TIME TO GO HOME: Criminal at early age

March 2, 2005

Hi All Members and Learned Members,

First of all, my intension is not to offend or insult any one. I Just want to convey something. NOW.

The person I presented as CRIMINAL is actually1) Working in MNC at very

good/reputed and Highly paid job.2) Married completely according to parents

wishes.3) Very soft spoken and cute looking.4) DEVOTEE of Lord KRSNA, offers

prayers everyday, regularly.5) Pure vaishnav vegetarian, with occaissional

onion/garlic.6) Simplest life-style of whole family, though everyone is earning

well.7) Calm and quite, never boasting.

In short he is exactly OPPOSITE to what YOU learned GURUS, have made him.

Now, try to understand, You don't go by general analysis, rather take for

granted what the person is saying. Some Astrologer once said to me, "First

lesson of astrology is, don't look at the present state of person OR what he is

saying. Judge him ONLY from kundali. He may be looking, but a millionaire

actually." He said Kundali is most powerful Device, so TRUST only kundali and

not the person sitting in front of you.

Similarily, I know, if I would have given you some CRIMINAL's kundali and

presented as Holyman, YOU, would have given your analysis supporting that also.

PLEASE, GENERALIZE and REVISE your techniquea. WAKE-UP, YOU ARE NEEDED, BUTIN

UNBIASED STATE, WHERE YOU ARE DRIVEN ONLY BY KUNDALI.

In last few months, YOU just give analysis according, how the person present

himself/herself. YOU don't look weather person deserve it or not. FOR EXAMPLE:-

EXAMPLE 1:----Some Mrs. Sudha sent a mail that her husband beats her. Everyone

sympathised. DID anyone looked at her : ***** Debilitated Venus in 12th with

8th lord Mars******what do YOU say about her sexual desires and gynaecological

problems. His husband seems comparetively better then her. Don't you think she

is HIDING something. There is definitely something wrong on her part also.

EXAMPLE 2:-Some Raghu, working in IBM call centre, was blaming his 2 girlfriend

of being low in character. Everyone answered in his support. DID anyone asked

about HIS character, That wot he is doing with 2 girls. A male is permitted to

have more then 1 girl without a questionable character, And a girl can't even

laugh with 2 boys

DONT u think there is a need of UNBIASED analysis, IRRESPECTIVE of WHO sent the mail.

I am an amateur, and wanted to show you some kundalis, BUT this incident shows

YOU dont have a general UNBIASED INSIGHT.

Now please REALISE the mistake, INSTEAD of ABUSING me, or JUSTIFYING yourself

with some EXCUSES. There are many people who needs your UNBIASED ADVISE.

Thanks

Celebrate 's 10th Birthday! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

March 2, 2005

Hi,

This is awesome. I totally agree with you.

Also to add here - I have seen many times that in astrology it is

very easy to do analysis on past. There are so many kundlis -

lagana , moon , navamsa , d-1 d-10, nakshatras...phew. With all due

respect, I think with so many kinds of combinations almost anyone

give a reason for what has happened.

Someone told here to first look for the lagna and then go for any

other kundli like D-1,2... I think we need to have this kind of

logical procedures in predicting. Many ppl if they dont find it in

lagna kundli directly go to navamsa or moon or nakskatra and try to

match it with what has happened. But these ppl. dont look why the

exception has occured...

It is very easy to tell why something has occured - becoz u know that

has occured - but to really learn astrology we need to find out why

there are exceptions. Becuase any kundli can made to look very good

or very bad - this shuld not be the case.

Pravin.

vedic astrology, Pallavi Aggarwal

<resplendentaura> wrote:

> Hi All Members and Learned Members,

>

> First of all, my intension is not to offend or insult any one. I

Just want to convey something. NOW.

>

> The person I presented as CRIMINAL is actually

> 1) Working in MNC at very good/reputed and Highly paid job.

> 2) Married completely according to parents wishes.

