Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 Dear Amolmandar, I will give you an example outside astrology and religion.Guru represents Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which is right. Students many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the Teacher as he monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth they want to do something which the Guru forbids being bad.Simialr is the case with the king whose ministers forbids him from doing something that is against RajDharma. Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the student/King and Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house would be clear. Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at looking at it in order to understand why this happens, and the Sages' principles are given to us as such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply our Viveka to fathom the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different views. Hope this helps understand the concept. Chandrashekhar. amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Chandrashekharji NamsteAs usual you explained the things very lucidly but just slight doubt. It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not religion) and it is as well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but usually fails. Hence Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So Guru should also never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house? Does MAYA play any role in this?Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMAndarArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 Dear Pradeep, The confusion arises because of the fact that some Sanskrita words loose their import when translated to English. The shloka does not say Damage or Harm. It says"Bhrashta". The word has different conotations depending on the context. Like Sthanabhrashta would be something like loosing one's place whereas Sheelabhrashta would mean one whose moral are loose. The same when said to be done by other would mean harming or damaging other's modesty. Limitations of the language does sometimes pose a problem in conveyance of the corect meaning of sanskrita words. This is why I have said many a times that Astrology is better understood if one learns it in Sanskrit or Sanskrit based Indian languages. Hope this helps, Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep ]Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Dear Chandrashekar jiI now understand why Jupiter placement can result in difficult outcomes.Do you mean to say if jupiter is placed in puthrasthana ,then the individuals can be intelligent but their children will suffer.This is just to make sure, if i have understood your example.But i have one slight difference in opinion regarding the statement -'Jupiter destroys or harms'.This statement makes us puzzled about the meaning vis-a-vis the nature of Jupiter.Because when we say it destroys - it means jupiter's action was intented towards destruction.But that is not the case.Jupiter tends to stick to principles even during adverse situations.This behaviour makes him unable to protect.But his intention was never to destroy nor the behaviour deserves destruction.But if you take another exampleWhen Ravana abducted Sita ,his behaviour deserved destruction.Though both the behaviours resulted(ends) in the destruction of the 'houses',the means are not the same.Hence i believe if we say Jupiter is unable to protect the house in which it is placed,during all circumstances, it becomes less ambigue -vis-a-vis its nature,because destruction was never intended.Though the end result is same i feel there is a difference in the inherent meaning.Kindly correct me if i am wrong.Also should one learn something from this lesson - to live in Kali Yuga!Thanks and respectPradeep--- In vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Pradeep,> Certain principles are given by the sages and are found to be true in their> application. Having said that, have you observed that the children living> with highly intelligent parents rarely suceed? This is what happens with> Jupiter placement in a house. You will also not ,if one wants to go to> Puranas that Deva's abode was attacked by the Daanaavas more often than> other way round, though Brihaspati resided there. Devas invariably got> defeated and had to be rescued by Mahadeva, Vishnu, Durga etc. Saturn> usually sided with the danavas and his samdharmi Rahu was their Senapati.> About Saturn being good in bad houses has to do with his ability to protect.> He protects one from bad indications of that house. These are my personal> opinions and other worthies might have different opinions.> Chandrashekhar.> > -------Original Message-------> > vedic astrology> Monday, August 25, 2003 08:17:02 PM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house> it and Saturn Protects//> > Dear Chandrashekar ji and learned members.> > I have seen from the archives ,where you had participated in> discussions,that Jupiter has the capacity to destroy the bhava in > which> it is placed and Saturn Protects.> > Here I have some queries.> > What is the reason for a benevolent planet like jupiter to try and > harm> or destroy.> > Also i have read that saturn can be good in bad houses (6,8,12 etc) -> because ,saturn by nature is bad and hence bad and bad> (negative,negative results in positive) should bring good. But if > saturn> can protect all the houses where it is placed ,then the above > statement> loses ist significance.Pls correct if my understanding of this> 'negative-negative' is wrong.> > When i try to understand the nature of jupiter - I feel it can test > the> individual always on the path of life,which can be painfull and hard > as> well at times. Why is this? Is it because such an individual can > combat> the tests and hardships,as jupiter gives him lots of patience and > other> mental strengths or more concern for others? Am i right? > > But why is it trying to destroy? > > Also doesn't other considerations like strength,position etc come > into> play while deciding on this?> > If you can explain the inherent nature of Jupiter, by virtue of > which > it> is trying to behave like this, it would be helpful. > > Moreover i can give input on my real experiences (good and bad) about> jupiter placed in ascendant.> > Thanks a lot > Pradeep> > > > Sponsor> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ........ May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > Terms of Service.Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 || Om Gurave Namah || Dear Jyotishas, Regarding Jupiter in various houses and signs below is something from Saaraavalli. It seems that Jupiter enhances the both the Sign qualities and house qualities. Warm Regards S. Prabhakaran Ch. 27. Effects of Jupiter in Various Signs 1-2. JUPITER IN ARIES. If Jupiter is posited in Aries at birth, one will be argumentative in disposition, will acquire precious stones and ornaments out of his efforts, will be endowed with strength, sons and wealth, will have eminent and famous profession, be splendourous, will have many enemies, much expenses and an injured body and will confer fierce and cruel punishments. 3-4. Should Jupiter be in Taurus, one will be endowed with a broad body, be corpulent, will honour Brahmins and Gods, be splendourous, fortunate, attached to his wife, be endowed with good appearance, profession, cows and abundant wealth; will possess good articles and ornaments, be distinguished in speech, intelligence and skill; will have political / judicial wisdom, be modest, be endowed with medical accomplishments and be skillful in experiments. 5-6. Should Jupiter be in Gemini, the native will be affluent, scholarly, proficient, will possess attractive eyes, be eloquent, courteous, skillful, virtuous, will honour elders and relatives, will be able to utter "bejeweled" words (be literally rich in words), which are benevolent in nature, be devoted to his duties and be a good poet. 7-8. If Jupiter be in Cancer at birth, the native will be a scholar, be beautiful, be highly learned, charitable, good-natured, be very strong, be famous, will possess abundant grains and riches, be endowed with truth and penance, will have long-living sons, be honoured by all, will be a king, will have a distinguished profession and will be attached to his friends. 9-10. Should Jupiter be in Leo at the time of birth, the native will be lastingly inimical, be strong, courageous, will show abundant friendship, be learned, rich, will have eminent relatives, be a king, will have heroism akin to that of a king, will be recognizable in an assembly, will destroy the entire band of his enemies, will possess a strong physique and will live in hills, fortresses, forests and temples. 11-12. If Jupiter occupies Virgo at birth, one will be a scholar, be virtuous, be skillful in his work, be fond of scents, robes and flowers, will firmly gain in undertakings, will have rich experience in Śāstras and fine arts, be affluent, charitable, pure-hearted, skillful and wonderfully learned. 13-14. If Jupiter occupies Libra at birth, one will be a scholar, will have many sons, be endowed with foreign assignments, will be very affluent, interested in ornaments, modest, will earn money through dance and drama, be pleasing in appearance, be splendourous, learned in Śāstras, be superior among his colleague-businessmen, will honour Gods and guests and be very learned. 15-16. Should Jupiter at the time of one's birth be in Scorpio, he will be expert in Śāstras, be a king, will be a commentator of many Bhāşyas (a commentary, which explains Sūtras word by word with comments of its own, for example, on Vedas), be skillful, will construct temples and towns, will have many wives, but few sons, be troubled by diseases, will undergo many difficulties, be very fierce, be ostentatious in his performance, be virtuous and will indulge in contemptuous acts. 17-18. If Jupiter occupies Sagittarius at birth, one will be a preceptor, will conduct religious vows, initiations, sacrifices etc., will have lasting wealth, be charitable, be friendly to his own men, be fond of helping others, interested in Shastras, be the head of a zone, or a minister, will live in many countries, will prefer loneliness and be interested in visiting shrines. 19-20. JUPITER IN CAPRICORN. Jupiter in Capricorn denotes, that the native will be less virile, will experience much grief and difficulties, will be mean in conduct, be a dunce, will meet a bad end, will suffer from penury, will serve others, will be bereft of auspiciousness, mercy, purity, affection to his relatives and of religion, will have an emaciated body, be timid, interested in living in other countries and be depressed of spirits. 21-22. JUPITER IN AQUARIUS. If Jupiter falls in Aquarius at the time of birth, one will be a tale-bearer, be ill disposed, interested in evil jobs, be chief among his race men, be always attached to base men, be malicious, miserly, will suffer from diseases, will lose wealth on account his own utterances, be devoid of intelligence and virtues and will violate elder's beds. 23-24. JUPITER IN PISCES. If Jupiter is in Pisces at birth, one will be expert in knowing the meanings of Vedas and other Shastras, will be honoured by friends and virtuous people, will be a headsman in the king's employ, be praiseworthy, unconquerable, rich, devoid of fear, be proud, firm in undertakings, be a king, be skillful in policies, training, behavior and war tactics, be famous and will be calm in his doings. >From Chapter 27 for Saturn 74. If Saturn happens to be in the Ascendant identical with exaltation, or own House, the native will equal a king in status, or will head a country, or city. If Saturn is in the Ascendant in other Rāśis, then his own, or exaltation Rāśi, the planet will give misery in boyhood, dirty disposition and indolence. 75. If Saturn occupies the 2nd, the native will have an ugly face, will enjoy worldly prosperity, be devoid of his own men, will render justice, will later on (in the course of his life) go to other countries and will earn money and conveyances. 76. If Saturn occupies the 3rd, the native will be dark in complexion, will maintain physical cleanliness, be base, will have indolent attendants, be courageous, charitable and will have great intelligence. 77. SATURN IN THE 4th. If Saturn occupies the 4th Bhava, the native will suffer heart disease, or be broken-hearted, be devoid of relatives, conveyances, wealth, intelligence and happiness, will suffer sickness in boyhood and will have (prominent) nails and hair. 78. SATURN IN THE 5th. Should Saturn occupy the 5th Bhava, the native will be bereft of happiness, sons, friends, intelligence and kindness, be agitated and be poor. 79. If Saturn occupies the 6th, the native will be very licentious, be beautiful, courageous, will eat abundantly, be crooked and will conquer many of his enemies. 80. If Saturn is posited in the 7th, the native will always be subjected to ill health, will lose his wife, be bereft of wealth, will present himself ugly, be sinful and will do very mean acts. 81. If Saturn occupies the 8th, the native will suffer from leprosy and fistula in the anus, or pudendum, will have short life and will fail in his undertakings. 82. If Saturn occupies the 9th, the native will be devoid of religious merits, will not have much wealth, be bereft of co-born, sons and happiness and will cause sorrow to others. 83. If Saturn occupies the 10th, the native will be wealthy, learned, valorous and be a minister, or a justice, or be the leader of a group, city, or village. 84. If Saturn occupies the 11th, the native will be long-lived, endowed with lasting riches, be courageous, will have knowledge of arts, be devoid of sickness and be endowed with money, people and wealth. 85. If Saturn occupies the 12th, the native will be distressed, fallen in moral sense, talkative, will have defective eyesight, be unkind, shameless, will spend much and be insulted. Chapter 30 --------- 50. If Jupiter occupies the 1st, the native will be attractive in appearance, energetic, long-lived, will act after assessing consequences, be learned, courageous and great. 51. Jupiter in the 2nd. If Jupiter occupies the 2nd, the native will be rich, will enjoy good food, be an eloquent speaker, be fortunate, be charitable and will have a beautiful body and face. 52. If Jupiter occupies the 3rd, the native will be greatly humiliated, be vile, ever successful, will have digestive deficiencies, be defeated by women and be sinful in acts. 53. If Jupiter occupies the 4th, the native will be endowed with relatives, paraphernalia, conveyance, happiness, intelligence, pleasures and wealth, be great and be a source of misery to his enemies. 54. If Jupiter occupies the 5th, the native will have abundant happiness, many sons and friends, be learned, courageous, wealthy and will always be happy. 55. If Jupiter is in the 6th, the native will lack digestive fire and masculine virile, be humiliated, weak, indolent, will become famous on account of females, will destroy his enemies and be widely famous. 56. If Jupiter occupies the 7th, the native will be charming, will acquire a beautiful wife, be greater than his father, be an eloquent speaker, a poet, a superior person and be learned and famous. 57. If Jupiter occupies the 8th, the native will be insulted, long- lived, be a servant, will serve his own people, be pitiable and will have union with dirty women. 58. If Jupiter is in 9th, the native will be attached to divine and paternal duties, be learned, fortunate, be a king's minister, or a leader and be chief. 59. If Jupiter occupies the 10th, the native will attain successful beginning in his undertaking, be honourable, effortful and will be endowed with abundant welfare, happiness, wealth, relatives, conveyances and fame. 60. If Jupiter occupies the 11th, the native will enjoy many gains, many conveyances and many servants, be virtuous, but will have limited education and few sons. 61. If Jupiter occupies the 12th, the native will be indolent, odious, be devoid of speech and luck and will be in all probability in servitude. Ch. 29. Effects of Saturn in Various Rāśis 1-2. SATURN IN ARIES. If Saturn occupies Aries at the time of one's birth one will be miserable due to his vices and hard labor, be deceitful will hate his relatives, be blameworthy, garrulous, reprobated, poor, bad in appearance, ill-tempered, inimical to his people, will do base acts, be jealous and sinful. 3-4. If Saturn occupies Taurus at the time of one's birth, he will be bereft of wealth, be a servant, will speak undesirable words, be untruthful, will win the hearts of old women, will have bad friends, will be addicted to women, will serve other women, be not outspoken, will have strong sight, be related to numerous assignments and be a fool. 5-6. If Saturn occupies Gemini, one will contract debts and imprisonments, will toil, will have vanity in disposition will consecrate by hymns and prayers, be bereft of virtues, be always in hide-out, be libidinous, cunning, wicked and fond of wandering and of sports. 7-8. SATURN IN CANCER. If Saturn is in Cancer, one will possess a beloved wife, be devoid of wealth in boyhood, will suffer many diseases, be learned, motherless, soft-spoken, distinguished in acts, will always contract diseases, will trouble others, be inimical to relatives, crooked, be kingly in his mid-life and will enjoy growing pleasures. 9-10. SATURN IN LEO. If Saturn occupies Leo, one will be interested in writing and reading, be skillful, be disdained, devoid of virtues and wife, will live by servitude, be devoid of his own men and happiness, be interested in doing base acts, ill-tempered, be mad with (undue) desires, will carry loads, will toil hard and will have a wrinkled body. 11-12. SATURN IN VIRGO. If Saturn occupies Virgo at birth the subject will resemble a eunuch, be very crafty, will depend on others for food, be addicted to prostitutes, will have a few friends, be unacquainted with arts, be desirous of indulging in ugly acts, will possess sons and wealth, be indolent, helpful to others, will intent upon spoiling virgins and be cautious in his actions. 13-14. Saturn posited in Libra at birth indicates, that the subject will be rich, soft-spoken, will earn money and honours from foreign countries, be a king, or a scholar, will have his wealth protected by his relatives, be senior in the circle, will attain a high status owing to his gracious speech in an assemblage, be good and will join corrupt female dancers and prostitutes. 15-16. SATURN IN SCORPIO. If Saturn occupies Scorpio at birth, the native will be hostile, be crooked, affected by poison and weapons, very ill-tempered, miserly, egoistic, rich, capable of stealing others' money, averse to instruments played on festive occasions, malicious, very miserable and will face destruction, misery and diseases. 17-18. SATURN IN SAGITTARIUS. If Saturn occupies Sagittarius, one will be skillful in behavior, teaching, Vedic meanings, learning and denotation, (i.e. he will be best placed in these respects), be famous due to virtuous children, family profession and his own virtues, will enjoy excellent affluence in his old age, will speak less, will have many names and be soft in disposition. 19-20. If Saturn is posited at birth in Capricorn, the native will lord over the lands of others' females, will be endowed with Vedic knowledge, virtues and knowledge of many branches of fine arts, be excellent among his caste-men, be honourable, will respect others, be famous, be interested in bathing and decoration, will be skillful in performance, will live in foreign places, be courageous and be polite in behavior. 21-22. If Saturn is in Aquarius, the native will be a great liar, be eminent, be addicted to women and wine, be wicked, crafty, will fall prey to evil friendship, be very ill-tempered, be averse to knowledge, conversation and traditional law, be addicted to other women, be harsh in speech and will attempt at many undertakings. 23-24. SATURN IN PISCES. If Saturn occupies Pisces at birth, one will be fond of Sacrifices and arts, be chief among his relatives and friends, be calm, will have increasing wealth, be skillful in policy- making, be capable of diamond testing, be virtuous, modest and will later on acquire an authoritative position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 Dear Chandrashekar ji This suggestion is really good. I too feel one should learn astrology from the original textual language or its derivatives, after reading your mail. But now after seeing your mail for amol ji,i am still having some doubts. As you have said, even though your example-regarding student,guru and all cannot be generalised - I am taking that example to clear my doubts. Here i believe the nature of the students and guru has to be considered - Similarly the king and minister. If both are of the same nature - then no one has to suffer,'Bhrashta'. 1)Similarly if jupiter is placed in a friendly house or deeptha or swakshethra - harmony is not troubled ,under normal circumstances. 2)But as the lagna or the individual is subject to various influences within the chart - there can be disharmony. Hence do you consider my point(1) as haaving some relevance? or shld we always give importance only to point (2). Please pardon me from asking questions like this as i am no person to debate with you - either by knowledge or age. Thanks again Pradeep vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Pradeep, > The confusion arises because of the fact that some Sanskrita words loose > their import when translated to English. The shloka does not say Damage or > Harm. It says"Bhrashta". The word has different conotations depending on the > context. Like Sthanabhrashta would be something like loosing one's place > whereas Sheelabhrashta would mean one whose moral are loose. The same when > said to be done by other would mean harming or damaging other's modesty. > Limitations of the language does sometimes pose a problem in conveyance of > the corect meaning of sanskrita words. This is why I have said many a times > that Astrology is better understood if one learns it in Sanskrit or Sanskrit > based Indian languages. > Hope this helps, > Chandrashekhar. > > vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep] > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 PM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > Dear Chandrashekar ji > > I now understand why Jupiter placement can result in difficult > outcomes. > > Do you mean to say if jupiter is placed in puthrasthana ,then the > individuals can be intelligent but their children will suffer.This is > just to make sure, if i have understood your example. > > But i have one slight difference in opinion regarding the statement - > 'Jupiter destroys or harms'. > > This statement makes us puzzled about the meaning vis-a-vis the > nature of Jupiter. > > Because when we say it destroys - it means jupiter's action was > intented towards destruction.But that is not the case.Jupiter tends > to stick to principles even during adverse situations.This behaviour > makes him unable to protect.But his intention was never to destroy > nor the behaviour deserves destruction. > > But if you take another example > When Ravana abducted Sita ,his behaviour deserved destruction. > > Though both the behaviours resulted(ends) in the destruction of > the 'houses',the means are not the same. > > Hence i believe if we say Jupiter is unable to protect the house in > which it is placed,during all circumstances, it becomes less ambigue - > vis-a-vis its nature,because destruction was never intended. > > Though the end result is same i feel there is a difference in the > inherent meaning. > > Kindly correct me if i am wrong. > > Also should one learn something from this lesson - to live in Kali > Yuga! > > Thanks and respect > Pradeep > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > <boxdel> wrote: > > Dear Pradeep, > > Certain principles are given by the sages and are found to be true > in their > > application. Having said that, have you observed that the children > living > > with highly intelligent parents rarely suceed? This is what happens > with > > Jupiter placement in a house. You will also not ,if one wants to go > to > > Puranas that Deva's abode was attacked by the Daanaavas more often > than > > other way round, though Brihaspati resided there. Devas invariably > got > > defeated and had to be rescued by Mahadeva, Vishnu, Durga etc. > Saturn > > usually sided with the danavas and his samdharmi Rahu was their > Senapati. > > About Saturn being good in bad houses has to do with his ability to > protect. > > He protects one from bad indications of that house. These are my > personal > > opinions and other worthies might have different opinions. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > ---- > > > > vedic astrology > > Monday, August 25, 2003 08:17:02 PM > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying > the house > > it and Saturn Protects// > > > > Dear Chandrashekar ji and learned members. > > > > I have seen from the archives ,where you had participated in > > discussions,that Jupiter has the capacity to destroy the bhava in > > which > > it is placed and Saturn Protects. > > > > Here I have some queries. > > > > What is the reason for a benevolent planet like jupiter to try and > > harm > > or destroy. > > > > Also i have read that saturn can be good in bad houses (6,8,12 > etc) - > > because ,saturn by nature is bad and hence bad and bad > > (negative,negative results in positive) should bring good. But if > > saturn > > can protect all the houses where it is placed ,then the above > > statement > > loses ist significance.Pls correct if my understanding of this > > 'negative-negative' is wrong. > > > > When i try to understand the nature of jupiter - I feel it can test > > the > > individual always on the path of life,which can be painfull and > hard > > as > > well at times. Why is this? Is it because such an individual can > > combat > > the tests and hardships,as jupiter gives him lots of patience and > > other > > mental strengths or more concern for others? Am i right? > > > > But why is it trying to destroy? > > > > Also doesn't other considerations like strength,position etc come > > into > > play while deciding on this? > > > > If you can explain the inherent nature of Jupiter, by virtue of > > which > > it > > is trying to behave like this, it would be helpful. > > > > Moreover i can give input on my real experiences (good and bad) > about > > jupiter placed in ascendant. > > > > Thanks a lot > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2003 Report Share Posted August 27, 2003 dear chandershekarji, does this mean that jupiter fails to protect the house in which is is located? iirespective of good or bad? what about the house it aspects. does this hold good even if jupiter is involved in yagas like hansa yoga or gajakesari yoga.? what about debilited jupiter? now what about saturn in good houses does it protect the sigindicanes of that house as well/ what about debilited saturn?what about the houses it aspects? with respect ajoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Dear Pradeep, If you remember my posts on various subjects on this list, you will remember that I have said, it is very easy to ignore that which faces you and concentrate on only one factor. This leads one to draw wrong conclusions. In the case of Jupiter in 1st house your question though right, misses out on one important fact. This is that Jupiter in 1st aspects 5th 7th and 9th. Look at the names given to these houses and the answer is obvious. I have already said that Jupiter's aaspect protects whereas Saturn's ( barring exception already mentioned earlier) harms. Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep ]Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:49 AMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Dear ChandrashekarjiThanks for the detailed reply.So i understand jeevaha and mandaha references are jupiter and saturn respectively.No statement can stand own its own.What is the circumstance in which this shloka is told by Parashara. Jupiter placement in first house(in own sign) ofcourse puts one under tremendous pressure to be just to everyone and react fast to things which one think are not correct.Thus this placement might help others more, than the self, atleast in certain aspects(because you have to lose something to balance the other)But at the same time i should say this gives one great craving for knowledge and also the blessing named luck.Really helps fifth and ninth houses.So i feel though there are difficulties due to the strictness,overall it is a blessing,if in strength plus other factors .The brevity of sanskrit is amazing.Also your statement ' Guru for Sagittarius' is neutral - keeps me thinking.Plus Papa for some 6 rashis!Thanks a lotPradeepvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Pradeep.> It is "Sthana bhrashta karoti jeevaha. sthana rakshati mandaha.". I have not> said that Jupiter damages all indications of a house. Astrology is not a> mathematical science, though projected as such by many. The Astrologer has> to assess the chart as a whole and arrive at the impact the relative> planetary position will have on the horoscope as a whole.> > About 2nd house placement of Jupiter , it does cause problems to 2nd house> unless placed in his own Rasi.About his placement in 1st house ,as you say> you have own experience.> > I have nowhere said that nature of Guru is Bhrashtra. I have said that Guru> causes the indication of the sthana in which he is placed to become> blemished(Bharashtra).I am emphasising on word Bhrashta, because that is> what the shloka says and its translation into english is indeed difficult. I> look at astrological principles from an analytical point of view. I> ,generally, do not try to associate them with Scriptural stories.> > The reason is that the meaning depends on one's own interpretation of> scriptures.And believe me they are capable of different interpretations,> because of brevity of Sanskrit language. The sanskrit grammar has undergone> many changes over the thousands of years that it has been in existence. It> is said " Laksham Vyakaranam Proktam, Chaturlaksham Tu Jyotisham."> > However some tend to think that the planets have fixed nature ( and they> might have their own experiences to believe such), whereas the nature> vis-a-vis a Jataka would depend on many factors such as house ownership,> placement,aspects, Varga positions and so on.> > The theory being advanced that Jupiter always protects, though attractive> does not explain why his place ment in 5th in strength is harmful to getting> progeny or 2nd house placement gives not favourable results. It also tends> to ridicule the Great parashara who says that Jupiter is said to be "Papa" a> malefic for Taurus,Gemini,Virgo,Libra,Capricorn and Aquarius.In addition ,> the reason of his being neutral to his Moola trikona Rasi Sagitarius as> stated by parashara would be wrong if we accept the hypothessis of Jupiter> being auscpicious no matter what and where.> > You could find out whether the principle is right or wrong by applying to> real life charts. This is the only way to ascertain whether a hypothesis is> correct or not.> > Hope this helps,> Chandrashekhar.> > > > vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep]> Friday, August 29, 2003 9:50 PM> vedic astrology> [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > > Dear chandrashekar ji> > Could you kindly quote the shloka related to guru.This is just out> of curiosity.> > Then from your mails i have understood that,you are very particular> about the 'Bhrashta' while speaking about jupiter.> > I believe apart from understanding the inherent meaning, you might> be having some experience related to the Guru and Bhrashta,perhaps> with people whom you know well.> > If you could quote some real life experiences it would become more> useful.> Because if we consider a person having jupiter in 2nd house - The> person should have problem related to money> savings,speech,family,and other aspects reprsntd by 2nd house.How is> this possible for all the aspects?> > I am totally with you regarding the strictness which guru might> impose on the houses in which he is placed - at least regarding> first house (because of own experience,also forming hamsa yoga).> > But again first house represents -> physique,appearance,intellect,complexion,happiness etc.But could you> explain how or why gurus prescence should result in damage of all> these aspects.> > I dont want to conclude anything for me.I want to wait and> understand what the sages have said.> > So from your experience and knowledge i am trying to gain some real> understanding regarding this.> > Also Zoranjis mail was conveying the message - one should> differentiate the nature of the planets from other factors.> But i understood from your mails that the very nature of guru is> resulting in 'Bhrashta'.So how do we relate this.> > regds & thanks> Pradeep> > vedic astrology, Zoran Radosavljevic> <ahimsa@N...> wrote:> > Om Namo Narayanaya,> > Dear Chandrakeshar,> > I see.. I was relying upon a subject.. This hypotesyse given as> the> > subject " Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn> > protects" is highly dubious and should not be followed...> > Best wishes> > Zoran> >> > Chandrashekhar Sharma wrote:> >> > > Dear Zoran,> > >> > > You are perhaps misinterpreting the Sanskrita word Guru with the> word> > > Guru as planet used in the original post.I was just trying to> clear> > > the misunderstanding when Guru as in planet was being taken as> Gur as> > > in the master by explaining the principles from both the> hypothesis.> > >> > > Regards,> > >> > > Chandrashekhar.> > >> > > > > > Zoran Radosavljevic [ahimsa@N...]> > > Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:50 AM> > > vedic astrology> > > Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable> of> > > destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > > Om Namo Narayanaya,> > > Dear Chandrakeshar and members,> > > Sorry for butting in so abrubtly without the following of the> > > previous mails... It has been experience among my students> and> > > those who learn Jyotish> > > that some basic confusion is very strong. One should never> mix> > > the natural tendency of a Graha and functional role of the> Graha..> > > Natural benefics as Guru who is the Bhagwan of the chart will> > > NEVER harm any point but on the contrary will IMPROVE all> points> > > he touches> > > in the chart by means of his NATURE. However, each graha has> a> > > role and different states. For instance, such guru may rule> 8th> > > house which is> > > Randra or the vulnarable place, the worst house. It is akin> to a> > > good person having a negative role. E.G> suppose, a good> neigbhour> > > has to tell you that> > > someone who is dear has passed away... it will never change> his> > > nature, he will still remain a good neigbour.. Furthermore,> graha> > > may give bad results even if benefic if placed in bad> avastas.> > > However, it doesnot again change its nature.. The malefic> results> > > are given due to graha bad mood. Thus, if guru gives bad> results, it> > > may give only on the bases of its rulership of bad houses, or> > > being placed in bad avastas. It can never change his natural> > > benefic tendency..> > > Hope this may help> > > Best wishes> > > Zoran> > >> > > Chandrashekhar Sharma wrote:> > >> > >> Dear Pradeep,> > >>> > >> The analogy of student/king is misunderstood. It was an> aside to> > >> the main topic and just to understand the idea of why the> > >> student's hous e would feel unconfortable by presence of> Guru.> > >>> > >> It is well to understand that the results that Jupiter will> give> > >> in each case would vary depending on his house lordship and> house> > >> of placement. However the streak of damage(Bhrashta) to the> house> > >> would remain, though modified.If he house is bad the results> > >> could actually be good as the bad efects get lessened.> > >>> > >> Chandrashekhar.> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > >> vijayadas_pradeep [> vijayadas_pradeep ]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:39 AM> > >> To: vedic astrology> > >> [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> capable of> > >> destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//> > >>> > >> Dear Chandrashekar ji> > >>> > >> This suggestion is really good.> > >> I too feel one should learn astrology from the original> textual> > >> language or its derivatives, after reading your mail.> > >>> > >> But now after seeing your mail for amol ji,i am still> having> > >> some> > >> doubts.> > >>> > >> As you have said, even though your example-regarding> > >> student,guru> > >> and all cannot be generalised - I am taking that> example to> > >> clear my> > >> doubts.> > >>> > >> Here i believe the nature of the students and guru has> to be> > >> considered - Similarly the king and minister.> > >>> > >> If both are of the same nature - then no one has to> > >> suffer,'Bhrashta'.> > >> 1)Similarly if jupiter is placed in a friendly house or> > >> deeptha or> > >> swakshethra - harmony is not troubled ,under normal> > >> circumstances.> > >>> > >> 2)But as the lagna or the individual is subject to> various> > >> influences within the chart - there can be disharmony.> > >>> > >> Hence do you consider my point(1) as haaving some> relevance?> > >> or shld we always give importance only to point (2).> > >>> > >> Please pardon me from asking questions like this as i> am no> > >> person> > >> to debate with you - either by knowledge or age.> > >>> > >> Thanks again> > >> Pradeep> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> --- In vedic-> astrology , "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > >> <boxdel> wrote:> > >> > Dear Pradeep,> > >> > The confusion arises because of the fact that some> > >> Sanskrita words> > >> loose> > >> > their import when translated to English. The shloka> does> > >> not say> > >> Damage or> > >> > Harm. It says"Bhrashta". The word has different> conotations> > >> depending on the> > >> > context. Like Sthanabhrashta would be something like> > >> loosing one's> > >> place> > >> > whereas Sheelabhrashta would mean one whose moral are> > >> loose. The> > >> same when> > >> > said to be done by other would mean harming or> damaging> > >> other's> > >> modesty.> > >> > Limitations of the language does sometimes pose a> problem in> > >> conveyance of> > >> > the corect meaning of sanskrita words. This is why I> have said> > >> many a times> > >> > that Astrology is better understood if one learns it> in> > >> Sanskrit> > >> or Sanskrit> > >> > based Indian languages.> > >> > Hope this helps,> > >> > Chandrashekhar.> > >> > > > >> > vijayadas_pradeep [> vijayadas_pradeep@y ...]> > >> > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 PM> > >> > To: vedic astrology> > >> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> capable of> > >> destroying the> > >> > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Dear Chandrashekar ji> > >> >> > >> > I now understand why Jupiter placement can result in> > >> difficult> > >> > outcomes.> > >> >> > >> > Do you mean to say if jupiter is placed in> puthrasthana> > >> ,then the> > >> > individuals can be intelligent but their children> will> > >> suffer.This is> > >> > just to make sure, if i have understood your> example.> > >> >> > >> > But i have one slight difference in opinion> regarding the> > >> statement -> > >> > 'Jupiter destroys or harms'.> > >> >> > >> > This statement makes us puzzled about the meaning> > >> vis-a-vis the> > >> > nature of Jupiter.> > >> >> > >> > Because when we say it destroys - it means jupiter's> > >> action was> > >> > intented towards destruction.But that is not the> > >> case.Jupiter> > >> tends> > >> > to stick to principles even during adverse> situations.This> > >> behaviour> > >> > makes him unable to protect.But his intention was> never to> > >> destroy> > >> > nor the behaviour deserves destruction.> > >> >> > >> > But if you take another example> > >> > When Ravana abducted Sita ,his behaviour deserved> > >> destruction.> > >> >> > >> > Though both the behaviours resulted(ends) in the> > >> destruction of> > >> > the 'houses',the means are not the same.> > >> >> > >> > Hence i believe if we say Jupiter is unable to> protect> > >> the house> > >> in> > >> > which it is placed,during all circumstances, it> becomes less> > >> ambigue -> > >> > vis-a-vis its nature,because destruction was never> intended.> > >> >> > >> > Though the end result is same i feel there is a> > >> difference in the> > >> > inherent meaning.> > >> >> > >> > Kindly correct me if i am wrong.> > >> >> > >> > Also should one learn something from this lesson -> to> > >> live in> > >> Kali> > >> > Yuga!> > >> >> > >> > Thanks and respect> > >> > Pradeep> > >> >> > >> > vedic-> astrology , "Chandrashekhar> > >> Sharma"> > >> > <boxdel> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Pradeep,> > >> > > Certain principles are given by the sages and are> found> > >> to be> > >> true> > >> > in their> > >> > > application. Having said that, have you observed> that the> > >> children> > >> > living> > >> > > with highly intelligent parents rarely suceed?> This is> > >> what> > >> happens> > >> > with> > >> > > Jupiter placement in a house. You will also> not ,if one> > >> wants> > >> to go> > >> > to> > >> > > Puranas that Deva's abode was attacked by the> Daanaavas> > >> more> > >> often> > >> > than> > >> > > other way round, though Brihaspati resided there.> Devas> > >> invariably> > >> > got> > >> > > defeated and had to be rescued by Mahadeva,> Vishnu,> > >> Durga etc.> > >> > Saturn> > >> > > usually sided with the danavas and his samdharmi> Rahu> > >> was their> > >> > Senapati.> > >> > > About Saturn being good in bad houses has to do> with his> > >> ability to> > >> > protect.> > >> > > He protects one from bad indications of that> house.> > >> These are> > >> my> > >> > personal> > >> > > opinions and other worthies might have different> opinions.> > >> > > Chandrashekhar.> > >> > >> > >> > > -------Original Message-------> > >> > >> > >> > > vedic astrology> > >> > > Monday, August 25, 2003 08:17:02 PM> > >> > > vedic astrology> > >> > > [vedic astrology] Why is // Jupiter> capable of> > >> destroying> > >> > the house> > >> > > it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Chandrashekar ji and learned members.> > >> > >> > >> > > I have seen from the archives ,where you had> > >> participated in> > >> > > discussions,that Jupiter has the capacity to> destroy> > >> the bhava> > >> in> > >> > > which> > >> > > it is placed and Saturn Protects.> > >> > >> > >> > > Here I have some queries.> > >> > >> > >> > > What is the reason for a benevolent planet like> jupiter> > >> to try> > >> and> > >> > > harm> > >> > > or destroy.> > >> > >> > >> > > Also i have read that saturn can be good in bad> houses> > >> (6,8,12> > >> > etc) -> > >> > > because ,saturn by nature is bad and hence bad> and bad> > >> > > (negative,negative results in positive) should> bring> > >> good. But> > >> if> > >> > > saturn> > >> > > can protect all the houses where it is> placed ,then the> > >> above> > >> > > statement> > >> > > loses ist significance.Pls correct if my> understanding> > >> of this> > >> > > 'negative-negative' is wrong.> > >> > >> > >> > > When i try to understand the nature of jupiter -> I feel> > >> it can> > >> test> > >> > > the> > >> > > individual always on the path of life,which can be> > >> painfull and> > >> > hard> > >> > > as> > >> > > well at times. Why is this? Is it because such an> > >> individual> > >> can> > >> > > combat> > >> > > the tests and hardships,as jupiter gives him lots> of> > >> patience> > >> and> > >> > > other> > >> > > mental strengths or more concern for others? Am i> right?> > >> > >> > >> > > But why is it trying to destroy?> > >> > >> > >> > > Also doesn't other considerations like> > >> strength,position etc> > >> come> > >> > > into> > >> > > play while deciding on this?> > >> > >> > >> > > If you can explain the inherent nature of> Jupiter, by> > >> virtue of> > >> > > which> > >> > > it> > >> > > is trying to behave like this, it would be> helpful.> > >> > >> > >> > > Moreover i can give input on my real experiences> (good> > >> and bad)> > >> > about> > >> > > jupiter placed in ascendant.> > >> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot> > >> > > Pradeep> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic-> astrology> > >> > >> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> > >> astrology/info.html> > >> > >> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > ........ May Jupiter's light shine on us ........> > >> > >> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> Terms of> > >> Service.> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Sponsor> > >> > > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Archives: vedic-> astrology> > >> >> > >> > Group info: vedic-> > >> astrology/info.html> > >> >> > >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > > >> >> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> >> > >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> >> > >> > Your use of is subject to the > Terms of> > >> Service.> > >> >> > >> > ---> > >> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > >> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (> http://www.grisoft.com).> > >> <http://www.grisoft.com%29.>> > >> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release> 8/19/03> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Archives: vedic astrology> > >>> > >> Group info:> > >> vedic astrology/info.html> > >>> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> > >> vedic astrology-> > >>> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >>> > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu> ||> > >>> > >> Your use of is subject to the > Terms of> > >> Service <> .> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Archives: vedic astrology> > >>> > >> Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >>> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> > >> vedic astrology-> > >>> > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >>> > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >>> > >> Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> > >> Service <> .> > >> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > > [click here]> > >> <http://rd./M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1> 705082686:HM/A=1693352/R=0/SIG=11tralmvc/*http://www.netflix.com/Defa> ult?mqso=60178293&partid=3170658>> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > > Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> Service> > > <> .> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Thank you for this thread. I realize it's not easy to clearly get point accross in complex issues like this one is- My understanding is- Ju can be both 'papa' and 'benefic', depending on H.Lordship and aspects. And it's quite a success that you've lead this thread without falling into black and white trap. As a result, I also understand better your point, you've consistently communicated to us, re bravity of shlokas- Ju in 1st for Ta and Ge /for example/ brings benefits to fifth and seventh house, but not first . It seems to be easily verifiable. Thank you for all of this, Chandrashekhar, Best Regards, AnnaChandrashekhar Sharma <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Amolmandar, I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an aside from astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of Bhagvadgita.Could you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva shochastvam pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti panditah"? Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on. It would ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these. I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita and that sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to the circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we seek. I have seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of death of other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying this anywhere. Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in which he is situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would not like to comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages. Hope this helps Chandrashekhar. amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Chandrashekhar ji Namaste>I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma.This statement is not clear with the astrological context. In the non-astrological sense as well why would student feel 'distrubed' in the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's place. i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why student should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to Gurus place. When Guru has come to your place student will never think of anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to a House(student) it must get protection from the Guru. The capabilities of the House should become more expressive with the blessings from the Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) but certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good' and 'bad' in the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi vastraharan, Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be put, where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things happened. Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. Krishna did not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to fight.As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is absolutly nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to grief on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki Ranmayana Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman had to say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death of near and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and medium of expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete shloka then it would be clear.SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo |tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38||Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya as same you should be ready for the war. So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not act as a klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that does not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death of his own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any grief over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war then it could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna has further said "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH|shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||"So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to Arjuna and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna (guru) was with him. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMAndar--- In vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Amolmandar,> You are again missing the point. I have not said that student does anything> bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, him> being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the house does not> express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while indicating effect of> Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the example is meant only> to amplify the concept and the example, though based on astrological> concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not understand the> concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in Mahabharata. Their> shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including Arjuna. You know> that I do not generally enter into debates based on perception of> scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna having failed.> Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The lord asked> him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This included"Sukha> Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of Abhimanyu and swore> death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of which the Lord> had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons and those of> others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by Ashwatthama he grieved> again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord failed to impart> knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? One has to> understand the difference between physical Guru and the Guru principle> represented by Jupiter.> Hope this helps.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> amolmandar [amolmandar]> Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste> > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as bad but tone> I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king as bad.> > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad.> > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear about> student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. What is the> youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru being placed> their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails because of ego> and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru> except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of> these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you, you> are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will create> problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as ideal one.> That is why I feel,Guru should never fail.> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > AmolMAndar> vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Amol Mandar,> > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said that> Student/King is> > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about a> displinarian Guru> > living with him, though he understands that the lessons are for> his own> > good.> > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM> > vedic astrology> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> >> > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king and> > teacher/minister why do we consider by default,student or king> > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in that should> > protect their good and at least should not spoil the effect.> > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the presence of> Guru,> > student would be interested in doing something bad? A good> student> > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru should> enhance> > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas capabilty.> If> > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. As it would> fail> > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should have that much> > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of Susthanas i.e.> > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated ego? In that> > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the company of> good> > student because of his big EGO and in the company of bad student> > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, if student> is> > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the case of good> > student Guru must appriciate student.> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > AmolMAndar> >> >> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > I will give you an example outside astrology and religion.Guru> > represents> > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which is> right.> > Students> > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the Teacher> as he> > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth they> want to> > do> Simialr is the case with> > the king> > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something that is> against> > RajDharma.> > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the> student/King> > and> > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house would be> clear.> > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at looking> at it> > in order> > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages' principles are> given> > to us as> > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply our> Viveka> > to fathom> > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different views.> > > Hope this helps understand the concept.> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > -----Original Message-----> > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM> > > To: vedic astrology> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> > destroying the> > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > > Chandrashekharji Namste> > >> > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly but just> slight> > doubt.> > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not religion) and> it> > is as> > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but usually fails.> > Hence> > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So Guru> should also> > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house? Does> MAYA> > play> > > any role in this?> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > >> > > AmolMAndar> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > > Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> > Service.> > >> > > ---> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Dear Anna, You explained it right. Chandrashekhar. AR [bona_mente ]Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:11 AMvedic astrologySubject: RE: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects// Dear AmolMAndar, It seems 'age gap' here prevents us from understanding! People of my age, and older than me, I guess, can easily see the point in this statement: '>I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma."In presence of Guru /master teacher/ we used to feel a special type of 'discomfort' about what we know and how much we've learnt, for HE may/is request more. And sure that goes with pleasure of having HIM with us. I still feel that 'respect and distance out of respect' for my professors even though I am no longer 'lower' in my knowledge, at least officially :)I will stop now, before I carry this too far, and say, 'new generations don't have enough respect for anything', as we all have heard at one time or another! Regards, Anna amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Chandrashekhar ji Namaste>I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma.This statement is not clear with the astrological context. In the non-astrological sense as well why would student feel 'distrubed' in the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's place. i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why student should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to Gurus place. When Guru has come to your place student will never think of anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to a House(student) it must get protection from the Guru. The capabilities of the House should become more expressive with the blessings from the Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) but certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good' and 'bad' in the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi vastraharan, Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be put, where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things happened. Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. Krishna did not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to fight.As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is absolutly nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to grief on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki Ranmayana Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman had to say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death of near and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and medium of expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete shloka then it would be clear.SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo |tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38||Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya as same you should be ready for the war. So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not act as a klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that does not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death of his own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any grief over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war then it could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna has further said "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH|shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||"So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to Arjuna and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna (guru) was with him. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMAndarvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Amolmandar,> You are again missing the point. I have not said that student does anything> bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, him> being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the house does not> express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while indicating effect of> Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the example is meant only> to amplify the concept and the example, though based on astrological> concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not understand the> concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in Mahabharata. Their> shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including Arjuna. You know> that I do not generally enter into debates based on perception of> scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna having failed.> Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The lord asked> him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This included"Sukha> Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of Abhimanyu and swore> death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of which the Lord> had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons and those of> others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by Ashwatthama he grieved> again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord failed to impart> knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? One has to> understand the difference between physical Guru and the Guru principle> represented by Jupiter.> Hope this helps.> Chandrashekhar.> > amolmandar [amolmandar]> Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM> To: vedic astrology> [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste> > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as bad but tone> I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king as bad.> > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad.> > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear about> student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. What is the> youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru being placed> their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails because of ego> and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru> except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of> these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you, you> are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will create> problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as ideal one.> That is why I feel,Guru should never fail.> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > AmolMAndar> vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Amol Mandar,> > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said that> Student/King is> > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about a> displinarian Guru> > living with him, though he understands that the lessons are for> his own> > good.> > Chandrashekhar.> >> > -----Original Message-----> > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM> > vedic astrology> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> >> > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king and> > teacher/minister why do we consider by default,student or king> > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in that should> > protect their good and at least should not spoil the effect.> > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the presence of> Guru,> > student would be interested in doing something bad? A good> student> > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru should> enhance> > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas capabilty.> If> > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. As it would> fail> > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should have that much> > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of Susthanas i.e.> > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated ego? In that> > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the company of> good> > student because of his big EGO and in the company of bad student> > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, if student> is> > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the case of good> > student Guru must appriciate student.> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > AmolMAndar> >> >> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > I will give you an example outside astrology and religion.Guru> > represents> > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which is> right.> > Students> > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the Teacher> as he> > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth they> want to> > do> Simialr is the case with> > the king> > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something that is> against> > RajDharma.> > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the> student/King> > and> > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house would be> clear.> > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at looking> at it> > in order> > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages' principles are> given> > to us as> > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply our> Viveka> > to fathom> > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different views.> > > Hope this helps understand the concept.> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM> > > vedic astrology> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> > destroying the> > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > > Chandrashekharji Namste> > >> > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly but just> slight> > doubt.> > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not religion) and> it> > is as> > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but usually fails.> > Hence> > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So Guru> should also> > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house? Does> MAYA> > play> > > any role in this?> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > >> > > AmolMAndar> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > > > >> > > Terms of> > Service.> > >> > > ---> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2003 Report Share Posted August 30, 2003 Dear Chandrashekhar, Thank you for this thread. I realize it's not easy to clearly get point accross in complex issues like this one is- My understanding is- Ju can be both 'papa' and 'benefic', depending on H.Lordship and aspects. And it's quite a success that you've lead this thread without falling into black and white trap. As a result, I also understand better your point, you've consistently communicated to us, re bravity of shlokas- Ju in 1st for Ta and Ge /for example/ brings benefits to fifth and seventh house, but not first . It seems to be easily verifiable. Thank you for all of this, Chandrashekhar, Best Regards, AnnaChandrashekhar Sharma <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Amolmandar, I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an aside from astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of Bhagvadgita.Could you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva shochastvam pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti panditah"? Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on. It would ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these. I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita and that sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to the circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we seek. I have seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of death of other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying this anywhere. Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in which he is situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would not like to comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages. Hope this helps Chandrashekhar. amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Chandrashekhar ji Namaste>I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma.This statement is not clear with the astrological context. In the non-astrological sense as well why would student feel 'distrubed' in the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's place. i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why student should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to Gurus place. When Guru has come to your place student will never think of anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to a House(student) it must get protection from the Guru. The capabilities of the House should become more expressive with the blessings from the Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) but certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good' and 'bad' in the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi vastraharan, Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be put, where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things happened. Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. Krishna did not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to fight.As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is absolutly nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to grief on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki Ranmayana Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman had to say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death of near and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and medium of expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete shloka then it would be clear.SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo |tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38||Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya as same you should be ready for the war. So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not act as a klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that does not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death of his own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any grief over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war then it could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna has further said "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH|shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||"So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to Arjuna and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna (guru) was with him. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMAndar--- In vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Amolmandar,> You are again missing the point. I have not said that student does anything> bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the Guru, him> being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the house does not> express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while indicating effect of> Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the example is meant only> to amplify the concept and the example, though based on astrological> concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not understand the> concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in Mahabharata. Their> shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including Arjuna. You know> that I do not generally enter into debates based on perception of> scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna having failed.> Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The lord asked> him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This included"Sukha> Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of Abhimanyu and swore> death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of which the Lord> had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons and those of> others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by Ashwatthama he grieved> again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord failed to impart> knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? One has to> understand the difference between physical Guru and the Guru principle> represented by Jupiter.> Hope this helps.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> amolmandar [amolmandar]> Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste> > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as bad but tone> I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king as bad.> > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad.> > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear about> student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. What is the> youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru being placed> their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails because of ego> and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru> except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of> these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you, you> are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will create> problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as ideal one.> That is why I feel,Guru should never fail.> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > AmolMAndar> vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Amol Mandar,> > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said that> Student/King is> > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about a> displinarian Guru> > living with him, though he understands that the lessons are for> his own> > good.> > Chandrashekhar.> >> > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM> > vedic astrology> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> >> > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king and> > teacher/minister why do we consider by default,student or king> > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in that should> > protect their good and at least should not spoil the effect.> > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the presence of> Guru,> > student would be interested in doing something bad? A good> student> > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru should> enhance> > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas capabilty.> If> > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. As it would> fail> > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should have that much> > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of Susthanas i.e.> > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated ego? In that> > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the company of> good> > student because of his big EGO and in the company of bad student> > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, if student> is> > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the case of good> > student Guru must appriciate student.> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > AmolMAndar> >> >> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > I will give you an example outside astrology and religion.Guru> > represents> > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which is> right.> > Students> > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the Teacher> as he> > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth they> want to> > do> Simialr is the case with> > the king> > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something that is> against> > RajDharma.> > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the> student/King> > and> > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house would be> clear.> > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at looking> at it> > in order> > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages' principles are> given> > to us as> > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply our> Viveka> > to fathom> > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different views.> > > Hope this helps understand the concept.> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > -----Original Message-----> > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM> > > To: vedic astrology> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> > destroying the> > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > > Chandrashekharji Namste> > >> > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly but just> slight> > doubt.> > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not religion) and> it> > is as> > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but usually fails.> > Hence> > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So Guru> should also> > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house? Does> MAYA> > play> > > any role in this?> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > >> > > AmolMAndar> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > > Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> > Service.> > >> > > ---> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2003 Report Share Posted August 31, 2003 Dear Pradeep, One could say that. However,personally I think that your later portion of the message would be the correct approach.One is at liberty to interprete the drishties etc. in a way that could make one understand its effects.However sages, having not given us any rationale ebhind soem of the principles, we have two options one is to follow them as given or to apply our logic for their application. I think Sages not being amongst us to explain the rationale, in the cases where the rationale is not given it is better to accept principles as given. Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep ]Sunday, August 31, 2003 1:45 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Dear Chandrashekar jiI understand this.Moreover jupiter as first house lord is lord of trine as well as quadrant.Now waht should we undertsnad from the different results due to aspects.Does this mean that aspect(glance from a distance) helps because it is just a liberal guidance.On the otherhand placement is like direct supervision or rather direct handling and therby frictions,differences leading to trouble.Similarly, saturn glancing from a distance might be instrumental in misguiding but cannot change situations favorably as he is lacking full control.While being placed in the house makes sure that 'Thru any means'he will ensure that he is not defeated.these are my thoughts about aspects.My question is, is it right to interpret the results like this.Has the sage anywhere mentioned about the reasons for various definitions.Because subjective interpretations are at the same time 'drawback as well as advantage' of astrology:)Thanks and respectpradeepvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Pradeep,> If you remember my posts on various subjects on this list, you will remember> that I have said, it is very easy to ignore that which faces you and> concentrate on only one factor. This leads one to draw wrong conclusions. In> the case of Jupiter in 1st house your question though right, misses out on> one important fact. This is that Jupiter in 1st aspects 5th 7th and 9th.> Look at the names given to these houses and the answer is obvious. I have> already said that Jupiter's aaspect protects whereas Saturn's ( barring> exception already mentioned earlier) harms.> Chandrashekhar.> > vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep]> Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:49 AM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Dear Chandrashekarji> > Thanks for the detailed reply.> > So i understand jeevaha and mandaha references are jupiter and> saturn respectively.No statement can stand own its own.What is the> circumstance in which this shloka is told by Parashara.> > Jupiter placement in first house(in own sign) ofcourse puts one> under tremendous pressure to be just to everyone and react fast to> things which one think are not correct.Thus this placement might> help others more, than the self, atleast in certain aspects(because> you have to lose something to balance the other)> > But at the same time i should say this gives one great craving for> knowledge and also the blessing named luck.Really helps fifth and> ninth houses.So i feel though there are difficulties due to the> strictness,overall it is a blessing,if in strength plus other> factors .> > The brevity of sanskrit is amazing.> Also your statement ' Guru for Sagittarius' is neutral - keeps me> thinking.Plus Papa for some 6 rashis!> > Thanks a lot> Pradeep> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Pradeep.> > It is "Sthana bhrashta karoti jeevaha. sthana rakshati mandaha.".> I have not> > said that Jupiter damages all indications of a house. Astrology is> not a> > mathematical science, though projected as such by many. The> Astrologer has> > to assess the chart as a whole and arrive at the impact the> relative> > planetary position will have on the horoscope as a whole.> >> > About 2nd house placement of Jupiter , it does cause problems to> 2nd house> > unless placed in his own Rasi.About his placement in 1st house ,as> you say> > you have own experience.> >> > I have nowhere said that nature of Guru is Bhrashtra. I have said> that Guru> > causes the indication of the sthana in which he is placed to become> > blemished(Bharashtra).I am emphasising on word Bhrashta, because> that is> > what the shloka says and its translation into english is indeed> difficult. I> > look at astrological principles from an analytical point of view. I> > ,generally, do not try to associate them with Scriptural stories.> >> > The reason is that the meaning depends on one's own> interpretation of> > scriptures.And believe me they are capable of different> interpretations,> > because of brevity of Sanskrit language. The sanskrit grammar has> undergone> > many changes over the thousands of years that it has been in> existence. It> > is said " Laksham Vyakaranam Proktam, Chaturlaksham Tu Jyotisham."> >> > However some tend to think that the planets have fixed nature (> and they> > might have their own experiences to believe such), whereas the> nature> > vis-a-vis a Jataka would depend on many factors such as house> ownership,> > placement,aspects, Varga positions and so on.> >> > The theory being advanced that Jupiter always protects, though> attractive> > does not explain why his place ment in 5th in strength is harmful> to getting> > progeny or 2nd house placement gives not favourable results. It> also tends> > to ridicule the Great parashara who says that Jupiter is said to> be "Papa" a> > malefic for Taurus,Gemini,Virgo,Libra,Capricorn and Aquarius.In> addition ,> > the reason of his being neutral to his Moola trikona Rasi> Sagitarius as> > stated by parashara would be wrong if we accept the hypothessis of> Jupiter> > being auscpicious no matter what and where.> >> > You could find out whether the principle is right or wrong by> applying to> > real life charts. This is the only way to ascertain whether a> hypothesis is> > correct or not.> >> > Hope this helps,> > Chandrashekhar.> >> >> > > > vijayadas_pradeep [vijayadas_pradeep]> > Friday, August 29, 2003 9:50 PM> > vedic astrology> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> >> > Dear chandrashekar ji> >> > Could you kindly quote the shloka related to guru.This is just> out> > of curiosity.> >> > Then from your mails i have understood that,you are very> particular> > about the 'Bhrashta' while speaking about jupiter.> >> > I believe apart from understanding the inherent meaning, you> might> > be having some experience related to the Guru and> Bhrashta,perhaps> > with people whom you know well.> >> > If you could quote some real life experiences it would become> more> > useful.