Guest guest Posted April 12, 2004 Report Share Posted April 12, 2004 Dear Sunil, I think you would not recommend all three gems for me is it not? That is why I said that there can not be a blanket rule. Take care, Chandrashekhar. Sunil John wrote: > *Dear Ramadasji,* > *Thanks for ur mail. * > *Dear Chandrashekharji,* > *Thanks for the mail and I again learn from u which i never knew that > most of the books on gems are written by Jewellers.* > *Re ur chart, I think in my limited opinion to have so many planets in > the 11th from AL ( good property }* > *Maybe I presume in ur case , one should look at the diff planets and > their karaktatwas, relations in chart etc before coming to conclusion, > as u pointed out.* > *best wishes* > *SJ* > Dear Sunil, > My opinion on the subject is below. Understand that this is my personal > opinion and others may have different opinions, on the matter. > No blanket method of Gem selections be used. One must understand the > problem being faced by the Jataka and find out the Planet that can not > only allieviate the problem, but also whether the planet is a benefic > for the chart. Then and only then should a Gem be recommended. > Understand that no ancient text gives how Gems should be used for > helping a Jataka. One has to study other shashtras and traditions to > understand how they should be used. Most of the books on gem usage in > astrology are written by Jewellers themselves, and one should take what > is written therein with a pinch of salt, for obvious reasons. > Before you jump to any conclusion, take my chart as an example, I have > Mars Mercury and Rahu in 11th from Aarudha Lagna. Would anyone,seriously > recommend me to wear Corral, Saffire and Gomed together? Think about this. > This does not mean that Sanjayji is wrong, it merely means that one has > to have his depth of astrological knowledge to be able to pick up the > planet causing problem and understand whether a gem can help the Jataka. > More harm is caused by recommending wrong Gems than help . > Chandrashekhar. > > Sunil John wrote: > om namo näräyaëäya| > Dear Sunil, > normally I never suggest anyone to wear any gemstone in left hand and > also not considered from AL. I consider from Lagna and 5th house are > more important.May be others can help you.I follow the olden methods > only.New researches are being done by many and they may help you in > this matter. > With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana, > Ramadas Rao. > > ------ > News, views and gossip. Hot downloads ‘n previews. Get it all at MSN > Cinema! <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENIN/2749??PS=> > > |Om Tat Sat| > http://www.varahamihira > > > ------ > * Links* > > * > varahamihira/ > * > varahamihira > <varahamihira?subject=Un> > * Terms of > Service <>. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 Dear Chandrashekharji, Yes of course there cannot be a blanket rule Chandrashekharji, the point is that students sometimes learn only one part of the rule and after more digging, we come to know that there are more finer points to it. This is what i gathered from Freedoms mail If a person with Taurus lagna has Venus and Mars 11th from AL and they are selling clothing, then it would obviously be better to recommend the diamond than coral. In this way it should be calculated so that you are increasing the planet that is actually supporting the individual. You don’t have to be a pro, it is ok to ask a person exactly what they do to make money. Best wishes SJ >Chandrashekhar <boxdel (AT) (DOT) co.uk> >varahamihira >CC: vedic astrology >Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: [vedic astrology] Gem (11th from AL & IL ) Stone wearing & Kala Chakra Table >Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:39:41 +0530 > >Dear Sunil, >I think you would not recommend all three gems for me is it not? That is >why I said that there can not be a blanket rule. >Take care, >Chandrashekhar. > >Sunil John wrote: > > > *Dear Ramadasji,* > > *Thanks for ur mail. * > > *Dear Chandrashekharji,* > > *Thanks for the mail and I again learn from u which i never knew that > > most of the books on gems are written by Jewellers.* > > *Re ur chart, I think in my limited opinion to have so many planets in > > the 11th from AL ( good property }* > > *Maybe I presume in ur case , one should look at the diff planets and > > their karaktatwas, relations in chart etc before coming to conclusion, > > as u pointed out.* > > *best wishes* > > *SJ* > > Dear Sunil, > > My opinion on the subject is below. Understand that this is my personal > > opinion and others may have different opinions, on the matter. > > No blanket method of Gem selections be used. One must understand the > > problem being faced by the Jataka and find out the Planet that can not > > only allieviate the problem, but also whether the planet is a benefic > > for the chart. Then and only then should a Gem be recommended. > > Understand that no ancient text gives how Gems should be used for > > helping a Jataka. One has to study other shashtras and traditions to > > understand how they should be used. Most of the books on gem usage in > > astrology are written by Jewellers themselves, and one should take what > > is written therein with a pinch of salt, for obvious reasons. > > Before you jump to any conclusion, take my chart as an example, I have > > Mars Mercury and Rahu in 11th from Aarudha Lagna. Would anyone,seriously > > recommend me to wear Corral, Saffire and Gomed together? Think about this. > > This does not mean that Sanjayji is wrong, it merely means that one has > > to have his depth of astrological knowledge to be able to pick up the > > planet causing problem and understand whether a gem can help the Jataka. > > More harm is caused by recommending wrong Gems than help . > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Ready cash in just 72 hours. Apply Now !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.