RE:---Fwd: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in Malefic houses???(example

[Guest guest]

||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

 

Dear Prabodhji,

 

I think sameway mars in cancer is same in all bhavas, loosing it's

own fire!!(Also called as Satwa)

So is the case in Tenth but in seventh house it'll become weak and

hence Kuja Dosha will be weak!!

Am I correct? I think when we r discussing about Kuja dosha we r

mainly concerned to seventh house (and family also) and effect of

mars on it, so I think like way!!

 

Now coming to 10th or other placements, don't you think those bhavas

will get suffer(I'm excluding neechabhanga and other parts) Or the

words use "weak malefic becomes more malefic " I think malefic is

used for suffering so it means more suffering!! That is what i have

understood which may be wrong also!! All learned ones may correct me!!

 

About tatwas I'm aware they are having great depth hence till date

nadis are mysteries for many of us!! But I had not made loose

statement with logic but got some ref(Ref:- RG Rao) In such case if

moon is weak then results may vary also!! But not willing to go in

depth as this is totally different subject.

 

Prabodhji and all learned ones, I have tried with my limited

knowledge so pls do rectify me, whereever I'm wrong.

 

Regards,

 

Vinay Patwardhan

 

 

----

----------

 

Message 41491 of 41494 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] Message

Index Msg #

 

"amolmandar" <amolmandar>

Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Fwd: Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in Malefic

houses???(example Anamika)

 

 

 

Dear Vinay Namste

 

Even if we consider that neecha kuja as fire in water but it should

be true for all the bhavas. Mars in 7th only can not be considered

as fire in water. In 10th as well it will be fire in water so

effects of mars will not be there with respect to 10th house. So its

neecha effects will be seen but not in amplified manner I suppose.

We are considering that weak malefic becomes strong malefic. I think

weak is always weak since it fails to protect houses owned by it and

hence their effects.

As far as aspect of malefic on swarasi,yes it strengthen the bhava

because being weak its dristi does not become weak.

I think person with shasha yoga may have tendency to doing excesses

in ocult sciences. Which may be good(benefic) for him but usually we

find his family to suffer(melefic) because of that. So my point is

that strong malefic will give effect like strong planet and weak

malefic will give as weak. There is will be no amplification in

their effects.

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, Amol Mandar

<amolmandar> wrote:

> --- vinaypatwardhan <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> wrote: > Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:48:39 -0000

> > "vinaypatwardhan"

> > <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> > "amolmandar" <amolmandar>

> > Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in

> > Malefic houses???(example Anamika)

> >

> > ||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

> >

> > Respected Chandrashekharji and Dear Prabodhji,

> >

> > I'm reading Prabodhji's mail currently where

> > debilitated malefic

> > planets are consider good (Kuja dosha -- Prabodhji)

> > as per his

> > opinion!! So I'm also contributing my limited

> > knowledge .

> >

> > I think if we take neecha kuja in seventh then it

> > shows fire in

> > water! Hence the fire can be controlled! Obviously

> > it will reduce the

> > fire of mars and accordingly his malefic influence !

> > Hence this might

> > be written in panchangas that this might reduce the

> > effects of mars.

> > (Learned ones do rectify me)

> >

> > But now coming to strong malefics point I do think

> > Shri

> > Chandrashekharji had guided us correctly!! Like

> > consider the same

> > case of neecha mars in 10th !! (An upachay also

> > along with karma

> > sthana) Here also mars is functional malefic but

> > it's position in

> > debilation in 10th H will surely create some

> > problems in career(OR

> > exalted one will create?)!! Same way consider it in

> > 4th H then even

> > though natural significator of lands mars neecha in

> > 4th will afflict

> > that house (Especially mother's health)!!

> > (functionaly good or

> > positive planet)

> > Like way if we consider neecha mars in all 12 bhavas

> > we can easily

> > conclude weak malefic is more malefic !!

