The (other ) side of Shankaracharya .............(Reply)

[Guest guest]

Dear Friend,

A surgeon's scalpel and an astrologer's application works properly if

the hand and mind is not governed by sentiments.

A horoscope has to be studied in total impartiality without attaching

any sentiments.

Same thing has been done by self .No judgement is passed by self .

Only what effects certain combinations can have , has been written.

 

Karmaphala does not leave anyone without getting back in same coin.

Whether it is self , Lord Krishna or anyone.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

<amolmandar> wrote:

>

> Dear all Namste

>

> Those who feel that there is a darker side of HH please read this

> article which was written in 2002. It can be a pointer to his

> present state as well.

>

> Thanksa lot for your Time and Sapce.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

> Dalits: Kanchi leads the way

>

> By Sandhya Jain

>

> The Shankaracharya of Kanchi, Swami Jayendra

> Saraswati, broke a critical stalemate in the current

> controversy over the merits of the Tamil Nadu ban on

> conversions by force, fraud or inducement, by offering

> worship at a Dalit-run temple in Madurai (The Hindu,

> 12 Nov. 2002). The Veerakali Amman temple, which

> serves the religious needs of eighteen villages and

> has a Dalit priest, lies in the Melur region where 250

> Hindus were converted en masse by a Canadian priest of

> the Seventh Day Adventists on 25 August 2002.

> Previously, about fifteen hundred Hindus were

> converted in the neighbouring areas in January 2001.

> By giving the villagers an unexpected darshan, the

> Shankaracharya gracefully shattered several myths and

> assumptions about inequality and divisiveness in Hindu

> society.

>

> Speaking with his legendary forthrightness, the seer

> told the gathering what many of us have always known,

> namely, that Hindu dharma does not promote or envision

> discrimination and regards people of all sections of

> society as equals. He rightly stressed that Hindus

> have an age-long tradition of living amicably as a

> "family", as brothers and sisters. Candidly accepting

> that there are always differences in society, he

> advised the people not to foster discrimination on

> this count, as unity has ever been the hallmark of the

> dharma.

>

> The Shankaracharya has truly led by example, with a

> view to blunting the criticism of evangelizing faiths

> that social discrimination compels Dalits to embrace

> other faiths. Hitherto, Hindus have been rebutting

> the argument by pointing out that the condition of

> former Dalits does not improve upon leaving the mother

> faith, and that persisting discrimination in the new

> faiths has led Christian and Muslim groups to demand

> the extension of reservation benefits to ex-Dalits in

> their fold.

>

> Swami Jayendra Saraswati, however, has risen above

> this cacophony to remind us that we cannot seek refuge

> in such specious arguments, and that it is our duty to

> uphold the principle of the brotherhood of man in our

> own lives. It is now enjoined upon each one of us to

> be worthy followers of a worthy leader. Tamil society

> in particular must rise to the occasion and accord the

> Dalits the personal dignity they crave for; a

> beginning must be made by doing away with the

> degrading two-glass system at village dhabas. In this

> regard, it may be worth noting that the Swamiji's

> choice of temple was singularly apt. The Veerakali

> Amman temple attracts devotees from all castes and is

> also a locally renowned symbol of communal harmony as

> Muslims regularly join the celebrations of its annual

> festival in January.

>

> What is most exciting about this new call from the

> bastions of the mainstream tradition is that it cannot

> be set aside lightly as a maverick or fringe movement.

> Swami Jayendra Saraswati followed up the Madurai

> initiative at Tirunelveli by categorically asserting

> that Dalits have the right to enter any temple across

> the State, individually, and offer prayers. This may

> not make sense to many urban citizens. But what it

> means is that at many important temples, Dalits from

> outside the region do enter anonymously along with

> other pilgrims, but local Dalits who might be

> recognized would be barred or beaten for entering the

> precincts.