> > Because if we consider a person having jupiter in 2nd house -The> > person should have problem related to money> > savings,speech,family,and other aspects reprsntd by 2nd> house.How is> > this possible for all the aspects?> >> > I am totally with you regarding the strictness which guru might> > impose on the houses in which he is placed - at least regarding> > first house (because of own experience,also forming hamsa yoga).> >> > But again first house represents -> > physique,appearance,intellect,complexion,happiness etc.But could> you> > explain how or why gurus prescence should result in damage of all> > these aspects.> >> > I dont want to conclude anything for me.I want to wait and> > understand what the sages have said.> >> > So from your experience and knowledge i am trying to gain some> real> > understanding regarding this.> >> > Also Zoranjis mail was conveying the message - one should> > differentiate the nature of the planets from other factors.> > But i understood from your mails that the very nature of guru is> > resulting in 'Bhrashta'.So how do we relate this.> >> > regds & thanks> > Pradeep> >> > vedic astrology, Zoran Radosavljevic> > <ahimsa@N...> wrote:> > > Om Namo Narayanaya,> > > Dear Chandrakeshar,> > > I see.. I was relying upon a subject.. This hypotesyse given as> > the> > > subject " Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn> > > protects" is highly dubious and should not be followed...> > > Best wishes> > > Zoran> > >> > > Chandrashekhar Sharma wrote:> > >> > > > Dear Zoran,> > > >> > > > You are perhaps misinterpreting the Sanskrita word Guru with> the> > word> > > > Guru as planet used in the original post.I was just trying to> > clear> > > > the misunderstanding when Guru as in planet was being taken> as> > Gur as> > > > in the master by explaining the principles from both the> > hypothesis.> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > >> > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > >> > > > > > > > Zoran Radosavljevic [ahimsa@N...]> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:50 AM> > > > To: vedic astrology> > > > Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> capable> > of> > > > destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//> > > >> > > > Om Namo Narayanaya,> > > > Dear Chandrakeshar and members,> > > > Sorry for butting in so abrubtly without the following> of the> > > > previous mails... It has been experience among my> students> > and> > > > those who learn Jyotish> > > > that some basic confusion is very strong. One should> never> > mix> > > > the natural tendency of a Graha and functional role of> the> > Graha..> > > > Natural benefics as Guru who is the Bhagwan of the chart> will> > > > NEVER harm any point but on the contrary will IMPROVE> all> > points> > > > he touches> > > > in the chart by means of his NATURE. However, each graha> has> > a> > > > role and different states. For instance, such guru may> rule> > 8th> > > > house which is> > > > Randra or the vulnarable place, the worst house. It is> akin> > to a> > > > good person having a negative role. E.G> suppose, a good> > neigbhour> > > > has to tell you that> > > > someone who is dear has passed away... it will never> change> > his> > > > nature, he will still remain a good neigbour..> Furthermore,> > graha> > > > may give bad results even if benefic if placed in bad> > avastas.> > > > However, it doesnot again change its nature.. The malefic> > results> > > > are given due to graha bad mood. Thus, if guru gives bad> > results, it> > > > may give only on the bases of its rulership of bad> houses, or> > > > being placed in bad avastas. It can never change his> natural> > > > benefic tendency..> > > > Hope this may help> > > > Best wishes> > > > Zoran> > > >> > > > Chandrashekhar Sharma wrote:> > > >> > > >> Dear Pradeep,> > > >>> > > >> The analogy of student/king is misunderstood. It was an> > aside to> > > >> the main topic and just to understand the idea of why> the> > > >> student's hous e would feel unconfortable by presence of> > Guru.> > > >>> > > >> It is well to understand that the results that Jupiter> will> > give> > > >> in each case would vary depending on his house lordship> and> > house> > > >> of placement. However the streak of damage(Bhrashta) to> the> > house> > > >> would remain, though modified.If he house is bad the> results> > > >> could actually be good as the bad efects get lessened.> > > >>> > > >> Chandrashekhar.> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > >> vijayadas_pradeep [> > vijayadas_pradeep ]> > > >> Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:39 AM> > > >> To: vedic astrology> > > >> [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> > capable of> > > >> destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//> > > >>> > > >> Dear Chandrashekar ji> > > >>> > > >> This suggestion is really good.> > > >> I too feel one should learn astrology from the> original> > textual> > > >> language or its derivatives, after reading your> mail.> > > >>> > > >> But now after seeing your mail for amol ji,i am> still> > having> > > >> some> > > >> doubts.> > > >>> > > >> As you have said, even though your example-regarding> > > >> student,guru> > > >> and all cannot be generalised - I am taking that> > example to> > > >> clear my> > > >> doubts.> > > >>> > > >> Here i believe the nature of the students and guru> has> > to be> > > >> considered - Similarly the king and minister.> > > >>> > > >> If both are of the same nature - then no one has to> > > >> suffer,'Bhrashta'.> > > >> 1)Similarly if jupiter is placed in a friendly> house or> > > >> deeptha or> > > >> swakshethra - harmony is not troubled ,under normal> > > >> circumstances.> > > >>> > > >> 2)But as the lagna or the individual is subject to> > various> > > >> influences within the chart - there can be> disharmony.> > > >>> > > >> Hence do you consider my point(1) as haaving some> > relevance?> > > >> or shld we always give importance only to point (2).> > > >>> > > >> Please pardon me from asking questions like this as> i> > am no> > > >> person> > > >> to debate with you - either by knowledge or age.> > > >>> > > >> Thanks again> > > >> Pradeep> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> --- In vedic-> > astrology , "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > > >> <boxdel> wrote:> > > >> > Dear Pradeep,> > > >> > The confusion arises because of the fact that some> > > >> Sanskrita words> > > >> loose> > > >> > their import when translated to English. The> shloka> > does> > > >> not say> > > >> Damage or> > > >> > Harm. It says"Bhrashta". The word has different> > conotations> > > >> depending on the> > > >> > context. Like Sthanabhrashta would be something> like> > > >> loosing one's> > > >> place> > > >> > whereas Sheelabhrashta would mean one whose moral> are> > > >> loose. The> > > >> same when> > > >> > said to be done by other would mean harming or> > damaging> > > >> other's> > > >> modesty.> > > >> > Limitations of the language does sometimes pose a> > problem in> > > >> conveyance of> > > >> > the corect meaning of sanskrita words. This is> why I> > have said> > > >> many a times> > > >> > that Astrology is better understood if one learns> it> > in> > > >> Sanskrit> > > >> or Sanskrit> > > >> > based Indian languages.> > > >> > Hope this helps,> > > >> > Chandrashekhar.> > > >> > > > > >> > vijayadas_pradeep [> > vijayadas_pradeep@y ...]> > > >> > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 PM> > > >> > vedic astrology> > > >> > Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> > capable of> > > >> destroying the> > > >> > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Dear Chandrashekar ji> > > >> >> > > >> > I now understand why Jupiter placement can> result in> > > >> difficult> > > >> > outcomes.> > > >> >> > > >> > Do you mean to say if jupiter is placed in> > puthrasthana> > > >> ,then the> > > >> > individuals can be intelligent but their> children> > will> > > >> suffer.This is> > > >> > just to make sure, if i have understood your> > example.> > > >> >> > > >> > But i have one slight difference in opinion> > regarding the> > > >> statement -> > > >> > 'Jupiter destroys or harms'.> > > >> >> > > >> > This statement makes us puzzled about the> meaning> > > >> vis-a-vis the> > > >> > nature of Jupiter.> > > >> >> > > >> > Because when we say it destroys - it means> jupiter's> > > >> action was> > > >> > intented towards destruction.But that is not the> > > >> case.Jupiter> > > >> tends> > > >> > to stick to principles even during adverse> > situations.This> > > >> behaviour> > > >> > makes him unable to protect.But his intention> was> > never to> > > >> destroy> > > >> > nor the behaviour deserves destruction.> > > >> >> > > >> > But if you take another example> > > >> > When Ravana abducted Sita ,his behaviour> deserved> > > >> destruction.> > > >> >> > > >> > Though both the behaviours resulted(ends) in the> > > >> destruction of> > > >> > the 'houses',the means are not the same.> > > >> >> > > >> > Hence i believe if we say Jupiter is unable to> > protect> > > >> the house> > > >> in> > > >> > which it is placed,during all circumstances, it> > becomes less> > > >> ambigue -> > > >> > vis-a-vis its nature,because destruction was> never> > intended.> > > >> >> > > >> > Though the end result is same i feel there is a> > > >> difference in the> > > >> > inherent meaning.> > > >> >> > > >> > Kindly correct me if i am wrong.> > > >> >> > > >> > Also should one learn something from this> lesson -> > to> > > >> live in> > > >> Kali> > > >> > Yuga!> > > >> >> > > >> > Thanks and respect> > > >> > Pradeep> > > >> >> > > >> > vedic-> > astrology , "Chandrashekhar> > > >> Sharma"> > > >> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > >> > > Dear Pradeep,> > > >> > > Certain principles are given by the sages and> are> > found> > > >> to be> > > >> true> > > >> > in their> > > >> > > application. Having said that, have you> observed> > that the> > > >> children> > > >> > living> > > >> > > with highly intelligent parents rarely suceed?> > This is> > > >> what> > > >> happens> > > >> > with> > > >> > > Jupiter placement in a house. You will also> > not ,if one> > > >> wants> > > >> to go> > > >> > to> > > >> > > Puranas that Deva's abode was attacked by the> > Daanaavas> > > >> more> > > >> often> > > >> > than> > > >> > > other way round, though Brihaspati resided> there.> > Devas> > > >> invariably> > > >> > got> > > >> > > defeated and had to be rescued by Mahadeva,> > Vishnu,> > > >> Durga etc.> > > >> > Saturn> > > >> > > usually sided with the danavas and his> samdharmi> > Rahu> > > >> was their> > > >> > Senapati.> > > >> > > About Saturn being good in bad houses has to> do> > with his> > > >> ability to> > > >> > protect.> > > >> > > He protects one from bad indications of that> > house.> > > >> These are> > > >> my> > > >> > personal> > > >> > > opinions and other worthies might have> different> > opinions.> > > >> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > ----> > > >> > >> > > >> > > vedic astrology> > > >> > > Monday, August 25, 2003 08:17:02 PM> > > >> > > vedic astrology> > > >> > > Subject: [vedic astrology] Why is // Jupiter> > capable of> > > >> destroying> > > >> > the house> > > >> > > it and Saturn Protects//> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Dear Chandrashekar ji and learned members.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > I have seen from the archives ,where you had> > > >> participated in> > > >> > > discussions,that Jupiter has the capacity to> > destroy> > > >> the bhava> > > >> in> > > >> > > which> > > >> > > it is placed and Saturn Protects.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Here I have some queries.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > What is the reason for a benevolent planet> like> > jupiter> > > >> to try> > > >> and> > > >> > > harm> > > >> > > or destroy.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Also i have read that saturn can be good in> bad> > houses> > > >> (6,8,12> > > >> > etc) -> > > >> > > because ,saturn by nature is bad and hence bad> > and bad> > > >> > > (negative,negative results in positive) should> > bring> > > >> good. But> > > >> if> > > >> > > saturn> > > >> > > can protect all the houses where it is> > placed ,then the> > > >> above> > > >> > > statement> > > >> > > loses ist significance.Pls correct if my> > understanding> > > >> of this> > > >> > > 'negative-negative' is wrong.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > When i try to understand the nature of> jupiter -> > I feel> > > >> it can> > > >> test> > > >> > > the> > > >> > > individual always on the path of life,which> can be> > > >> painfull and> > > >> > hard> > > >> > > as> > > >> > > well at times. Why is this? Is it because> such an> > > >> individual> > > >> can> > > >> > > combat> > > >> > > the tests and hardships,as jupiter gives him> lots> > of> > > >> patience> > > >> and> > > >> > > other> > > >> > > mental strengths or more concern for others?> Am i> > right?> > > >> > >> > > >> > > But why is it trying to destroy?> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Also doesn't other considerations like> > > >> strength,position etc> > > >> come> > > >> > > into> > > >> > > play while deciding on this?> > > >> > >> > > >> > > If you can explain the inherent nature of> > Jupiter, by> > > >> virtue of> > > >> > > which> > > >> > > it> > > >> > > is trying to behave like this, it would be> > helpful.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Moreover i can give input on my real> experiences> > (good> > > >> and bad)> > > >> > about> > > >> > > jupiter placed in ascendant.> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Thanks a lot> > > >> > > Pradeep> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Sponsor> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Archives: vedic-> > astrology> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Group info:> vedic-> > > >> astrology/info.html> > > >> > >> > > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > ........ May Jupiter's light shine on> us ........> > > >> > >> > > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> > Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Your use of is subject to the> > > > >> Terms of> > > >> Service.> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Sponsor> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Archives: vedic-> > astrology> > > >> >> > > >> > Group info: vedic-> > > >> astrology/info.html> > > >> >> > > >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > >> >> > > >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> > Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> >> > > >> > Your use of is subject to the> > > Terms of> > > >> Service.> > > >> >> > > >> > ---> > > >> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > >> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (> > http://www.grisoft.com).> > > >> <http://www.grisoft.com%29.>> > > >> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release> > Date: 8/19/03> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Archives: vedic-> astrology> > > >>> > > >> Group info:> > > >> vedic-> astrology/info.html> > > >>> > > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> > > >> vedic astrology-> > > >>> > > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > >>> > > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu> > ||> > > >>> > > >> Your use of is subject to the > > Terms of> > > >> Service <> .> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Archives: vedic astrology> > > >>> > > >> Group info: vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > > >>> > > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> > > >> vedic astrology-> > > >>> > > >> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > >>> > > >> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu> ||> > > >>> > > >> > Terms of> > > >> Service <> .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > [click here]> > > >> >> <http://rd./M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1> >> 705082686:HM/A=1693352/R=0/SIG=11tralmvc/*http://www.netflix.com/Defa> > ult?mqso=60178293&partid=3170658>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > >> > > > Group info: vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > > >> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > >> > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > >> > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> > > > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> > Service> > > > <> .> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2003 Report Share Posted September 2, 2003 Chandrashekhar ji Namaste "I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I think there is indeed a 'gap' in this. Sir, with all due respect I would like to draw your attention to the following facts.There are again few stops. Lets trace out the things: In one of my mails I said [Me]>>MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you,you are bound to succeed. Sir, Please note , I said only Mahabharat and without any reference to Gita. The MAhabhart and Krishna reference was to put forward that when real Guru is with you, you will succeed. In response to this, discussion was sifted by you to Bhagvat Gita and made main point of thread by puting half shloka from the gita. [You]>>Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The lord asked him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This included"Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". You as well said that since Arjuna grieved at the loss of near and dear ones does it attribute to faliure of either Krishna or Arjuna. Now since I thought that the shloka which you quoted should be taken in totality and not in parts I said that "SUkha Dukkha Sama krutva.." was in regard with War and gave the complete shloka . I as well put forward the example of Rama who grieved like child in Valmiki Ramayana at the loss of Sita (which you did not take cognizance of!). With Lord Rama grieving at the loss of near and dear, Arjunas greiving is well justified and hence said neither Krishna nor Arjuna failed. To greif at the loss of near and dear is a duty of every Grihasta. Nothing unsual about it. At this, you were amazed and put up few more shlokas from Gita. Since they were all related to same part of the Mahabharata i.e. making Arjuna realized futility of human relation at the time of war I thought that I would give example of Krishnas behaviour before and after war. Sir, it was not simple anger but grief as well in the Satyakriya of Krisha in the case of Draupadi,Bhishma and later Uttara. My point was to prove that quoting Krishna from Gita and his teachings from only Gita is not sufficient. What ever Krishna in the Gita has said it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the battle field. Gita is more of spiritual nature rather than mere philosophical. We must see the Krishna in entire Mahabharata. I never shifted from my any of points. The two examples, student/king and Krishna/Arjuna/Gita which you put forward, I was not able to understand properly. That is why I tried to get it through. If you still allow me to say, I wished to have clear-cut tabular information regarding the Bhrstachar done or caused by Guru/Sthana vis-a-vis "Sthana Brhashta Karoti...". When Guru is responsible for Brahstha of Sthana then it must be either brahstachar of Guru or Sthana. Otherwise Brahstha will not occur. It must Guru at a sthana doing Brahstachar or Stahana attributes getting Brahstha because of Guru. If we personify SThana, as Lagna as self and 9/10 as father then brahstachar should be from that respective person.Is there any other possibility? I never said that Guru is not papi or malefic. It can be good or bad to a lagna but I could not understand when Guru is at your place how can it be malefic or why it does brhasta of sthana? It was 'distrubed' feeling which was main line of argument. I thought that, this argument lacks universality and since Vedic astrological hindu principles are usually universal I wanted to put forward my line of argument against this statement. So I humbly wanted to request to reconsider the statement of yours that "I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I dont have a tendency to surf on emotional thought process without supporting logic from scriptures/text books. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. AmolMandar vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Amolmandar, > You know me too well to understand that I am not given to anger.I got > exasperated when you tried to twist what the Lord Krishna said about how > yogi faces death, though you are well versed in scriptures. > > It serves no purpose to read meanings where there are none. I have noted > this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only. For a fruitful > discussion it is better to stick to one thread, so that everybody's > knowledge increases. Even now you think in terms of Bhrashtachar of > Guru.Could you tell me where have I ever said that Guru is responsible for > Bhrashtachara( you said"possible Brhastachar of Guru ".)?. > > Again in the examples given by you you are deviating from what has been said > in Gita. If I remember right,the point was whether shishyas failed or Gurus. > The discussion was about grieving over death and not about anger.I had > quoted specific shlokas and do not understand why you chose not to answer > about them and veered to selective parts of Mahabharata. > > If you feel Krishna's word is inferior to what is supposed to be stated by > Vyasa, I do not to this view. You must be aware that most of the > epics were gilded later on by additions by other writers and these include, > both Ramayana and Mahabharata. It is like pitting what has been said in > Padma Purana against that given in Linga Purana, without understanding the > essense of the Hindu philisophy. Such discussions lead one nowhere. I have > already told you to apply the given principles yourself and find out what > are the results.This is the best way to learn the science. > Hope this helps. > Chandrashekhar. > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > Monday, September 01, 2003 4:50 PM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > It seems that you are angry with me. I am sorry that I tested your > patience more than I am allowed to. But I hope that you will pardon > my adventure. I did not want to get a abnormal death to the Thread, > at least not before getting fully satisfied, but it seems that i > must realize "Sthana Brhasta Karoti........" principle of Guru. > Just a small request,if you dont take otherwise,please give explicit > table of possible Brhastachar of Guru per sthana(or should it be > Brhastachar of Sthana because of Guru.) As implicit examples are too > far from my little brain I request you to make it as explicit as > possible. > > I know that there wont be any discussions further but to put some of > the Krishnas reactions will be interesting for you. > > Before the start of the war Darupadi told her agony regarding > Vastraharan in the Rajashabha in fornt of all Gurus and Krishna was > very distressed to hear that. He expressed his SatyaKriya as > > this > > "Rodayishyanti striyo heyveam yesham krudhaasi bhavini | > Bibhastasusharmsanchannachonitaoopariplutan || > Nihatan valabhan vikshaya shayanan vasudhatale | > yat samartham pandavanam tat kariyashami shuchaH|| > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken insult of Daupadi as a > Yogi but he did not. > > > In the course of war one day Bhisma was furious at Pandavsena and > that resulted in many deaths in pandav side. Krishna could not > tolerate death of his near and dear ones and inspite of his pleadge, > opted for picking-up the dhanushya to destroy Bhisma. Here, Krishna > did not remember what he preached himself to Arjuna(SukhaDukhe Same > Krutwa...) before start of the war. > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandavsena as > a Yogi but he did not. > > And at the end of the war when Aashawatthama and Arjuna applied > Brahmastra on each other, Arjuna called his astra back on the > request of Vyas but Ashwatthama refused saying that it is for > destruction of last Pandav vansha. It was aimed at the Garbha of > uttara,wife of Abhimanyu. Hearing this Krishna was very distrubed > and cursed Ashwatthama. I think Krishna gave curse only once in his > life and that to a Brahman. > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandav > vanshaja as a Yogi but he did not. > > > So there is no question of interpreting scriptures according to our > needs. What is stated by Vyasa is plain and simple. One has to read > it in totality. > > Once again I am extremly sorry for the trouble I created for you. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > AmolMAndar > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > <boxdel> wrote: > > Dear Amolmandar, > > I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an > aside from > > astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of > Bhagvadgita.Could > > you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva shochastvam > > pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti > panditah"? > > Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on. It > would > > ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these. > > I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita > and that > > sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to the > > circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we > seek. I have > > seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of > death of > > other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying > this > > anywhere. > > Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in > which he is > > situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would not > like to > > comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages. > > Hope this helps > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PM > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of > destroying the > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > > > >I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the > Guru, > > >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. > > > > This statement is not clear with the astrological context. In the > > non-astrological sense as well why would student > feel 'distrubed' in > > the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's > place. > > i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why > student > > should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to > > celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to > Gurus > > place. When Guru has come to your place student will never think > of > > anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question > > of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to a > House > > (student) it must get protection from the Guru. The capabilities > of > > the House should become more expressive with the blessings from > the > > Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) but > > certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except > > Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of > > Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good' > and 'bad' in > > the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi vastraharan, > > Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be > put, > > where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things > happened. > > Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. Krishna did > > not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to fight. > > > > As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is absolutly > > nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to > grief > > on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki > Ranmayana > > Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman had > to > > say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death of > near > > and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and medium > of > > expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam > krutwa...". > > he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete shloka > then > > it would be clear. > > > > SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo | > > tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38|| > > > > Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya as > same > > you should be ready for the war. > > > > So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not act > as a > > klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that does > > not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death of > his > > own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any > grief > > over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war then it > > could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna has > > further said > > > > "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH| > > shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||" > > > > So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to > Arjuna > > and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna > (guru) > > was with him. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > Dear Amolmandar, > > > You are again missing the point. I have not said that student > does > > anything > > > bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of > the > > Guru, him > > > being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the > house > > does not > > > express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while > indicating > > effect of > > > Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the example > is > > meant only > > > to amplify the concept and the example, though based on > > astrological > > > concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not > > understand the > > > concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in Mahabharata. > > Their > > > shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including Arjuna. > > You know > > > that I do not generally enter into debates based on perception > of > > > scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna > having > > failed. > > > Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The > > lord asked > > > him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This > > included"Sukha > > > Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of Abhimanyu > and > > swore > > > death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of > which > > the Lord > > > had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons and > > those of > > > others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by > Ashwatthama > > he grieved > > > again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord > failed > > to impart > > > knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? One > has > > to > > > understand the difference between physical Guru and the Guru > > principle > > > represented by Jupiter. > > > Hope this helps. > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of > > destroying the > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste > > > > > > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as bad > but > > tone > > > I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king as > bad. > > > > > > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad. > > > > > > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear > about > > > student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. What > is the > > > youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru being > > placed > > > their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails because > of > > ego > > > and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every > Guru > > > except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of > either > > of > > > these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with > you, > > you > > > are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will > create > > > problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as > ideal > > one. > > > That is why I feel,Guru should never fail. > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar > Sharma" > > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > > Dear Amol Mandar, > > > > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said > that > > > Student/King is > > > > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about a > > > displinarian Guru > > > > living with him, though he understands that the lessons > are for > > > his own > > > > good. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM > > > > vedic astrology > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable > of > > > destroying the > > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > > > > > > > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king and > > > > teacher/minister why do we consider by default,student or > > king > > > > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in that > > should > > > > protect their good and at least should not spoil the > effect. > > > > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the > presence > > of > > > Guru, > > > > student would be interested in doing something bad? A > good > > > student > > > > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru > should > > > enhance > > > > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas > > capabilty. > > > If > > > > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. As it > > would > > > fail > > > > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should have > that > > much > > > > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of > Susthanas > > i.e. > > > > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated > ego? In > > that > > > > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the > company of > > > good > > > > student because of his big EGO and in the company of bad > > student > > > > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, if > > student > > > is > > > > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the case > of > > good > > > > student Guru must appriciate student. > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- astrology, "Chandrashekhar > > Sharma" > > > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > > > Dear Amolmandar, > > > > > I will give you an example outside astrology and > > religion.Guru > > > > represents > > > > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which > is > > > right. > > > > Students > > > > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the > > Teacher > > > as he > > > > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth > they > > > want to > > > > do > > > Simialr is the case with > > > > the king > > > > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something that > is > > > against > > > > RajDharma. > > > > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the > > > student/King > > > > and > > > > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house > would > > be > > > clear. > > > > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at > > looking > > > at it > > > > in order > > > > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages' > principles > > are > > > given > > > > to us as > > > > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply > our > > > Viveka > > > > to fathom > > > > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different > > views. > > > > > Hope this helps understand the concept. > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter > capable > > of > > > > destroying the > > > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekharji Namste > > > > > > > > > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly but > just > > > slight > > > > doubt. > > > > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not > religion) > > and > > > it > > > > is as > > > > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but > usually > > fails. > > > > Hence > > > > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So > Guru > > > should also > > > > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house? > Does > > > MAYA > > > > play > > > > > any role in this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic- > astrology > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > Terms > > of > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: > > 8/19/03 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic- astrology > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > Terms > of > > > Service. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: > 8/19/03 > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/03 > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03 > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2003 Report Share Posted September 2, 2003 Dear Amolmandar, You are confusing the issues. You reffered to Shishyas failing Gurus except Arjuna failing Lord Krishna in Mahabharata.No doubt, you reffered to Mahabharata and not Gita and Gita subject was brought in by me. However are there references in Mahabharata where Krishna is reffered to as Guru of Arjuna prior to his recital of Gita to Arjuna? The Mahabharata that I know tells about Krupacharya being Guru of Kuruvansha and Dronacharya being Guru of Kuru Rajkumars for warfare. Again in Gita itself Arjuna begs pardon of the Lord for having reffered to him as Sakha(Friend) after the Vishvarupa is revealed by the Lord.Should you doubt existence of the shloka refer to Adhyaya 11 shloka 41 and 42. This being the case, I do not understand how I have "shifted" from the thread by giving Gita shloka and the arguments.In case some other reference of Krishna as Guru of Arjuna pre Gita revelation is available in the edition of Gita available with you, kindly quote from it so that my knowledge of scriptures can increase. I have said that the attributes of yogi included Sukh dukkhe sam krutwa since after telling Arjuna about Ashocchananva shochaste... at Adhyaya2 Sh. 11 and other shlokas , as you call them, Sukh dukkhe same krutwa appears as shloka 39 in the same adhyaaya and the statement there in refers to what the Lor has told Arjuna vide Ashocchananva...Adhyaya 2 sh11. which incidentally is the begining of the Lord's upadesha in that Adhyaya. The meaning of any shashtra is to be taken into its entirety and not from individual shlokas, is the teaching of the Gurus(and even Lord Krishna instructs Arjuna about how study of is to be done in Gita). If you need reference for this statement of mine, refer to Neelakantha Tajiki on Prashnatantra. Therefore it(Sukhadukkhe..) does not only refer to the war but the very basis of Arjuna wanting to avoid war, which was his grief on the posibility of their dying at his hands. Whether grieving for departed ones is justified or not,was not the original point under discussions. It was about your statement that in Mahabharata every Guru but Krishna failed his shishya. I merely pointed out that it is not the Guru failed the shishya but shishyas failed their Gurus and added that even Arjuna failed Lord Krishna who was his Adhyatmic Guru by virtue of revelation of Bhagvadgita. If failure of a shishya is not applying the principles taught by his Guru to real life situation, kindly enlighten what is the test of a shishya. You have said "What ever Krishna in the Gita has said it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the battle field." and you are entitled to that opinion.However Gita is much more than that, it is revelation of the essence of Hindu philosophy, duties, interpretation of rituals and encompasses Vedas and Upanishadas. Arjuna having been convinced about the necessity of figthing as you call it by the Vishvarupa darshan Adhyaaya 11, seeks further knowledge of dharma, Sanyasa Yogis and the Lord reveals deep philosophy including Kshetra- Kshtreja knowledge in the remaining 7 adhyaayas. Therefore the logic of calling Gita as "to convince a dejected kshtriya" is an explaination difficult to digest for me. It is you who talked about Bhrashtachar of Guru, though I had said to distinguish between Guru as in Jupiter planet and Guru as in Teacher. I had clearly stated that the example of Teacher/Guru-student/king is given as strictly apart from astrology and only in order to explain the concept better.You had said about a tabular form of interpretation of Guru in different places. As already explained the principles are to be applied in a wholistic manner and not in isolation or they make one draw wrong conclusions. Some one had,painstakingly,even the results of Guru in different Rasis and Houses as given in Saravali and other standard texts. If you have read them, you will understand why one get lead astray by applying principles nonwholistically. By the way you have not given your explaination on "Ashochhananva shochastve..." your translation of this would be appreciated. It would also help us understand the advice given by the Lord to Arjuna about grief on passing away of near ones and happiness on birth of one. It would be interesting to know whether Arjna followed the advice. Chandrashekhar. amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:12 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects// Chandrashekhar ji Namaste"I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I think there is indeed a 'gap' in this.Sir, with all due respect I would like to draw your attention to the following facts.There are again few stops. Lets trace out the things:In one of my mails I said [Me]>>MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guruexcept for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you,you are bound to succeed.Sir, Please note , I said only Mahabharat and without any reference to Gita. The MAhabhart and Krishna reference was to put forward that when real Guru is with you, you will succeed.In response to this, discussion was sifted by you to Bhagvat Gita and made main point of thread by puting half shloka from the gita. [You]>>Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The lord asked him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This included"Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". You as well said that since Arjuna grieved at the loss of near and dear ones does it attribute to faliure of either Krishna or Arjuna.Now since I thought that the shloka which you quoted should be taken in totality and not in parts I said that "SUkha Dukkha Sama krutva.." was in regard with War and gave the complete shloka . I as well put forward the example of Rama who grieved like child in Valmiki Ramayana at the loss of Sita (which you did not take cognizance of!). With Lord Rama grieving at the loss of near and dear, Arjunas greiving is well justified and hence said neither Krishna nor Arjuna failed. To greif at the loss of near and dear is a duty of every Grihasta. Nothing unsual about it.At this, you were amazed and put up few more shlokas from Gita. Since they were all related to same part of the Mahabharata i.e. making Arjuna realized futility of human relation at the time of war I thought that I would give example of Krishnas behaviour before and after war. Sir, it was not simple anger but grief as well in the Satyakriya of Krisha in the case of Draupadi,Bhishma and later Uttara. My point was to prove that quoting Krishna from Gita and his teachings from only Gita is not sufficient. What ever Krishna in the Gita has said it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the battle field. Gita is more of spiritual nature rather than mere philosophical. We must see the Krishna in entire Mahabharata. I never shifted from my any of points. The two examples, student/king and Krishna/Arjuna/Gita which you put forward, I was not able to understand properly. That is why I tried to get it through.If you still allow me to say, I wished to have clear-cut tabular information regarding the Bhrstachar done or caused by Guru/Sthana vis-a-vis "Sthana Brhashta Karoti...". When Guru is responsible for Brahstha of Sthana then it must be either brahstachar of Guru or Sthana. Otherwise Brahstha will not occur. It must Guru at a sthana doing Brahstachar or Stahana attributes getting Brahstha because of Guru. If we personify SThana, as Lagna as self and 9/10 as father then brahstachar should be from that respective person.Is there any other possibility?I never said that Guru is not papi or malefic. It can be good or bad to a lagna but I could not understand when Guru is at your place how can it be malefic or why it does brhasta of sthana? It was 'distrubed' feeling which was main line of argument. I thought that, this argument lacks universality and since Vedic astrological hindu principles are usually universal I wanted to put forward my line of argument against this statement. So I humbly wanted to request to reconsider the statement of yours that "I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I dont have a tendency to surf on emotional thought process without supporting logic from scriptures/text books. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMandarvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Amolmandar,> You know me too well to understand that I am not given to anger.I got> exasperated when you tried to twist what the Lord Krishna said about how> yogi faces death, though you are well versed in scriptures.> > It serves no purpose to read meanings where there are none. I have noted> this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only. For a fruitful> discussion it is better to stick to one thread, so that everybody's> knowledge increases. Even now you think in terms of Bhrashtachar of> Guru.Could you tell me where have I ever said that Guru is responsible for> Bhrashtachara( you said"possible Brhastachar of Guru ".)?.> > Again in the examples given by you you are deviating from what has been said> in Gita. If I remember right,the point was whether shishyas failed or Gurus.> The discussion was about grieving over death and not about anger.I had> quoted specific shlokas and do not understand why you chose not to answer> about them and veered to selective parts of Mahabharata.> > If you feel Krishna's word is inferior to what is supposed to be stated by> Vyasa, I do not to this view. You must be aware that most of the> epics were gilded later on by additions by other writers and these include,> both Ramayana and Mahabharata. It is like pitting what has been said in> Padma Purana against that given in Linga Purana, without understanding the> essense of the Hindu philisophy. Such discussions lead one nowhere. I have> already told you to apply the given principles yourself and find out what> are the results.This is the best way to learn the science.> Hope this helps.> Chandrashekhar.> -----Original Message-----> amolmandar [amolmandar]> Monday, September 01, 2003 4:50 PM> vedic astrology> Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> > It seems that you are angry with me. I am sorry that I tested your> patience more than I am allowed to. But I hope that you will pardon> my adventure. I did not want to get a abnormal death to the Thread,> at least not before getting fully satisfied, but it seems that i> must realize "Sthana Brhasta Karoti........" principle of Guru.> Just a small request,if you dont take otherwise,please give explicit> table of possible Brhastachar of Guru per sthana(or should it be> Brhastachar of Sthana because of Guru.) As implicit examples are too> far from my little brain I request you to make it as explicit as> possible.> > I know that there wont be any discussions further but to put some of> the Krishnas reactions will be interesting for you.> > Before the start of the war Darupadi told her agony regarding> Vastraharan in the Rajashabha in fornt of all Gurus and Krishna was> very distressed to hear that. He expressed his SatyaKriya as> > this> > "Rodayishyanti striyo heyveam yesham krudhaasi bhavini |> Bibhastasusharmsanchannachonitaoopariplutan ||> Nihatan valabhan vikshaya shayanan vasudhatale |> yat samartham pandavanam tat kariyashami shuchaH||> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken insult of Daupadi as a> Yogi but he did not.> > > In the course of war one day Bhisma was furious at Pandavsena and> that resulted in many deaths in pandav side. Krishna could not> tolerate death of his near and dear ones and inspite of his pleadge,> opted for picking-up the dhanushya to destroy Bhisma. Here, Krishna> did not remember what he preached himself to Arjuna(SukhaDukhe Same> Krutwa...) before start of the war.> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandavsena as> a Yogi but he did not.> > And at the end of the war when Aashawatthama and Arjuna applied> Brahmastra on each other, Arjuna called his astra back on the> request of Vyas but Ashwatthama refused saying that it is for> destruction of last Pandav vansha. It was aimed at the Garbha of> uttara,wife of Abhimanyu. Hearing this Krishna was very distrubed> and cursed Ashwatthama. I think Krishna gave curse only once in his> life and that to a Brahman.> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandav> vanshaja as a Yogi but he did not.> > > So there is no question of interpreting scriptures according to our> needs. What is stated by Vyasa is plain and simple. One has to read> it in totality.> > Once again I am extremly sorry for the trouble I created for you.> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > AmolMAndar> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Amolmandar,> > I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an> aside from> > astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of> Bhagvadgita.Could> > you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva shochastvam> > pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti> panditah"?> > Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on. It> would> > ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these.> > I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita> and that> > sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to the> > circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we> seek. I have> > seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of> death of> > other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying> this> > anywhere.> > Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in> which he is> > situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would not> like to> > comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages.> > Hope this helps> > Chandrashekhar.> > -----Original Message-----> > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PM> > vedic astrology> > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> >> > >I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the> Guru,> > >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma.> >> > This statement is not clear with the astrological context. In the> > non-astrological sense as well why would student> feel 'distrubed' in> > the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's> place.> > i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why> student> > should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to> > celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to> Gurus> > place. When Guru has come to your place student will never think> of> > anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question> > of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to a> House> > (student) it must get protection from the Guru. The capabilities> of> > the House should become more expressive with the blessings from> the> > Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) but> > certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except> > Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of> > Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good'> and 'bad' in> > the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi vastraharan,> > Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be> put,> > where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things> happened.> > Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. Krishna did> > not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to fight.> >> > As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is absolutly> > nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to> grief> > on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki> Ranmayana> > Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman had> to> > say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death of> near> > and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and medium> of> > expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam> krutwa...".> > he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete shloka> then> > it would be clear.> >> > SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo |> > tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38||> >> > Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya as> same> > you should be ready for the war.> >> > So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not act> as a> > klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that does> > not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death of> his> > own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any> grief> > over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war then it> > could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna has> > further said> >> > "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH|> > shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||"> >> > So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to> Arjuna> > and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna> (guru)> > was with him.> >> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > AmolMAndar> >> >> >> >> >> > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > You are again missing the point. I have not said that student> does> > anything> > > bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of> the> > Guru, him> > > being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the> house> > does not> > > express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while> indicating> > effect of> > > Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the example> is> > meant only> > > to amplify the concept and the example, though based on> > astrological> > > concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not> > understand the> > > concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in Mahabharata.> > Their> > > shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including Arjuna.> > You know> > > that I do not generally enter into debates based on perception> of> > > scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna> having> > failed.> > > Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. The> > lord asked> > > him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This> > included"Sukha> > > Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of Abhimanyu> and> > swore> > > death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of> which> > the Lord> > > had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons and> > those of> > > others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by> Ashwatthama> > he grieved> > > again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord> failed> > to impart> > > knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? One> has> > to> > > understand the difference between physical Guru and the Guru> > principle> > > represented by Jupiter.> > > Hope this helps.> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM> > > vedic astrology> > > Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> > destroying the> > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste> > >> > > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as bad> but> > tone> > > I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king as> bad.> > >> > > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad.> > >> > > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear> about> > > student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. What> is the> > > youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru being> > placed> > > their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails because> of> > ego> > > and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every> Guru> > > except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of> either> > of> > > these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with> you,> > you> > > are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will> create> > > problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as> ideal> > one.