Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Dear Visti, I wonder if you might throw some light on this. COVA suggests, and so does Vimshottari and Udu Dashas that Guru's Gochar Drishti on the 2nd from UL or Gochar itself on the said location is a necassary condition for a lasting marriage. Will a Rashi Drishti to the 2nd L from UL suffice? I seem to remember that Pt. Rath allowed this in one example in COVA. This is distinct from the case where marriage happened while Guru aspected the 2nd L from UL but was only consummated, at Pt. Rath's directions, when Guru covered the 2nd House itself. Further, would Rashi Drishti to the UL strengthen the case while aspecting the 2nd L from UL though not the 2nd H? Clarity on this point will be much appreciated. Regards. Anurag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 |Hare Rama Krsna| Dear Anurag, Namaskar This is a Muhürta principle. Can you please mention on which page Sanjayji has given the exception for the 2nd lord from UL – I would be learning too. Yours, bold">Visti Larsen color:#4E81C4"> visti (AT) (DOT) org Verdana;color:#4E81C4"> padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm"> font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">anuraagsharma27 [anuraagsharma27 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com] 17 August 2004 18:48 To: vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Rashi Drishti & Marriage-Visti 12.0pt"> 10.0pt">Dear Visti, I wonder if you might throw some light on this. COVA suggests, and so does Vimshottari and Udu Dashas that Guru's Gochar Drishti on the 2nd from UL or Gochar itself on the said location is a necassary condition for a lasting marriage. Will a Rashi Drishti to the 2nd L from UL suffice? I seem to remember that Pt. Rath allowed this in one example in COVA. This is distinct from the case where marriage happened while Guru aspected the 2nd L from UL but was only consummated, at Pt. Rath's directions, when Guru covered the 2nd House itself. Further, would Rashi Drishti to the UL strengthen the case while aspecting the 2nd L from UL though not the 2nd H? Clarity on this point will be much appreciated. Regards. Anurag. To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Attachment: (image/jpeg) image001.jpg [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Dear Visti, I'll try to find it. It must be one of the examples under the 7th House in COVA. Till I manage to find it, do you have any opinion on the matter, assuming of course, the example actually exists. Regards. Anurag. vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen" <visti@s...> wrote: > |Hare Rama Krsna| > > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > > This is a Muhürta principle. Can you please mention on which page Sanjayji > has given the exception for the 2nd lord from UL – I would be learning too. > > Yours, > > > > > > Visti Larsen > <visti@s...> visti@s... > _____ > > anuraagsharma27 [anuraagsharma27@h...] > 17 August 2004 18:48 > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Rashi Drishti & Marriage-Visti > > > > Dear Visti, > > I wonder if you might throw some light on this. COVA suggests, and so > does Vimshottari and Udu Dashas that Guru's Gochar Drishti on the 2nd > from UL or Gochar itself on the said location is a necassary > condition for a lasting marriage. Will a Rashi Drishti to the 2nd L > from UL suffice? I seem to remember that Pt. Rath allowed this in one > example in COVA. This is distinct from the case where marriage > happened while Guru aspected the 2nd L from UL but was only > consummated, at Pt. Rath's directions, when Guru covered the 2nd > House itself. > > Further, would Rashi Drishti to the UL strengthen the case while > aspecting the 2nd L from UL though not the 2nd H? > > Clarity on this point will be much appreciated. > > Regards. > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > Sponsor > > > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129nnngpe/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117 6/D=gr > oups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1092847725/A=2164330/R=0/SIG=11eamf8g4/*http: /www.n > etflix.com/Default?mqso=60183350> click here > > > > <http://us.adserver./l? M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S= > :HM/A=2164330/rand=984082844> > > > > _____ > > Links > > * > vedic astrology/ > > * > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > * > <> Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Dear Visti, Pranaam, Though this is not the case I seem to remember, it too has Guru Gochar through the UL and aspecting the lord thereof. Page 271 COVA. Though the marriage was not lasting, Pt. Rath does not attribute it to Guru Gochar but to natal inauspicious dispositions of AL, UL etc. In this case, Guru transits the UL and aspects, perhaps by Graha Drishti, the lord of UL ans second therefrom. There is another case in one of Pt. Rath's books which more precisely ilustrates the situation, since the marriage is lasting etc. The point is if Guru's Drishti to the 2nd L suffices if Guru also covers by Gochar or Rashi Drishti, the UL and 7th therefrom. Only as a supplement to the rule about the 2nd House from Upapada. Best regards. Anurag. vedic astrology, "anuraagsharma27" <anuraagsharma27@h...> wrote: > Dear Visti, > > I'll try to find it. It must be one of the examples under the 7th > House in COVA. Till I manage to find it, do you have any opinion on > the matter, assuming of course, the example actually exists. > > Regards. > > Anurag. > > vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen" <visti@s...> > wrote: > > |Hare Rama Krsna| > > > > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > > > > This is a Muhürta principle. Can you please mention on which page > Sanjayji > > has given the exception for the 2nd lord from UL – I would be > learning too. > > > > Yours, > > > > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > <visti@s...> visti@s... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > anuraagsharma27 [anuraagsharma27@h...] > > 17 August 2004 18:48 > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Rashi Drishti & Marriage-Visti > > > > > > > > Dear Visti, > > > > I wonder if you might throw some light on this. COVA suggests, and > so > > does Vimshottari and Udu Dashas that Guru's Gochar Drishti on the > 2nd > > from UL or Gochar itself on the said location is a necassary > > condition for a lasting marriage. Will a Rashi Drishti to the 2nd L > > from UL suffice? I seem to remember that Pt. Rath allowed this in > one > > example in COVA. This is distinct from the case where marriage > > happened while Guru aspected the 2nd L from UL but was only > > consummated, at Pt. Rath's directions, when Guru covered the 2nd > > House itself. > > > > Further, would Rashi Drishti to the UL strengthen the case while > > aspecting the 2nd L from UL though not the 2nd H? > > > > Clarity on this point will be much appreciated. > > > > Regards. > > > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129nnngpe/M=298184.5285298.6392945.300117 > 6/D=gr > > > oups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1092847725/A=2164330/R=0/SIG=11eamf8g4/*http: > /www.n > > etflix.com/Default?mqso=60183350> click here > > > > > > > > <http://us.adserver./l? > M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S= > > :HM/A=2164330/rand=984082844> > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > Links > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? > subject=Un> > > > > * > > <> Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.