Whether Bush or Kerry wins, astrology will lose - here's why!

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

Has it occurred to any of you that whether Bush or Kerry wins,

astrology will lose, and in fact has already lost? If astrology is

set forward as a methodology that can be used by sincere and

intelligent practitioners to predict future events, then the very

fact that even the best practitioners cannot agree on the outcome

points to a weakness in the methodology or knowledge of it. I think

it is equally important for top astrologers to arrive at a CONSENSUS

BEFORE the event, as it is for them to correctly predict the outcome

of the event. We have SJC gurus and experienced practitioners on this

group siding all possible outcomes (Bush wins, Kerry wins, Edwards

eventually wins). We know for sure that someone will win, so some

astrologer will be "correct". Even the layman non-believer knows

that - that someone will be correct. What would really be an eye-

opener for the average person would be if all astrologers, or in this

case at least SJC gurus at least, agreed on an outcome using

independent analysis using the same rules and that outcome turned out

correct. Now that would be a really convincing win for astrology - it

would show that the science of astrology has consistent

interpretation. Everything else will simply be a temporary ego-boost

for the astrologer that turns out to be "correct", nothing more,

unless the same astrologer turns out to be correct, election after

election. But I dont even see that happening. Sometimes one person is

correct, sometimes another..

 

Sundeep