> 3) Very soft spoken and cute looking.

> 4) DEVOTEE of Lord KRSNA, offers prayers everyday, regularly.

> 5) Pure vaishnav vegetarian, with occaissional onion/garlic.

> 6) Simplest life-style of whole family, though everyone is earning

well.

> 7) Calm and quite, never boasting.

>

> In short he is exactly OPPOSITE to what YOU learned GURUS, have

made him.

>

> Now, try to understand, You don't go by general analysis, rather

take for granted what the person is saying. Some Astrologer once said

to me, "First lesson of astrology is, don't look at the present state

of person OR what he is saying. Judge him ONLY from kundali. He may

be looking, but a millionaire actually." He said Kundali is most

powerful Device, so TRUST only kundali and not the person sitting in

front of you.

>

> Similarily, I know, if I would have given you some CRIMINAL's

kundali and presented as Holyman, YOU, would have given your analysis

supporting that also. PLEASE, GENERALIZE and REVISE your techniquea.

WAKE-UP, YOU ARE NEEDED, BUTIN UNBIASED STATE, WHERE YOU ARE DRIVEN

ONLY BY KUNDALI.

>

> In last few months, YOU just give analysis according, how the

person present himself/herself. YOU don't look weather person deserve

it or not. FOR EXAMPLE:-

>

> EXAMPLE 1:----

> Some Mrs. Sudha sent a mail that her husband beats her. Everyone

sympathised. DID anyone looked at her : ***** Debilitated Venus in

12th with 8th lord Mars******

> what do YOU say about her sexual desires and gynaecological

problems. His husband seems comparetively better then her. Don't you

think she is HIDING something. There is definitely something wrong on

her part also.

>

> EXAMPLE 2:-

> Some Raghu, working in IBM call centre, was blaming his 2

girlfriend of being low in character. Everyone answered in his

support. DID anyone asked about HIS character, That wot he is doing

with 2 girls. A male is permitted to have more then 1 girl without a

questionable character, And a girl can't even laugh with 2 boys

>

> DONT u think there is a need of UNBIASED analysis, IRRESPECTIVE of

WHO sent the mail.

>

> I am an amateur, and wanted to show you some kundalis, BUT this

incident shows YOU dont have a general UNBIASED INSIGHT.

>

> Now please REALISE the mistake, INSTEAD of ABUSING me, or

JUSTIFYING yourself with some EXCUSES. There are many people who

needs your UNBIASED ADVISE.

>

> Thanks

>

> Celebrate 's 10th Birthday!

> Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

March 2, 2005

I 100 per cent agree with the following post.

manoj

--- Pallavi Aggarwal <resplendentaura

wrote:

> Hi All Members and Learned Members,

>

> First of all, my intension is not to offend or

> insult any one. I Just want to convey something.

> NOW.

>

> The person I presented as CRIMINAL is actually

> 1) Working in MNC at very good/reputed and Highly

> paid job.

> 2) Married completely according to parents wishes.

> 3) Very soft spoken and cute looking.

> 4) DEVOTEE of Lord KRSNA, offers prayers everyday,

> regularly.

> 5) Pure vaishnav vegetarian, with occaissional

> onion/garlic.

> 6) Simplest life-style of whole family, though

> everyone is earning well.

> 7) Calm and quite, never boasting.

>

> In short he is exactly OPPOSITE to what YOU learned

> GURUS, have made him.

>

> Now, try to understand, You don't go by general

> analysis, rather take for granted what the person is

> saying. Some Astrologer once said to me, "First

> lesson of astrology is, don't look at the present

> state of person OR what he is saying. Judge him ONLY

> from kundali. He may be looking, but a millionaire

> actually." He said Kundali is most powerful Device,

> so TRUST only kundali and not the person sitting in

> front of you.

>

> Similarily, I know, if I would have given you some

> CRIMINAL's kundali and presented as Holyman, YOU,

> would have given your analysis supporting that also.

