To Kartik< Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Accident schematic)

[Guest guest]

Mr. Kartik

Here's my analysis.

The whole point of this excercise was to see the D1 and other

Divisional chart promise (According to Mr. Karthik). I will take the

natives Rasi/Navamsa first.

Sat-Moon from 2001 Sept to 2003 May. Fifth house indications. Saturn

MD lord is in 12th house, also happens to be fifth lord for this

libra lagna native. Tenth lord in fifth is very good for studies.

But see what MD lord is promising - 12th house. And he is doing

higher studies in US. Navams lagna is capricorn, In Navamsa Moon is

exlated-hence he will do very well in his studies (and alos

fourth/kendra compared to Rasi chart). See the nakshatra of moon -

poorvabhadra ruled by jupiter and this jupiter is in 12th house.

Jupiter as lord of 3/6 will give some competitive spirit, hard work.

So bottom line from only Rasi/Navamsa: Education in a foreign

country with lot of hard work, competition and eventually leading to

distinction. He must have come to US with Assistanship (please

confirm yes or no).

 

 

Let's see D24 (Chaturvimsamsa) for higher learning. Lagna is Taurus,

Saturn (4/5 lord of rasi) is in 11th house of gains, aspecting fifth

house. Even D24 fifth lord-Mer is well placed. So overall it is a

very good period for education. Remember it is already confirmed by

Rasi/Navamsa chart.

 

Take 18:09:40 as birth time (according to Shri Narasimhas's

software, the cool feature I like). Lagna moves to Aries. And it is

picture of educational set back, or at best poor performance. This

contradicts our Rasi/Navams analysis.

 

So let me summarize: Rasi/Navamsa is promising a good period -

educationally. D24 Lagna will change within 3 minutes. If it is

18:09 it is bad period for education (contrary to Rasi/Navamsa). If

it is 18:12, it is good period (confirmning Rasi/Navamsa promise).

 

Bottom line: pick Rasi/Navamsa analysis and predict good period.

Ignore D24, if you give Rasi/Navamsa 3 points of importance each,

give D24 1 point of importance only

 

Hope this is the kind of analysis that you had hoped for Mr. Kartik

PS: For lack of time I have not done, Jaimini analysis. Saturn is PK

in Jaimini.

 

Sharma

 

vedic astrology, "amoebabhu" <amoebabhu>

wrote:

>

> Dear Praveenji,

> I have tried to answer your questions in detail as follows

> (please tell me as to how you come to your conclusions as I am

> strongly interested in understanding predictive astrology) :

> The native is male.

> 1.) TOB : 18:12 (hospital records), DOB : 04/30/1981

> 2.) Margin of error : +/- 6 minutes

> 3.) Nature : Fair minded, balanced, lazy, changing interests

> Physical features : 6ft, athletic build.

> 4.) Education : Engineering (07/1998-05/2002)

> Masters (2002/08- present) with fellowship

(changed

> to science instead of engineering)

> Moved to the US in the 1st week of 08/02.

> 5.) Parents Profession : Father (High position Engineer/Manager

in

> Defense), Mother (Housewife & does social service, highly

respected).

> 6.) Parents Health : Father is diabetic (some health problems for

> about a year since Jan 2004)

> Please let me know if more details are required.

> Regards,

> Kartik

>

>

> vedic astrology, Praveen Kumar

> <chunnu2001@v...> wrote:

> > Please give following details:

> > 1) Source of TOB, that is recorded meticulously, hospital

record,

> rectified etc.

> > 2) Margin of error possible.

> > 3) Some past trends / facts / events, may be other than you want

> to ask about. You may write about your nature, education,

> profession, marriage / spouse if married / relationship, good /

bad

> periods of past, parents' profession / status, health etc.

> >

> > I expect at least the sex of the native. However, with given

data,

> 5th house is activated. Hence, it may not be good for children /

> studies etc. Now, the native being just 20 then, we conclude that

> the period was not good for studies. This is mainly from Rasi

chart.

> If the native is a female, the other possibility is involvement in

a

> typical love affair wherein issues related with pregnancy are also

> involved. This is my impression, prima-facie.

