The Dates Mother Earth May Shake....12th ,13th quakes on schedule..... Mr.Krishna

[Guest guest]

May be you should have read all the postings made by self. You would have got what you wanted.

If you do not find it, I will help you out.

Undersigned had written to Chi. PVNarasimha that combinations gor gandam to

oneself cannot say what extent or percentage they will affect a person.

Insignificant quakes below 5 on Richter scale have not been taken into account.

 

Any how thanks for the input.

 

Tatvam-AsiKrishna K <krishna.kadiri > wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:40:30 -0000, nameisego

mentioned above, which makesit suspect.

Seehttp://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm'>http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm for a reporton an

earthquake on January 19. Searching the web will give you moreinstances. It is

unlikely that you did not check if January 19 did nothave any chance of an

earthquake.Basically it appears that you have still not found the unique

factorthat distinguishes a non-earthquake (or an insignificant earthquake)day

from a devastating killer earthquake. Again, the web

(particularlyhttp://earthquakes.usgs.gov/ ) hints that mother earth shakes

prettyfrequently in some places and such places are more prepared than therest.

Regarding Retro Saturn and Guru being related to theearthquakes, there have been

earthquakes in Oct 2004, when neitherplanet was

retro.Regards,Krishna------------------------ Sponsor

--------------------~--> Has someone you know been affected by illness or

disease?Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness

efforts!http://us.click./UwRTUD/UOnJAA/i1hLAA/.8XolB/TM--~->

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go

to:vedic astrology/<*> To from this

group, send an email to:vedic astrology<*> Your use

of is subject to:

Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Guest guest]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:50:11 -0800 (PST), Noname Noname

<nameisego wrote:

 

Dear Mr.Noname,

 

> May be you should have read all the postings made by self. You would have

> got what you wanted. If you do not find it, I will help you out.

 

Your help is greatly appreciated. I did follow your postings. Points

relevant to my posting are that you are still researching on the

X-factor and that you do not claim credit to some quake on January

18th. If there is anything else, pls let me know. Otherwise, my point

was that your X-factor, at whatever stage of research you may be in,

could not help you predict a quake on January 19th.

 

> Insignificant quakes below 5 on Richter scale have not been taken into

> account.

 

The one that I mentioned is at 6.4 on Ritcher

(http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm), unlike

the really insignificant ones in the range of 5.2-5.5 that you use to

vindicate your theory. Significance of a quake is determined by the

suffering it brings/brought.

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

>

> Any how thanks for the input.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> Krishna K <krishna.kadiri wrote:

>

> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:40:30 -0000, nameisego

> After seeing your mails vindicating your theory on predictions on

> Earthquakes, I dug some info for your perusal:

>

> You wrote long time back:

>

> vedic astrology, "nameisego"

>

> > With two of the major planets Saturn and Jupiter in Retro,

> > earth is going to behave like a ten wheeled tractor with two of

>

> > At the risk of FAILING and being RIDICULED, I am posting the dates

> > during next two months which may shake the earth with greater

> > or slightly less great force resulting in natural disasters

>

> > LIST OF DATES OF PREDICTED SEISMIC EVENTS

>

> > 1) 10th/11th and 17th January 2005 (Already quakes

> > were recorded)

>

> > 2) 22 to 24 January 2005 In Mithun Chandra

>

> There have been earthquakes on dates NOT mentioned above, which makes

> it suspect. See

> http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm for a report

> on an earthquake on January 19. Searching the web will give you more

> instances. It is unlikely that you did not check if January 19 did not

> have any chance of an earthquake.

>

> Basically it appears that you have still not found the unique factor

> that distinguishes a non-earthquake (or an insignificant earthquake)

> day from a devastating killer earthquake. Again, the web (particularly

> http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/ ) hints that mother earth shakes pretty

> frequently in some places and such places are more prepared than the

> rest. Regarding Retro Saturn and Guru being related to the

> earthquakes, there have been earthquakes in Oct 2004, when neither

> planet was retro.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

> || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> Links

>

>

>

________________________________

>

> Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Links

>

> vedic astrology/

>

>

> vedic astrology

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Krishna,

 

I greatly appreciate your interest and help in pointing out quake of

19th January in Japan.

Self was unaware of this quake.

 

1) It again proves that Moon in VM signs is dangerous for earth.

On the day and time, Japanese quake occured, Moon was in Mesha

very much in VM sign.Hence 18th and 19th January were also

significant days when an earthquake can occur.

 

2) To know what is VM sign, I am afraid that you will have to

read old postings on Rahu Centric HP Theory.

 

3) It is evident that you may not be knowing some basic

principles of HP Theory.

 

4) Thanks for providing link to seimology department of USA.

 

Tatvam-Asi

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, Krishna K

<krishna.kadiri@g...> wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:50:11 -0800 (PST), Noname Noname

> <nameisego> wrote:

>

> Dear Mr.Noname,

>

> > May be you should have read all the postings made by self. You

would have

> > got what you wanted. If you do not find it, I will help you out.

>

> Your help is greatly appreciated. I did follow your postings. Points

> relevant to my posting are that you are still researching on the

> X-factor and that you do not claim credit to some quake on January

> 18th. If there is anything else, pls let me know. Otherwise, my

point

> was that your X-factor, at whatever stage of research you may be in,

> could not help you predict a quake on January 19th.

>

> > Insignificant quakes below 5 on Richter scale have not been taken

into

> > account.

>

> The one that I mentioned is at 6.4 on Ritcher

> (http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm), unlike

> the really insignificant ones in the range of 5.2-5.5 that you use

to

> vindicate your theory. Significance of a quake is determined by the

> suffering it brings/brought.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> >

> > Any how thanks for the input.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Krishna K <krishna.kadiri@g...> wrote:

> >

> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:40:30 -0000, nameisego

> > After seeing your mails vindicating your theory on predictions on

> > Earthquakes, I dug some info for your perusal:

> >

> > You wrote long time back:

> >

> > vedic astrology, "nameisego"

> >

> > > With two of the major planets Saturn and Jupiter in Retro,

> > > earth is going to behave like a ten wheeled tractor with two of

> >

> > > At the risk of FAILING and being RIDICULED, I am posting the

dates

> > > during next two months which may shake the earth with greater

> > > or slightly less great force resulting in natural disasters

> >

> > > LIST OF DATES OF PREDICTED SEISMIC EVENTS

> >

> > > 1) 10th/11th and 17th January 2005 (Already quakes

> > > were recorded)

> >

> > > 2) 22 to 24 January 2005 In Mithun Chandra

> >

> > There have been earthquakes on dates NOT mentioned above, which

makes

> > it suspect. See

> > http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/ustlag.htm for a

report

> > on an earthquake on January 19. Searching the web will give you

more

> > instances. It is unlikely that you did not check if January 19

did not

> > have any chance of an earthquake.

> >

> > Basically it appears that you have still not found the unique

factor

> > that distinguishes a non-earthquake (or an insignificant

earthquake)

> > day from a devastating killer earthquake. Again, the web

(particularly

> > http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/ ) hints that mother earth shakes

pretty

> > frequently in some places and such places are more prepared than

the

> > rest. Regarding Retro Saturn and Guru being related to the

> > earthquakes, there have been earthquakes in Oct 2004, when neither

> > planet was retro.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||

> > Links

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> >

> > Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Links

> >

> > vedic astrology/

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology

> >

> > Terms of

Service.

> >

> >