>

> Now an orthodox Hindu leader with unparalleled

> knowledge of the shastras has ruled that "appropriate

> action" would be taken against those trying to prevent

> a Harijan from entering a temple. And as the cosmic

> vision of the Hindus does not envisage the shallow

> separation of religion and the public sphere, as

> Mahatma Gandhi had intuitively understood, the

> Shankaracharya has rightly asserted that religious

> leaders must increasingly participate in public life

> to foster a social renaissance.

>

> Given the encouraging signs emanating from different

> parts of the country, it would appear that a major

> paradigm shift is in the making. Later this month,

> Hindu religious leaders are slated to meet at

> Kottakkal in Malappuram district, Kerala, to discuss

> whether temples should open their doors to all

> visitors, irrespective of religion (The Hindustan

> Times, 12 Nov. 2002). Historically, there are

> legitimate reasons for both the imposition of the ban,

> and socially, there are valid reasons for its

> revocation. A mature look at both sides of the coin

> would go a long way to ensure community amity and

> national harmony.

>

> Those who contend that conversions are not an assault

> upon the country's native faith and living

> civilization would do well to recollect that Hindu

> dharma has suffered grievously for several centuries,

> and its temples have been the special foci of

> sustained assault and injury. Simply put, this is the

> reason for the self-protective ban on the entry of

> non-believers into temple precincts. Left historian

> Sanjay Subramaniam has recorded the fortuitous escape

> of the famed Tirupathi shrine from annihilation at the

> hands of the Portuguese. Can one imagine south India

> without Tirupathi? North India was home to several

> such Tirupathis; today it has only the Ganga. Yet, the

> priests of Tirupathi have welcomed all devotees

> provided only that they declare faith in Sri

> Venkatesvara; that is why it rankles to this day that

> Signora Sonia Gandhi should so arrogantly refuse this

> courtesy at such a holy shrine.

>

> Nonetheless, much water has flown under the bridge,

> and communities have grown to the point that many

> individuals wish to stake claim to a larger Indic

> heritage. Hindu tradition is by definition inclusivist

> rather than exclusionary, hence deference to the

> sentiments of non-Hindu devotees would be highly

> appropriate. The present move is the result of the

> hurt felt by many at a perceived injustice to

> celebrated singer K.J. Yesudas, a great bhakta of

> Guruvayurappan, who has been denied temple entry on

> account of being born in a Christian family. The poet

> Yusufali Kecherry, who has written some of the best

> songs in honour of Lord Krishna, has also been

> excluded from Guruvayur because of his Muslim origins.

>

> This seemingly innocuous issue came to the forefront a

> couple of years ago when the Guruvayur Temple

> performed a purificatory rite after the wedding of the

> son of Congress leader Vyalar Ravi. The explanation

> offered was that Mr. Ravi's wife was not a Hindu. But

> the incident proved unacceptable to the Hindu

> conscience and sparked off the present reformation

> drive. Much can be expected from the conclave as the

> chief of the Namboodiri sect has taken the lead in the

> matter and major temples and social organizations are

> expected to attend the meet. It seems reasonable to

> extend freedom of entry to all devotees (or for that

> matter even heritage tourists from other faiths)

> provided that they show proper respect to temple

> traditions and do not defile their sanctity. And it

> goes without saying that this generosity must extend

> to less privileged groups within the Hindu fold.

>

> Change is already in the air. In strife-torn Bihar,

> birthplace of Lord Mahavira, the apostle of

> non-violence, authorities of Patna's famous Mahavira

> temple have decided to increase the number of Dalit

> priests after a successful experiment launched nine

> years ago. A former untouchable, Suryavanshi Das, was

> recruited as a priest and has been successfully

> performing the traditional rituals along with the

> Brahmin priests. His public acceptance is absolute.

> The temple administration actively promotes equality

> among human beings and maintains links with the

> Ramanandi community which practiced non-discrimination

> seven centuries ago.

>

> End of matter

[Guest guest]

Dear Self Namste

 

Why do you think that synchronization of hand and mind is only known

to you and not others. How can a person of your stature comment on

HH by looking at only one aspect of his chart? Does it not mean

carried away by sentiments and loosing the hand in the process. Or

is it that for getting some cheap popularity, like many in the

media, your self has targeted the repected person?

