Thank you Partha and Senthil (Twin Problem & Shastyamsa)

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha, Partha & list members,

 

You/we are all "right" - and at the same time "wrong".

"The human being lives in accordance with his/her believes".

 

It is my view that it is not enough to be a knowledgable Jyotish "expert".

One MUST have some knowledge of human psychology and be aware of medical

research results concerning processes of brain functionality (as known

today).

 

Any type of extremism (some will call it "fanaticism"), especially connected

with religion and politics (both connected with "power" and "control") will

produce a near total blockage for accepting (or even listening) any

different views, lack of respect, enmity etc.

 

I could have filled in a few thousand pages here but the conclusion will

always be the same:

RESPECT to each others views is the key to learning and developing.

No respect = no progress.

 

Lucky us here to have come so far - so let's keep studying and enriching

each other with RESPECT!

 

God bless you all.

 

Kind regards

/Jay Weiss

http://www.alvicomm.com

 

 

-

"pvr108" <pvr

<vedic astrology>

Thursday, November 27, 2003 6:49 AM

[vedic astrology] Thank you Partha and Senthil (Re: Twin Problem &

Shastyamsa)

 

 

> Dear Partha and Senthil,

>

> Thank you both for your timely reminder. Your comments will be

> useful to me.

>

> When I write on astrology on these lists, I am so focussed on the

> *technical* aspects that I may sometimes falter in the *human*

> aspects.

>

> When I write on any nice technique with examples, I normally think

> that the technique matters and how well the example fits the

> technique matters. I have never bothered about the other aspects of

> choosing the examples and language. I have never bothered about the

> effect various example would have on people.

>

> If I choose the same Rajiv Gandhi or Indira Gandhi or JFK chart to

> illustrate 20 different examples, I see that people are ok with it.

> If I choose my own chart and give an academic distinction from the

> past as an event, I see that it somehow has an irritating effect on

> some people. I never even considered that possibility. This may be a

> side effect of certain other aspects of my writing style which may

> be construed to be arrogant at times.

>

> The bottomline is that when people read what I write, they are not

> only trying to appreciate/learn a technique, but also trying to

> judge me as a person based on the examples chosen and the language

> used. This may not be what I bargained for, but that is how some

> people are and I have to live with it.

>

> Thank you for bringing this important point to my attention. I will

> try to be more conscious of your feelings and will try not to

> irritate you.

>

> Having said that, my warning that those who make *personal* comments

> on anyone will be thrown off the list is still active. I will tend

> to be lenient with personal comments directed against me. If the

> same personal comments are made against anyone else, the offender

> will be thrown off the list immediately.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> PS: Neeraj, I have answered your question in my second mail to Imran

> bhai tonight. And, yes, God willing, I do hope to write more books

> on several topics.

>

> > Dear Narasimha,

> > I do agree with partha....

> >

> > Regards

> > Senthil

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>