Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 Dear Anilkumar, I shall try to answer by numbered reference, as many questions are asked. I trust this suits you. 1) Iqqwal:- The shashtra says "SamastaH: so in the case suggested by you it does not form Iqqwal. 2)Itthshal:- Yes it is known as Bhavishya Itthshal. 3) One is separating aspect and other is applying aspect. Since both are past, it is inffered that malefic or benefic results have occurred in the past(before chart was cast for Prashna/ Varsha). The meaning and logic would be clear if you read Surya Siddhanta. 4) Yes, if aspect/ yoga is between them. Same logic as 3 above. 5) Unless you are asking this as a rhetoric, having read radda yoga. The method should be clear from the shloka itself. It does say "astaneecharipuvakraheenabha" does it not? *Please do not try to test anybodys knowledge this way it is unbecoming of one who claims to have read all available editions of BPHS( your last mail on Rahu aspect). *SJC Gurus might not be knowledgeable according to you, but believe me, they are not imbeciles. 6) Depends on how the principles are applied and by whom. 7) Yes Tajik applies different principles for friendship/ enmity amongst planets and one can not mix two systems and expect correct predictions. 8)a) Shloka39 does indicate how this is to be done. The bala 3/4 in friend's sign, 1/2 in sama's sign and becomes1/4th for enemy sign. Now since no bala is allotted to Debilitation signs a graha would not have any bala for that sign in Pancha Vargeeya bala should be clear. Planet being in own hadda or not makes no difference to the way panchvargeeya bala is to be calculated. b) The method is given by Neelkanth and is based on again, in a way Panchvargeeya bala. Planets involved in yoga (Moon here for Kambool to occur) in exaltation own Hadda,Drekkana, Navamsha etc makes Uttamaa etc. Kambool, rest per their strengths. But this is applicable to other yogas too. 9) There is no harm if a new Tajik system is developed and tested on the anvil of time. 10) Does Tajik mention Muthahaa dasha? I see only Patyaayini dasha. The reason being it is based on Planetary degrees and I am more comfortable with that. Muthahaa by its very name will have to be based on Rasi and could be used by those who find consistent results with it. If I am not wrong, Neelakantha does not mention it. Of course at my age, I could forget and correct me if I am wrong. Regards, Chandrashekhar. aokedia wrote: > Dear Chandrashekharji, > > RAM KRISHN HARE > > I have some doubts on Tajik.Kindly give your views. > (1)Iquebal Yoga: If some planets are in kendr and some in panaphar but > opolokkams are empty,will this yoga formation occures? > (2)Itthshal Yoga: If planets are within deeptansh in adjecent > signs,yoga > occures.Can we extend it to other signs in which aspects are not > there but > sign change will cause aspect?Eg. Moon in Dhanu at 27deg. and budh in > Kark in 2deg. > (3)what is the difference in past itthashal and Israf yog? > (4)If planet is retrograde and approching to slower one who is behind > the > faster one,then can we call it itthshal?Similar case for Israf etc. > yogas? > (5)How can we find HEENABH or planet with little brilliance as needed > in > some yogas like Radda? > (6)Are rahu and ketu part of 16 tajik yogas?Since they do not own any > sign, > they can not be lagnesh or karyesh.Can we include them in some cases > where > 3rd planet is needed?Also are nodes included in Iquebal Yoga? > (7)Can friends(3,11,5,9) and enemies(1,4,7,10) be determined on the > basis of > aspects? or we have to use Parashari rules?I feel if dispositer is > placed in > above() positoins,we can call it friend/enemy else neutral. This is > the view > given by Neelkanth(verse 1/1/81). > (8)If a planet is in own hadda but in sign of neech,what should we > consider? > How to assign dignity of uttam,maddhyam,adham etc in kambool and > other > yogas(order of preferance)? > (9)For Panch-vargee-bala,we are given relative strength of 5 types > but how > can we allot weitages in dwadash-vargee-bala? > (10)Can you tell which dasha is better(1)Patyayini(2)Muddha? > > I hope you will kindly give your guidance on these points. > > THANKS > > Anilkumar > > OM TAT SAT > ---- > ----- > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > * Sponsor* > > <http://rd./SIG=12975v866/M=295196.4901138.6071305.3001176/D=groups/S=1\ 705082686:HM/EXP=1085556621/A=2128215/R=0/SIG=10se96mf6/*http://companion..\ com> > > > > ------ > * Links* > > * > vedic astrology/ > > * > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology?subject=Un> > > * Terms of > Service <>. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.