 

It is believed that Astrologer will think 100 times before coming to

any decisions more so if it is about darker side of anybody. Your

self seems to have own ways of thinking and beliving that it is the

only correct way of thinking. Under the banner of Rahu ofcourse your

self can say anything! That is how Rahu acts.

 

It would be interesting to know your self's present birth details.

So that we can as well understand your motive of posting darker side

of HH. I hope you will not hide your birth details from the list. Or

your 10th house Rahu will not allow you to do so?

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

Jai Jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "nameisego" <nameisego>

wrote:

>

>

> Dear Friend,

> A surgeon's scalpel and an astrologer's application works properly

if

> the hand and mind is not governed by sentiments.

> A horoscope has to be studied in total impartiality without

attaching

> any sentiments.

> Same thing has been done by self .No judgement is passed by self .

> Only what effects certain combinations can have , has been written.

>

> Karmaphala does not leave anyone without getting back in same coin.

> Whether it is self , Lord Krishna or anyone.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

> vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

> <amolmandar> wrote:

> >

> > Dear all Namste

> >

> > Those who feel that there is a darker side of HH please read

this

> > article which was written in 2002. It can be a pointer to his

> > present state as well.

> >

> > Thanksa lot for your Time and Sapce.

> >

> > Prabodh Vekhande

> > Jai Jai Shankar

> > Har Har Shankar

> >

> > Dalits: Kanchi leads the way

> >

> > By Sandhya Jain

> >

> > The Shankaracharya of Kanchi, Swami Jayendra

> > Saraswati, broke a critical stalemate in the current

> > controversy over the merits of the Tamil Nadu ban on

> > conversions by force, fraud or inducement, by offering

> > worship at a Dalit-run temple in Madurai (The Hindu,

> > 12 Nov. 2002). The Veerakali Amman temple, which

> > serves the religious needs of eighteen villages and

> > has a Dalit priest, lies in the Melur region where 250

> > Hindus were converted en masse by a Canadian priest of

> > the Seventh Day Adventists on 25 August 2002.

> > Previously, about fifteen hundred Hindus were

> > converted in the neighbouring areas in January 2001.

> > By giving the villagers an unexpected darshan, the

> > Shankaracharya gracefully shattered several myths and

> > assumptions about inequality and divisiveness in Hindu

> > society.

> >

> > Speaking with his legendary forthrightness, the seer

> > told the gathering what many of us have always known,

> > namely, that Hindu dharma does not promote or envision

> > discrimination and regards people of all sections of

> > society as equals. He rightly stressed that Hindus

> > have an age-long tradition of living amicably as a

> > "family", as brothers and sisters. Candidly accepting

> > that there are always differences in society, he

> > advised the people not to foster discrimination on

> > this count, as unity has ever been the hallmark of the

> > dharma.

> >

> > The Shankaracharya has truly led by example, with a

> > view to blunting the criticism of evangelizing faiths

> > that social discrimination compels Dalits to embrace

> > other faiths. Hitherto, Hindus have been rebutting

> > the argument by pointing out that the condition of

> > former Dalits does not improve upon leaving the mother

> > faith, and that persisting discrimination in the new

> > faiths has led Christian and Muslim groups to demand

> > the extension of reservation benefits to ex-Dalits in

> > their fold.

> >

> > Swami Jayendra Saraswati, however, has risen above

> > this cacophony to remind us that we cannot seek refuge

> > in such specious arguments, and that it is our duty to

> > uphold the principle of the brotherhood of man in our

> > own lives. It is now enjoined upon each one of us to

> > be worthy followers of a worthy leader. Tamil society

> > in particular must rise to the occasion and accord the

> > Dalits the personal dignity they crave for; a

> > beginning must be made by doing away with the

> > degrading two-glass system at village dhabas. In this

> > regard, it may be worth noting that the Swamiji's

> > choice of temple was singularly apt. The Veerakali

> > Amman temple attracts devotees from all castes and is

> > also a locally renowned symbol of communal harmony as

> > Muslims regularly join the celebrations of its annual

> > festival in January.

