Badhak-sthan

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekharji

 

RAM KRISHN HARE

 

I fully agree with you.Sage Parashar has mentioned only about movable

signs.

He has not said anything about badhakesh.He just said that 11,2,5,8

are

badhak-Rashis for 1,4,7,10 signs.It only means that fixed signs

obstruct

movable ones.More so if a planet is placed in them.He has not even

remotly

mentioned about badhakas for other signs.Prashn marg,however gives

many

more details including them.According to me,it just indicates

influence

of signs with opposing nature/attitude.That is why Prashn marg

includes

signs in kendr to badhak sign also.

 

If a planet is placed in such a sign,it is more important then so-

called

badhakesh.Here I feel that Dasha etc. of that planet will give good

results

if it is benefic as per Parashari rules but it will give obstructions

in

general. Further confirmation can be done by its placement from Arudh

Lagn.If the said planet also happens to be Kharesh etc.,it will only

increase its obstructive nature.In absence of any planet in such sign,

one can see badhakesh on these lines.

 

THANKS

 

Anilkumar

 

OM TAT SAT

*************

You wrote:

 

whenever Lord of trine and quadrant make a sambandha, good

yoga results and effects enhanced if it happens in a quadrant or

Trine.No

mention what so ever is made of exceptions being applicable to

Badhaka or

Badhaka Sthana. Now, since barring Chara Lagna the Badhakas own trine

or a

quadrant should not in case of Sthira or Dual Lagna results have been

indicated to be inimical instead of beneficial ? Similarly if the

premise of

just being lord is given credence then for those with dual Lagna

Panchmahapurusha yoga could not occur in 7th house even when Mercury

or

Jupiter occupy their own house. Shasha yoga could also not occur in

7th

house for Aries ascendant as the planet giving yoga would be

Badhakesh. This

does not seem very logical to me. Parashara also indicates that Trine

lords

are always Shubha if not also trishadayapati.I have no problem with

11th

lord as its malfeasance is established by virtue of being

Trishadayapati.

As regards whether Badhaka works every time one must ascertain

whether no

other factor is giving the result being credited to operation of

Badhaka,

which I think is rarely attempted.

[Guest guest]

Dear Anilkumar,

You have been able to see the logic right. I think some confusion, also, must

have crept in due to application of Prashna Marga principles too. Prashna based

predictions are based on Tajik system and many of the parameters differ from

Natal horoscopy. Of course this is my personal view, others more learned than

me might hold different views.

Chandrashekhar.

aokedia [anilkedia (AT) indiatimes (DOT) com]Sent:

Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:44 PMvedic astrologySubject:

[vedic astrology] Badhak-sthanDear ChandrashekharjiRAM KRISHN HAREI fully agree

with you.Sage Parashar has mentioned only about movable signs.He has not said

anything about badhakesh.He just said that 11,2,5,8 are badhak-Rashis for

1,4,7,10 signs.It only means that fixed signs obstructmovable ones.More so if a

planet is placed in them.He has not even remotlymentioned about badhakas for

other signs.Prashn marg,however gives manymore details including them.According

to me,it just indicates influenceof signs with opposing nature/attitude.That is

why Prashn marg includessigns in kendr to badhak sign also.If a planet is

placed in such a sign,it is more important then so-called badhakesh.Here I feel

that Dasha etc. of that planet will give good results if it is benefic as per

Parashari rules but it will give obstructions in general. Further confirmation

can be done by its placement from Arudh Lagn.If the said planet also happens to

be Kharesh etc.,it will onlyincrease its obstructive nature.In absence of any

planet in such sign,one can see badhakesh on these lines.THANKSAnilkumarOM TAT

SAT*************You wrote:whenever Lord of trine and quadrant make a sambandha,

goodyoga results and effects enhanced if it happens in a quadrant or

Trine.Nomention what so ever is made of exceptions being applicable to Badhaka

orBadhaka Sthana. Now, since barring Chara Lagna the Badhakas own trine or

aquadrant should not in case of Sthira or Dual Lagna results have beenindicated

to be inimical instead of beneficial ? Similarly if the premise ofjust being

lord is given credence then for those with dual LagnaPanchmahapurusha yoga

could not occur in 7th house even when Mercury orJupiter occupy their own

house. Shasha yoga could also not occur in 7thhouse for Aries ascendant as the

planet giving yoga would be Badhakesh. Thisdoes not seem very logical to me.

Parashara also indicates that Trine lordsare always Shubha if not also

trishadayapati.I have no problem with 11thlord as its malfeasance is

established by virtue of being Trishadayapati.As regards whether Badhaka works

every time one must ascertain whether noother factor is giving the result being

credited to operation of Badhaka,which I think is rarely attempted. Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......