> > In fact aspect of malefic planet on swarasi will

> > strengthen it

> > (Rasi=Bhava) And aspect of malefic planet on enemies

> > house will

> > destroy or reduce the effects of that rasi (Bhava)

> > The only thing

> > when malefics are concerned more hardship or

> > struggle is required to

> > achieve the success!!

> >

> > I 'll like to think on mahapurush yogas formed by

> > Sat or mars!! So

> > Prabodhji , respected Chandrshekharji pls think on

> > above points and

> > do rectify me.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Vinay Patwardhan

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

> >

> > <amolmandar> wrote:

> > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

> > >

> > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > malefic is capable of

> > > >giving far less malefic effects.

> > >

> > > Sir I have a confusion. For the charts where mars

> > is causing dosha

> > > weak mars is preferable. As many of the panchangas

> > say the weak and

> > > debiliated Kuja does not cause the Kuja dosha. On

> > the other hand if

> > > we go by 'weak Malefic is more malefic' principle

> > then debilated

> > > mars in 7th should be treated as strong kujadosha.

> > Now if we take

> > > the example,the charts of Anamika and her husband

> > have Kujadosha.

> > > The anamika chart has Mars debiliated in 7th and

> > her husband has MT

> > > mars in 12th aspecting its own house in 7th. For

> > both of them mars

> > > is functionally malefic. Ofcourse, in anamikas

> > case Mars in

> > > navmansha gets little bit strength being in 5th

> > and own house. In

> > > her husband case the strong exalted mars aspecting

> > 7th own house

> > and

> > > Ve/Me must be creating problems in her married

> > life as neecha mars

> > > cancels kuja dosha in her case. So I thought that

> > strong malefic

> > > will always be more dangerous than weak one.

> > Please clarify.

> > >

> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

> > >

> > >

> > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology,

> > Chandrashekhar

> > <boxdel>

> > > wrote:

> > > > Dear Mukund,

> > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > malefic is capable of

> > > giving

> > > > far less malefic effects. This of course has to

> > be applied based

> > > on the

> > > > placement and functional nature of planets. For

> > example in

> > > pravrajya

> > > > yoga weak combust planets, with strong Sun give

> > pravrajya denoted

> > > by

> > > > Sun, whereas strong Malefics similarly placed

> > make a person

> > > devoted to

> > > > such holy men. So the effects, whether malefic

> > or benefic would

> > > depend

> > > > on one's point of view of looking at an event.

> > > > In the example you have quoted rahu occupying

> > Mars's house will

> > > give

> > > > results of Mars too. Therefore in 6th he would

> > probably give you

> > > victory

> > > > over enemies. This is because the nodes give

> > results of house

> > > lord,

> > > > planets associating them and planets in 7th from

> > where they are

> > > placed.

> > > > In addition they give results of Saturn in case

> > of rahu and Mars

> > > in

> > > > Ketu's case if placed as a single planet in a

> > rasi.

> > > > Chandrashekhar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Vinay Namste

 

Once mars has lost its fire then depending on its position fire in

perticular aspect of the life will be missing. Since 'fire' is

essential element of every aspect of our life lack of that will

cause problems. That is what we consider as melefic effect of weak

mars. But there is no amplification of effects of such mars.

 

Strong mars has excess of fire so if left uncontrolled may cause

damage to the native specially if it is regarding marriage. It gets

controlled by its position, ownership and aspect of benefics.

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "vinaypatwardhan"

<vinaypatwardhan> wrote:

> ||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

>

> Dear Prabodhji,

>

> I think sameway mars in cancer is same in all bhavas, loosing it's

> own fire!!(Also called as Satwa)

> So is the case in Tenth but in seventh house it'll become weak and

> hence Kuja Dosha will be weak!!

> Am I correct? I think when we r discussing about Kuja dosha we r

> mainly concerned to seventh house (and family also) and effect of

> mars on it, so I think like way!!