> >

> > What is most exciting about this new call from the

> > bastions of the mainstream tradition is that it cannot

> > be set aside lightly as a maverick or fringe movement.

> > Swami Jayendra Saraswati followed up the Madurai

> > initiative at Tirunelveli by categorically asserting

> > that Dalits have the right to enter any temple across

> > the State, individually, and offer prayers. This may

> > not make sense to many urban citizens. But what it

> > means is that at many important temples, Dalits from

> > outside the region do enter anonymously along with

> > other pilgrims, but local Dalits who might be

> > recognized would be barred or beaten for entering the

> > precincts.

> >

> > Now an orthodox Hindu leader with unparalleled

> > knowledge of the shastras has ruled that "appropriate

> > action" would be taken against those trying to prevent

> > a Harijan from entering a temple. And as the cosmic

> > vision of the Hindus does not envisage the shallow

> > separation of religion and the public sphere, as

> > Mahatma Gandhi had intuitively understood, the

> > Shankaracharya has rightly asserted that religious

> > leaders must increasingly participate in public life

> > to foster a social renaissance.

> >

> > Given the encouraging signs emanating from different

> > parts of the country, it would appear that a major

> > paradigm shift is in the making. Later this month,

> > Hindu religious leaders are slated to meet at

> > Kottakkal in Malappuram district, Kerala, to discuss

> > whether temples should open their doors to all

> > visitors, irrespective of religion (The Hindustan

> > Times, 12 Nov. 2002). Historically, there are

> > legitimate reasons for both the imposition of the ban,

> > and socially, there are valid reasons for its

> > revocation. A mature look at both sides of the coin

> > would go a long way to ensure community amity and

> > national harmony.

> >

> > Those who contend that conversions are not an assault

> > upon the country's native faith and living

> > civilization would do well to recollect that Hindu

> > dharma has suffered grievously for several centuries,

> > and its temples have been the special foci of

> > sustained assault and injury. Simply put, this is the

> > reason for the self-protective ban on the entry of

> > non-believers into temple precincts. Left historian

> > Sanjay Subramaniam has recorded the fortuitous escape

> > of the famed Tirupathi shrine from annihilation at the

> > hands of the Portuguese. Can one imagine south India

> > without Tirupathi? North India was home to several

> > such Tirupathis; today it has only the Ganga. Yet, the

> > priests of Tirupathi have welcomed all devotees

> > provided only that they declare faith in Sri

> > Venkatesvara; that is why it rankles to this day that

> > Signora Sonia Gandhi should so arrogantly refuse this

> > courtesy at such a holy shrine.

> >

> > Nonetheless, much water has flown under the bridge,

> > and communities have grown to the point that many

> > individuals wish to stake claim to a larger Indic

> > heritage. Hindu tradition is by definition inclusivist

> > rather than exclusionary, hence deference to the

> > sentiments of non-Hindu devotees would be highly

> > appropriate. The present move is the result of the

> > hurt felt by many at a perceived injustice to

> > celebrated singer K.J. Yesudas, a great bhakta of

> > Guruvayurappan, who has been denied temple entry on

> > account of being born in a Christian family. The poet

> > Yusufali Kecherry, who has written some of the best

> > songs in honour of Lord Krishna, has also been

> > excluded from Guruvayur because of his Muslim origins.

> >

> > This seemingly innocuous issue came to the forefront a

> > couple of years ago when the Guruvayur Temple

> > performed a purificatory rite after the wedding of the

> > son of Congress leader Vyalar Ravi. The explanation

> > offered was that Mr. Ravi's wife was not a Hindu. But

> > the incident proved unacceptable to the Hindu

> > conscience and sparked off the present reformation

> > drive. Much can be expected from the conclave as the

> > chief of the Namboodiri sect has taken the lead in the

> > matter and major temples and social organizations are

> > expected to attend the meet. It seems reasonable to

> > extend freedom of entry to all devotees (or for that

> > matter even heritage tourists from other faiths)

> > provided that they show proper respect to temple

> > traditions and do not defile their sanctity. And it

> > goes without saying that this generosity must extend

> > to less privileged groups within the Hindu fold.

> >

> > Change is already in the air. In strife-torn Bihar,

> > birthplace of Lord Mahavira, the apostle of

> > non-violence, authorities of Patna's famous Mahavira

> > temple have decided to increase the number of Dalit

> > priests after a successful experiment launched nine

> > years ago. A former untouchable, Suryavanshi Das, was

> > recruited as a priest and has been successfully

> > performing the traditional rituals along with the

> > Brahmin priests. His public acceptance is absolute.

> > The temple administration actively promotes equality

> > among human beings and maintains links with the

> > Ramanandi community which practiced non-discrimination

> > seven centuries ago.

> >

> > End of matter

[Guest guest]

Your reply has been forwarded as per your wish without comments.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

Ps. You have chosen to use undersigned's name . Makes no difference to self.Amol

Mandar <amolmandar > wrote:

Dear Mr. Hemant Trivedi NamasteSee I never had any serious problems of your way

ofastrology. Let it be Rahu centric or Ketu focal. Ihave had absolutly no

problems so far as it is notcreating problems with the general principles

ofastrology. Let it be very clear that there is noquesions of you entertaining

me( as far as HPdiscussions ). In the public group no body isentertaing

anybody. Make it very clear. If you can notread your mistakes please stop

reading from publicgropus.Considering only one facet of the chart if

jyotishasstart predicting then it would be really verydifficult to have

meaningful disscussions. I respectyour age and seriousness in getting something

new inthe astrology( I have said this many times as well)but that does not mean

any extremist attitude in thefield of astrology will be proper.

Even if yourpredictions become true(you have many to your credit)it is difficult

to accept the logic with which youarrived to the conclusions. Sometimes we see

that byapplying logic correctly we end up in wrongconclusions. Reverse is true

in your case I think.This is what I say Sadhana is helping you. But I thinkyou

should utilise your sadhana in proper directionsrather than finding faults with

others.The other group where your Rahu was tampared likeanything is closed I

think. So less said is betterabout other group,Rahu and its effects.I may be

wrong about my gussing about Rahu in your10th. But why should I belive it? You

dont have gutsto declare your correct birth details and that speakseverything.

I dont allaged anything. I say what I feel likesaying. It may hurt you at

times. If you are notsaying all this for cheap publicity please let meanalyse

your chart. I know you will never accept

that.Now to tell you one more thing, after this letter toyou, for the first time

on the list, there is mailwith my mail address containg virus. Ofcourse somebody

played trick with the computers. Can you give mesome hint on this? So Mr.

Trivedi dont hide yourelf and come in the frontand lets have free and fair

disscussions. Why do youwant to hide so many things and say anything under

thebanner of Rahu and contentions that my theory is underdeveloping state? Try

to be in adult state rather thancreating problems by being in parent and chils

state.Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.Prabodh VekhandeJai Jai ShankarHar

