Guest guest Posted November 27, 2003 Report Share Posted November 27, 2003 Please someone answer these questions. I am very confused: vedic astrology, "kanwarpreet_grewal" <kanwarpreet_grewal> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am still confused about the functional and natural nature > of planets. If the only thing we needed to consider was the functional > nature then there would be no need to define the natural benefics! > > So my questions are: > > 1) What nature is used to indicate whether a planet will do good > to the house it owns? I believe that a strong planet will always > protect its own significators and the significatiors of the house > it rules. This is irrespective of its nature. Is this true? > > 2) What nature is to be considered when we see the placement of a > planet in a house? > > 3) What nature is consdered when we talk about the aspects of planets? > > 4) What nature is considered when we talk about yogas formed? > > 5) What nature is considered when we talk about dasha/mahadasha? > > 6) In the dasha of FM/FB what happens? In the dasha of FB/FM > what happens? > > 7) Is a strong FM less bad or more bad? > > 8) Is a vargottama FM less bad/more bad? > > 9) If a FM but natural benefic forms a benefic yoga then does > it give good effects? > > > Please provide me detailed answers to these. I am confused. > > Kanwar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.