>

> Now coming to 10th or other placements, don't you think those

bhavas

> will get suffer(I'm excluding neechabhanga and other parts) Or the

> words use "weak malefic becomes more malefic " I think malefic is

> used for suffering so it means more suffering!! That is what i

have

> understood which may be wrong also!! All learned ones may correct

me!!

>

> About tatwas I'm aware they are having great depth hence till date

> nadis are mysteries for many of us!! But I had not made loose

> statement with logic but got some ref(Ref:- RG Rao) In such case

if

> moon is weak then results may vary also!! But not willing to go in

> depth as this is totally different subject.

>

> Prabodhji and all learned ones, I have tried with my limited

> knowledge so pls do rectify me, whereever I'm wrong.

>

> Regards,

>

> Vinay Patwardhan

>

>

> -

---

> ----------

>

> Message 41491 of 41494 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] Message

> Index Msg #

>

> "amolmandar" <amolmandar>

> Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:46 pm

> Fwd: Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in Malefic

> houses???(example Anamika)

>

>

>

> Dear Vinay Namste

>

> Even if we consider that neecha kuja as fire in water but it should

> be true for all the bhavas. Mars in 7th only can not be considered

> as fire in water. In 10th as well it will be fire in water so

> effects of mars will not be there with respect to 10th house. So

its

> neecha effects will be seen but not in amplified manner I suppose.

> We are considering that weak malefic becomes strong malefic. I

think

> weak is always weak since it fails to protect houses owned by it

and

> hence their effects.

> As far as aspect of malefic on swarasi,yes it strengthen the bhava

> because being weak its dristi does not become weak.

> I think person with shasha yoga may have tendency to doing excesses

> in ocult sciences. Which may be good(benefic) for him but usually

we

> find his family to suffer(melefic) because of that. So my point is

> that strong malefic will give effect like strong planet and weak

> malefic will give as weak. There is will be no amplification in

> their effects.

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, Amol Mandar

> <amolmandar> wrote:

> > --- vinaypatwardhan <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> > wrote: > Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:48:39 -0000

> > > "vinaypatwardhan"

> > > <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> > > "amolmandar" <amolmandar>

> > > Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in

> > > Malefic houses???(example Anamika)

> > >

> > > ||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

> > >

> > > Respected Chandrashekharji and Dear Prabodhji,

> > >

> > > I'm reading Prabodhji's mail currently where

> > > debilitated malefic

> > > planets are consider good (Kuja dosha -- Prabodhji)

> > > as per his

> > > opinion!! So I'm also contributing my limited

> > > knowledge .

> > >

> > > I think if we take neecha kuja in seventh then it

> > > shows fire in

> > > water! Hence the fire can be controlled! Obviously

> > > it will reduce the

> > > fire of mars and accordingly his malefic influence !

> > > Hence this might

> > > be written in panchangas that this might reduce the

> > > effects of mars.

> > > (Learned ones do rectify me)

> > >

> > > But now coming to strong malefics point I do think

> > > Shri

> > > Chandrashekharji had guided us correctly!! Like

> > > consider the same

> > > case of neecha mars in 10th !! (An upachay also

> > > along with karma

> > > sthana) Here also mars is functional malefic but

> > > it's position in

> > > debilation in 10th H will surely create some

> > > problems in career(OR

> > > exalted one will create?)!! Same way consider it in

> > > 4th H then even

> > > though natural significator of lands mars neecha in

> > > 4th will afflict

> > > that house (Especially mother's health)!!

> > > (functionaly good or

> > > positive planet)

> > > Like way if we consider neecha mars in all 12 bhavas

> > > we can easily

> > > conclude weak malefic is more malefic !!

> > > In fact aspect of malefic planet on swarasi will

> > > strengthen it

> > > (Rasi=Bhava) And aspect of malefic planet on enemies

> > > house will

> > > destroy or reduce the effects of that rasi (Bhava)

> > > The only thing

> > > when malefics are concerned more hardship or

> > > struggle is required to

> > > achieve the success!!