Har ShankarP.S: It woud be good to tell everybody about ourmails. Why to hide

and start in private mode when westarted in public mode?--- nameisego wrote: >

> Dear Mr. Prabodh Vekhande,> Undersigned has already made his position

very> clear.> No discussions will be entered into by self on this> issue.> If

you do not like Rahu centric theory, may it be> so.> You have tried to demean

the undersigned in other> groups also on this > issue.Nothing has been taken by

self personally and> nothing will be.> > Many times in past, it has been made

clear that HP> Theory is on the > anvil and is being tested.And reading about

Sri> Sankaracharya was > done as a test case , in the same manner as HP> Theory

was used in > making forecast about, Indian, USA elections,> Arafat's death and

also > defeat of Naidu in Andhra elections, marriage> timings of many people, >

foreign travels etc.> So far the Theory has stood the test > > About your

allegation that it is being done to gain> cheap popularity, > you are sadly

mistaken.> You said " A

person of your stature"...> Sorry there is no stature for self. He is>

insignificant.> > A person's personality has many sides. Please> understand

that.> Otherwise , self has no motives in analysing any> chart of anyone no >

matter how high or low.> There is no need for undersigned to put his birth>

details on list. > He has no 10th house Rahu.(Sorry to disappoint you)> > As a

devout follower of H H Sri Chandrashekharendra> Saraswati swami, > (Who has

himself blessed the undersigned for> jyothisha)Self would not > like to see any

adverse thing happening to the> present Shankaracharya > swamiji if he has a

clean slate.> > So please be restrained in your allegations.> > Tatvam-Asi> > >

> vedic astrology, "amolmandar"> > wrote:> >

> > Dear Self Namste> > > > Why do you think that synchronization of hand and>

mind is only > known > > to you and not others. How can a person of your>

stature comment > on > > HH by looking at only one aspect of his chart?> Does

it not mean > > carried away by sentiments and loosing the hand in> the

process. Or > > is it that for getting some cheap popularity, like> many in the

> > media, your self has targeted the repected person?> > > > It is believed

that Astrologer will think 100> times before coming > to > > any decisions more

so if it is about darker side> of anybody. Your > > self seems to have own ways

of thinking and> beliving that it is > the > > only correct way of thinking.

Under the banner of> Rahu ofcourse > your > > self can say

anything! That is how Rahu acts. > > > > It would be interesting to know your

self's> present birth details. > > So that we can as well understand your

motive of> posting darker > side > > of HH. I hope you will not hide your birth

details> from the list. > Or > > your 10th house Rahu will not allow you to do

so? > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.> > > > Prabodh Vekhande> >

Jai Jai Shankar> > Har Har Shankar> > > > > > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology,> "nameisego" > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >

Dear Friend,> > > A surgeon's scalpel and an astrologer's> application works >

properly > > if > > > the hand and mind is not governed by

sentiments.> > > A horoscope has to be studied in total> impartiality without >

> attaching > > > any sentiments.> > > Same thing has been done by self .No

judgement> is passed by self .> > > Only what effects certain combinations can

have> , has been > written.> > > > > > Karmaphala does not leave anyone without

getting> back in same > coin.> > > Whether it is self , Lord Krishna or anyone.>

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology,>

"amolmandar" > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > Dear all Namste> > > > > > > > Those

who feel that there is a darker side of> HH please read > > this > > > >

article which was written in

2002. It can be a> pointer to his > > > > present state as well.> > > > > > > >

Thanksa lot for your Time and Sapce.> > > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > > Jai

Jai Shankar> > > > Har Har Shankar> > > > > > > > Dalits: Kanchi leads the way>

> > > > > > > By Sandhya Jain> > > > > > > > The Shankaracharya of Kanchi,

Swami Jayendra> > > > Saraswati, broke a critical stalemate in the> current> >

> > controversy over the merits of the Tamil Nadu> ban on> > > > conversions by

force, fraud or inducement, by> offering> > > > worship at a Dalit-run temple in

Madurai (The> Hindu,> > > > 12 Nov. 2002). The Veerakali Amman temple,> which> >

> > serves the

religious needs of eighteen> villages and> > > > has a Dalit priest, lies in the

Melur region> where 250> > > > Hindus were converted en masse by a Canadian>

priest of> > > > the Seventh Day Adventists on 25 August 2002.> > > >

Previously, about fifteen hundred Hindus were> > > > converted in the

neighbouring areas in January> 2001.> > > > By giving the villagers an

unexpected darshan,> the> > > > Shankaracharya gracefully shattered several>

myths and> > > > assumptions about inequality and divisiveness> in Hindu> > > >

society.> > > > > > > > Speaking with his legendary forthrightness,> the seer> >

> > told the gathering what many of us have always> known,> > > > namely, that

Hindu dharma does not promote or>

envision> > > > discrimination and regards people of all> sections of> > > >

society as equals. He rightly stressed that> Hindus> > > > have an age-long

tradition of living amicably> as === message truncated === =====Jai Jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar_________

ALL-NEW Messenger - all new features - even more fun!

http://uk.messenger.

