Guest guest Posted March 6, 2005 Report Share Posted March 6, 2005 Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Hello Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share their experience. regards Prafulla -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" <viitaldragon> wrote: > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Namaste, I use it and it has worked for me. Instead of getting into technicalities or opinions, I suggest if everything seems to fit with the savana year, use it. .... On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 06:08:00 -0000, viitaldragon <viitaldragon wrote: > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > Sponsor > > > Children International > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > ·Click Here to meet a Girl > And Give Her Hope > ·Click Here to meet a Boy > And Change His Life > > Learn More > > ________________________________ > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Namaste, One more thing I would like to add is as most software use geocentric( from the center of the earth) calculations and not topocentric calculations, one may have to use parallax moon . SO I feel 360 day works better. It has for me anyway .... On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 06:08:00 -0000, viitaldragon <viitaldragon wrote: > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > Sponsor > > > Children International > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > ·Click Here to meet a Girl > And Give Her Hope > ·Click Here to meet a Boy > And Change His Life > > Learn More > > ________________________________ > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Dear Prafulla, I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this use on the list many times so shall not repeat. Chandrashekhar. Prafulla Gang wrote: Hello Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share their experience. regards Prafulla -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" <viitaldragon> wrote: > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 What about the other dashas (Narayana, Shoola, Kaal) is there anytime when I shouldn't use the Savana year for the dasha calculations? vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" <viitaldragon@y. ...> wrote: > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of the > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Hello Prafulla and Chandrashekhar, I also have found (initially to my surprise) that the savana year gives better results. I would like to know if Prafulla in fact means Lahiri -52'(minus 52') (ie. grahas 52' more advanced in zodiac than with Lahiri). If so, I was using an ayanamsha very close to this for a time: Lahiri minus 52'22" (rounded to 52'30"). I have now found that Lahiri minus 30'16" with a savana year seems generally to work better. There are also symbolic and astronomical reasons for both of these options, connected with the intersection of the the galactic plane and the ecliptic (ie. the galactic nodes, in early Sagittarius and early Gemini) which I won't go into, as I don't think they would interest everyone. In any case, the proof of the pudding is in the eating! I know that the Phaladipika (Adhyaya 19, sloka 4) is quite unambiguous that the year for nakshatra dasas should be a sidereal solar year, but a 360 day year was apparently used for some ceremonial purposes in Vedic times, and many ancient civilisations also seem to have had a 360 day year for prophetic and often astrological purposes (Egyptian, Ancient Greek, Pre-Columbian Meso- America, Old Testament prophets). The dasa system seems to be a very ancient system of "directions", so perhaps it's worth keeping an open mind. Some say that the 360 day year is not just an "ideal" year, but may actually have been the true year in very ancient times, before things were "churned" and went "out of joint" (cf. the fascinating and thoroughly-researched book "Hamlet's Mill" by Giorgio de Santillana, and other studies which can be tracked down on the web). Best wishes Graham Fox vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this use on > the list many times so shall not repeat. > Chandrashekhar. > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system > > is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ > > minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share > > their experience. > > > > regards > > Prafulla > > > > > > -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" > > <viitaldragon> wrote: > > > > > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of > > the > > > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > > > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > *Children International* > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=0/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Girl > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=1/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Give Her Hope > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Boy > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=2/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Change His Life > > > > *Learn More* > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=3/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- ------- > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Dear Chandrashekhar ji Do you use with Lahiri Ayanamsa. Somehow, fagan ayanamsa(+53'to lahiri)with savana year, brings closes to events in my readings. +52 minutes correction to lahiri was even finer. regards/Prafulla vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this use on > the list many times so shall not repeat. > Chandrashekhar. > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system > > is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ > > minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share > > their experience. > > > > regards > > Prafulla > > > > > > -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" > > <viitaldragon> wrote: > > > > > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of > > the > > > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > > > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > *Children International* > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=0/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Girl > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=1/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Give Her Hope > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Boy > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=2/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Change His Life > > > > *Learn More* > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=3/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- ------- > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Hello Graham Somehow, fagan ayanamsa(+53'to lahiri)with savana year, brings closes to events in my readings. +52 minutes correction to lahiri was even finer. regards/Prafulla vedic astrology, "Graham Fox" <fox.graham@w...> wrote: > > Hello Prafulla and Chandrashekhar, > I also have found (initially to my surprise) that the savana year > gives better results. I would like to know if Prafulla in fact means > Lahiri -52'(minus 52') (ie. grahas 52' more advanced in zodiac than > with Lahiri). If so, I was using an ayanamsha very close to this for > a time: Lahiri minus 52'22" (rounded to 52'30"). I have now found > that Lahiri minus 30'16" with a savana year seems generally to work > better. There are also symbolic and astronomical reasons for both of > these options, connected with the intersection of the the galactic > plane and the ecliptic (ie. the galactic nodes, in early Sagittarius > and early Gemini) which I won't go into, as I don't think they would > interest everyone. In any case, the proof of the pudding is in the > eating! I know that the Phaladipika (Adhyaya 19, sloka 4) is quite > unambiguous that the year for nakshatra dasas should be a sidereal > solar year, but a 360 day year was apparently used for some > ceremonial purposes in Vedic times, and many ancient civilisations > also seem to have had a 360 day year for prophetic and often > astrological purposes (Egyptian, Ancient Greek, Pre-Columbian Meso- > America, Old Testament prophets). The dasa system seems to be a very > ancient system of "directions", so perhaps it's worth keeping an > open mind. Some say that the 360 day year is not just an "ideal" > year, but may actually have been the true year in very ancient > times, before things were "churned" and went "out of joint" (cf. the > fascinating and thoroughly-researched book "Hamlet's Mill" by > Giorgio de Santillana, and other studies which can be tracked down > on the web). > Best wishes > Graham Fox > > vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > > Dear Prafulla, > > I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this > use on > > the list many times so shall not repeat. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa > system > > > is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ > > > minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may > share > > > their experience. > > > > > > regards > > > Prafulla > > > > > > > > > -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" > > > <viitaldragon> wrote: > > > > > > > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of > > > the > > > > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use > the > > > > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > > > *Children International* > > > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > > > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 > 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=0/SIG=142trf8s > 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? > _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% > 20International> > > > > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Girl > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 > 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=1/SIG=142trf8s > 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? > _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% > 20International> > > > And Give Her Hope > > > > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Boy > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 > 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=2/SIG=1424c63e > m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? > _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% > 20International> > > > And Change His Life > > > > > > *Learn More* > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 > 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=3/SIG=1424c63e > m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? > _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% > 20International> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ -- > ------- > > > * Links* > > > > > > * > > > vedic astrology/ > > > > > > * > > > vedic astrology > > > <vedic astrology? > subject=Un> > > > > > > * Terms of > > > Service <>. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2005 Report Share Posted March 8, 2005 Dear Prafulla, I use Lahiri Ayanamsha. I also look at transit Sun and Moon's placement and get fairly good results. Recording of birth time is by itself is something about which astrologers have different opinion. I have always held that it is the time of baby's first cry as it generally coincides with draw of first breath. But there are different opinions. I also believe the sages developed the system with latitude for a few minutes difference, which is likely to occur, in recording of birth time. So I think, more than accuracy to the second, it is the right application of principles that leads one to near correct predictions. However these are my personal opinions and those more learned than me might have a different view on the subject. By the way I have posted the shlokas in support of Savana year use on the list as requested by Graham. Chandrashekhar. Prafulla Gang wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji Do you use with Lahiri Ayanamsa. Somehow, fagan ayanamsa(+53'to lahiri)with savana year, brings closes to events in my readings. +52 minutes correction to lahiri was even finer. regards/Prafulla vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this use on > the list many times so shall not repeat. > Chandrashekhar. > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system > > is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ > > minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share > > their experience. > > > > regards > > Prafulla > > > > > > -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" > > <viitaldragon> wrote: > > > > > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of > > the > > > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > > > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > *Children International* > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=0/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Girl > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=1/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Give Her Hope > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Boy > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=2/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Change His Life > > > > *Learn More* > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=3/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- ------- > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2005 Report Share Posted March 8, 2005 Dear Graham, I have posted the shlokas you wanted. About use of different Ayanamsha, I have always held that the Sages have a certain latitude built in to the system for minor variation in recording time of birth. So if transits are applied logically with Dashas, even without change of Ayanamsha, one should be able to come near an accurate prediction. Chandrashekhar. Graham Fox wrote: Hello Prafulla and Chandrashekhar, I also have found (initially to my surprise) that the savana year gives better results. I would like to know if Prafulla in fact means Lahiri -52'(minus 52') (ie. grahas 52' more advanced in zodiac than with Lahiri). If so, I was using an ayanamsha very close to this for a time: Lahiri minus 52'22" (rounded to 52'30"). I have now found that Lahiri minus 30'16" with a savana year seems generally to work better. There are also symbolic and astronomical reasons for both of these options, connected with the intersection of the the galactic plane and the ecliptic (ie. the galactic nodes, in early Sagittarius and early Gemini) which I won't go into, as I don't think they would interest everyone. In any case, the proof of the pudding is in the eating! I know that the Phaladipika (Adhyaya 19, sloka 4) is quite unambiguous that the year for nakshatra dasas should be a sidereal solar year, but a 360 day year was apparently used for some ceremonial purposes in Vedic times, and many ancient civilisations also seem to have had a 360 day year for prophetic and often astrological purposes (Egyptian, Ancient Greek, Pre-Columbian Meso- America, Old Testament prophets). The dasa system seems to be a very ancient system of "directions", so perhaps it's worth keeping an open mind. Some say that the 360 day year is not just an "ideal" year, but may actually have been the true year in very ancient times, before things were "churned" and went "out of joint" (cf. the fascinating and thoroughly-researched book "Hamlet's Mill" by Giorgio de Santillana, and other studies which can be tracked down on the web). Best wishes Graham Fox vedic astrology, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > I use 360 days Savana regularly. I have given the source of this use on > the list many times so shall not repeat. > Chandrashekhar. > > Prafulla Gang wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > Long back, I tried with savana year (logical as entire dasa system > > is based upon moon's poistion) but with lahiri corrected with 52+ > > minutes. The results were quite satisfying. List members may share > > their experience. > > > > regards > > Prafulla > > > > > > -- In vedic astrology, "viitaldragon" > > <viitaldragon> wrote: > > > > > > Should I use the Savana (360 day year) when for calculations of > > the > > > Vimsottari dasha? Everything seems to fit in better when I use the > > > savana year but I'm not sure if I should or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > * Sponsor* > > > > *Children International* > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need? > > > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=0/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Girl > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=1/SIG=142trf8s 4/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=872&s=f&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Give Her Hope > > > > > > · Click Here to meet a Boy > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=2/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > And Change His Life > > > > *Learn More* > > <http://us.ard./SIG=129prnlt3/M=332618.6144543.7151980.21522 11/D=groups/S=1705082686:HM/EXP=1110269818/A=2535374/R=3/SIG=1424c63e m/*http://children.780net.com/qry/CICHildselect.taf? _function=childSearch&ETTFMRS_BHST_ID=871&s=m&hostName=Children% 20International> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- ------- > > * Links* > > > > * > > vedic astrology/ > > > > * > > vedic astrology > > <vedic astrology? subject=Un> > > > > * Terms of > > Service <>. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.