> PLEASE, GENERALIZE and REVISE your techniquea.

> WAKE-UP, YOU ARE NEEDED, BUTIN UNBIASED STATE, WHERE

> YOU ARE DRIVEN ONLY BY KUNDALI.

>

> In last few months, YOU just give analysis

> according, how the person present himself/herself.

> YOU don't look weather person deserve it or not. FOR

> EXAMPLE:-

>

> EXAMPLE 1:----

> Some Mrs. Sudha sent a mail that her husband beats

> her. Everyone sympathised. DID anyone looked at her

> : ***** Debilitated Venus in 12th with 8th lord

> Mars******

> what do YOU say about her sexual desires and

> gynaecological problems. His husband seems

> comparetively better then her. Don't you think she

> is HIDING something. There is definitely something

> wrong on her part also.

>

> EXAMPLE 2:-

> Some Raghu, working in IBM call centre, was blaming

> his 2 girlfriend of being low in character. Everyone

> answered in his support. DID anyone asked about HIS

> character, That wot he is doing with 2 girls. A male

> is permitted to have more then 1 girl without a

> questionable character, And a girl can't even laugh

> with 2 boys

>

> DONT u think there is a need of UNBIASED analysis,

> IRRESPECTIVE of WHO sent the mail.

>

> I am an amateur, and wanted to show you some

> kundalis, BUT this incident shows YOU dont have a

> general UNBIASED INSIGHT.

>

> Now please REALISE the mistake, INSTEAD of ABUSING

> me, or JUSTIFYING yourself with some EXCUSES. There

> are many people who needs your UNBIASED ADVISE.

>

> Thanks

>

> Celebrate 's 10th Birthday!

> Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

Celebrate 's 10th Birthday!

Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

http://birthday./netrospective/

March 2, 2005

Hi All,

I sincerely hope this would be a real eye opener for everyone here

including myself. Granted the fact that most of us here are beginners

but I see strong tendencies among people here to jump to conclusions

without offering rational and supportable logic.

I believe an astrologer has to clearly explain his conclusions in an

understandable fashion. For example I read many opinions with strong

conclusions but the supporting evidence is too weak.

In my humble opinion, it will be more useful if people here start

laying down both the positives and negatives in a chart related to a

particular bhava that is being analysed and clearly explain why they

think the positives outweigh the negatives or vice versa. That way

even if the conclusions may not be correct, atleast some body will be

able to point out the flaw in reasoning rather than it being a total

black box.

Regards

Suresh

vedic astrology, Panditji <navagraha@g...>

wrote:

> Namaste,

>

> Bravo ! Excellent. It shows that one can find anything in any

kundali

> once the event is known. When one starts using 10 lagnas and 10

> divisional charts and 10 kinds of dashas, in rashi as well as

> divisional charts one will have so many parameters one will either

get

> confused totally or can justify any event in a chart, I mean any

> event. Accident , marriage, divorce, dhana yogas, winning elections

> and what not.

>

> It is imporatnt to derive things from the rashi chart and may access

> some strengths from navansh. Again I repeat " Divisonal chart can

not

> give what rashi chart does not promise" Divisional chart is a

tertiary

> factor NOT the primary souce of analysis.

>

> Good lesson.

>

> ..

>

> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:53:01 -0800 (PST), Pallavi Aggarwal

> <resplendentaura> wrote:

> > Hi All Members and Learned Members,

> >

> > First of all, my intension is not to offend or insult any one. I

Just want

> > to convey something. NOW.

> >

> > The person I presented as CRIMINAL is actually

> > 1) Working in MNC at very good/reputed and Highly paid job.

> > 2) Married completely according to parents wishes.

> > 3) Very soft spoken and cute looking.

> > 4) DEVOTEE of Lord KRSNA, offers prayers everyday, regularly.

> > 5) Pure vaishnav vegetarian, with occaissional onion/garlic.