> > > That is why I feel,Guru should never fail.> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > >> > > AmolMAndar> > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar> Sharma"> > > <boxdel> wrote:> > > > Dear Amol Mandar,> > > > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said> that> > > Student/King is> > > > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about a> > > displinarian Guru> > > > living with him, though he understands that the lessons> are for> > > his own> > > > good.> > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > >> > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM> > > > vedic astrology> > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable> of> > > destroying the> > > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > >> > > >> > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> > > >> > > > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king and> > > > teacher/minister why do we consider by default,student or> > king> > > > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in that> > should> > > > protect their good and at least should not spoil the> effect.> > > > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the> presence> > of> > > Guru,> > > > student would be interested in doing something bad? A> good> > > student> > > > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru> should> > > enhance> > > > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas> > capabilty.> > > If> > > > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. As it> > would> > > fail> > > > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should have> that> > much> > > > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of> Susthanas> > i.e.> > > > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated> ego? In> > that> > > > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the> company of> > > good> > > > student because of his big EGO and in the company of bad> > student> > > > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, if> > student> > > is> > > > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the case> of> > good> > > > student Guru must appriciate student.> > > >> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > >> > > > AmolMAndar> > > >> > > >> > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar> > Sharma"> > > > <boxdel> wrote:> > > > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > > > I will give you an example outside astrology and> > religion.Guru> > > > represents> > > > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that which> is> > > right.> > > > Students> > > > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of the> > Teacher> > > as he> > > > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their youth> they> > > want to> > > > do> > > Simialr is the case with> > > > the king> > > > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something that> is> > > against> > > > RajDharma.> > > > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being the> > > student/King> > > > and> > > > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the house> would> > be> > > clear.> > > > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way at> > looking> > > at it> > > > in order> > > > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages'> principles> > are> > > given> > > > to us as> > > > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to apply> our> > > Viveka> > > > to fathom> > > > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold different> > views.> > > > > Hope this helps understand the concept.> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM> > > > > vedic astrology> > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> capable> > of> > > > destroying the> > > > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Chandrashekharji Namste> > > > >> > > > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly but> just> > > slight> > > > doubt.> > > > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not> religion)> > and> > > it> > > > is as> > > > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but> usually> > fails.> > > > Hence> > > > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So> Guru> > > should also> > > > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to house?> Does> > > MAYA> > > > play> > > > > any role in this?> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > >> > > > > AmolMAndar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Archives: vedic-> astrology> > > > >> > > > > Group info: vedic-> > > astrology/info.html> > > > >> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > >> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > >> > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > > >> > > > > Your use of is subject to the > Terms> > of> > > > Service.> > > > >> > > > > ---> > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system> (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date:> > 8/19/03> > > >> > > >> > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > >> > > > Group info: vedic-> > > astrology/info.html> > > >> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> > > > Terms> of> > > Service.> > > >> > > > ---> > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date:> 8/19/03> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > > Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> > Service.> > >> > > ---> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2003 Report Share Posted September 3, 2003 Chandrashekhar ji Namaste Last time you wrote "You reffered to Shishyas failing Gurus except Arjuna failing Lord Krishna in Mahabharata." I beg your pardon. I never said this. I said, failing of Gurus in Mahabharta except Krishna. I never said that shishyas failing Gurus except Arjuna failing Krishna. These are not my words. I will reproduce it for your kind considerations. "Dont you think Guru fails because of ego and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you,you are bound to succeed." SO where is the question of I refering,Arjuna failing Krishna or for that matter any shishya failing guru? I was reffering to the fact that if at all, Guru fails it is usually because of big EGO or lack of courage. In this context Krishna never failed in Mahabharata. This is what all I said. I never compared Krishna-Arjuna as Guru- Shishyas. Krishna was GURU of all mankind and not only Arjuna although Arjuna was his best companion.He loved Arjuna like father,friend,elder brother and a Guru. That is why I said you shifted from main thread to secondary. Now as far as pre-Gita relationship of Krishna-Arjuna, I would like to first say that krishna was considered as Vishnuavatar by pandavs,Bhisma,Drona,Kripa and all known 'Gurus' at the Kurukul. In the Rajsuya yagnya of Yudhisthir, everyone agreed to worship Krishna first he being Vishnu himself. Shishipal did not agree and was later killed by Sudarshanchakra of Vishnu possesed by Krishna. In that assembly everyone was lucky enough to see that Virat darshan of Krishna. So it confirms that Krishna was considered as Bhagawan by one and all. If we have to argue on 'Guru' and Bhagawan is not same then possibly we would loose the point of contention. All Devas,Bhagawan,Lords are Gurus. Because the word Guru itself means "gakaraH sidhadhida proktato refaH papasya harakaH| ukaro vishnurvyatastitayatma GuruH paraH||" As far as Gita and shlokas put up by your side I would like to point out the very fact that the Adhyaya in which these are present, begins with a very interesting situation. With your permissions I would like to put forward it in best possible manner. First Skloka of 2 Adhyaya "Tam Tatha Krupayavisthamshrupurna kule kishnam | vishidadantamidim vakyamuvacha madhusudan||1|| [Free translation] Seeing Arjuna full of compassion, deeply conserned and his eyes full of tears, Madhusudan spoke following sentences. "Krutstva kshmlamidim vishame samupisthitham | Anayajusthamswargamkirtirimjuna ||2 || [Free translation] O,Arjuna how have these impurites come upon you at such time? These are unprogressive,derogative and bringing infamy. "Klibyam ma sma gamaH partha naiitatvayayuppdhyete| kishudra hridayamdaurbalam tyavaktvotisthi paramtap||3|| [Free translation] O Son of Protha, do not succumb to degrading impotence. It does not benefit you. Cast off such nasty weakness of heart and stand up to the greater cause,O great performance of penance. Upon this Arjuna again said "KAtham bhishmaham sankhe dronam cha madhusudan | ishubhihi prati yooiityasyami poojarvasrisudhan||4|| [Free translation] O madhusudhan,O arisudhana, how can I counterattack with arrows personalities like bhishma and dorna,who are worthy of worship? After that Arjuna said similar things till shlokas 9. At 5th shloka Arjuna says "It is better to live begging than to live by killing these people worthy of worship." In 6th he adds that it is not good to live by killing the sons of Dhritrashra. In the 7th shloka he makes his position clear,he says that now I am suffering from mental weakness and hence I am confused about Dharma (Constitutional duty). I am asking you to tell me clearly what is best for me because I have surrendered myself to you as your disciple. In the shloka 8th he further adds that I find no way out of this whirlpool of grief which is drying my senses. Common persons,proud of their intelligence,generally take shelter of the religious assumptions and ethical suppositions of their time, in order to show that their thoughts and actions thereto are quite correct and worthy of praise. They never feel that they are wrong. The Arjun here has been shown by Ved Vyasa, of similar mentality.Hence Arjuna here has been shown to say that he would better beg than to kill the so called supiriors who are openly siding the enemies. Many a times persons having a place in the society also speak such thoughts as Arjuna did but such thoughts are impotant and detrimental for the health of the society and even individual. Ved Vyasa right away discards such thought as impotence,dirty and improper for the Arya person. That is why Krishna in shloka 4th is called Madhusudana and Arisudana. Madhusudan is killer of so called sweet engagements(false traditions given in sweet words) and Arisudana meaning killer of unhealthy tendencies. Looking at this condition of great kshatriya like Arjuna, Krishna starts with Sankhya philosophy. The first of this was Ashocchananva... since Arjuna a great worrier was speaking like a commoner and a miser. Now at this juncture Krishna says "Aashochyananyashochstvam prdgyavadamshcha Bhasache| Gatasunagatasuscha nanushochanti panditaH||11|| [Free translation] You are talking things of knowledge and at the same time you are lamenting for what is not worthy of greif. persons may come and may go , but wise do not lament for the same. Arjuna was speaking about traditiona conception and thus thinking that he was really speaking knowledge,which is the terminus of human life. But soul or atman is greater than such traditional social conceptions and hence Krishna gives correct doze to Arjuna,who was professing about what he was not. With this begining of Sankhya, Krishna then goes on to give all posiible ways of seeking true knowledge. That is why it gets in Karmayoga and Bhakti yoga as well. Because Ved Vyasa wanted to counter the false perception of traditions and to counter the philosophy of dejection and false tyaga, every possible way of seeking knowlwdge in Vedic way was put in Gita. As this philosophy on the face of it seems very convincing and sweet a gereater effort is required and that is why it touches the spiritual aspect as well. But there is no doubt that it begins with a dejected Arjuna and his unnecessary thinking of traditions vis-a-vis swadharma. [i have not twisted anything form Gita to suit my interpretation rather to understand the shloka i have followed the general rules to understand the semantics of words used in the shloka without biased. I have not used here Analogy to come to the meaning of the shlokas.] Now regarding tabular form, you said that "You had said about a tabular form of interpretation of Guru in different places." No I said that with respect to "Sthana Brhastha karoti.." principle of Guru/Jupiter please give me tabular information per sthana. At this you said that this is to be applied in wholistic manner and not in isolation. Does this mean to apply this principle on hindsight? If nothig seems to justify then blame it on Sthana bhrastha karoti principle of Guru!. Last time only I said that when Guru does Brhastha of sthana then it must be because of brahsthachar of either Guru or sthana personified. Is there anything wrong in this? Anything go Brhastha only if some brhasthachar gets done. So I wanted to know in what way Guru does Brhasthachar given a position OR How Sthana pserforms brhasthachar my mere presence of Guru? And since there is no good answer to this it becomes a rule to be applied on the hindsight. So following things are worth noting. I did refer to MAhabharat only and never mentioned Arjuna or Gita from my side first. I never mentioned Krishna-Arjuna as Guru-Shishya first, rather you assumed that I am referring to that, for the reasons best known to you. You shifted to these issues and drifted discussions towards these points. On repeated orders from you, I tried to analyse shlokas from Gita. That may have caused my mail lengthy please excuse me for that. After repeated request, you siad that the "Sthana Brhastha karoti..." principle is to be applied on wholistic manner and not in isolation. May be on the hindsights. Am I right? Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. AmolMandar vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote: > Dear Amolmandar, > > You are confusing the issues. You reffered to Shishyas failing Gurus except > Arjuna failing Lord Krishna in Mahabharata.No doubt, you reffered to > Mahabharata and not Gita and Gita subject was brought in by me. However are > there references in Mahabharata where Krishna is reffered to as Guru of > Arjuna prior to his recital of Gita to Arjuna? > > The Mahabharata that I know tells about Krupacharya being Guru of Kuruvansha > and Dronacharya being Guru of Kuru Rajkumars for warfare. Again in Gita > itself Arjuna begs pardon of the Lord for having reffered to him as > Sakha(Friend) after the Vishvarupa is revealed by the Lord.Should you doubt > existence of the shloka refer to Adhyaya 11 shloka 41 and 42. > > This being the case, I do not understand how I have "shifted" from the > thread by giving Gita shloka and the arguments.In case some other reference > of Krishna as Guru of Arjuna pre Gita revelation is available in the edition > of Gita available with you, kindly quote from it so that my knowledge of > scriptures can increase. > > I have said that the attributes of yogi included Sukh dukkhe sam krutwa > since after telling Arjuna about Ashocchananva shochaste... at Adhyaya2 Sh. > 11 and other shlokas , as you call them, Sukh dukkhe same krutwa appears as > shloka 39 in the same adhyaaya and the statement there in refers to what the > Lor has told Arjuna vide Ashocchananva...Adhyaya 2 sh11. which incidentally > is the begining of the Lord's upadesha in that Adhyaya. The meaning of any > shashtra is to be taken into its entirety and not from individual shlokas, > is the teaching of the Gurus(and even Lord Krishna instructs Arjuna about > how study of is to be done in Gita). If you need reference for this > statement of mine, refer to Neelakantha Tajiki on Prashnatantra. Therefore > it(Sukhadukkhe..) does not only refer to the war but the very basis of > Arjuna wanting to avoid war, which was his grief on the posibility of their > dying at his hands. > > Whether grieving for departed ones is justified or not,was not the original > point under discussions. It was about your statement that in Mahabharata > every Guru but Krishna failed his shishya. I merely pointed out that it is > not the Guru failed the shishya but shishyas failed their Gurus and added > that even Arjuna failed Lord Krishna who was his Adhyatmic Guru by virtue of > revelation of Bhagvadgita. If failure of a shishya is not applying the > principles taught by his Guru to real life situation, kindly enlighten what > is the test of a shishya. > > You have said "What ever Krishna in the Gita has said > it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the > battle field." and you are entitled to that opinion.However Gita is much > more than that, it is revelation of the essence of Hindu philosophy, duties, > interpretation of rituals and encompasses Vedas and Upanishadas. Arjuna > having been convinced about the necessity of figthing as you call it by the > Vishvarupa darshan Adhyaaya 11, seeks further knowledge of dharma, Sanyasa > Yogis and the Lord reveals deep philosophy including Kshetra- Kshtreja > knowledge in the remaining 7 adhyaayas. Therefore the logic of calling Gita > as "to convince a dejected kshtriya" is an explaination difficult to digest > for me. > > It is you who talked about Bhrashtachar of Guru, though I had said to > distinguish between Guru as in Jupiter planet and Guru as in Teacher. I had > clearly stated that the example of Teacher/Guru-student/king is given as > strictly apart from astrology and only in order to explain the concept > better.You had said about a tabular form of interpretation of Guru in > different places. As already explained the principles are to be applied in a > wholistic manner and not in isolation or they make one draw wrong > conclusions. > Some one had,painstakingly,even the results of Guru in different Rasis and > Houses as given in Saravali and other standard texts. If you have read them, > you will understand why one get lead astray by applying principles > nonwholistically. > > By the way you have not given your explaination on "Ashochhananva > shochastve..." your translation of this would be appreciated. It would also > help us understand the advice given by the Lord to Arjuna about grief on > passing away of near ones and happiness on birth of one. It would be > interesting to know whether Arjna followed the advice. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:12 PM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > "I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours > only." I think there is indeed a 'gap' in this. > > Sir, with all due respect I would like to draw your attention to the > following facts.There are again few stops. > > Lets trace out the things: > > In one of my mails I said > > [Me]>>MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru > except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of > either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is > with you,you are bound to succeed. > > > Sir, Please note , I said only Mahabharat and without any reference > to Gita. The MAhabhart and Krishna reference was to put forward that > when real Guru is with you, you will succeed. > > In response to this, discussion was sifted by you to Bhagvat Gita > and made main point of thread by puting half shloka from the gita. > > > [You]>>Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. > The lord asked him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. > This included"Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...". > > You as well said that since Arjuna grieved at the loss of near and > dear ones does it attribute to faliure of either Krishna or Arjuna. > > Now since I thought that the shloka which you quoted should be taken > in totality and not in parts I said that "SUkha Dukkha Sama > krutva.." was in regard with War and gave the complete shloka . I as > well put forward the example of Rama who grieved like child in > Valmiki Ramayana at the loss of Sita (which you did not take > cognizance of!). With Lord Rama grieving at the loss of near and > dear, Arjunas greiving is well justified and hence said neither > Krishna nor Arjuna failed. To greif at the loss of near and dear is > a duty of every Grihasta. Nothing unsual about it. > > At this, you were amazed and put up few more shlokas from Gita. > Since they were all related to same part of the Mahabharata i.e. > making Arjuna realized futility of human relation at the time of war > I thought that I would give example of Krishnas behaviour before and > after war. > > Sir, it was not simple anger but grief as well in the Satyakriya of > Krisha in the case of Draupadi,Bhishma and later Uttara. My point > was to prove that quoting Krishna from Gita and his teachings from > only Gita is not sufficient. What ever Krishna in the Gita has said > it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the > battle field. Gita is more of spiritual nature rather than mere > philosophical. We must see the Krishna in entire Mahabharata. > > I never shifted from my any of points. The two examples, > student/king and Krishna/Arjuna/Gita which you put forward, I was > not able to understand properly. That is why I tried to get it > through. > > If you still allow me to say, I wished to have clear-cut tabular > information regarding the Bhrstachar done or caused by Guru/Sthana > vis-a-vis "Sthana Brhashta Karoti...". When Guru is responsible for > Brahstha of Sthana then it must be either brahstachar of Guru or > Sthana. Otherwise Brahstha will not occur. It must Guru at a sthana > doing Brahstachar or Stahana attributes getting Brahstha because of > Guru. If we personify SThana, as Lagna as self and 9/10 as father > then brahstachar should be from that respective person.Is there any > other possibility? > > I never said that Guru is not papi or malefic. It can be good or > bad to a lagna but I could not understand when Guru is at your place > how can it be malefic or why it does brhasta of sthana? > > It was 'distrubed' feeling which was main line of argument. I > thought that, this argument lacks universality and since Vedic > astrological hindu principles are usually universal I wanted to put > forward my line of argument against this statement. So I humbly > wanted to request to reconsider the statement of yours that "I have > noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I dont > have a tendency to surf on emotional thought process without > supporting logic from scriptures/text books. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > AmolMandar > > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > <boxdel> wrote: > > Dear Amolmandar, > > You know me too well to understand that I am not given to anger.I > got > > exasperated when you tried to twist what the Lord Krishna said > about how > > yogi faces death, though you are well versed in scriptures. > > > > It serves no purpose to read meanings where there are none. I have > noted > > this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only. For a > fruitful > > discussion it is better to stick to one thread, so that everybody's > > knowledge increases. Even now you think in terms of Bhrashtachar of > > Guru.Could you tell me where have I ever said that Guru is > responsible for > > Bhrashtachara( you said"possible Brhastachar of Guru ".)?. > > > > Again in the examples given by you you are deviating from what has > been said > > in Gita. If I remember right,the point was whether shishyas failed > or Gurus. > > The discussion was about grieving over death and not about anger.I > had > > quoted specific shlokas and do not understand why you chose not to > answer > > about them and veered to selective parts of Mahabharata. > > > > If you feel Krishna's word is inferior to what is supposed to be > stated by > > Vyasa, I do not to this view. You must be aware that > most of the > > epics were gilded later on by additions by other writers and > these include, > > both Ramayana and Mahabharata. It is like pitting what has been > said in > > Padma Purana against that given in Linga Purana, without > understanding the > > essense of the Hindu philisophy. Such discussions lead one > nowhere. I have > > already told you to apply the given principles yourself and find > out what > > are the results.This is the best way to learn the science. > > Hope this helps. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > Monday, September 01, 2003 4:50 PM > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of > destroying the > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > > > It seems that you are angry with me. I am sorry that I tested > your > > patience more than I am allowed to. But I hope that you will > pardon > > my adventure. I did not want to get a abnormal death to the > Thread, > > at least not before getting fully satisfied, but it seems that i > > must realize "Sthana Brhasta Karoti........" principle of Guru. > > Just a small request,if you dont take otherwise,please give > explicit > > table of possible Brhastachar of Guru per sthana(or should it be > > Brhastachar of Sthana because of Guru.) As implicit examples are > too > > far from my little brain I request you to make it as explicit as > > possible. > > > > I know that there wont be any discussions further but to put > some of > > the Krishnas reactions will be interesting for you. > > > > Before the start of the war Darupadi told her agony regarding > > Vastraharan in the Rajashabha in fornt of all Gurus and Krishna > was > > very distressed to hear that. He expressed his SatyaKriya as > > > > this > > > > "Rodayishyanti striyo heyveam yesham krudhaasi bhavini | > > Bibhastasusharmsanchannachonitaoopariplutan || > > Nihatan valabhan vikshaya shayanan vasudhatale | > > yat samartham pandavanam tat kariyashami shuchaH|| > > > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken insult of Daupadi > as a > > Yogi but he did not. > > > > > > In the course of war one day Bhisma was furious at Pandavsena and > > that resulted in many deaths in pandav side. Krishna could not > > tolerate death of his near and dear ones and inspite of his > pleadge, > > opted for picking-up the dhanushya to destroy Bhisma. Here, > Krishna > > did not remember what he preached himself to Arjuna (SukhaDukhe > Same > > Krutwa...) before start of the war. > > > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of > pandavsena as > > a Yogi but he did not. > > > > And at the end of the war when Aashawatthama and Arjuna applied > > Brahmastra on each other, Arjuna called his astra back on the > > request of Vyas but Ashwatthama refused saying that it is for > > destruction of last Pandav vansha. It was aimed at the Garbha of > > uttara,wife of Abhimanyu. Hearing this Krishna was very distrubed > > and cursed Ashwatthama. I think Krishna gave curse only once in > his > > life and that to a Brahman. > > > > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandav > > vanshaja as a Yogi but he did not. > > > > > > So there is no question of interpreting scriptures according to > our > > needs. What is stated by Vyasa is plain and simple. One has to > read > > it in totality. > > > > Once again I am extremly sorry for the trouble I created for you. > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > Dear Amolmandar, > > > I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an > > aside from > > > astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of > > Bhagvadgita.Could > > > you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva > shochastvam > > > pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti > > panditah"? > > > Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on. > It > > would > > > ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these. > > > I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita > > and that > > > sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to > the > > > circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we > > seek. I have > > > seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of > > death of > > > other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying > > this > > > anywhere. > > > Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in > > which he is > > > situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would > not > > like to > > > comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages. > > > Hope this helps > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PM > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of > > destroying the > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > > > > > >I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the > > Guru, > > > >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. > > > > > > This statement is not clear with the astrological context. > In the > > > non-astrological sense as well why would student > > feel 'distrubed' in > > > the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's > > place. > > > i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why > > student > > > should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to > > > celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to > > Gurus > > > place. When Guru has come to your place student will never > think > > of > > > anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question > > > of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to > a > > House > > > (student) it must get protection from the Guru. The > capabilities > > of > > > the House should become more expressive with the blessings > from > > the > > > Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful) > but > > > certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except > > > Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of > > > Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good' > > and 'bad' in > > > the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi > vastraharan, > > > Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be > > put, > > > where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things > > happened. > > > Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego. > Krishna did > > > not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to > fight. > > > > > > As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is > absolutly > > > nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to > > grief > > > on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki > > Ranmayana > > > Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman > had > > to > > > say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death > of > > near > > > and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and > medium > > of > > > expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam > > krutwa...". > > > he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete > shloka > > then > > > it would be clear. > > > > > > SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo | > > > tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38|| > > > > > > Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya- PArajaya > as > > same > > > you should be ready for the war. > > > > > > So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not > act > > as a > > > klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that > does > > > not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death > of > > his > > > own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any > > grief > > > over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war > then it > > > could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna > has > > > further said > > > > > > "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH| > > > shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||" > > > > > > So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to > > Arjuna > > > and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna > > (guru) > > > was with him. > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar > Sharma" > > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > > Dear Amolmandar, > > > > You are again missing the point. I have not said that > student > > does > > > anything > > > > bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence > of > > the > > > Guru, him > > > > being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the > > house > > > does not > > > > express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while > > indicating > > > effect of > > > > Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the > example > > is > > > meant only > > > > to amplify the concept and the example, though based on > > > astrological > > > > concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not > > > understand the > > > > concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in > Mahabharata. > > > Their > > > > shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including > Arjuna. > > > You know > > > > that I do not generally enter into debates based on > perception > > of > > > > scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna > > having > > > failed. > > > > Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve. > The > > > lord asked > > > > him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This > > > included"Sukha > > > > Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of > Abhimanyu > > and > > > swore > > > > death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of > > which > > > the Lord > > > > had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons > and > > > those of > > > > others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by > > Ashwatthama > > > he grieved > > > > again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord > > failed > > > to impart > > > > knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna? > One > > has > > > to > > > > understand the difference between physical Guru and the > Guru > > > principle > > > > represented by Jupiter. > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > > Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM > > > > vedic astrology > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable > of > > > destroying the > > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste > > > > > > > > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as > bad > > but > > > tone > > > > I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king > as > > bad. > > > > > > > > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad. > > > > > > > > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear > > about > > > > student/king as house and its youth and bad activity. > What > > is the > > > > youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru > being > > > placed > > > > their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails > because > > of > > > ego > > > > and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. > Every > > Guru > > > > except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of > > either > > > of > > > > these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is > with > > you, > > > you > > > > are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will > > create > > > > problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as > > ideal > > > one. > > > > That is why I feel,Guru should never fail. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > vedic- astrology, "Chandrashekhar > > Sharma" > > > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > > > Dear Amol Mandar, > > > > > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said > > that > > > > Student/King is > > > > > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about > a > > > > displinarian Guru > > > > > living with him, though he understands that the lessons > > are for > > > > his own > > > > > good. > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > > > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter > capable > > of > > > > destroying the > > > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste > > > > > > > > > > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king > and > > > > > teacher/minister why do we consider by > default,student or > > > king > > > > > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in > that > > > should > > > > > protect their good and at least should not spoil the > > effect. > > > > > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the > > presence > > > of > > > > Guru, > > > > > student would be interested in doing something bad? A > > good > > > > student > > > > > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru > > should > > > > enhance > > > > > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas > > > capabilty. > > > > If > > > > > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without. > As it > > > would > > > > fail > > > > > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should > have > > that > > > much > > > > > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of > > Susthanas > > > i.e. > > > > > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated > > ego? In > > > that > > > > > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the > > company of > > > > good > > > > > student because of his big EGO and in the company of > bad > > > student > > > > > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact, > if > > > student > > > > is > > > > > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the > case > > of > > > good > > > > > student Guru must appriciate student. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- > astrology, "Chandrashekhar > > > Sharma" > > > > > <boxdel> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Amolmandar, > > > > > > I will give you an example outside astrology and > > > religion.Guru > > > > > represents > > > > > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that > which > > is > > > > right. > > > > > Students > > > > > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of > the > > > Teacher > > > > as he > > > > > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their > youth > > they > > > > want to > > > > > do > > > > Simialr is the case with > > > > > the king > > > > > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something > that > > is > > > > against > > > > > RajDharma. > > > > > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being > the > > > > student/King > > > > > and > > > > > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the > house > > would > > > be > > > > clear. > > > > > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way > at > > > looking > > > > at it > > > > > in order > > > > > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages' > > principles > > > are > > > > given > > > > > to us as > > > > > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to > apply > > our > > > > Viveka > > > > > to fathom > > > > > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold > different > > > views. > > > > > > Hope this helps understand the concept. > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar] > > > > > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter > > capable > > > of > > > > > destroying the > > > > > > house it and Saturn Protects// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrashekharji Namste > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly > but > > just > > > > slight > > > > > doubt. > > > > > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not > > religion) > > > and > > > > it > > > > > is as > > > > > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but > > usually > > > fails. > > > > > Hence > > > > > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So > > Guru > > > > should also > > > > > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to > house? > > Does > > > > MAYA > > > > > play > > > > > > any role in this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > > > > > > > > > > > AmolMAndar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic- > > astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic- astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > > Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > Terms > > > of > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release > Date: > > > 8/19/03 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic- > astrology > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > Terms > > of > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: > > 8/19/03 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic- astrology > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > Terms > of > > > Service. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: > 8/19/03 > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/03 > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03 > > > Sponsor > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2003 Report Share Posted September 3, 2003 Dear Amolmandar, Perhaps the whole confusion arises out of the difference between your perception and mine on the meaning of Guru. As far as I know the word GURU is derived from two letters GU and RU and implies one who removes the darkness of ignorance. That being the case if you accept somebody as GURU of somebody, it would be the Shishya who could fail and not the GURU. However since you want to indulge in semantics, let us examine again the history of this thread. If you remember ,on your statement of Guru failing shishya message, my reply was that it is not Guru who fails shishya but shishyas that fail Gurus.For your convinience I will paste the same from this message it self "Again I do not understand the concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing inMahabharata.Their shishyas might have failed as indeed they did includingArjuna." Having made my position clear , I answered you and you answered with, "So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to Arjuna and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna (guru)was with him." Again you have not yet explained how without Gita coming in to the discussion, Arjuna's shishyatva of Krishna or Krishna being Guru of Arjuna prior to Gita when Arjuna himself called him Sakha or friend till that time. Trying to state what Krishan's being accepted aas Vishnu does not make him Guru of Arjuna pre Gita. If you apply this principle then by your own logic all those who accepted this, including the Kauravas, were Krisha's shishya and since Kauravas lost both their lives and their kingdom by your logic Krishna failed to teach all of them and as such failed as a Guru.In that case your earlier statement of Krishna not having failed as Guru would be wrong. In caseyou find fault with this logic and insist that by virtue of being accepted as God earlier he becomes exclusive Guru of Arjuna(which argument if put forth defies logic) and Arjuna did everything right as (as you said) his guru was with him. Then pray why did Arjuna not learn and did not want to go to war with the Kauravas, by your logic this in itself would be failure of Krishna as guru(since Krishna was physically present with him in the chariot). If you want to deviate from this logic, then explain why even after the Lord told Arjuna to be fixed in Yoga and also that for all yogis, final emancipation and reach his(Krishna's) abode(Swarga) is the goal; and adviced him to strive for it, did not Arjuna reach Swarga, unlike Yudhishthira and his Dog. By your logic, this would indicate that Krishna failed as a Guru. Either you are using the term Virata darshan of Kishna in a very loose way when you say that at Rajsuya Yagna "In that assembly everyone was lucky enough to see that Virat darshan of Krishna."or you imply that when Krishna told Arjuna that this Rupa cannot be seen even by Arjuna with his human eyes and so granted him the Divya drishti, he made a wrong statement. Clarify your position on above two points before we go on debating fruitlessly. Giving endless shlokas of Gita with misplaced translation does not make wrong right. "Gatasoonagataasuscha" does not refer to " persons may come and may go" but those dead and those yet to be born. I do not understand why the shloka is "freely" translated as such. It would ,indeed be interesting to see your translation of" avyaktadini Bhootaani.....Tatra kaparivedana" Ad.2 Sh.28. Trivialising the divine knowledge which the Lord himself says is " Puratan yoga a dovine secret (worthy of being kept secret)" by calling it " Krishna gives correct doze to Arjuna" is not correct. Similar is the strange translation of Madhusudana and Arisudana. Krishna had killed many demons and Madhu and Ari were amongst them.Madhusudana means "One who has killed Madhu" and similar is the meaning of Arisudana. Trying to take out a different meaning out of these names of Krishna to suit an argument is not very correct. Already a lot of valuable space is being wasted on the list by giving full versions of shlokas and out of context material. So please at least reply to this by giving replies to the points raised specifically. Also if you can look at this as a discussion to gain knowledge rather than as an argument between two sides reducing it to a caricature of Kaurava Pandava conflict( your quote"As far as Gita and shlokas put up by your side " ) may be the concept would become clear. Chandrashekhar. amolmandar [amolmandar ]Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:07 PMTo: vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects//Chandrashekhar ji NamasteLast time you wrote"You reffered to Shishyas failing Gurus except Arjuna failing Lord Krishna in Mahabharata." I beg your pardon. I never said this.I said, failing of Gurus in Mahabharta except Krishna. I never said that shishyas failing Gurus except Arjuna failing Krishna. These are not my words. I will reproduce it for your kind considerations. "Dont you think Guru fails because of ego and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is with you,you are bound to succeed."SO where is the question of I refering,Arjuna failing Krishna or for that matter any shishya failing guru? I was reffering to the fact that if at all, Guru fails it is usually because of big EGO or lack of courage. In this context Krishna never failed in Mahabharata. This is what all I said. I never compared Krishna-Arjuna as Guru-Shishyas. Krishna was GURU of all mankind and not only Arjuna although Arjuna was his best companion.He loved Arjuna like father,friend,elder brother and a Guru. That is why I said you shifted from main thread to secondary. Now as far as pre-Gita relationship of Krishna-Arjuna, I would like to first say that krishna was considered as Vishnuavatar by pandavs,Bhisma,Drona,Kripa and all known 'Gurus' at the Kurukul. In the Rajsuya yagnya of Yudhisthir, everyone agreed to worship Krishna first he being Vishnu himself. Shishipal did not agree and was later killed by Sudarshanchakra of Vishnu possesed by Krishna. In that assembly everyone was lucky enough to see that Virat darshan of Krishna. So it confirms that Krishna was considered as Bhagawan by one and all. If we have to argue on 'Guru' and Bhagawan is not same then possibly we would loose the point of contention. All Devas,Bhagawan,Lords are Gurus. Because the word Guru itself means "gakaraH sidhadhida proktato refaH papasya harakaH|ukaro vishnurvyatastitayatma GuruH paraH||"As far as Gita and shlokas put up by your side I would like to point out the very fact that the Adhyaya in which these are present, begins with a very interesting situation. With your permissions I would like to put forward it in best possible manner.First Skloka of 2 Adhyaya"Tam Tatha Krupayavisthamshrupurna kule kishnam |vishidadantamidim vakyamuvacha madhusudan||1||[Free translation]Seeing Arjuna full of compassion, deeply conserned and his eyes full of tears, Madhusudan spoke following sentences."Krutstva kshmlamidim vishame samupisthitham |Anayajusthamswargamkirtirimjuna ||2 ||[Free translation]O,Arjuna how have these impurites come upon you at such time? These are unprogressive,derogative and bringing infamy."Klibyam ma sma gamaH partha naiitatvayayuppdhyete|kishudra hridayamdaurbalam tyavaktvotisthi paramtap||3||[Free translation]O Son of Protha, do not succumb to degrading impotence. It does not benefit you. Cast off such nasty weakness of heart and stand up to the greater cause,O great performance of penance.Upon this Arjuna again said"KAtham bhishmaham sankhe dronam cha madhusudan |ishubhihi prati yooiityasyami poojarvasrisudhan||4||[Free translation]O madhusudhan,O arisudhana, how can I counterattack with arrows personalities like bhishma and dorna,who are worthy of worship?After that Arjuna said similar things till shlokas 9. At 5th shloka Arjuna says "It is better to live begging than to live by killing these people worthy of worship."In 6th he adds that it is not good to live by killing the sons of Dhritrashra. In the 7th shloka he makes his position clear,he says that now I am suffering from mental weakness and hence I am confused about Dharma(Constitutional duty). I am asking you to tell me clearly what is best for me because I have surrendered myself to you as your disciple. In the shloka 8th he further adds that I find no way out of this whirlpool of grief which is drying my senses. Common persons,proud of their intelligence,generally take shelter of the religious assumptions and ethical suppositions of their time, in order to show that their thoughts and actions thereto are quite correct and worthy of praise. They never feel that they are wrong. The Arjun here has been shown by Ved Vyasa, of similar mentality.Hence Arjuna here has been shown to say that he would better beg than to kill the so called supiriors who are openly siding the enemies. Many a times persons having a place in the society also speak such thoughts as Arjuna did but such thoughts are impotant and detrimental for the health of the society and even individual. Ved Vyasa right away discards such thought as impotence,dirty and improper for the Arya person. That is why Krishna in shloka 4th is called Madhusudana and Arisudana. Madhusudan is killer of so called sweet engagements(false traditions given in sweet words) and Arisudana meaning killer of unhealthy tendencies. Looking at this condition of great kshatriya like Arjuna, Krishna starts with Sankhya philosophy. The first of this was Ashocchananva... since Arjuna a great worrier was speaking like a commoner and a miser. Now at this juncture Krishna says"Aashochyananyashochstvam prdgyavadamshcha Bhasache|Gatasunagatasuscha nanushochanti panditaH||11||[Free translation]You are talking things of knowledge and at the same time you are lamenting for what is not worthy of greif. persons may come and may go , but wise do not lament for the same.Arjuna was speaking about traditiona conception and thus thinking that he was really speaking knowledge,which is the terminus of human life. But soul or atman is greater than such traditional social conceptions and hence Krishna gives correct doze to Arjuna,who was professing about what he was not.With this begining of Sankhya, Krishna then goes on to give all posiible ways of seeking true knowledge. That is why it gets in Karmayoga and Bhakti yoga as well. Because Ved Vyasa wanted to counter the false perception of traditions and to counter the philosophy of dejection and false tyaga, every possible way of seeking knowlwdge in Vedic way was put in Gita. As this philosophy on the face of it seems very convincing and sweet a gereater effort is required and that is why it touches the spiritual aspect as well. But there is no doubt that it begins with a dejected Arjuna and his unnecessary thinking of traditions vis-a-vis swadharma.[i have not twisted anything form Gita to suit my interpretation rather to understand the shloka i have followed the general rules to understand the semantics of words used in the shloka without biased. I have not used here Analogy to come to the meaning of the shlokas.]Now regarding tabular form, you said that "You had said about a tabular form of interpretation of Guru in different places." No I said that with respect to "Sthana Brhastha karoti.." principle of Guru/Jupiter please give me tabular information per sthana. At this you said that this is to be applied in wholistic manner and not in isolation. Does this mean to apply this principle on hindsight? If nothig seems to justify then blame it on Sthana bhrastha karoti principle of Guru!.Last time only I said that when Guru does Brhastha of sthana then it must be because of brahsthachar of either Guru or sthana personified. Is there anything wrong in this? Anything go Brhastha only if some brhasthachar gets done. So I wanted to know in what way Guru does Brhasthachar given a position OR How Sthana pserforms brhasthachar my mere presence of Guru? And since there is no good answer to this it becomes a rule to be applied on the hindsight.So following things are worth noting. I did refer to MAhabharat only and never mentioned Arjuna or Gita from my side first. I never mentioned Krishna-Arjuna as Guru-Shishya first, rather you assumed that I am referring to that, for the reasons best known to you. You shifted to these issues and drifted discussions towards these points. On repeated orders from you, I tried to analyse shlokas from Gita. That may have caused my mail lengthy please excuse me for that. After repeated request, you siad that the "Sthana Brhastha karoti..." principle is to be applied on wholistic manner and not in isolation. May be on the hindsights. Am I right?Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.AmolMandarvedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma" <boxdel> wrote:> Dear Amolmandar,> > You are confusing the issues. You reffered to Shishyas failing Gurus except> Arjuna failing Lord Krishna in Mahabharata.No doubt, you reffered to> Mahabharata and not Gita and Gita subject was brought in by me. However are> there references in Mahabharata where Krishna is reffered to as Guru of> Arjuna prior to his recital of Gita to Arjuna?> > The Mahabharata that I know tells about Krupacharya being Guru of Kuruvansha> and Dronacharya being Guru of Kuru Rajkumars for warfare. Again in Gita> itself Arjuna begs pardon of the Lord for having reffered to him as> Sakha(Friend) after the Vishvarupa is revealed by the Lord.Should you doubt> existence of the shloka refer to Adhyaya 11 shloka 41 and 42.> > This being the case, I do not understand how I have "shifted" from the> thread by giving Gita shloka and the arguments.In case some other reference> of Krishna as Guru of Arjuna pre Gita revelation is available in the edition> of Gita available with you, kindly quote from it so that my knowledge of> scriptures can increase.> > I have said that the attributes of yogi included Sukh dukkhe sam krutwa> since after telling Arjuna about Ashocchananva shochaste... at Adhyaya2 Sh.> 11 and other shlokas , as you call them, Sukh dukkhe same krutwa appears as> shloka 39 in the same adhyaaya and the statement there in refers to what the> Lor has told Arjuna vide Ashocchananva...Adhyaya 2 sh11. which incidentally> is the begining of the Lord's upadesha in that Adhyaya. The meaning of any> shashtra is to be taken into its entirety and not from individual shlokas,> is the teaching of the Gurus(and even Lord Krishna instructs Arjuna about> how study of is to be done in Gita). If you need reference for this> statement of mine, refer to Neelakantha Tajiki on Prashnatantra. Therefore> it(Sukhadukkhe..) does not only refer to the war but the very basis of> Arjuna wanting to avoid war, which was his grief on the posibility of their> dying at his hands.> > Whether grieving for departed ones is justified or not,was not the original> point under discussions. It was about your statement that in Mahabharata> every Guru but Krishna failed his shishya. I merely pointed out that it is> not the Guru failed the shishya but shishyas failed their Gurus and added> that even Arjuna failed Lord Krishna who was his Adhyatmic Guru by virtue of> revelation of Bhagvadgita. If failure of a shishya is not applying the> principles taught by his Guru to real life situation, kindly enlighten what> is the test of a shishya.> > You have said "What ever Krishna in the Gita has said> it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the> battle field." and you are entitled to that opinion.However Gita is much> more than that, it is revelation of the essence of Hindu philosophy, duties,> interpretation of rituals and encompasses Vedas and Upanishadas. Arjuna> having been convinced about the necessity of figthing as you call it by the> Vishvarupa darshan Adhyaaya 11, seeks further knowledge of dharma, Sanyasa> Yogis and the Lord reveals deep philosophy including Kshetra- Kshtreja> knowledge in the remaining 7 adhyaayas. Therefore the logic of calling Gita> as "to convince a dejected kshtriya" is an explaination difficult to digest> for me.> > It is you who talked about Bhrashtachar of Guru, though I had said to> distinguish between Guru as in Jupiter planet and Guru as in Teacher. I had> clearly stated that the example of Teacher/Guru-student/king is given as> strictly apart from astrology and only in order to explain the concept> better.You had said about a tabular form of interpretation of Guru in> different places. As already explained the principles are to be applied in a> wholistic manner and not in isolation or they make one draw wrong> conclusions.> Some one had,painstakingly,even the results of Guru in different Rasis and> Houses as given in Saravali and other standard texts. If you have read them,> you will understand why one get lead astray by applying principles> nonwholistically.> > By the way you have not given your explaination on "Ashochhananva> shochastve..." your translation of this would be appreciated. It would also> help us understand the advice given by the Lord to Arjuna about grief on> passing away of near ones and happiness on birth of one. It would be> interesting to know whether Arjna followed the advice.> > Chandrashekhar.> > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:12 PM> vedic astrology> [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the> house it and Saturn Protects//> > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> > "I have noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours> only." I think there is indeed a 'gap' in this.> > Sir, with all due respect I would like to draw your attention to the> following facts.There are again few stops.> > Lets trace out the things:> > In one of my mails I said> > [Me]>>MAhabharat is the best example. Every Guru> except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of> either of these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is> with you,you are bound to succeed.> > > Sir, Please note , I said only Mahabharat and without any reference> to Gita. The MAhabhart and Krishna reference was to put forward that> when real Guru is with you, you will succeed.> > In response to this, discussion was sifted by you to Bhagvat Gita> and made main point of thread by puting half shloka from the gita.> > > [You]>>Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve.> The lord asked him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi.> This included"Sukha Dukkha sam krutwa...".> > You as well said that since Arjuna grieved at the loss of near and> dear ones does it attribute to faliure of either Krishna or Arjuna.> > Now since I thought that the shloka which you quoted should be taken> in totality and not in parts I said that "SUkha Dukkha Sama> krutva.." was in regard with War and gave the complete shloka . I as> well put forward the example of Rama who grieved like child in> Valmiki Ramayana at the loss of Sita (which you did not take> cognizance of!). With Lord Rama grieving at the loss of near and> dear, Arjunas greiving is well justified and hence said neither> Krishna nor Arjuna failed. To greif at the loss of near and dear is> a duty of every Grihasta. Nothing unsual about it.> > At this, you were amazed and put up few more shlokas from Gita.> Since they were all related to same part of the Mahabharata i.e.> making Arjuna realized futility of human relation at the time of war> I thought that I would give example of Krishnas behaviour before and> after war.> > Sir, it was not simple anger but grief as well in the Satyakriya of> Krisha in the case of Draupadi,Bhishma and later Uttara. My point> was to prove that quoting Krishna from Gita and his teachings from> only Gita is not sufficient. What ever Krishna in the Gita has said> it was to convince a dejected Kshtriya who opted to quit from the> battle field. Gita is more of spiritual nature rather than mere> philosophical. We must see the Krishna in entire Mahabharata.> > I never shifted from my any of points. The two examples,> student/king and Krishna/Arjuna/Gita which you put forward, I was> not able to understand properly. That is why I tried to get it> through.> > If you still allow me to say, I wished to have clear-cut tabular> information regarding the Bhrstachar done or caused by Guru/Sthana> vis-a-vis "Sthana Brhashta Karoti...". When Guru is responsible for> Brahstha of Sthana then it must be either brahstachar of Guru or> Sthana. Otherwise Brahstha will not occur. It must Guru at a sthana> doing Brahstachar or Stahana attributes getting Brahstha because of> Guru. If we personify SThana, as Lagna as self and 9/10 as father> then brahstachar should be from that respective person.Is there any> other possibility?> > I never said that Guru is not papi or malefic. It can be good or> bad to a lagna but I could not understand when Guru is at your place> how can it be malefic or why it does brhasta of sthana?> > It was 'distrubed' feeling which was main line of argument. I> thought that, this argument lacks universality and since Vedic> astrological hindu principles are usually universal I wanted to put> forward my line of argument against this statement. So I humbly> wanted to request to reconsider the statement of yours that "I have> noted this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only." I dont> have a tendency to surf on emotional thought process without> supporting logic from scriptures/text books.> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > AmolMandar> > > > --- In vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> <boxdel> wrote:> > Dear Amolmandar,> > You know me too well to understand that I am not given to anger.I> got> > exasperated when you tried to twist what the Lord Krishna said> about how> > yogi faces death, though you are well versed in scriptures.> >> > It serves no purpose to read meanings where there are none. I have> noted> > this tendency in quite a few mails, not of yours only. For a> fruitful> > discussion it is better to stick to one thread, so that everybody's> > knowledge increases. Even now you think in terms of Bhrashtachar of> > Guru.Could you tell me where have I ever said that Guru is> responsible for> > Bhrashtachara( you said"possible Brhastachar of Guru ".)?.> >> > Again in the examples given by you you are deviating from what has> been said> > in Gita. If I remember right,the point was whether shishyas failed> or Gurus.> > The discussion was about grieving over death and not about anger.I> had> > quoted specific shlokas and do not understand why you chose not to> answer> > about them and veered to selective parts of Mahabharata.> >> > If you feel Krishna's word is inferior to what is supposed to be> stated by> > Vyasa, I do not to this view. You must be aware that> most of the> > epics were gilded later on by additions by other writers and> these include,> > both Ramayana and Mahabharata. It is like pitting what has been> said in> > Padma Purana against that given in Linga Purana, without> understanding the> > essense of the Hindu philisophy. Such discussions lead one> nowhere. I have> > already told you to apply the given principles yourself and find> out what> > are the results.This is the best way to learn the science.> > Hope this helps.> > Chandrashekhar.> > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > Monday, September 01, 2003 4:50 PM> > vedic astrology> > Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> destroying the> > house it and Saturn Protects//> >> >> > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> >> > It seems that you are angry with me. I am sorry that I tested> your> > patience more than I am allowed to. But I hope that you will> pardon> > my adventure. I did not want to get a abnormal death to the> Thread,> > at least not before getting fully satisfied, but it seems that i> > must realize "Sthana Brhasta Karoti........" principle of Guru.> > Just a small request,if you dont take otherwise,please give> explicit> > table of possible Brhastachar of Guru per sthana(or should it be> > Brhastachar of Sthana because of Guru.) As implicit examples are> too> > far from my little brain I request you to make it as explicit as> > possible.> >> > I know that there wont be any discussions further but to put> some of> > the Krishnas reactions will be interesting for you.> >> > Before the start of the war Darupadi told her agony regarding> > Vastraharan in the Rajashabha in fornt of all Gurus and Krishna> was> > very distressed to hear that. He expressed his SatyaKriya as> >> > this> >> > "Rodayishyanti striyo heyveam yesham krudhaasi bhavini |> > Bibhastasusharmsanchannachonitaoopariplutan ||> > Nihatan valabhan vikshaya shayanan vasudhatale |> > yat samartham pandavanam tat kariyashami shuchaH||> >> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken insult of Daupadi> as a> > Yogi but he did not.> >> >> > In the course of war one day Bhisma was furious at Pandavsena and> > that resulted in many deaths in pandav side. Krishna could not> > tolerate death of his near and dear ones and inspite of his> pleadge,> > opted for picking-up the dhanushya to destroy Bhisma. Here,> Krishna> > did not remember what he preached himself to Arjuna(SukhaDukhe> Same> > Krutwa...) before start of the war.> >> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of> pandavsena as> > a Yogi but he did not.> >> > And at the end of the war when Aashawatthama and Arjuna applied> > Brahmastra on each other, Arjuna called his astra back on the> > request of Vyas but Ashwatthama refused saying that it is for> > destruction of last Pandav vansha. It was aimed at the Garbha of> > uttara,wife of Abhimanyu. Hearing this Krishna was very distrubed> > and cursed Ashwatthama. I think Krishna gave curse only once in> his> > life and that to a Brahman.> >> > As a matter of fact Krishna should have taken death of pandav> > vanshaja as a Yogi but he did not.> >> >> > So there is no question of interpreting scriptures according to> our> > needs. What is stated by Vyasa is plain and simple. One has to> read> > it in totality.> >> > Once again I am extremly sorry for the trouble I created for you.> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > AmolMAndar> >> > --- In vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar Sharma"> > <boxdel> wrote:> > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > I had already said that the example of Guru/student/king is an> > aside from> > > astrology. However I am amazed at your interpretation of> > Bhagvadgita.Could> > > you intereprete what is the meaning of "Ashochyananva> shochastvam> > > pradnyavadasch bhaashse, gatasunagatasunscha nanushochanti> > panditah"?> > > Adhyaya2 Shloka 11 and the subsequent shlokas 15,28 and so on.> It> > would> > > ,indeed, be interesting to see the interpretation of these.> > > I am aware that there are many interpretations of the Holy Gita> > and that> > > sometimes people like to distort it to suit their meaning to> the> > > circumstances. However this does not add to knowledge which we> > seek. I have> > > seen people claiming someone's being happy on receiving news of> > death of> > > other as a mark of yogi per Gita. I do not find the Lord saying> > this> > > anywhere.> > > Anyway since you have decided that Jupiter helps the house in> > which he is> > > situated, without exception it is your prerogative and I would> not> > like to> > > comment on it. I had only given what has been stated by Sages.> > > Hope this helps> > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:19 PM> > > vedic astrology> > > Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of> > destroying the> > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > >> > >> > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> > >> > > >I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence of the> > Guru,> > > >him being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma.> > >> > > This statement is not clear with the astrological context.> In the> > > non-astrological sense as well why would student> > feel 'distrubed' in> > > the presence of Guru? It is ok if student has gone to Guru's> > place.> > > i.e. School but when Guru has come to the student house why> > student> > > should feel distrubed? I suppose it should be a occasion to> > > celebrate. Your argument is valid only if student has gone to> > Gurus> > > place. When Guru has come to your place student will never> think> > of> > > anything that his Guru does not like. So there is no question> > > of 'distrubed' feeling for the student. So when Guru goes to> a> > House> > > (student) it must get protection from the Guru. The> capabilities> > of> > > the House should become more expressive with the blessings> from> > the> > > Guru. So Guru can be 'Anistha' unfavorable( and not harmful)> but> > > certainly not when in your house.When I said all Gurus except> > > Krishna faild I wanted to say that in all the incidences of> > > Mahabharat whenever there was a conflict between 'good'> > and 'bad' in> > > the presence of the Gurus, 'bad' prevailed. Draupadi> vastraharan,> > > Dyuta-krida, Abhimanyu Vadha, and several other things can be> > put,> > > where, in the presence of all learned gurus, these things> > happened.> > > Possibly because of their lack of courage or big Ego.> Krishna did> > > not fail because of Gita. He could change Arjunas mind to> fight.> > >> > > As far as Arjunas shoka is concerned, I think there is> absolutly> > > nothing wrong in Arjunas reaction. Krishna never said not to> > grief> > > on the death of near and dear ones. Rather in the VAlmiki> > Ranmayana> > > Rama himself grieved like a child so much so that Lakshaman> had> > to> > > say some strong words to Rama. To express grief at the death> of> > near> > > and dear is a must for every grihastha. The intensity and> medium> > of> > > expression may vary. when Krishna said "Sukha Dukkha sam> > krutwa...".> > > he said with reference to Yudha. If we see the complete> shloka> > then> > > it would be clear.> > >> > > SukhaDukhe Same Krutwa Labhalaboo Jayajayoo |> > > tato Yudhaya Yujuyaswa naivam papamvapyasi ||2.38||> > >> > > Treating Sukha-Dukha, Labha(Gain)-Hani(loss), Jaya-PArajaya> as> > same> > > you should be ready for the war.> > >> > > So when your relatives are ready for the war you should not> act> > as a> > > klib. you should not feel grief on these relatives. But that> does> > > not mean that Arjuna should not haved greived over the death> of> > his> > > own son with whom he had no fights. HAd Arjuna expressed any> > grief> > > over the death of relatives whom he himelf killed the war> then it> > > could have been failure of Krishna. On the contarary Krishna> has> > > further said> > >> > > "Niyatam Kuru karma tvam karma jyayo ayhakarmanaH|> > > shariyatrapi cha te na prasidhyedkarmanaH||"> > >> > > So I think Krishna has not failed in imparting knowledge to> > Arjuna> > > and neither Arjuna failed in implementing it because Krishna> > (guru)> > > was with him.> > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > >> > > AmolMAndar> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar> Sharma"> > > <boxdel> wrote:> > > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > > You are again missing the point. I have not said that> student> > does> > > anything> > > > bad. I have said student /king feels disturbed in presence> of> > the> > > Guru, him> > > > being a displinaranian regarding study and Dharma. Thus the> > house> > > does not> > > > express itself fully hence the specific Bharashta while> > indicating> > > effect of> > > > Guru's joining a house. I have already stated that the> example> > is> > > meant only> > > > to amplify the concept and the example, though based on> > > astrological> > > > concepts is not from an astrological work. Again I do not> > > understand the> > > > concept of all Gurus other than Krishna failing in> Mahabharata.> > > Their> > > > shishyas might have failed as indeed they did including> Arjuna.> > > You know> > > > that I do not generally enter into debates based on> perception> > of> > > > scriptures. But let me make it clear what I mean by Arjuna> > having> > > failed.> > > > Read Bhagvadgita and see what te Lord told him to achieve.> The> > > lord asked> > > > him to be a Yogi and described attributes of Yogi. This> > > included"Sukha> > > > Dukkha sam krutwa...". Still he grieved on death of> Abhimanyu> > and> > > swore> > > > death to Jayadratha before the Sun sets, a situation out of> > which> > > the Lord> > > > had to retrieve him.And later, on death of his other sons> and> > > those of> > > > others, at end of the Yuddha when they were slain by> > Ashwatthama> > > he grieved> > > > again.Now would you interprete this to mean that the Lord> > failed> > > to impart> > > > knowledge about the indestructibility of Atman to Arjuna?> One> > has> > > to> > > > understand the difference between physical Guru and the> Guru> > > principle> > > > represented by Jupiter.> > > > Hope this helps.> > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > -----Original Message-----> > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > > Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:15 PM> > > > To: vedic astrology> > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable> of> > > destroying the> > > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > >> > > >> > > > Chandrashekharji NAmaste> > > >> > > > Yes there was no explicit reference of student/king as> bad> > but> > > tone> > > > I thought was implicit towards classifying student/king> as> > bad.> > > >> > > > > > something which the Guru forbids being bad.> > > >> > > > So even if we now take the last post still I am not clear> > about> > > > student/king as house and its youth and bad activity.> What> > is the> > > > youth of a house? And what bad it performs which Guru> being> > > placed> > > > their forbids it to do so? Dont you think Guru fails> because> > of> > > ego> > > > and lack of courage? MAhabharat is the best example.> Every> > Guru> > > > except for Shri Krishna, failed in Mahabharat because of> > either> > > of> > > > these qualities . SO when ideal Guru(Shri Krishna) is> with> > you,> > > you> > > > are bound to succeed. But the company of semi-guru will> > create> > > > problems. Astrology I suppose must be considering Guru as> > ideal> > > one.> > > > That is why I feel,Guru should never fail.> > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > >> > > > AmolMAndar> > > > vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar> > Sharma"> > > > <boxdel> wrote:> > > > > Dear Amol Mandar,> > > > > Read the previous mail carefully again. I have not said> > that> > > > Student/King is> > > > > bad. I have said to see what student / king feel about> a> > > > displinarian Guru> > > > > living with him, though he understands that the lessons> > are for> > > > his own> > > > > good.> > > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > > > Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:42 PM> > > > > To: vedic astrology> > > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> capable> > of> > > > destroying the> > > > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Chandrashekhar ji Namaste> > > > >> > > > > Now some confusion. In the analogy of student/king> and> > > > > teacher/minister why do we consider by> default,student or> > > king> > > > > as 'bad'? The Susthanas represent good and Guru in> that> > > should> > > > > protect their good and at least should not spoil the> > effect.> > > > > Moreover, why should we asume that everytime in the> > presence> > > of> > > > Guru,> > > > > student would be interested in doing something bad? A> > good> > > > student> > > > > i.e. good house i.e. Susthana in the presence of Guru> > should> > > > enhance> > > > > its capability. Therefore Guru should enhance Sthanas> > > capabilty.> > > > If> > > > > in Susthanas with consent and in Dusthanas without.> As it> > > would> > > > fail> > > > > to make 'bad' student 'good'. At least Guru should> have> > that> > > much> > > > > discremination power. Or is it that in the case of> > Susthanas> > > i.e.> > > > > with good student Guru fails because of his elevated> > ego? In> > > that> > > > > case we can say that Guru will always fail. In the> > company of> > > > good> > > > > student because of his big EGO and in the company of> bad> > > student> > > > > because of his lack of courage. As a matter of fact,> if> > > student> > > > is> > > > > really bad then Guru must make him good and in the> case> > of> > > good> > > > > student Guru must appriciate student.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > >> > > > > AmolMAndar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --- In vedic-> astrology, "Chandrashekhar> > > Sharma"> > > > > <boxdel> wrote:> > > > > > Dear Amolmandar,> > > > > > I will give you an example outside astrology and> > > religion.Guru> > > > > represents> > > > > > Minister or the teacher . Now teacher tells that> which> > is> > > > right.> > > > > Students> > > > > > many a times feel unconfortable in the presence of> the> > > Teacher> > > > as he> > > > > > monitors their behaviour, specially if in their> youth> > they> > > > want to> > > > > do> > > > Simialr is the case with> > > > > the king> > > > > > whose ministers forbids him from doing something> that> > is> > > > against> > > > > RajDharma.> > > > > > Now imagine House where Jupiter is posited being> the> > > > student/King> > > > > and> > > > > > Jupiter being the Teacher. The results for the> house> > would> > > be> > > > clear.> > > > > > Of course , as I said earlier this is only my way> at> > > looking> > > > at it> > > > > in order> > > > > > to understand why this happens, and the Sages'> > principles> > > are> > > > given> > > > > to us as> > > > > > such without the reasons behind them. We have to> apply> > our> > > > Viveka> > > > > to fathom> > > > > > the logic behind it.Other worthies might hold> different> > > views.> > > > > > Hope this helps understand the concept.> > > > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > > > > > > > amolmandar [amolmandar]> > > > > > Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:39 PM> > > > > > To: vedic astrology> > > > > > Subject: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter> > capable> > > of> > > > > destroying the> > > > > > house it and Saturn Protects//> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Chandrashekharji Namste> > > > > >> > > > > > As usual you explained the things very lucidly> but> > just> > > > slight> > > > > doubt.> > > > > > It is said many times that Guru is Dharma (not> > religion)> > > and> > > > it> > > > > is as> > > > > > well said that Guru tries to uphold Dharma but> > usually> > > fails.> > > > > Hence> > > > > > Dharma fails. But many say Dharma never fails. So> > Guru> > > > should also> > > > > > never fail. Then why it fails with respect to> house?> > Does> > > > MAYA> > > > > play> > > > > > any role in this?> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > > >> > > > > > AmolMAndar> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Archives: vedic-> > astrology> > > > > >> > > > > > Group info: vedic-> > > > astrology/info.html> > > > > >> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > > >> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> > Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > > > >> > > > > > Your use of is subject to the> > > Terms> > > of> > > > > Service.> > > > > >> > > > > > ---> > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system> > (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release> Date:> > > 8/19/03> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Archives: vedic-> astrology> > > > >> > > > > Group info: vedic-> > > > astrology/info.html> > > > >> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > >> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > >> > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri> Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > > >> > > > > Your use of is subject to the > Terms> > of> > > > Service.> > > > >> > > > > ---> > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system> (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date:> > 8/19/03> > > >> > > >> > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > >> > > > Group info: vedic-> > > astrology/info.html> > > >> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> > > > Terms> of> > > Service.> > > >> > > > ---> > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date:> 8/19/03> > >> > >> > > Sponsor> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > > Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of> > Service.> > >> > > ---> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> >> >> > Sponsor> > > >> >> >> >> > Archives: vedic astrology> >> > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > >> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> >> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> >> > Your use of is subject to the Terms of> Service.> >> > ---> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03> > > Sponsor> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > Terms of Service.> > ---> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release 8/19/03Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2003 Report Share Posted December 21, 2003 Any idea how to get this book ? Mentioned link does not work..... - Rajeev Kumar vedic astrology Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:29 PM RE: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects// Namaste Chandreshekhar Ji, Here I am making a cut and paste from SatyarthPrakash (Light Of Truth) by Swami Dayananda Saraswati, this book is available online at www.vjsingh.com/books.html This portion I have taken from chapter 11 of the said book at http://www.vjsingh.com/11p2.html Readers can themselves decide whether the statements made by Chandreshekhar Ji is true or false.So here it goes ............... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2003 Report Share Posted December 21, 2003 Dear Denis, Try this email address: PRACHAR (AT) ARYASAMAJ (DOT) COM You may get the info you want. regards viswanadhamDenis 1008 <denis1008 > wrote: Any idea how to get this book ? Mentioned link does not work..... - Rajeev Kumar vedic astrology Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:29 PM RE: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter capable of destroying the house it and Saturn Protects// Namaste Chandreshekhar Ji, Here I am making a cut and paste from SatyarthPrakash (Light Of Truth) by Swami Dayananda Saraswati, this book is available online at www.vjsingh.com/books.html This portion I have taken from chapter 11 of the said book at http://www.vjsingh.com/11p2.html Readers can themselves decide whether the statements made by Chandreshekhar Ji is true or false.So here it goes ............... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... To visit your group on the web, go to:vedic astrology/ To from this group, send an email to:vedic astrology Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2003 Report Share Posted December 21, 2003 Hello Rajeev, You can also go the webpage "http://www.vedicbooks.com/cgi-bin/S-Mart/smart.cgi?command=listitems&type=group\ &pos=0&group=hindi2". Listed here are some of the works of Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati. Regards, Devika --- H S Viswanadham <vishwanatham wrote: > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Denis, > > Try this email address: > PRACHAR > > You may get the info you want. > > regards > viswanadham > > Denis 1008 <denis1008 wrote: > Any idea how to get this book ? Mentioned link does > not work..... > > - > Rajeev Kumar > vedic astrology > Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:29 PM > RE: [vedic astrology] Re: Why is // Jupiter > capable of destroying the house it and Saturn > Protects// > > > Namaste Chandreshekhar Ji, > > Here I am making a cut and paste from > SatyarthPrakash (Light Of Truth) by Swami Dayananda > Saraswati, this book is available online at > > www.vjsingh.com/books.html > > This portion I have taken from chapter 11 of the > said book at > > http://www.vjsingh.com/11p2.html > > Readers can themselves decide whether the statements > made by Chandreshekhar Ji is true or false.So here > it goes ............... > > > > Archives: > vedic astrology > > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > > > > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Your use of is subject to the > > > New Photos - easier uploading and sharing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.