Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Dear Ramadas, Seeing your expertise with time rectification I would like to ask what do you think about my new time rectification for my chart. I hope you still have it, if I'm right I have given you before. With the time of 10:50 or 10:52 am the Saptamsa lagna is changing and with 10:50 should have given children already, however it didn't, and so the time range of 10:52:10-20 would be correct. However, kunda is not correct. What do you think, could kunda be Krttika or Rohini? Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, Jyotisha http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Dhira Ji, Namaste Guru Ji with your permission, let me attempt to answer Dhira Ji and correct me if my thinking is not correct!. I think, the rectified birth time should be between: 10:56:51 to 10:57:20. See this time does match to your D-7 and its results so far. I am getting Kunda as Asresha/Ashlesha pada 4. Regards Raghunadha Rao vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna BCS" <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > Dear Ramadas, > > Seeing your expertise with time rectification I would like to ask what do > you think about my new time rectification for my chart. I hope you still > have it, if I'm right I have given you before. With the time of 10:50 or > 10:52 am the Saptamsa lagna is changing and with 10:50 should have given > children already, however it didn't, and so the time range of 10:52:10-20 > would be correct. However, kunda is not correct. What do you think, could > kunda be Krttika or Rohini? > > Yours, > Dhira Krsna dasa, > Jyotisha > http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Dhira Krsna Ji, I am really sorry that I dont have your birth detals.Please furnish me again and I will check them.But according to me, if we correct the time using all the 3 methods ie., Pranapada Lagna,Kunda and Navamsha-Dwadashamsha methods,we may be able to arrive at correct birth charts. With Sri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana, Ramadas Rao.Dhira Krsna BCS <Dhira.Krsna.BCS (AT) pamho (DOT) net> wrote: Dear Ramadas,Seeing your expertise with time rectification I would like to ask what doyou think about my new time rectification for my chart. I hope you stillhave it, if I'm right I have given you before. With the time of 10:50 or10:52 am the Saptamsa lagna is changing and with 10:50 should have givenchildren already, however it didn't, and so the time range of 10:52:10-20would be correct. However, kunda is not correct. What do you think, couldkunda be Krttika or Rohini?Yours,Dhira Krsna dasa,Jyotishahttp://www.radhadesh.comArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Post your profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Dear Ramadas, >I am really sorry that I dont have your birth detals.Please furnish me >again and I will check them.But according to me, if we correct the time >using all the 3 methods ie., Pranapada Lagna,Kunda and >Navamsha-Dwadashamsha methods,we may be able to arrive at correct birth >charts. I see. Here are my details: date of birth - 23-May-1968 time 10:52:20 am in Ronse, Belgium. 3E36 50N45 Please note that previously when I took the time of 10:20, Sanjay Rath has said that D-60 lagna should be Scorpio because of Moon in 9th house in kulaghnamsa as well as Jupiter in 5th. The reason being the karma with my parents, and my mother leaving my father before I was 2 years old. Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, Jyotisha http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2003 Report Share Posted October 30, 2003 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Dhira Ji, Namaste, I have looked at your D-20 today and made a little ( few seconds less ) adjustment to your time of birth, and the corrected time is : 10:57:07. The reason for this few seconds adjustment was, the Moon should be in trines in D-20 for Krishna's devotees. Isn't it. Regards Raghunadha Rao vedic astrology, "Rao Nemani" <raon1008> wrote: > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Dhira Ji, > > Namaste > > Guru Ji with your permission, let me attempt to answer Dhira Ji > and correct me if my thinking is not correct!. > > I think, the rectified birth time should be between: 10:56:51 to > 10:57:20. See this time does match to your D-7 and its results > so far. I am getting Kunda as Asresha/Ashlesha pada 4. > > Regards > Raghunadha Rao > > vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna BCS" > <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > > Dear Ramadas, > > > > Seeing your expertise with time rectification I would like to ask > what do > > you think about my new time rectification for my chart. I hope you > still > > have it, if I'm right I have given you before. With the time of > 10:50 or > > 10:52 am the Saptamsa lagna is changing and with 10:50 should have > given > > children already, however it didn't, and so the time range of > 10:52:10-20 > > would be correct. However, kunda is not correct. What do you think, > could > > kunda be Krttika or Rohini? > > > > Yours, > > Dhira Krsna dasa, > > Jyotisha > > http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2003 Report Share Posted November 1, 2003 om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Dhira Krsna Ji, I have got your birth time rectified to 10 : 57 :58 AM on 23/5/1968 and as usual I have used Kp Ayanamsha.Here Kunda Nakshatra falls in Revathi which is your Janma Nakshatra,Pranapada Lagna falls in Mesha 8 Deg.42'47 " whose Navamsha is in Mithuna which is in trine to Chandra in Navamsha chart.Finally in Navamsha Dwadashamsha Chart,Lagna falls in Tula which is a odd sign indicating a male birth.Now in this case your D-60 Lagna falls in Mesha and, Neecha Surya and Uccha Shani are in 7th from Lagna,thus afflicting Pitr Karaka Surya who is also 5th lord and this Shani who is a Badhakesh for Mesha Lagna aspects also Chandra who is in 4th with Shukra and Ketu,thus afflicting your Matr Karaka as well as Matr Sthanadhipaty Chandra and your 7th lord who is a Kalatra Karaka Shukra also. Chandra is in Kulaghna Shastyamsha. I hope this helps you. With Sri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana, Ramadas Rao.Rao Nemani <raon1008 > wrote: Hare Rama KrishnaDear Dhira Ji,Namaste,I have looked at your D-20 today and made a little ( few seconds less ) adjustment to your time of birth, and the corrected time is : 10:57:07.The reason for this few seconds adjustment was, the Moon should be in trines in D-20 for Krishna's devotees. Isn't it.RegardsRaghunadha Raovedic astrology, "Rao Nemani" <raon1008> wrote:> Hare Rama Krishna> > Dear Dhira Ji,> > Namaste> > Guru Ji with your permission, let me attempt to answer Dhira Ji> and correct me if my thinking is not correct!.> > I think, the rectified birth time should be between: 10:56:51 to > 10:57:20. See this time does match to your D-7 and its results> so far. I am getting Kunda as Asresha/Ashlesha pada 4.> > Regards> Raghunadha Rao> > --- In vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna BCS" > <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote:> > Dear Ramadas,> > > > Seeing your expertise with time rectification I would like to ask > what do> > you think about my new time rectification for my chart. I hope you > still> > have it, if I'm right I have given you before. With the time of > 10:50 or> > 10:52 am the Saptamsa lagna is changing and with 10:50 should have > given> > children already, however it didn't, and so the time range of > 10:52:10-20> > would be correct. However, kunda is not correct. What do you think, > could> > kunda be Krttika or Rohini?> > > > Yours,> > Dhira Krsna dasa,> > Jyotisha> > http://www.radhadesh.comArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Post your profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2003 Report Share Posted November 2, 2003 Dear Rao, >The reason for this few seconds adjustment was, the Moon >should be in trines in D-20 for Krishna's devotees. Isn't it. Indeed, that's correct, but a sambandha or aspect with 1st, 5th or 9th lord with the Moon will give a correct Vimsamsa as well for Krsna's devotees. In my case, surely Moon should be in 5th. But as I said before, Moon should be in Navamsa lagna as well, in order to give the fair and pale bodily complexion which I have. Also, I was trying to find out the incorrectness of Pisces Navamsa lagna from Navamsa Narayan Dasha. I married in Aries dasha first legal marriage - 7th from it is stronger and aspects UL in Taurus with Aquarius Navamsa lagna. Secondly, vedic marriage was during Scorpio dasha, and being in 7th from UL with 7th stronger, marriage is again indicated. But with Pisces Navamsa lagna UL switches to Sagittarius, and Scorpio is in 12th, with 7th from it stronger and in 6/8 to UL doesn't show marriage to be so likely, though UL lord joins there. Perhaps, but I don't think Pisces Navamsa lagna is correct. Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, Jyotisha http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2003 Report Share Posted November 2, 2003 ~ Om Namah Shivaya ~ Dear Members and Respected Gurus, Kindly tell me the address / contact details of a Vedic Astrologer in Delhi or near by Delhi, who can do Birth Time Rectification. Thanks and regards, Neeraj Gupta --- Dhira Krsna BCS <Dhira.Krsna.BCS wrote: > Dear Rao, > > >The reason for this few seconds adjustment was, the > Moon > >should be in trines in D-20 for Krishna's devotees. > Isn't it. > > Indeed, that's correct, but a sambandha or aspect > with 1st, 5th or 9th > lord with the Moon will give a correct Vimsamsa as > well for Krsna's > devotees. In my case, surely Moon should be in 5th. > > But as I said before, Moon should be in Navamsa > lagna as well, in order to > give the fair and pale bodily complexion which I > have. Also, I was trying > to find out the incorrectness of Pisces Navamsa > lagna from Navamsa Narayan > Dasha. I married in Aries dasha first legal marriage > - 7th from it is > stronger and aspects UL in Taurus with Aquarius > Navamsa lagna. Secondly, > vedic marriage was during Scorpio dasha, and being > in 7th from UL with 7th > stronger, marriage is again indicated. But with > Pisces Navamsa lagna UL > switches to Sagittarius, and Scorpio is in 12th, > with 7th from it stronger > and in 6/8 to UL doesn't show marriage to be so > likely, though UL lord > joins there. Perhaps, but I don't think Pisces > Navamsa lagna is correct. > > Yours, > Dhira Krsna dasa, > Jyotisha > http://www.radhadesh.com > ===== http://www.geocities.com/master_minds_india/ Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch./promos/britneyspears/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2003 Report