Guest guest Posted November 28, 2003 Report Share Posted November 28, 2003 Dear Parthasarathy Ji After reading your mails i have one doubt. Should regression be the first choice for self actualisation or assimilating with the truth? Is it possible to achieve this through meditation or similar methods? Because from your mails i could understand that you had some sort of insecurity or fear(phobia).You wanted to know the reason. Pt.shri Rath could help you but was unable to heal.Thus you were very eager for the truth which resulted in regression. But your case is a very special case and an exception.Can exceptions be examples? Relating this to the Maslows need pyramid theory - you had a need for security and you wanted self actualisation which is a higher need in the hierarchy. Generally a need for security is normal.eg when a child is born it always needs the company or warmth of mother else it has an insecure feeling.But it goes off with age. In your case what i could undersatand(correct me if i am wrong) is your insecurity persisted.Which was forcing you for a fast recovery. Thus i believe your case is an exception.Of course every insecurity can be solved completely only at the highest level(supreme soul).But the means you have chosen shows some desperateness.Is this really needed or should be tried only when other means fail?Please take my question in a positive way. One more question - When you were visualising your past births how did you identify that it was 'you'.I mean could you identify the persons as you yourselves.Purely out of curiousity. Respect Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2003 Report Share Posted November 28, 2003 vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > One more question - When you were visualising your past births how > did you identify that it was 'you'.I mean could you identify the > persons as you yourselves.Purely out of curiousity. > > Respect > Pradeep Dear Pradeep, Pardon me for responding to a question meant for Partha. However, I feel like saying this: Certain things are better experienced than analysed. regards, -Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2003 Report Share Posted November 28, 2003 Dear Siva Ji I can understand what you have said.It was my ignorance which made me ask this question.After reading the link which i have sent in the previous mail,i could understand to a bit what the Guru jis were mentioning. Thanks for the mail Pradeep vedic astrology, "schinnas" <schinnas> wrote: > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > One more question - When you were visualising your past births how > > did you identify that it was 'you'.I mean could you identify the > > persons as you yourselves.Purely out of curiousity. > > > > Respect > > Pradeep > > Dear Pradeep, > Pardon me for responding to a question meant for Partha. However, > I feel like saying this: Certain things are better experienced than > analysed. > > regards, > -Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.