> > 6) Simplest life-style of whole family, though everyone is

earning well.

> > 7) Calm and quite, never boasting.

> >

> > In short he is exactly OPPOSITE to what YOU learned GURUS, have

made him.

> >

> > Now, try to understand, You don't go by general analysis, rather

take for

> > granted what the person is saying. Some Astrologer once said to

me, "First

> > lesson of astrology is, don't look at the present state of person

OR what he

> > is saying. Judge him ONLY from kundali. He may be looking, but a

millionaire

> > actually." He said Kundali is most powerful Device, so TRUST only

kundali

> > and not the person sitting in front of you.

> >

> > Similarily, I know, if I would have given you some CRIMINAL's

kundali and

> > presented as Holyman, YOU, would have given your analysis

supporting that

> > also. PLEASE, GENERALIZE and REVISE your techniquea. WAKE-UP, YOU

ARE

> > NEEDED, BUTIN UNBIASED STATE, WHERE YOU ARE DRIVEN ONLY BY

KUNDALI.

> >

> > In last few months, YOU just give analysis according, how the

person present

> > himself/herself. YOU don't look weather person deserve it or not.

FOR

> > EXAMPLE:-

> >

> > EXAMPLE 1:----

> > Some Mrs. Sudha sent a mail that her husband beats her. Everyone

> > sympathised. DID anyone looked at her : ***** Debilitated Venus

in 12th with

> > 8th lord Mars******

> > what do YOU say about her sexual desires and gynaecological

problems. His

> > husband seems comparetively better then her. Don't you think she

is HIDING

> > something. There is definitely something wrong on her part also.

> >

> > EXAMPLE 2:-

> > Some Raghu, working in IBM call centre, was blaming his 2

girlfriend of

> > being low in character. Everyone answered in his support. DID

anyone asked

> > about HIS character, That wot he is doing with 2 girls. A male is

permitted

> > to have more then 1 girl without a questionable character, And a

girl can't

> > even laugh with 2 boys

> >

> > DONT u think there is a need of UNBIASED analysis, IRRESPECTIVE

of WHO sent

> > the mail.

> >

> > I am an amateur, and wanted to show you some kundalis, BUT this

incident

> > shows YOU dont have a general UNBIASED INSIGHT.

> >

> > Now please REALISE the mistake, INSTEAD of ABUSING me, or

JUSTIFYING

> > yourself with some EXCUSES. There are many people who needs your

UNBIASED

> > ADVISE.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Celebrate 's 10th Birthday!

> > Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> > Sponsor

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Links

> >

> > vedic astrology/

> >

> > vedic astrology

> >

> > Terms of

Service.

> >

March 2, 2005

Hare Krishna

Dear Group,

One thing that was forgotten,

WE ARE ALWAYS SUPPOSED TO DO A PRASHNA WHEN STARTING A CHART,

THIS WILL SHOW WHAT IS BEHIND THE QUIRY, WHETHER SOMEONE IS TRYING TO

TEST US OR THE TRUE INTENT BEHIND THE INQUIRY.

IN THIS CASE WE MIGHT HAVE SEEN KETU OR RAHU INLAGNA OF PRASHNA CHART

AS SOME DETIALS WERE HIDDEN.ETC.

ALl the best,

Lakshmi

vedic astrology, Pallavi Aggarwal

<resplendentaura> wrote:

> Hi All Members and Learned Members,

>

> First of all, my intension is not to offend or insult any one. I

Just want to convey something. NOW.

>

> The person I presented as CRIMINAL is actually

> 1) Working in MNC at very good/reputed and Highly paid job.

> 2) Married completely according to parents wishes.

> 3) Very soft spoken and cute looking.

> 4) DEVOTEE of Lord KRSNA, offers prayers everyday, regularly.

> 5) Pure vaishnav vegetarian, with occaissional onion/garlic.

> 6) Simplest life-style of whole family, though everyone is earning

well.

> 7) Calm and quite, never boasting.

