Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Rao Nemani [raon1008 ]Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:37 AMSameer SawhneyRe: Sun's progression for timing marriage Sameer Sawhney <icecoolsam (AT) vsnl (DOT) net> wrote: Respected Raghunadha Rao ji,I read your post on Sun's progression for timing marriage and I have foundit to bevery accurate in all the charts I have applied. In my elder bro's case Ifound itto be not working, so can I doubt that some rectification is needed in birthtime.His Birth details are : 4 Nov, 1974, 1.23 pm, India, 76E46, 30N45.With this you get Navamsa Su in PiNavamsa lagna is Cn: 5,17,29,41,...Navamsa 7th is Cp : 11,23,35,47,...Trines to 7th are :Ta : 3,15,27,39,...Vi : 7,19,31,43..He got married on 12 Dec'02 at the age of 28 which is missing from abovelist.But if I consider the birth time as 1.27 pm I do get 28 as one of thepossible years.So is my assumption correct ?Please advise.Thanks,Sameer Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Sameer, I am very glad to know that, the Sun's Progression method worked very well with most of your cases, and I also agree with your in some cases it does not. In my opinion, there are two possibilities: one is, as you rightly said, the time of birth may not be accurate. As you have mentioned, by changing the birth time (by adding 2 minutes), his marriage year did matched with this Sun's progression method. Honestly, I have used this method in few occassions to narrow down the birth time rectification apart from the other methods. So in my opinion, that may be the correct birth time, but I would still suggest you to go ahead further and see whether the rectified birth time do match with his other past events, so that you can confirm you are not changing the birth time just to satisfy this method. Please remember, this is a complimentary to the other dasa system, so there would be some cases where this method may not work also. Regards Raghunadha Rao vedic astrology, Sameer Sawhney <icecoolsam@v...> wrote: > > > Rao Nemani [raon1008] > Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:37 AM > Sameer Sawhney > Re: Sun's progression for timing marriage > > > > > Sameer Sawhney <icecoolsam@v...> wrote: > Respected Raghunadha Rao ji, > > I read your post on Sun's progression for timing marriage and I have found > it to be > very accurate in all the charts I have applied. In my elder bro's case I > found it > to be not working, so can I doubt that some rectification is needed in > birth > time. > > His Birth details are : 4 Nov, 1974, 1.23 pm, India, 76E46, 30N45. > > With this you get Navamsa Su in Pi > > Navamsa lagna is Cn: 5,17,29,41,... > Navamsa 7th is Cp : 11,23,35,47,... > Trines to 7th are : > Ta : 3,15,27,39,... > Vi : 7,19,31,43.. > > He got married on 12 Dec'02 at the age of 28 which is missing from above > list. > > But if I consider the birth time as 1.27 pm I do get 28 as one of the > possible years. > > So is my assumption correct ? > > Please advise. > > > Thanks, > Sameer > > > > -- -------- > ---- > > Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2004 Report Share Posted January 22, 2004 Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat Dear Rao, This sounds interesting! I am sure you would have done your study on this. If it works it could help in time rectification, especially correcting Navamsa lagna in some cases. It would be nice to hear from Gurus on this. Kind regards Ramesh Rao Nemani [raon1008 ]Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:02 AMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Re: FW: Sun's progression for timing marriageHare Rama KrishnaDear Sameer,I am very glad to know that, the Sun's Progression method worked very well with most of your cases, and I also agree with your in some cases it does not.In my opinion, there are two possibilities: one is, as you rightly said, the time of birth may not be accurate. As you have mentioned, by changing the birth time (by adding 2 minutes), his marriage year did matched with this Sun's progression method. Honestly, I have used this method in few occassions to narrow down the birth time rectification apart from the other methods.So in my opinion, that may be the correct birth time, but I would still suggest you to go ahead further and see whether the rectified birth time do match with his other past events, so that you can confirm you are not changing the birth time just to satisfy this method.Please remember, this is a complimentary to the other dasa system, so there would be some cases where this method may not work also.RegardsRaghunadha Rao--- In vedic astrology, Sameer Sawhney <icecoolsam@v...> wrote:> > > Rao Nemani [raon1008]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:37 AM> Sameer Sawhney> Re: Sun's progression for timing marriage> > > > > Sameer Sawhney <icecoolsam@v...> wrote:> Respected Raghunadha Rao ji,> > I read your post on Sun's progression for timing marriage and I have found> it to be> very accurate in all the charts I have applied. In my elder bro's case I> found it> to be not working, so can I doubt that some rectification is needed in> birth> time.> > His Birth details are : 4 Nov, 1974, 1.23 pm, India, 76E46, 30N45.> > With this you get Navamsa Su in Pi> > Navamsa lagna is Cn: 5,17,29,41,...> Navamsa 7th is Cp : 11,23,35,47,...> Trines to 7th are :> Ta : 3,15,27,39,...> Vi : 7,19,31,43..> > He got married on 12 Dec'02 at the age of 28 which is missing from above> list.> > But if I consider the birth time as 1.27 pm I do get 28 as one of the> possible years.> > So is my assumption correct ?> > Please advise.> > > Thanks,> Sameer> > > > ----------> ----> > Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" SweepstakesArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... To visit your group on the web, go to:vedic astrology/ To from this group, send an email to:vedic astrology Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.