Guest guest Posted October 1, 2003 Report Share Posted October 1, 2003 List members please clear my following doubts. Badhka Planet: Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively. According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign respectively. b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the conditions. Which one we should adopt as Badhka? ARGALA Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991. According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting lagna) holds true for judging financial status? SHUNNY NIGAM Delhi The New with improved product search Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2003 Report Share Posted October 1, 2003 Dear Shunny, My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not. About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have different views. Chandrashekhar. shunny nigam [shunny65 ]Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PMVedic AstrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts OM DURGAYEE NAMAH List members please clear my following doubts. Badhka Planet: Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively. According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign respectively. b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the conditions. Which one we should adopt as Badhka? ARGALA Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991. According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting lagna) holds true for judging financial status? SHUNNY NIGAM Delhi The New with improved product search Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2003 Report Share Posted October 1, 2003 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">|| Jaya Jagannath || Dear Sanjay, 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">If the enemy of Jupiter has to afflict it to make someone obese, why not Rahu comes into picture? 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Best Wishes 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Sarajit 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> shunny nigam [shunny65 ] Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:30 AM Vedic Astrology [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts OM DURGAYEE NAMAH List members please clear my following doubts. Badhka Planet: Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively. According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign respectively. b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the conditions. Which one we should adopt as Badhka? ARGALA Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991. According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting lagna) holds true for judging financial status? SHUNNY NIGAM Delhi The New with improved product search Archives: vedic astrology To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya || Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji, Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving conclusions. This was enlightening! Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my ignorance. Namaste. Rageshwari. vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Shunny, > My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the > correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and > treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to > be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not. > About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to > be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be > caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of > shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the > shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls > would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have > different views. > Chandrashekhar. > > shunny nigam [shunny65] > Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM > Vedic Astrology > [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts > > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH > > List members please clear my following doubts. > > Badhka Planet: > > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th > lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively. > > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet > to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. > > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign > respectively. > b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied > by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). > > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not > have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the > conditions. > > Which one we should adopt as Badhka? > > ARGALA > > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status > written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991. > According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT > Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is > aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this > case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). > > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting > lagna) holds true for judging financial status? > > > SHUNNY NIGAM > Delhi > > > -- -------- > -- > > The New with improved product search > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat Dear Rageshwari, Pardon me for butting in. I think 22nd Drekkana is to be seen from 8th house of D3. 8L in D3 is lord of 22nd drekkana. I am sure Chandrashekharji and other learned members will correct me if I have made a mistake. Lagna Rasi for D3 is decided by Lagna placement in Rasi Chart. If Lagna is placed in 1st Drekkana the D3 lagna rashi will be the same as Rashi lagna. If in 2nd drekkana, D3 lagna rashi will be 5th from Rashi lagna and if it is 3rd, D3 lagna rashi will be 9th from rashi lagna. Kind regards Ramesh vedic astrology, "rageshwari75" <rageshwari75> wrote: > || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya || > > Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji, > > Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I > had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving > conclusions. This was enlightening! > > Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my > ignorance. > > Namaste. > > Rageshwari. > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > <boxdel> wrote: > > Dear Shunny, > > My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka > Paarijaata is the > > correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine > and > > treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat > them to > > be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not. > > About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya > appears to > > be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction > would be > > caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in > case of > > shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas > obstructing the > > shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala > falls > > would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others > might have > > different views. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > shunny nigam [shunny65] > > Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM > > Vedic Astrology > > [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts > > > > > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH > > > > List members please clear my following doubts. > > > > Badhka Planet: > > > > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th > and 7th > > lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs > respectively. > > > > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for > a planet > > to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. > > > > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign > > respectively. > > b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house > occupied > > by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). > > > > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts > may not > > have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the > > conditions. > > > > Which one we should adopt as Badhka? > > > > ARGALA > > > > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and > professional status > > written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August > 1991. > > According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who > ASPECT > > Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars > is > > aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars > in this > > case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). > > > > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( > aspecting > > lagna) holds true for judging financial status? > > > > > > SHUNNY NIGAM > > Delhi > > > > > > -- > -------- > > -- > > > > The New with improved product search > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 Dear Rameshji, Thank you very much for the prompt reply! Namaste. Rageshwari. vedic astrology, "rgangaramani" <ramesh.gangaramani@a...