Saham

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunadha Rao

 

RAM KRISHN HARE

 

In case of B.Chandrasekhar,you wrote:

(DOB:18 nov 1975, 5:10pm, Mumbai(near wadala), India)

Now let me see your chart using Annual T.P Chart:-

In this year 2002-2003 Annaul T.P Chart, the Vivaha Saham is: 0 Aq

28.

Anil:why are you using 2002-3 in place of 2003-4?

 

So principle here is: When Saham Lord aspects Lagna in annual TP

chart or when progressed Sun touches the Saham, then the relvant

things related to Sahams fructify.

Annual T.P Chart: Saham is 0 Aq 28 and its lord Sat is in Annual Rasi

Lagna.

Another way of looking at Transits and Navamsa in Annual T.P Chart

for timing the marriage using Vivaha Saham:-

Now if you take the Progressed Sun in the Annual T.P chart, on Oct

5th Sun is in Ge, which is also Navamsa Lagna.

Anil:Are you progressing in reverse direction?His natal sun is in Sc.

So 30th year at the rate of one sign/year is in Ar.If you use D9 based

progression,counting from D9 sun in leo,it is Cp.How are you

calculating?

 

Vivaha Saham is ( Transit ): 5 Ta 02. So if you take the Venus is

the Ta's Lord, who is placed in Navamsa Lagna along with progressed

Sun.

Anil:what do you mean by transit saham?Is it from Day-chart?

 

So in my opinion the Saham's working very well in this case and the

data of marriage should be somewhere close to Oct 5th 2004.

Raghunadha Rao

Anil:It seems that you are not using Natal sahams.It is not proper

to use this great system in this way when classical writers clearly

say:

 

"No sahams should be seen in varsh chart unless natal sahams are

strong

in the year".

 

Read Tajik Neelkanthi if you have not heard of this rule earlier.

 

Why don't you do a tajik analysis of saham also and then compare the

actual

results?

 

It is incorrect to ignore the fundamental rules and then say that it

is

not working in Tajik charts.Nothing is more consistant then Tajik.

 

In any case,Sahams are the gift of TAJIK not TP.

 

Thanks

 

Anilkumar

 

OM TAT SAT