Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Hello, When we calculate dasas and bhuktis, we need two tools: the Moon and the nakshatras. The others astrological tools (signs, aspects, houses) do not interfer. When we read dasas and bhuktis, there is only one tool too many astrologers do not use: nakshatras. Is it consistent? I have studied the Kriishnamurti Paddhatti for several years. I have also read some books about "stellar astrology". Could the members of the list give their experience about "using nakshatras in reading dasas and bhuktis"? Thanks a lot Denis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Dear Sir, Dr.Krishnamurthys Paddhathi is an excellent system.You wont believe if I say that independently I too got the idea of sub rulers etc before I had any idea about Dr.Krishnamurthys writings and system. I had the good fortune in my life to hear some Nadis being readover to individual persons on several occasions.The metod as I understood it to be mostly the same as the one adopted by Dr.B.V.Raman and such others.Generally the metod followed is that, the Rishi concerned explains about the Bhava in question considered both from Janama lgnam and Chandra laganam.Janmalagnam is called the "uir" which means life and Chandra lagnam is called the "udal"which means the body. That is how the Rishis designated the Janmalagnam and the Chandra lagnam respectively. With regards, jagannathan jagannathankr --- Labouré_Denis <Laboure wrote: Hello, When we calculate dasas and bhuktis, we need two tools: the Moon and the nakshatras. The others astrological tools (signs, aspects, houses) do not interfer. When we read dasas and bhuktis, there is only one tool too many astrologers do not use: nakshatras. Is it consistent? I have studied the Kriishnamurti Paddhatti for several years. I have also read some books about "stellar astrology". Could the members of the list give their experience about "using nakshatras in reading dasas and bhuktis"? Thanks a lot Denis Sponsor Group info: vedic astrology/info.html To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Terms of Service. ===== Jagannathan . ______________________ India Promos: Win TVs, Bikes, DVD players & more! Go to http://in.promos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2003 Report Share Posted August 31, 2003 It is usual to call this Division of the MOON long into these parts as the Nakshta. For finding Vimsottari Dasa all you need the Date of Birth, and the Longitude of the MOON, no need to know the Nakshtra. In fact in KP one uses the Lord of the Nakshtra called as STAR LORD, although out of habit of usung Traditional Astrolgy, KP books refer to the Nakshtras. Labouré_Denis <Laboure (AT) WANADOO (DOT) FR> wrote: Hello,When we calculate dasas and bhuktis, we need two tools: the Moon and thenakshatras. The others astrological tools (signs, aspects, houses) do notinterfer. When we read dasas and bhuktis, there is only one tool too manyastrologers do not use: nakshatras. Is it consistent?I have studied the Kriishnamurti Paddhatti for several years. I have alsoread some books about "stellar astrology". Could the members of the listgive their experience about "using nakshatras in reading dasas and bhuktis"?Thanks a lotDenisArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2003 Report Share Posted August 31, 2003 Om Namo Narayanaya, Dear Denis, >Hello, > >When we calculate dasas and bhuktis, we need two tools: the Moon and the >nakshatras. The others astrological tools (signs, aspects, houses) do not >interfer. When we read dasas and bhuktis, there is only one tool too many >astrologers do not use: nakshatras. Is it consistent? > There are dashas based on signs called rashi dashas described in both Parashara and Jaimini. Nakshatras are consistent. One CANNOT judge dashas without the use of nakshatras. I would be curious to see the astrologers who judge dashas succesfully without nakshatras. Lord of Nakshatra is called "JEEVA" and is responsible for the mental and subtle level of the graha, and for general happiness and fortune a graha may experience. For example, during a dasha of the lagna lord, a personal happiness, mental experience and general fortune trend will be experienced based on the position of its nakshatra lord. SO Nakshatra is not the invention of Krishnamurti Paddhatti, but a very basic and standard tool, EACH jyotisha must use.. Best wishes Zoran > >I have studied the Kriishnamurti Paddhatti for several years. I have also >read some books about "stellar astrology". Could the members of the list >give their experience about "using nakshatras in reading dasas and bhuktis"? > >Thanks a lot >Denis > > > > > > > > > >....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > >Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2003 Report Share Posted August 31, 2003 I am glad you explained that, because it hasn't received appropriate attention so far. I fully agree with you, and yes, I know that's inherent part of SJC teaching, less dealt with though. /and that's exactly what I find vluable in Nadi, KP.. as well. / I am anxious to hear Sanjay talking on 'Nakastras'! I understand Denis at the moment, because for understandable reasons not eerything was covered equally in this eclectic approach/ Nakastras would be next BIG BOOM/Boom-Mercury Nakastra sound/ Future seems so good, except for the fact that Monday is-tomorrow. Regards, Anna n Radosavljevic <ahimsa (AT) NSpoint (DOT) net> wrote: Om Namo Narayanaya,Dear Denis,>Hello,>>When we calculate dasas and bhuktis, we need two tools: the Moon and the>nakshatras. The others astrological tools (signs, aspects, houses) do not>interfer. When we read dasas and bhuktis, there is only one tool too many>astrologers do not use: nakshatras. Is it consistent?>There are dashas based on signs called rashi dashas described in both Parashara and Jaimini. Nakshatras areconsistent. One CANNOT judge dashas without the use of nakshatras. I would be curious to see the astrologers whojudge dashas succesfully without nakshatras. Lord of Nakshatra is called "JEEVA" and is responsible for the mentaland subtle level of the graha, and for general happiness and fortune a graha may experience. For example, during a dashaof the lagna lord, a personal happiness, mental experience and general fortune trend will be experienced based on the positionof its nakshatra lord. SO Nakshatra is not the invention of Krishnamurti Paddhatti, but a very basic and standard tool,EACH jyotisha must use..Best wishesZoran>>I have studied the Kriishnamurti Paddhatti for several years. I have also>read some books about "stellar astrology". Could the members of the list>give their experience about "using nakshatras in reading dasas and bhuktis"?>>Thanks a lot>Denis>>>>Archives: vedic astrology>>Group info: vedic astrology/info.html>>To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology->>....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......>>|| Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || >>Your use of is subject to >>Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.