Mars.... is he really karaka for celebecy ? Sri Parthasarathy

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

 

BPHS is one of the greatest treaties on Astrology.

Anything apart from BPHS is certainly beyond the ambit of BPHS.

What is important is , if one wants to proceed further and conquer

new horizons, he has to break free of boundaries .

 

And may be formulate one's own rules or break conventional rules.

What is called for is to read, think, experiment and accept new

things if there is merit in a new thing or thought.

 

At no point , Ostrich Syndrome helps in expanding the science.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

 

-- In vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

<partvinu5> wrote:

> Dear Noname

>

> What is beyond BPHS?, can you quote me a source superior to it?

> best wishes

> partha

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Nameisego/noname

 

One can go beyond ones own boundaries, but not beyond BPHS, when in

doubt refer BPHS, and then come to conclusions. Research has to be

done on what Parasara says, and not what suits our own selves,

research has to be done on what he meant by certain slokas, rather

than invent our own slokas and call it research. It is not research ,

but more of Blasphemy.

And please dont use such words as ostrich, as long as there is a

healthy debate there is growth, otherwise it veers of into personal

debate, which the listmembers can ill afford to tolerate. And by the

way i know your name, there is no need to hide your identity. People

are not fools here not to know the identity crisises,

best wishes

partha

 

 

vedic astrology, "nameisego" <nameisego>

wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

>

> BPHS is one of the greatest treaties on Astrology.

> Anything apart from BPHS is certainly beyond the ambit of BPHS.

> What is important is , if one wants to proceed further and conquer

> new horizons, he has to break free of boundaries .

>

> And may be formulate one's own rules or break conventional rules.

> What is called for is to read, think, experiment and accept new

> things if there is merit in a new thing or thought.

>

> At no point , Ostrich Syndrome helps in expanding the science.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

>

> -- In vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

> <partvinu5> wrote:

> > Dear Noname

> >

> > What is beyond BPHS?, can you quote me a source superior to it?

> > best wishes

> > partha

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

 

 

What an intolerant stand you are taking!

 

How much of Parashar or for that matter jyotisha is known by people

who say that there is nothing beyond BPHS?

 

And who made the rule that research has to be done on what sage

Parashara says ?

 

Any science progresses only when there is an ability to question and

work towards finding answers. Inquiring mind is fodder for growth of

any branch of knowledge. There is nothing callled LAST WORD in any

discipline.

 

Astrology is a dynemic science and must have dynemic philosophy and

laws. There is no place for rigidity my friend.

 

And what makes you think that only sage parashar can compose slokas

and others who compose slokas are not slokas? You say everything else

is blasphamy? This looks to me like KUPAMANDOOKTA.(ostrich syndrome

in samskrit)

 

You make this being smile.

 

And what makes you say that what others say with proof is blasphamy

and constitutes un healthy debate?

 

Where is the fairness ? Where is a level playing ground?

 

Coming to knowing this being's identity and name, it is no concern at

all here. It does not make an iota of difference to this group.

This being is not the one who tries to learn about Ayanamsha hiding

behind identity of a woman.

 

If you have anything to contribute in the debate about Mars being

what Mars is please do so or please lay off.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

<partvinu5> wrote:

> Dear Nameisego/noname

>

> One can go beyond ones own boundaries, but not beyond BPHS, when in

> doubt refer BPHS, and then come to conclusions. Research has to be

> done on what Parasara says, and not what suits our own selves,

> research has to be done on what he meant by certain slokas, rather

> than invent our own slokas and call it research. It is not

research ,

> but more of Blasphemy.

> And please dont use such words as ostrich, as long as there is a

> healthy debate there is growth, otherwise it veers of into personal

> debate, which the listmembers can ill afford to tolerate. And by

the

> way i know your name, there is no need to hide your identity.

People

> are not fools here not to know the identity crisises,

> best wishes

> partha

>

>

> vedic astrology, "nameisego"

<nameisego>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

> >

> > BPHS is one of the greatest treaties on Astrology.

> > Anything apart from BPHS is certainly beyond the ambit of BPHS.

> > What is important is , if one wants to proceed further and

conquer

> > new horizons, he has to break free of boundaries .

> >

> > And may be formulate one's own rules or break conventional rules.

> > What is called for is to read, think, experiment and accept new

> > things if there is merit in a new thing or thought.

> >

> > At no point , Ostrich Syndrome helps in expanding the science.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> >

> >

> > -- In vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

> > <partvinu5> wrote:

> > > Dear Noname

> > >

> > > What is beyond BPHS?, can you quote me a source superior to it?

> > > best wishes

> > > partha

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Nameisego

 

You can change your names hundred times, and may be put noname etc,

but still people will come to know of the reality. I really dont want

to waste the space of listmembers in arguing with a person who

doesnot have even courage to put his name. I never knew that even

putting a name requires courage, but your example has proved that

also. Whatever you want to say , come in front and talk with your

real identity, dont hide behind with false identities.

I never questioned other sages, or other works. I questioned "your"

inventions, as your inventions dont have any basis or logic. And i am

not going to reply to your nonsense any more, you may write whatever

you want to.

best wishes

partha

 

 

vedic astrology, "nameisego" <nameisego>

wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

>

>

> What an intolerant stand you are taking!

>

> How much of Parashar or for that matter jyotisha is known by people

> who say that there is nothing beyond BPHS?

>

> And who made the rule that research has to be done on what sage

> Parashara says ?

>

> Any science progresses only when there is an ability to question

and

> work towards finding answers. Inquiring mind is fodder for growth

of

> any branch of knowledge. There is nothing callled LAST WORD in any

> discipline.

>

> Astrology is a dynemic science and must have dynemic philosophy and

> laws. There is no place for rigidity my friend.

>

> And what makes you think that only sage parashar can compose slokas

> and others who compose slokas are not slokas? You say everything

else

> is blasphamy? This looks to me like KUPAMANDOOKTA.(ostrich

syndrome

> in samskrit)

>

> You make this being smile.

>

> And what makes you say that what others say with proof is

blasphamy

> and constitutes un healthy debate?

>

> Where is the fairness ? Where is a level playing ground?

>

> Coming to knowing this being's identity and name, it is no concern

at

> all here. It does not make an iota of difference to this group.

> This being is not the one who tries to learn about Ayanamsha hiding

> behind identity of a woman.

>

> If you have anything to contribute in the debate about Mars being

> what Mars is please do so or please lay off.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

> <partvinu5> wrote:

> > Dear Nameisego/noname

> >

> > One can go beyond ones own boundaries, but not beyond BPHS, when

in

> > doubt refer BPHS, and then come to conclusions. Research has to

be

> > done on what Parasara says, and not what suits our own selves,

> > research has to be done on what he meant by certain slokas,

rather

> > than invent our own slokas and call it research. It is not

> research ,

> > but more of Blasphemy.

> > And please dont use such words as ostrich, as long as there is a

> > healthy debate there is growth, otherwise it veers of into

personal

> > debate, which the listmembers can ill afford to tolerate. And by

> the

> > way i know your name, there is no need to hide your identity.

> People

> > are not fools here not to know the identity crisises,

> > best wishes

> > partha

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "nameisego"

> <nameisego>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

> > >

> > > BPHS is one of the greatest treaties on Astrology.

> > > Anything apart from BPHS is certainly beyond the ambit of BPHS.

> > > What is important is , if one wants to proceed further and

> conquer

> > > new horizons, he has to break free of boundaries .

> > >

> > > And may be formulate one's own rules or break conventional

rules.

> > > What is called for is to read, think, experiment and accept new

> > > things if there is merit in a new thing or thought.

> > >

> > > At no point , Ostrich Syndrome helps in expanding the science.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -- In vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

> > > <partvinu5> wrote:

> > > > Dear Noname

> > > >

> > > > What is beyond BPHS?, can you quote me a source superior to

it?

> > > > best wishes

> > > > partha

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

 

WOW. !!

You sure pack a punch .

Like an old scratchy record, you are still struck on name.

Why don't you put some arguments as Sjt.Visti did?

 

What is written by this being is nonsense(To you)then what shall

people call your writings?

 

Well more space is needed for intelligent discussions ....so your

choosing not to write is the first sensible thing you would be doing

in this discussion.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

Before it is forgotten, Ayanamsha is sure a fine topic to learn.

[Guest guest]

Dear Partha!

 

Of course name is varying through incarnations.

 

But when you are born - then the people are giving you the name,

which is close to your inner nature or not, sometimes the name is

awful (especialy in ancietn tribes) in order not to maleficiate the

person. This is true at some extent if you have unstable ethereal

body, but it is insignificant when you have reached some stable level

of energy.

 

In Moslem religion there is the embargo (tabu) to paint a man, so the

Moslem architecture have only the beautiful figured ornaments.

 

Dear Tatvam-Asi - Name-is-ego!

 

You are right - name is expressing your ego. But ego is one of the

necessary appendix (application) to the quality of consciousness.

Who knows what is in the world of subconsciousness? And moksha - what

is it without ego?

 

Best wishes.

Lyudmila

 

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Sri Parthasarathy,

>

> WOW. !!

> You sure pack a punch .

> Like an old scratchy record, you are still struck on name.

> Why don't you put some arguments as Sjt.Visti did?

>

> What is written by this being is nonsense(To you)then what shall

> people call your writings?

>

> Well more space is needed for intelligent discussions ....so your

> choosing not to write is the first sensible thing you would be

doing

> in this discussion.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

> Before it is forgotten, Ayanamsha is sure a fine topic to learn.

[Guest guest]

- jai

 

nameisego <nameisego > wrote:

Dear Sri Parthasarathy,BPHS is one of the greatest treaties on

Astrology.Anything apart from BPHS is certainly beyond the ambit of BPHS.What

is important is , if one wants to proceed further and conquer new horizons, he

has to break free of boundaries .And may be formulate one's own rules or break

conventional rules.What is called for is to read, think, experiment and accept

new things if there is merit in a new thing or thought.At no point , Ostrich

Syndrome helps in expanding the science.Tatvam-Asi-- In

vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy" wrote:> Dear Noname> > What

is beyond BPHS?, can you quote me a source superior to it?> best wishes> partha>

> > ------------------------ Sponsor

--------------------~--> Domains - Claim yours for only

$14.70http://us.click./Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/.8XolB/TM--~->

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-........ May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go

to:vedic astrology/<*> To from this

group, send an email to:vedic astrology<*> Your use

of is subject to:om tat sat

Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger