Kunda Nakshatra Issue in JH 5-->Narasimha Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Rao ji,

 

The lagna longitude given by JHora and calculated by Sanjay ji in CoVA is about

10 arc-min. That results in 810 arc-min or 13.5 deg. That definitely takes the

Kunda nakshatra back by one.

 

What do you mean by "When I calculated manually, I am getting Pusyami too"?

 

Lagna is at 25Aq53'57.3" in the chart you sent, i.e. 25.89925 deg in Aq. This is

325.89925. Multiplied by 81, this gives 26397.83925. After removing multiples of

360, we get 117.83925. So Kunda is at 27.83925 deg in Cancer. That is what JHora

gives. It is in Asresha and not in Pushyami.

 

When dealing with Kunda, please remember that a small error in lagna's longitude

gives a big error in Kunda's longitude.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

 

> Dear Narasimha Ji,> > Namaste,> > Please help me to understand the differnce

in "Kunda> Nakshatra" Calculation between the JH 5 and COVA> example.> > I

know, there is a slight differece calculations for> the accuracy in JH 5 and

that is perfectly fine.> > Now, I have entered the birth details as per the

COVA> Page 34, chart 7 and I get ( Aslesha) Nakshatra from> JH 5, but where as

Sanjay Ji mentioned in his book> Page 39 is "Pusyami".> > When I calculated

manually, I am getting Pusyami too,> which is matching with COVA.> > When I

have tested this difference with some more> cases, some cases it is matching in

JH 5 and some> cases are not, hence I need your help to see, where I> am making

any mistake or our JH 5 need some bug fixes> before your next release.> > I have

attached the chart for your convenience.> > Thanks for your help in advance.> >

Regards> Rao> > P.S: Guru's and Members, can you please look at the> above

calculation and see whether I am making any> mistake and share your thoughts

and obsevations> please, so that it will be helpful to Narasimha Ji to> fix the

problem before the next release of JH 5.

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha Ji,

 

Namaste,

 

Thanks for the clarification. You are correct, a small

difference in lagna's longitude making a big difference in

Kunda's longitude.

 

That is what exactly my confusion before, because as per

COVA Page 39, the Lagna is : 25 Aq 43 and as per JH 5 it

is : 25 Aq 53'57.3" and the difference is about 10 arc-min

and made the difference and created a confusion to me.

 

That is what I meant by saying when I calculated manually

I was getting Pusyami too, with Lagna as : 25 Aq 43.

 

After your message, I have also changed the time of birth

to : 1:52:32 in the example chart of COVA Page 39, and I

get in JH 5, Lagna as : 25 Aq 43' 47.43", which gives Kunda

Nakshatra of Pusyami.

 

Also when I calculated manually with Lagna as :

25 Aq 43' 47.43", which gives Kunda Nakshatra of Pusyami too.

 

So summary is : JH 5 Kunda Calculation is correct, but still

I have a question which is bothering me: why COVA Page 39

example Longitude is different from JH 5 Lagna with the same

birth details. Please explain me Narasimha Ji.

 

Which one is correct, I still do not know! Can someone

please Calculate the Lagna values for the Chart-7 of COVA

Page 34 and publish please, I have done this few times,

but I want some one else to do the calculation to find the

lagna, so that, my doubt is cleared.

 

The details are:

 

COVA-Chart 7,Page 34,Kunda-Page 39

 

May 23, 1955

Time: 1:54:00

Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

Place: 76 E 52' 00", 30 N 29' 00"

 

Regards

Rao

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Dear Rao ji,

>

> The lagna longitude given by JHora and calculated by Sanjay ji in

CoVA is about 10 arc-min. That results in 810 arc-min or 13.5 deg.

That definitely takes the Kunda nakshatra back by one.

>

> What do you mean by "When I calculated manually, I am getting

Pusyami too"?

>

> Lagna is at 25Aq53'57.3" in the chart you sent, i.e. 25.89925 deg

in Aq. This is 325.89925. Multiplied by 81, this gives 26397.83925.

After removing multiples of 360, we get 117.83925. So Kunda is at

27.83925 deg in Cancer. That is what JHora gives. It is in Asresha

and not in Pushyami.

>

> When dealing with Kunda, please remember that a small error in

lagna's longitude gives a big error in Kunda's longitude.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> > Dear Narasimha Ji,

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > Please help me to understand the differnce in "Kunda

> > Nakshatra" Calculation between the JH 5 and COVA

> > example.

> >

> > I know, there is a slight differece calculations for

> > the accuracy in JH 5 and that is perfectly fine.

> >

> > Now, I have entered the birth details as per the COVA

> > Page 34, chart 7 and I get ( Aslesha) Nakshatra from

> > JH 5, but where as Sanjay Ji mentioned in his book

> > Page 39 is "Pusyami".

> >

> > When I calculated manually, I am getting Pusyami too,

> > which is matching with COVA.

> >

> > When I have tested this difference with some more

> > cases, some cases it is matching in JH 5 and some

> > cases are not, hence I need your help to see, where I

> > am making any mistake or our JH 5 need some bug fixes

> > before your next release.

> >

> > I have attached the chart for your convenience.

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Rao

> >

> > P.S: Guru's and Members, can you please look at the

> > above calculation and see whether I am making any

> > mistake and share your thoughts and obsevations

> > please, so that it will be helpful to Narasimha Ji to

> > fix the problem before the next release of JH 5.

[Guest guest]

Dear Rao ji,

 

> So summary is : JH 5 Kunda Calculation is correct, but still

> I have a question which is bothering me: why COVA Page 39

> example Longitude is different from JH 5 Lagna with the same

> birth details. Please explain me Narasimha Ji.

 

Sanjay ji never mentioned the time for that longitude he used in

Kunda calculation. He started with 1:30 - 2:00 am and using various

rectification methods, he concluded that the longitude is 25:43 or

above (he did not mention what time this translates too). He found

Kunda for it. He found it in Pushyami. He concluded that it should

be in Hasta (trine to Moon's nakshatra) and then said that 1:54 is

the final rectified time for which you get Hasta. So you

misinterpreted it all.

 

In any case, even with the final time of 1:54, Sanjay ji said lagna

was at 26:23. That is half degree higher than what JHora gives for

that time. To make things worse, the latitude of the place given

with chart data is different from the one given inside the chart.

Basically, there are some typos etc.

 

I suspect Sanjay ji manually calculated charts when he wrote CoVA.

That is why calculations are not accurate.

 

To the best of my knowledge, all the commercial software packages

give the same lagna (if the same ayanamsa is used and the same

longitude and latitude of the place are given). Deviation of JHora

from other popular commercial packages can only be a few arc-

seconds. Definitely, 10 arc-min is not possible.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha Ji,

 

Namste,

 

Thank you very much for your time in investigating and explaining the

deviations in my finding. Now, I will agree with you the

calculations of JH's Kunda Calculations.

 

Thanks for helping me in avoiding my confusion.

 

Regards

Rao

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "pvr108" <pvr@c...> wrote:

> Dear Rao ji,

>

> > So summary is : JH 5 Kunda Calculation is correct, but still

> > I have a question which is bothering me: why COVA Page 39

> > example Longitude is different from JH 5 Lagna with the same

> > birth details. Please explain me Narasimha Ji.

>

> Sanjay ji never mentioned the time for that longitude he used in

> Kunda calculation. He started with 1:30 - 2:00 am and using various

> rectification methods, he concluded that the longitude is 25:43 or

> above (he did not mention what time this translates too). He found

> Kunda for it. He found it in Pushyami. He concluded that it should

> be in Hasta (trine to Moon's nakshatra) and then said that 1:54 is

> the final rectified time for which you get Hasta. So you

> misinterpreted it all.

>

> In any case, even with the final time of 1:54, Sanjay ji said lagna

> was at 26:23. That is half degree higher than what JHora gives for

> that time. To make things worse, the latitude of the place given

> with chart data is different from the one given inside the chart.

> Basically, there are some typos etc.

>

> I suspect Sanjay ji manually calculated charts when he wrote CoVA.

> That is why calculations are not accurate.

>

> To the best of my knowledge, all the commercial software packages

> give the same lagna (if the same ayanamsa is used and the same

> longitude and latitude of the place are given). Deviation of JHora

> from other popular commercial packages can only be a few arc-

> seconds. Definitely, 10 arc-min is not possible.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha