To Sundeep (News Article:'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC')

[Guest guest]

|| Om Gurave Namah ||

Dear Sandeep,

I do not actually want to speculate on something so abstract. As

Narasimhaji said it's better we work on Shree Krishna's chart before

even venturing into to dating Lord Rama in modern calender.

 

I would just like to point out that Archaelogy largely depends on

physical evindences left behind previous era.

We as Jyotishas know that in every yuga certain planets are stronger.

Like Jupiter, Sun in Sat yuga and Saturn and Rahu in Kali yuga etc.

And each of these planets rules a dhatu (materials). So with changes

in yuga the natural dhatu available in world increases.

As in Kali yuga we see that Saturn and Rahu ruleds substances are in

increase on Planet surface. Like Iron, Steel, Stones(rocks) etc.

We see that most kali yuga monuments founds so far by archaelogy is

made of stones. And Carbon(ruled by Saturn) dating is most prevelant

method of dating in this Kali Yuga.

 

We also know that Jupiter and Sun rules wood, grass and other such

materials. So my thought is that in Sat/treta yuga most constructions

(including all that multi storied apartments in Ayodya) must have

been in natural materials like wood etc. Also note that sun rules

very strong tree. The quality of trees then could have been much

better. Simply imagine replacing all steel bars with strong wooden

ones. So such constructions are very easy to taken over by time after

all Saturn debilitates Jupiter.

 

I may be speculating a lot here but,

We cannot rule out possiblities based on what little we know now.

We should keep a Jupiterain attitude.

 

Warm Regards

S. Prabhakaran

 

Om Tat Sat

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "vedicastrostudent"

<vedicastrostudent> wrote:

> First, let me say that I am not trying to reduce the validity of

the

> scriptures. I am simply trying, and would love to see from experts

> and Gurus, some reconciliation between scriptures and physical

> evidence. I find it somewhat dismissive to say that physical and

> scientific evidence is weak for the non-existence of civilization

> before 10-12,000 years ago. It is actually pretty strong. If some

> form of civilization did exist 990,000 years before the

> archaelogically evident date, there should be some archaeological

> proof no? Because in the 10-12,000 years of archaelogically known

> civilization, progress and proofs abound all over the place.

> Excavated cities, ornaments, jewelries, skeletons (not one as you

say

> but several hundreds or even more), domesticated animal fossils,

art

> and in later years written record. You are saying that it is

logical

> that for the past 10,000 years we have thousands of pieces of

> evidence and for the 990,000 years before that we should not even

> find one? Not even one? We have somehow missed every single piece

of

> evidence for the past 990,000 years of HUMAN civilization but have

> retrieved hundreds of uncivilized human fossils of that period?

>

> And if this is logical to you i.e. you dismiss the scientific

method

> completely, then I must warn you that your extrapolations of the

> ephemeris of thousands of years ago is ALSO a scientific

> extrapolation, isnt it? How else do you say that in 5114 BC so and

so

> planets were here and so and so planets were there? You have used

> objective scientific data based on the regular movement of planets

> and/or their relative positions to fixed stars to extrapolate their

> positions then. I mean you are using your senses to observe arent

> you? Why are your senses valid for observing stars but not for

> observing fossils - to be consistent you should observe stars not

> with your eyes but with internal meditative vision then..?

>

> And to the comment by an earlier poster that our spirituality is

> dependent on the birth of Lord Ram several million years ago, is

that

> really true? If Lord Ram were actually born in 5114 BC, does that

> mean that there is no Brahman, no Atman etc?

>

> I hope this post will be understood in it's true meaning - I mean

> absolutely no disrespect - I am simply trying to resolve the

> confusion that genuinely exists within me.

>

> Sundeep