Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Dear Anna, U are most welcome to post ur views & presuming this is an open forum so is everyone. Yes i do not possess a physical emphemeris, which i presume u mean by a Panchanga what we call here. 1. But i feel isn't it logical that most softwares calculate charts, are the chart which are shown in softwares done on the basis of emphemeris, thats the impression i was under always, pls correct me if i am wrong, otherwise how does a software calculate a chart. I presume their could be difference in quality of an emphemerisis as in india also i hear their are 600/800 different Panchangas. 2. I feel what u were trying to say is what i said it in few emails back that softwares need to show how they show next to a planet R(retrogade), they need to show S (for Stationery) something like that. I hear people can see if a planet is stationery on the speed of planets as given in JHora but i do not understand that. I feel for common man less initiated softwares shold show stationery positions 3. U have hit a valid point that stationery planets are very imp and yes most astrologers dont even see that maybe, but the older generation of wise astrologers who always used a panchanga inspite of having a computer next to them still use panchanga and see whether a planet is stationery or not. 4. I am right now in discussion with Lakhmi Ramesh on if Sanjay Rathji's Jup is stationery or not. 5. Thanks for ur tip, as of now even i use a normal software and test if few days back or forward a planet got retrogade or not, but it is too cumbersome, most charts that were sent to me were not sure if they are stationery and checking so many charts to find this out is very tiring with the little time one gets for astrology. 6. For everyone who wrote in re stationery planets, this could be of help which Lakshmi Ramesh has been kind enough to supply. Thanks SJ Mumbai Retrograde Planetary Cycles As a rule, retrograde planets presage a period of seemingly inevitable or fated events, which relate to their sphere of influence. They present us with a series of events over which we seem to have little or no control, relating especially to the sign in which the retrogradation occurs. For example, Neptune retrograde in Aquarius presents quite different sets of circumstances from those generated when it retrogrades into Capricorn. Retrograde Mercury Retrograde Mars Back to Start A retrograde period is best seen as a cycle, which begins when the planet begins to slow to a halt before travelling backwards through the zodiac and ends when the planet returns to the point where it first paused. However, during the cycle, the planet's energy is most powerful (and more likely to generate critical events of universal importance) when the planet makes a station, appearing motionless in the sky. These stationary periods occur at the beginning of the cycle (when the planet first halts as it prepares to move backwards) and midway through the cycle when the retrograde planet slows to a stop before moving forward again. Pluto has its retro station in March 2000, turning direct again in August 2000; Neptune's next retrograde station occurs in May 2000, while its direct station happens in October 2000. Uranus too turns retrograde in May 20000, while Saturn has a retrograde station in mid-September 2000. Jupiter turns retro at the end of September 2000. Both Saturn and Jupiter return to direct motion in January 2001. Retrograde Planetary Cycles MercuryRetrograde 24 days Stationary approx. 3 days VenusRetrograde 42 days Stationary approx. 11 days MarsRetrograde 80 days Stationary approx. 20 days JupiterRetrograde 120 daysStationary approx. 10 days SaturnRetrograde 140 daysStationary approx. 10 days UranusRetrograde 150 daysStationary approx. 16 days NeptuneRetrograde 160 daysStationary approx. 16 days PlutoRetrograde 160 daysStationary approx. 16 days Dear Sunil,If you don't mind my unswering- you have to have ephemeris to knowwhen the planet, any, slows down before changing direction, ie beingstationary /D or R/. Unfortunatelly you won't find that in anycomputer program, and my observation is that most astrologers,although they do agree that stationary planets are extremely potent,using comp. programs, rarely do in fact consider that major factorin practice- mistake for sure- bottom line: don't rely on computerprograms only, or, alternatively, always look the day /or rarely 1and half/ prior and after the D-day- that's how long S. period lasts.When, say, one day later a planet changes direction, you can beCERTAIN that in the second year of the native's life some relatedmajor changes has happened. And sure, that slow-moving- Stat. statusadds potency to the planet.I think I've seen Chandrashekhar already mentioning that fact sometime ago.Regards,A. Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Dear Sunil, I have seen practitioners of System Apporach use Sationary planets and give it importance and also on the tripple transit. Acutally if you study the Transit Alerts given by Sateesh Batas on various lists he mentions this phenemon. Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, Sunil John <jjnet2000_in> wrote: > Dear Anna, > U are most welcome to post ur views & presuming this is an open forum so is everyone. Yes i do not possess a physical emphemeris, which i presume u mean by a Panchanga what we call here. > 1. But i feel isn't it logical that most softwares calculate charts, are the chart which are shown in softwares done on the basis of emphemeris, thats the impression i was under always, pls correct me if i am wrong, otherwise how does a software calculate a chart. I presume their could be difference in quality of an emphemerisis as in india also i hear their are 600/800 different Panchangas. > > 2. I feel what u were trying to say is what i said it in few emails back that softwares need to show how they show next to a planet R (retrogade), they need to show S (for Stationery) something like that. I hear people can see if a planet is stationery on the speed of planets as given in JHora but i do not understand that. I feel for common man less initiated softwares shold show stationery positions > > 3. U have hit a valid point that stationery planets are very imp and yes most astrologers dont even see that maybe, but the older generation of wise astrologers who always used a panchanga inspite of having a computer next to them still use panchanga and see whether a planet is stationery or not. > > 4. I am right now in discussion with Lakhmi Ramesh on if Sanjay Rathji's Jup is stationery or not. > > 5. Thanks for ur tip, as of now even i use a normal software and test if few days back or forward a planet got retrogade or not, but it is too cumbersome, most charts that were sent to me were not sure if they are stationery and checking so many charts to find this out is very tiring with the little time one gets for astrology. > > 6. For everyone who wrote in re stationery planets, this could be of help which Lakshmi Ramesh has been kind enough to supply. > > Thanks > SJ > Mumbai > > > > Retrograde Planetary Cycles > > > As a rule, retrograde planets presage a period of seemingly inevitable or fated events, which relate to their sphere of influence. They present us with a series of events over which we seem to have little or no control, relating especially to the sign in which the retrogradation occurs. For example, Neptune retrograde in Aquarius presents quite different sets of circumstances from those generated when it retrogrades into Capricorn. Retrograde Mercury > Retrograde Mars > Back to Start > > > > > A retrograde period is best seen as a cycle, which begins when the planet begins to slow to a halt before travelling backwards through the zodiac and ends when the planet returns to the point where it first paused. However, during the cycle, the planet's energy is most powerful (and more likely to generate critical events of universal importance) when the planet makes a station, appearing motionless in the sky. These stationary periods occur at the beginning of the cycle (when the planet first halts as it prepares to move backwards) and midway through the cycle when the retrograde planet slows to a stop before moving forward again. > > > Pluto has its retro station in March 2000, turning direct again in August 2000; Neptune's next retrograde station occurs in May 2000, while its direct station happens in October 2000. Uranus too turns retrograde in May 20000, while Saturn has a retrograde station in mid- September 2000. Jupiter turns retro at the end of September 2000. Both Saturn and Jupiter return to direct motion in January 2001.Retrograde Planetary Cycles > > > > Mercury > Retrograde 24 days > Stationary approx. 3 days > > > Venus > Retrograde 42 days > Stationary approx. 11 days > > > Mars > Retrograde 80 days > Stationary approx. 20 days > > > Jupiter > Retrograde 120 days > Stationary approx. 10 days > > > Saturn > Retrograde 140 days > Stationary approx. 10 days > > > Uranus > Retrograde 150 days > Stationary approx. 16 days > > > Neptune > Retrograde 160 days > Stationary approx. 16 days > > > Pluto > Retrograde 160 days > Stationary approx. 16 days Dear Sunil, > If you don't mind my unswering- you have to have ephemeris to know > when the planet, any, slows down before changing direction, ie being > stationary /D or R/. Unfortunatelly you won't find that in any > computer program, and my observation is that most astrologers, > although they do agree that stationary planets are extremely potent, > using comp. programs, rarely do in fact consider that major factor > in practice- mistake for sure- bottom line: don't rely on computer > programs only, or, alternatively, always look the day /or rarely 1 > and half/ prior and after the D-day- that's how long S. period lasts. > > When, say, one day later a planet changes direction, you can be > CERTAIN that in the second year of the native's life some related > major changes has happened. And sure, that slow-moving- Stat. status > adds potency to the planet. > > I think I've seen Chandrashekhar already mentioning that fact some > time ago. > Regards, > A. > > Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.