Share Posted November 9, 2003 Dear Rao Nemani and Ramadas, Hare Rama Krsna! Thanks for this attempt, Ramadasji, but with this time you wouldn't get Vimsamsa lagna in trines to Moon, though Mercury as 9th lord would still aspect on Moon. However, Vimsamsa lagna should definitely be Virgo, since calculating Vimsamsa Narayan dasha the 9th house in Vimsamsa will give initiation - diksa, and Saturn initiates the Narayan dasha here, so 9th house Taurus comes from the age of 20, which is indeed the time my spiritual life started. I took diksa at the end of my 26th year. The rasi having UL, Cancer is also the Narayan dasha I married. Btw, you used KP ayanamsha for your calculation, which is a sensitive point. I gave you my chart for rectification actually because I wanted to show that kunda rectification is not that simple. And the same you mentioned for Sastyamsa can be explained with the Scorpio lagna. Now to Nemani, when we take Scorpio sastyamsa lagna, then Navamsa-Dvadasamsa rectifies to a lagna between 26°06'40" - 26°23'20" to give male birth. Then I chose amongst the janma vighati graha Rahu since it is male and corresponds to the time of 10:53:10-34. Then using the Kalidasa rectification which was once explained to me by Visti, my gurudeva, I came to the time of 10:53:23 (range of 6 seconds from 10:53:19-25). I'll copy the quote from an old letter of Visti to me: >>Kalidasa gives something similar, where one takes the Ista Kala in Vighatikas and multiplies this by 4. Then he divides this by 9 and finds the remainder. This number should be in trines to the number of the Janma Nakshetra. This translates to a change every 6 seconds. He also gives the dictum for Prana Pada, and some other finer methods.>> The new time is also correct with Pranapada, and I got convinced about sunrise time from edge of the Sun and not center, as I believed before. I should listen my gurudeva more... Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, Jyotisha http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2003 Report Share Posted November 9, 2003 Hare Rama Krishna, Namaste Dhira Ji, Thank you for the feed back and I agree with you, it is not easy to rectify the birth time. I am glad to know that, my thinking is somewhat close to your final rectified time. So, now you are using option-3 in the Sunrise Definitions options in JH 5, which I have mentioned to you few months ago, please confirm. Please, remember, I am still a student with a very little time spent on studying Jyotish, so my interest is always to learn from Guru's like you. Regards Raghunadha Rao vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna BCS" <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > Dear Rao Nemani and Ramadas, > > Hare Rama Krsna! > > Thanks for this attempt, Ramadasji, but with this time you wouldn't get > Vimsamsa lagna in trines to Moon, though Mercury as 9th lord would still > aspect on Moon. However, Vimsamsa lagna should definitely be Virgo, since > calculating Vimsamsa Narayan dasha the 9th house in Vimsamsa will give > initiation - diksa, and Saturn initiates the Narayan dasha here, so 9th > house Taurus comes from the age of 20, which is indeed the time my > spiritual life started. I took diksa at the end of my 26th year. The rasi > having UL, Cancer is also the Narayan dasha I married. Btw, you used KP > ayanamsha for your calculation, which is a sensitive point. I gave you my > chart for rectification actually because I wanted to show that kunda > rectification is not that simple. And the same you mentioned for Sastyamsa > can be explained with the Scorpio lagna. > > Now to Nemani, when we take Scorpio sastyamsa lagna, then > Navamsa-Dvadasamsa rectifies to a lagna between 26°06'40" - 26° 23'20" to > give male birth. Then I chose amongst the janma vighati graha Rahu since > it is male and corresponds to the time of 10:53:10-34. Then using the > Kalidasa rectification which was once explained to me by Visti, my > gurudeva, I came to the time of 10:53:23 (range of 6 seconds from > 10:53:19-25). I'll copy the quote from an old letter of Visti to me: > > >>Kalidasa gives something similar, where one takes the Ista Kala in > Vighatikas and multiplies this by 4. Then he divides this by 9 and finds > the remainder. This number should be in trines to the number of the Janma > Nakshetra. This translates to a change every 6 seconds. He also gives the > dictum for Prana Pada, and some other finer methods.>> > > The new time is also correct with Pranapada, and I got convinced about > sunrise time from edge of the Sun and not center, as I believed before. I > should listen my gurudeva more... > > Yours, > Dhira Krsna dasa, > Jyotisha > http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2003 Report Share Posted November 11, 2003 Dear Rao, >So, now you are using option-3 in the Sunrise Definitions >options in JH 5, which I have mentioned to you few months ago, >please confirm. Yes, that means sunrise from first limb of Sun as well as sunset from last limb. You're welcome to write your idea of the rectification. I'd like to see your reasoning. Btw, I see you're signing with Raghunadha now since some time, while you weren't doing that in the beginning. Did you have diksa initiation? Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, Jyotisha http://www.radhadesh.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.