOT a vedic astrologer. I am a Uranian astrologer and use dials and 45 degree graphs. I dont deal much with houses and signs except Asc and MC. I lay a great emphasis on the aspects that too the 8th harmonic." > > Your practicing method is far away from vedic astrology. You do not deal with houses and signs much, you use tropical zodiac, and most of all, you believe in "New Age Astrology" which uses a new ayanamsa 12 degrees away from Lahiri, which says Ketu is the most important planet which boosts anything it aspects/joins. There were great logical and healthy debate in the list of "New age astrology", where, at last, the list owner moderated the list that all messages will need his permission to be published. So now, questions and confusions regarding his new system is not publishing, only so positive comments and appreciations are publishing there. A poll was created and the latest result was, > > "Believe in his system = 8" > "Do not believe in his system = 67" > > In that point the list owner deleted the poll with destroying the poll result. And now the list has been moderated, the confusions and questions asked are not publishing there. > > The list owner was also banned from other lists for his all strange ideas, like there is 7 degree difference between Rahu - Ketu, they can be 6th - 8th from each other, etc etc. That 'astrologer' could not even support his ayanamsa and method logically in other lists, he could not even prove or answer about his methods. > > In fact this is a total waste of time to argue on this. People like you and that list owner change all the basic things of Vedic astrology for the sake of 'New age astrology'. > > I wonder if you even read the name of this list - "VEDIC ASTROLOGY". So, this is not a place to discuss THAT "ASTROLOGY" which does not deal with signs and houses much, and use tropical ayanamsas and believe that Rahu Ketu is 6th - 8th from each other. > > I know very well how far western astrology can go with it's prediction ability and other merits. To western astrology, a prediction is only a "possibility". Huh? That's a very good way to avoid blames when you make a wrong prediction. Becaue the predictions are only possibilites. I do not know then what is the point of predicting? Everything has possibilities, like "He may die today", "I can buy a car next year" etc etc. So WHY predicting? > > Western astrologers like you are very cunning in their practices. Surprisingly, they 'never' make wrong predictions. Like, a western astrologer may tell his client that he may face an accident next weak, so he advised him to be cautious in driving. So, if the client faces accident, then the prediction came true - so, credit of the western astrologer. And, if he does not face accident, then it is the credit of the western astrologer, too; Because only for his advice the client was cautious so he did not do accident! Thus, western astrology and astrologers are safe in both ends. Excellent! > > Vedic astrologers accept their limitations of predicting ability and making mistakes. They accept that when they tell about "possibility" then they say it because they are not sure, that is their limitation that they are not sure always. They accept it. And they tells, "The chart is confirm what it will do, but we say 'not sure' because WE are not sure to READ it confirmly, but the CHART is sure what it will do." Vedic astrologers do not say that predictions are possibilities, so that they can avoid the blaim easily. > > So, I request you, that when you do not believe in vedic astrology principles, and think that you are far more knowledgeable than the ancient sages to show thumb to their established rules, and when you think you can develop new principles of new age astrology, then you should not waste your time posting in this list. The members of this list respects ancient vedic astrology, they have no interest for such "new age astrology" which deals with Rahu - Ketu being 6th - 8th fro each other. You can discuss and develop your new age ideas in some other list where you will find many people like you who want to develop new age astrology. > > - Deepak > > PS. I am a member of that list of "New age astrology". For my convenient, I used to read the posts from the net, and did not set my option to deliver messages to my mailbox. Surprisingly, recently, my membership options are getting changed by the list owner everyday, to deliver the posts directly to my mailbox, which creates a mail flood in my account. It is just, that each day I change the option to, "Do not deliver me messages, I will read the messages from the site" and soon, the same day, the list owner changes the option to deliver all messages to my inbox. Nice respect for the members, huh? > > > > > > Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2003 Report Share Posted April 8, 2003 Namaste friends, The mails below were the latest in a series of mails that questioned why Rajeev was on this list. Blacklisting somebody is never an easy decision for me, but Rajeev has muddied the waters for too long without contributing anything to the list. He was always hell-bent on dismissing Vedic astrology and allied subjects and promote his methods. When I sent a mail the other day about sticking to Vedic astrology, I had already blacklisted him. He cannot post to vedic astrology any longer. So please do not discuss Rajeev any more. Let us move on to astrology. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha List Founder & Administrator > Dear Moderator,> > I share the feelings of Deepakji. Please delist Rajeev at the soonest > possible. He is not contributing anything anyway to the list. And > people like myself and many others come to these lists for learning > and not to take sarcasm or "oh see how smart I am" attitude!> > Namaste.> > Rageshwari. > Rajeev is just here to> make trouble and not advance the cause of Vedic> Astology and worst still his infalted ego beleives> that he holds the key to the Absolute Truth. > > Rajeev, if you are lloking for recognition to boost> your ego, please go somewhere else. !> > Ajith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.