> > >

> > > I 'll like to think on mahapurush yogas formed by

> > > Sat or mars!! So

> > > Prabodhji , respected Chandrshekharji pls think on

> > > above points and

> > > do rectify me.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Vinay Patwardhan

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

> > >

> > > <amolmandar> wrote:

> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

> > > >

> > > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > > malefic is capable of

> > > > >giving far less malefic effects.

> > > >

> > > > Sir I have a confusion. For the charts where mars

> > > is causing dosha

> > > > weak mars is preferable. As many of the panchangas

> > > say the weak and

> > > > debiliated Kuja does not cause the Kuja dosha. On

> > > the other hand if

> > > > we go by 'weak Malefic is more malefic' principle

> > > then debilated

> > > > mars in 7th should be treated as strong kujadosha.

> > > Now if we take

> > > > the example,the charts of Anamika and her husband

> > > have Kujadosha.

> > > > The anamika chart has Mars debiliated in 7th and

> > > her husband has MT

> > > > mars in 12th aspecting its own house in 7th. For

> > > both of them mars

> > > > is functionally malefic. Ofcourse, in anamikas

> > > case Mars in

> > > > navmansha gets little bit strength being in 5th

> > > and own house. In

> > > > her husband case the strong exalted mars aspecting

> > > 7th own house

> > > and

> > > > Ve/Me must be creating problems in her married

> > > life as neecha mars

> > > > cancels kuja dosha in her case. So I thought that

> > > strong malefic

> > > > will always be more dangerous than weak one.

> > > Please clarify.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology,

> > > Chandrashekhar

> > > <boxdel>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > Dear Mukund,

> > > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > > malefic is capable of

> > > > giving

> > > > > far less malefic effects. This of course has to

> > > be applied based

> > > > on the

> > > > > placement and functional nature of planets. For

> > > example in

> > > > pravrajya

> > > > > yoga weak combust planets, with strong Sun give

> > > pravrajya denoted

> > > > by

> > > > > Sun, whereas strong Malefics similarly placed

> > > make a person

> > > > devoted to

> > > > > such holy men. So the effects, whether malefic

> > > or benefic would

> > > > depend

> > > > > on one's point of view of looking at an event.

> > > > > In the example you have quoted rahu occupying

> > > Mars's house will

> > > > give

> > > > > results of Mars too. Therefore in 6th he would

> > > probably give you

> > > > victory

> > > > > over enemies. This is because the nodes give

> > > results of house

> > > > lord,

> > > > > planets associating them and planets in 7th from

> > > where they are

> > > > placed.

> > > > > In addition they give results of Saturn in case

> > > of rahu and Mars

> > > > in

> > > > > Ketu's case if placed as a single planet in a

> > > rasi.

> > > > > Chandrashekhar.

[Guest guest]

||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

 

 

Dear Prabodhji,

 

Yes I got your views!!

Also seen the Panchangas(Date) and confirm it's written in that.

Still I'll like to get clearer views , pls continue the discussion!

 

Regards,

 

Vinay Patwardhan

 

 

vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

<amolmandar> wrote:

> Dear Vinay Namste

>

> Once mars has lost its fire then depending on its position fire in

> perticular aspect of the life will be missing. Since 'fire' is

> essential element of every aspect of our life lack of that will

> cause problems. That is what we consider as melefic effect of weak

> mars. But there is no amplification of effects of such mars.

>

> Strong mars has excess of fire so if left uncontrolled may cause

> damage to the native specially if it is regarding marriage. It gets

> controlled by its position, ownership and aspect of benefics.

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "vinaypatwardhan"

> <vinaypatwardhan> wrote:

> > ||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

> >

> > Dear Prabodhji,

> >

> > I think sameway mars in cancer is same in all bhavas, loosing

it's

> > own fire!!(Also called as Satwa)

> > So is the case in Tenth but in seventh house it'll become weak

and

> > hence Kuja Dosha will be weak!!

> > Am I correct? I think when we r discussing about Kuja dosha we r

> > mainly concerned to seventh house (and family also) and effect of

> > mars on it, so I think like way!!

> >

> > Now coming to 10th or other placements, don't you think those

> bhavas

> > will get suffer(I'm excluding neechabhanga and other parts) Or

the

> > words use "weak malefic becomes more malefic " I think malefic is

> > used for suffering so it means more suffering!! That is what i

> have

> > understood which may be wrong also!! All learned ones may correct

> me!!

> >

> > About tatwas I'm aware they are having great depth hence till

date

> > nadis are mysteries for many of us!! But I had not made loose

> > statement with logic but got some ref(Ref:- RG Rao) In such case

> if

> > moon is weak then results may vary also!! But not willing to go

in

> > depth as this is totally different subject.

> >

> > Prabodhji and all learned ones, I have tried with my limited

> > knowledge so pls do rectify me, whereever I'm wrong.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Vinay Patwardhan

> >

> >

> >

-

> ---

> > ----------

> >

> > Message 41491 of 41494 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ]

Message

> > Index Msg #

> >

> > "amolmandar" <amolmandar>

> > Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:46 pm

> > Fwd: Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in Malefic

> > houses???(example Anamika)

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Vinay Namste

> >

> > Even if we consider that neecha kuja as fire in water but it

should

> > be true for all the bhavas. Mars in 7th only can not be considered

> > as fire in water. In 10th as well it will be fire in water so

> > effects of mars will not be there with respect to 10th house. So

> its

> > neecha effects will be seen but not in amplified manner I suppose.

> > We are considering that weak malefic becomes strong malefic. I

> think

> > weak is always weak since it fails to protect houses owned by it

> and

> > hence their effects.

> > As far as aspect of malefic on swarasi,yes it strengthen the bhava

> > because being weak its dristi does not become weak.

> > I think person with shasha yoga may have tendency to doing

excesses

> > in ocult sciences. Which may be good(benefic) for him but usually

> we

> > find his family to suffer(melefic) because of that. So my point is

> > that strong malefic will give effect like strong planet and weak

> > malefic will give as weak. There is will be no amplification in

> > their effects.

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

> >

> > Prabodh Vekhande

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Amol Mandar

> > <amolmandar> wrote:

> > > --- vinaypatwardhan <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> > > wrote: > Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:48:39 -0000

> > > > "vinaypatwardhan"

> > > > <patwardhanvinay@h...>

> > > > "amolmandar" <amolmandar>

> > > > Re: Confusion regarding Malefics placed in

> > > > Malefic houses???(example Anamika)

> > > >

> > > > ||Shri GaneshDattaGurubhyo Namah||

> > > >

> > > > Respected Chandrashekharji and Dear Prabodhji,

> > > >

> > > > I'm reading Prabodhji's mail currently where

> > > > debilitated malefic

> > > > planets are consider good (Kuja dosha -- Prabodhji)

> > > > as per his

> > > > opinion!! So I'm also contributing my limited

> > > > knowledge .

> > > >

> > > > I think if we take neecha kuja in seventh then it

> > > > shows fire in

> > > > water! Hence the fire can be controlled! Obviously

> > > > it will reduce the

> > > > fire of mars and accordingly his malefic influence !

> > > > Hence this might

> > > > be written in panchangas that this might reduce the

> > > > effects of mars.

> > > > (Learned ones do rectify me)

> > > >

> > > > But now coming to strong malefics point I do think

> > > > Shri

> > > > Chandrashekharji had guided us correctly!! Like

> > > > consider the same

> > > > case of neecha mars in 10th !! (An upachay also

> > > > along with karma

> > > > sthana) Here also mars is functional malefic but

> > > > it's position in

> > > > debilation in 10th H will surely create some

> > > > problems in career(OR

> > > > exalted one will create?)!! Same way consider it in

> > > > 4th H then even

> > > > though natural significator of lands mars neecha in

> > > > 4th will afflict

> > > > that house (Especially mother's health)!!

> > > > (functionaly good or

> > > > positive planet)

> > > > Like way if we consider neecha mars in all 12 bhavas

> > > > we can easily

> > > > conclude weak malefic is more malefic !!

> > > > In fact aspect of malefic planet on swarasi will

> > > > strengthen it

> > > > (Rasi=Bhava) And aspect of malefic planet on enemies

> > > > house will

> > > > destroy or reduce the effects of that rasi (Bhava)

> > > > The only thing

> > > > when malefics are concerned more hardship or

> > > > struggle is required to

> > > > achieve the success!!

> > > >

> > > > I 'll like to think on mahapurush yogas formed by

> > > > Sat or mars!! So

> > > > Prabodhji , respected Chandrshekharji pls think on

> > > > above points and

> > > > do rectify me.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Vinay Patwardhan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

> > > >

> > > > <amolmandar> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

> > > > >

> > > > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > > > malefic is capable of

> > > > > >giving far less malefic effects.

> > > > >

> > > > > Sir I have a confusion. For the charts where mars

> > > > is causing dosha

> > > > > weak mars is preferable. As many of the panchangas

> > > > say the weak and

> > > > > debiliated Kuja does not cause the Kuja dosha. On

> > > > the other hand if

> > > > > we go by 'weak Malefic is more malefic' principle

> > > > then debilated

> > > > > mars in 7th should be treated as strong kujadosha.

> > > > Now if we take

> > > > > the example,the charts of Anamika and her husband

> > > > have Kujadosha.

> > > > > The anamika chart has Mars debiliated in 7th and

> > > > her husband has MT

> > > > > mars in 12th aspecting its own house in 7th. For

> > > > both of them mars

> > > > > is functionally malefic. Ofcourse, in anamikas

> > > > case Mars in

> > > > > navmansha gets little bit strength being in 5th

> > > > and own house. In

> > > > > her husband case the strong exalted mars aspecting

> > > > 7th own house

> > > > and

> > > > > Ve/Me must be creating problems in her married

> > > > life as neecha mars

> > > > > cancels kuja dosha in her case. So I thought that

> > > > strong malefic

> > > > > will always be more dangerous than weak one.

> > > > Please clarify.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology,

> > > > Chandrashekhar

> > > > <boxdel>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > Dear Mukund,

> > > > > > Weak malefic is more malefic, where strong

> > > > malefic is capable of

> > > > > giving

> > > > > > far less malefic effects. This of course has to

> > > > be applied based

> > > > > on the

> > > > > > placement and functional nature of planets. For

> > > > example in

> > > > > pravrajya

> > > > > > yoga weak combust planets, with strong Sun give

> > > > pravrajya denoted

> > > > > by

> > > > > > Sun, whereas strong Malefics similarly placed

> > > > make a person

> > > > > devoted to

> > > > > > such holy men. So the effects, whether malefic

> > > > or benefic would

> > > > > depend

> > > > > > on one's point of view of looking at an event.

> > > > > > In the example you have quoted rahu occupying

> > > > Mars's house will

> > > > > give

> > > > > > results of Mars too. Therefore in 6th he would

> > > > probably give you

> > > > > victory

> > > > > > over enemies. This is because the nodes give

> > > > results of house

> > > > > lord,

> > > > > > planets associating them and planets in 7th from

> > > > where they are

> > > > > placed.

> > > > > > In addition they give results of Saturn in case

> > > > of rahu and Mars

> > > > > in

> > > > > > Ketu's case if placed as a single planet in a

> > > > rasi.

> > > > > > Chandrashekhar.