> wrote: > Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat > > Dear Rageshwari, > > Pardon me for butting in. I think 22nd Drekkana is to be seen from > 8th house of D3. 8L in D3 is lord of 22nd drekkana. I am sure > Chandrashekharji and other learned members will correct me if I have > made a mistake. > > Lagna Rasi for D3 is decided by Lagna placement in Rasi Chart. If > Lagna is placed in 1st Drekkana the D3 lagna rashi will be the same > as Rashi lagna. If in 2nd drekkana, D3 lagna rashi will be 5th from > Rashi lagna and if it is 3rd, D3 lagna rashi will be 9th from rashi > lagna. > > Kind regards > Ramesh > > vedic astrology, "rageshwari75" > <rageshwari75> wrote: > > || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya || > > > > Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji, > > > > Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I > > had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving > > conclusions. This was enlightening! > > > > Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my > > ignorance. > > > > Namaste. > > > > Rageshwari. > > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > Dear Shunny, > > > My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka > > Paarijaata is the > > > correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a > trine > > and > > > treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others > treat > > them to > > > be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not. > > > About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya > > appears to > > > be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction > > would be > > > caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in > > case of > > > shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas > > obstructing the > > > shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha > argala > > falls > > > would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others > > might have > > > different views. > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > shunny nigam [shunny65] > > > Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM > > > Vedic Astrology > > > [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts > > > > > > > > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH > > > > > > List members please clear my following doubts. > > > > > > Badhka Planet: > > > > > > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, > 9th > > and 7th > > > lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs > > respectively. > > > > > > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order > for > > a planet > > > to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down. > > > > > > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign > > > respectively. > > > b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house > > occupied > > > by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna). > > > > > > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many > charts > > may not > > > have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both > the > > > conditions. > > > > > > Which one we should adopt as Badhka? > > > > > > ARGALA > > > > > > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and > > professional status > > > written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of > August > > 1991. > > > According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet > who > > ASPECT > > > Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence > Mars > > is > > > aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet > (Mars > > in this > > > case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H). > > > > > > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( > > aspecting > > > lagna) holds true for judging financial status? > > > > > > > > > SHUNNY NIGAM > > > Delhi > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- -- > -- > > -------- > > > -- > > > > > > The New with improved product search > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 What are the remedies one can practice for the benificence of the badhak lord regards chakroorageshwari75 <rageshwari75 > wrote: || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya ||Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji,Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving conclusions. This was enlightening!Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my ignorance.Namaste.Rageshwari.vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Shunny,> My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the> correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and> treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to> be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not.> About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to> be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be> caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of> shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the> shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls> would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have> different views.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> shunny nigam [shunny65]> Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM> Vedic Astrology> [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts> > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH> > List members please clear my following doubts.> > Badhka Planet:> > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th> lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively.> > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet> to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down.> > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign> respectively.> b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied> by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna).> > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not> have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the> conditions.> > Which one we should adopt as Badhka?> > ARGALA> > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status> written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991.> According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT> Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is> aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this> case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H).> > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting> lagna) holds true for judging financial status?> > > SHUNNY NIGAM> Delhi> > > ----------> --> > The New with improved product search> Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Nature doesnot do anything uselessly The New with improved product search Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 Dear Rageshwari, If Lagna falls in 1st dreshkana, each rasi containing 3 dreshkana would mean that 1st Dreshkana of the 8th house would be 22nd Dreshkana. An easier way would be to see the 8th house of D# chart. Chandrashekhar. rageshwari75 [rageshwari75 ]Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:30 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Badhka and Argala doubts|| Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya ||Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji,Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving conclusions. This was enlightening!Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my ignorance.Namaste.Rageshwari.vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Shunny,> My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the> correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and> treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to> be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not.> About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to> be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be> caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of> shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the> shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls> would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have> different views.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> shunny nigam [shunny65]> Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM> Vedic Astrology> [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts> > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH> > List members please clear my following doubts.> > Badhka Planet:> > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th> lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively.> > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet> to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down.> > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign> respectively.> b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied> by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna).> > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not> have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the> conditions.> > Which one we should adopt as Badhka?> > ARGALA> > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status> written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991.> According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT> Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is> aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this> case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H).> > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting> lagna) holds true for judging financial status?> > > SHUNNY NIGAM> Delhi> > > ----------> --> > The New with improved product search> Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 In my case I have Venus Lord of 11th and Jup Lord of 9th together in 4th with Saturn Lord of 7th in the 10th house, thereby aspecting each other. Can you help me in advising which one should I strengthen in this case. Regards Chakroo Chandrashekhar Sharma <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Chakroo, Usually it is better to strengthen the trinal lord( stronger of the two) and worship the ishtadevata. Whether badhaka lord will be beneficial of malefic would depend on its placement and strength of the chart. Chandrashekhar. Rajiv Lakhanpal [chakroo ]Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:29 PMvedic astrologySubject: Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Badhka and Argala doubts Dear Chandrashekhar ji What are the remedies one can practice for the benificence of the badhak lord regards chakroorageshwari75 <rageshwari75 > wrote: || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya ||Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji,Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving conclusions. This was enlightening!Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my ignorance.Namaste.Rageshwari.vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Shunny,> My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the> correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and> treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to> be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not.> About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to> be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be> caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of> shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the> shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls> would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have> different views.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> shunny nigam [shunny65]> Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM> Vedic Astrology> [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts> > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH> > List members please clear my following doubts.> > Badhka Planet:> > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th> lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively.> > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet> to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down.> > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign> respectively.> b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied> by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna).> > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not> have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the> conditions.> > Which one we should adopt as Badhka?> > ARGALA> > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status> written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991.> According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT> Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is> aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this> case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H).> > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting> lagna) holds true for judging financial status?> > > SHUNNY NIGAM> Delhi> > > ----------> --> > The New with improved product search> Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Nature doesnot do anything uselessly The New with improved product search Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Nature doesnot do anything uselessly The New with improved product search Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2003 Report Share Posted October 8, 2003 Dear Chakroo, In your case it appears that the Ascendant is Cancer.Ideally you should strengthen Mars who is the Kendakonadhipati and yogakaraka.Amongst Venus and Jupiter ,Venus gets digbala in 4th house where as Jupiter gets half of digbala so it may be better to strengthen/propiate Jupiter, he also being lord of the 6th. Venus is malefic being 11th lord and attracting kendradhipati dosha so his strengthening is likely to cause more harm than benefits. Of course this is my personal opinion and others more learned than me might hold different views on the subject. Hope this helps, Chandrashekhar. Rajiv Lakhanpal [chakroo ]Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:03 AMvedic astrologySubject: RE: [vedic astrology] Re: Badhka and Argala doubts Dear Chandrashekhar ji In my case I have Venus Lord of 11th and Jup Lord of 9th together in 4th with Saturn Lord of 7th in the 10th house, thereby aspecting each other. Can you help me in advising which one should I strengthen in this case. Regards Chakroo Chandrashekhar Sharma <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Chakroo, Usually it is better to strengthen the trinal lord( stronger of the two) and worship the ishtadevata. Whether badhaka lord will be beneficial of malefic would depend on its placement and strength of the chart. Chandrashekhar. Rajiv Lakhanpal [chakroo ]Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:29 PMvedic astrologySubject: Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Badhka and Argala doubts Dear Chandrashekhar ji What are the remedies one can practice for the benificence of the badhak lord regards chakroorageshwari75 <rageshwari75 > wrote: || Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya ||Dear Chandrashekharji and Shunnyji,Thanks much for bringing this discussion on the table. Until now, I had been blindly considering 11/9/7 lords as Badhaka and deriving conclusions. This was enlightening!Now, how does one go about calculating 22nd Drekkana? Pardon my ignorance.Namaste.Rageshwari.vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Shunny,> My personal opinion is that the method indicated by Jataka Paarijaata is the> correct one. The reason is that Lord of the 9th is lord of a trine and> treated as a shubha graha, per laghu parashari.However others treat them to> be Badhaka irespective of whether they are Kharesha or not.> About you question on argalas , what is stated by I. Rangacharya appears to> be the right representation of Argala calculations as obstruction would be> caused to the aspect of a planet and not House per-se.Though in case of> shubha argalas, argalas to house indications and argalas obstructing the> shubha argalas causing planet and the house on which shubha argala falls> would have both to be taken into consideration. Of course others might have> different views.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> shunny nigam [shunny65]> Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:00 PM> Vedic Astrology> [vedic astrology] Badhka and Argala doubts> > > OM DURGAYEE NAMAH> > List members please clear my following doubts.> > Badhka Planet:> > Usually we all consider The Badhka Planets or sign as 11th, 9th and 7th> lord or sign from Lagna for Moveable, Fixed and Dual signs respectively.> > According to Jataka Parijata (Chapter II, Sloka 48):In order for a planet> to qualify as Badhka two condition are laid down.> > a) 11, 9, 7 houses or lords for moveable, fixed and dual sign> respectively.> b)Such a planet should simultaneously be the ruler of the house occupied> by Mandi or Kharesha (22 Drekkana from Lagna).> > So according to Jataka Parijata defination of Badhka many charts may not> have the badhka at all because very few charts will qualify both the> conditions.> > Which one we should adopt as Badhka?> > ARGALA> > Recently I read a article on Argala for financial and professional status> written by Iranganti Rangacharya in Astrological Magazine of August 1991.> According to him " Argala sign should be reckoned from planet who ASPECT> Lagna.Say for example Lagna is Taurus and Mars in Libra hence Mars is> aspecting Lagna.So the principal Argala from aspecting planet (Mars in this> case) would be Scorpio(2H),Capricorn (4H) and Cancer (10H).> > Does this theroy of calculating Argala from aspecting planet ( aspecting> lagna) holds true for judging financial status?> > > SHUNNY NIGAM> Delhi> > > ----------> --> > The New with improved product search> Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release 9/23/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Nature doesnot do anything uselessly The New with improved product search Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Nature doesnot do anything uselessly The New with improved product search Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.