>

> In short he is exactly OPPOSITE to what YOU learned GURUS, have

made him.

>

> Now, try to understand, You don't go by general analysis, rather

take for granted what the person is saying. Some Astrologer once said

to me, "First lesson of astrology is, don't look at the present state

of person OR what he is saying. Judge him ONLY from kundali. He may

be looking, but a millionaire actually." He said Kundali is most

powerful Device, so TRUST only kundali and not the person sitting in

front of you.

>

> Similarily, I know, if I would have given you some CRIMINAL's

kundali and presented as Holyman, YOU, would have given your analysis

supporting that also. PLEASE, GENERALIZE and REVISE your techniquea.

WAKE-UP, YOU ARE NEEDED, BUTIN UNBIASED STATE, WHERE YOU ARE DRIVEN

ONLY BY KUNDALI.

>

> In last few months, YOU just give analysis according, how the

person present himself/herself. YOU don't look weather person deserve

it or not. FOR EXAMPLE:-

>

> EXAMPLE 1:----

> Some Mrs. Sudha sent a mail that her husband beats her. Everyone

sympathised. DID anyone looked at her : ***** Debilitated Venus in

12th with 8th lord Mars******

> what do YOU say about her sexual desires and gynaecological

problems. His husband seems comparetively better then her. Don't you

think she is HIDING something. There is definitely something wrong on

her part also.

>

> EXAMPLE 2:-

> Some Raghu, working in IBM call centre, was blaming his 2

girlfriend of being low in character. Everyone answered in his

support. DID anyone asked about HIS character, That wot he is doing

with 2 girls. A male is permitted to have more then 1 girl without a

questionable character, And a girl can't even laugh with 2 boys

>

> DONT u think there is a need of UNBIASED analysis, IRRESPECTIVE of

WHO sent the mail.

>

> I am an amateur, and wanted to show you some kundalis, BUT this

incident shows YOU dont have a general UNBIASED INSIGHT.

>

> Now please REALISE the mistake, INSTEAD of ABUSING me, or

JUSTIFYING yourself with some EXCUSES. There are many people who

needs your UNBIASED ADVISE.

>

> Thanks

>

> Celebrate 's 10th Birthday!

> Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

March 2, 2005

Om Krishna Guru

Namaste Lakshmi,

Forgot to provide the Prashna Details in my previous

message, here they are:-

March 1, 2005

Time: 21:27:20

Time Zone: 6:00:00 (West of GMT)

Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"

USA

You can the details about the queriest and intensions behind

this question(s) too.

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

vedic astrology, "Raghunatha Rao Nemani"

<raon1008> wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Lakshmi,

>

> As a matter of fact, I did casted a Prashna and got

> some negative answers, hence I have not participlated.

> Even I have attempted another Prashna Y'day night and

> got the same results of Intention of the queriest is

> not correct. So you are correct, Prashna will help us

> to determine few things in first place, that is why

> I am liking this Prashna method now a days.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> vedic astrology, "lakshmikary"

> <lakshmikary> wrote:

> >

> > Hare Krishna

> > Dear Group,

> > One thing that was forgotten,

> > WE ARE ALWAYS SUPPOSED TO DO A PRASHNA WHEN STARTING A CHART,

> > THIS WILL SHOW WHAT IS BEHIND THE QUIRY, WHETHER SOMEONE IS

TRYING

> TO

> > TEST US OR THE TRUE INTENT BEHIND THE INQUIRY.

> > IN THIS CASE WE MIGHT HAVE SEEN KETU OR RAHU INLAGNA OF PRASHNA

> CHART

> > AS SOME DETIALS WERE HIDDEN.ETC.

> > ALl the best,

> > Lakshmi

March 2, 2005

Jaya Jagannatha

Dear Pallavi,

Time to go home.

Swee

Pallavi Aggarwal [resplendentaura ] Wednesday, March

02, 2005 3:52 PMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology]