Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on May 14, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP!

You wrote

 

> What you just wrote is not a proof of following assumption:

>

> If in 1966 Srila Prabhupada made himself recognized and accepted as the

> sole diksa guru for ISKCON, then in 1966 he wanted to be the sole diksa

> guru for ISKCON.

 

In my previous post I defeated your example regarding sannyas. In doing so I

defended once again our position that the guru wants to do what he does.

 

It’s very simple:

 

1) The guru carries out Krishna’s plan.

2) The guru wants to do this since he wants to serve Krishna otherwise he

would not be the guru.

3) Since we know Srila Prabhupada acted deliberately to make himself

recognised and accepted as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966 this must

have been Krishna’s plan.

4) Therefore Srila Prabhupada wanted to do 3).

 

Please explain which of the above is wrong, or how 4 does not follow?

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu