Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 Dear Siva, Saying that a world class batsman will score runs on a given date may not be a statastically prominent event. But to say that he will have a wife who is several years elder to him, is a not a common thing. And then children, becoming successful at a very young age,famous at a very young age, becoming very rich at a very young age etc., In experts' hands these events should stand out, i think. Anyway, i am happy that you had not taken offense. regards viswanadhamschinnas <schinnas > wrote: Dear Vishwanadham-ji,I did not take any offense. My understanding was that the "idea" was ridiculed, not "I" was ridiculed. We can use more milder words than "ridicule" but thats a different issue.The reason for my point is, astrology is a vast ocean of multiple techniques. Many times contrary indicators will be in a chart and when one astrologer is looking for an answer to one specific question, (s)he might unintentionally ignore some indicators and arrive at a result. That is why even the best of the astrologers cannot claim 100% success rate. It is just not possible, unless the astrologer has some yogic power.Similarly, it is sometimes possible (though kind of rare) that we can arrive at some successful predictions using wrong birth data. For example, consider two horoscopes (H1 and H2) floating around for a person, X. It is so possible that both H1 and H2 might hold promise for some great achievement during the same period. So any prediction made using either horoscope for a particular period will be correct!Unless we know very specific personal events, it may not be very easy at all to settle a horoscope without any controversy.regards,Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.