Discover all that’s new in My

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Prabodh,

 

i agree with what you said... i cannot agree with the 10th Rahu

because, i have Rahu in the 10th :-), and my birth details are widely

distributed on this group (That despite Scorpio Lagna!).

 

i feel that the reason could be something else...!

 

i get to say all this because of my belief that astrology without

remedies is waste of time (playing with somebody's feelings is Not

good and for that reason astrology is not for entertainment or to

prove someone's greatness!).

 

Between rahu & ketu, poor mind is tossed up.

 

Om Shanti Shanti Shanti.

 

regards

viswanadham

[Guest guest]

Dear Vishwanath Namaste

 

Actually I thought that when profesional tries to hide his details

then Rahu must be somewhere in 2-6-10 . I took a chance on 10th

being most powerful among these houses.

 

It would be interesting to know your chart with Scorpio lagna and

10th house Rahu!

 

Thanks alot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

 

Jai Jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar

 

vedic astrology, "vishwanatham"

<vishwanatham@r...> wrote:

>

> Hare Rama Krishna

>

> Dear Prabodh,

>

> i agree with what you said... i cannot agree with the 10th Rahu

> because, i have Rahu in the 10th :-), and my birth details are

widely

> distributed on this group (That despite Scorpio Lagna!).

>

> i feel that the reason could be something else...!

>

> i get to say all this because of my belief that astrology without

> remedies is waste of time (playing with somebody's feelings is Not

> good and for that reason astrology is not for entertainment or to

> prove someone's greatness!).

>

> Between rahu & ketu, poor mind is tossed up.

>

> Om Shanti Shanti Shanti.

>

> regards

> viswanadham

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Prabodh,

 

Namasthe.

 

i give my birth details:

 

dob: 29th Jan 1961

tob: 2.10 am

pob: 81e42,16n45 (India)

 

All i like to know is when i'll wina lottery. Anything else you say

will be a bonus!

 

regards

viswanadham

vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

<amolmandar> wrote:

>

> Dear Vishwanath Namaste

>

> Actually I thought that when profesional tries to hide his details

> then Rahu must be somewhere in 2-6-10 . I took a chance on 10th

> being most powerful among these houses.

>

> It would be interesting to know your chart with Scorpio lagna and

> 10th house Rahu!

>

> Thanks alot for your Time and Sapce.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

>

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Vishwandham Namaste

 

I also ask this everybody without any correct answer!. But you seem

to be lucky as the prashna has lords of lagna and 8th in the same

drekna so you can gain just now as well! So go and try your luck!

I will gothrough your natal afterwards.

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

Jai Jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar

 

vedic astrology, "vishwanatham"

<vishwanatham@r...> wrote:

>

> Hare Rama Krishna

>

> Dear Prabodh,

>

> Namasthe.

>

> i give my birth details:

>

> dob: 29th Jan 1961

> tob: 2.10 am

> pob: 81e42,16n45 (India)

>

> All i like to know is when i'll wina lottery. Anything else you

say

> will be a bonus!

>

> regards

> viswanadham

> vedic astrology, "amolmandar"

> <amolmandar> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vishwanath Namaste

> >

> > Actually I thought that when profesional tries to hide his

details

> > then Rahu must be somewhere in 2-6-10 . I took a chance on 10th

> > being most powerful among these houses.

> >

> > It would be interesting to know your chart with Scorpio lagna

and

> > 10th house Rahu!

> >

> > Thanks alot for your Time and Sapce.

> >

> > Prabodh Vekhande

> >

> > Jai Jai Shankar

> > Har Har Shankar

> >