Jayalalita's Intentions from Chart -Reply

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Pradeep,

 

Allow me to jump in!

 

i understand your neutrality. Inadvertantly, you said something about

Jayalalithaa not granting bail (in your previous mail). That is the

worst fear!! Politicians, CMs', interference in judiciary.

 

When it is state vs an individual, it is the individual who is

weaker and our sympathies are with the individual. This confirms to

the basic tenet that no one is guilty till the crime is proved beyond

doubt. Fundamental rights should not be curtailed until such time

that a substantial portion of the crime is establised.

 

Not that, charged and put behind bars, without bail etc.,

 

Yes to prosecution etc., because under constitution it is Not

exempted for the Religious heads (unlike state governors etc., !)

 

Once again, i appreciate your neutrality.

 

regards

viswanadham

[Guest guest]

Dear Viswanatham ji

 

Thanks for your mail and comments.

I believe the respective state governments have authority to grant

bail or parole for individuals undergoing Police custody. Thus the

TN government is having authority to grant the same.

 

Your views regarding prolonged imprisonment ,without trial and

thereby denial of justice is correct. Justice delayed is justice

denied.

 

My first mail was pointing towards the necessity of impartiality. The

true meaning of Secularism should be exercised, which unfortunately

has not been the case always, in the past.

 

Judiciary , Executive and Legislature has to have a rhythm and

proportion for effective functioning of the State.

 

Ideally Police should be given free hand without political

intervention.But experience shows ,due to lack of maturity, the

freedom is misused in majority of cases, thereby making police

stations a place of fear for common man.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

 

 

vedic astrology, "vishwanatham"

<vishwanatham@r...> wrote:

>

> Hare Rama Krishna

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> Allow me to jump in!

>

> i understand your neutrality. Inadvertantly, you said something

about

> Jayalalithaa not granting bail (in your previous mail). That is

the

> worst fear!! Politicians, CMs', interference in judiciary.

>

> When it is state vs an individual, it is the individual who is

> weaker and our sympathies are with the individual. This confirms

to

> the basic tenet that no one is guilty till the crime is proved

beyond

> doubt. Fundamental rights should not be curtailed until such time

> that a substantial portion of the crime is establised.

>

> Not that, charged and put behind bars, without bail etc.,

>

> Yes to prosecution etc., because under constitution it is Not

> exempted for the Religious heads (unlike state governors etc., !)

>

> Once again, i appreciate your neutrality.

>

> regards

> viswanadham