> >

> > Praveen Kumar (Mumbai)

> >

> > -

> > amoebabhu

> > vedic astrology

> > 19, 03, 2005 8:59 AM

> > [vedic astrology] Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re:

> Accident schematic)

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Panditji,

> > That was a lot of food for thought, I havent

considered

> it

> > that way and does open an interesting line of thinking (in my

> mind

> > at least). For further clarification Panditji I would like

your

> > opinion on an example in which the divisional charts and the

> natal

> > chart showed conflicting results (in my humble opinion) in two

> time

> > periods and I wanted to know as to what your opinion would be

> > (essentially as to how you would interpret this). The example

> is :

> > DOB : 04/30/1981

> > Time : 18:12 +/- 6 mins (100%) (I have fixed a time of birth

> but

> > then I am not sure about this, if required I will e-mail you

the

> > details of some incidents to fix the time of birth)

> > Place : Hyderabad, India

> > The times I am talking about are 07/30/2001-2003.

> > and also the native is expecting some results (good/bad) in

the

> next

> > couple of months and according to me the divisional charts

> showed

> > different results from the natal chart ( I might be completely

> > wrong).

> > Please do not consider this as a test, this purely for my

> > understanding and I would appreciate it if you would show me

as

> to

> > how you would decipher this.

> > Regards,

> > Kartik

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Panditji

> <navagraha@g...>

> > wrote:

> > > namaste,

> > >

> > > Someone just sent me this. I am posting it here. The

gentleman

> who

> > > posted this is vijaydas_pradeep. I have not asked his

> permission to

> > > post it here but I thought this is in context with various

> > divisional

> > > and other techniques we are debating. My apologies to Mr.

> pradeep

> > if I

> > > am taking too many liberties here.

> > >

> > > ---

> > > This mail only address my concerns regarding technical

points.

> > > I think we are missing the essence. Techniques that ease our

> > > calculation are a boon. No one disagrees. For that reason we

> use

> > > software. But Jyotish is not about technical sophistication.

> > >

> > > When we have a door and steps to enter a house why should we

> use

> > our

> > > acrobatic skills and climb through the sewage pipe, at the

> building

> > > rear? After knowing the basics (purpose of door and steps)

one

> can

> > > try climbing through sewage for a change.

> > >

> > > But what is happening. One is not aware of the basics and

goes

> > > directly to sewage pipe. Many go directly to dashamsha

> whenever

> > > professional matters are to be ascertained, even without

> knowing

> > how

> > > dashamsha is derived. Many believe dashamsha as a division

of

> the

> > > 10th house & Navamsha as a division of the 9th house. I got

> > private

> > > mails. This is certainly a bad trend.

> > >

> > > It is true that dash ''amsha'' is for professional matters,

> but

> > > there is no classical reference sanctioning the usage of it

as

> a

> > > chart. Moreover astronomically it is impossible. As per Shri

> > > Narasimha sage has not even given the amsha tattwas - just

the

> > lords

> > > alone!!! - How can we find AL, 9TH from it,Artha trikonas

etc

> in

> > > divisionals, when considering it as a chart itself is

against

> > > rules?.

> > >

> > > If we start stretching our legs before we sit, we will fall.

> > > Unfortunately some techniques are taking one away from

basics.

> If

> > we

> > > have a good foundation, any number of floors can be erected

on

> > top.

> > > If our basement is weak, irrespective of how many techniques

> we

> > > have, the structures can only collapse. One can keep and

open

> mind

> > > and pick the good from all sources. It is not necessary to

> accept

> > > all from one place and leave the rest. I can learn from you

> and

> > vice

> > > versa may be one of the best approaches. Please see this in

> the

> > > right spirit. I respect knowledge from all,but do not accept

> > > anything blindly.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > > Pradeep

> > > -----

> > >

> > >

> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:04:24 -0500, Panditji

<navagraha@g...>

> > wrote:

> > > > Namaste Kartik,

> > > >

> > > > Excellent question. Everything is derived from rashi and

it

> > trumps all

> > > > the charts. I do look at the divisional lagna and planets

in

> it

> > or the

> > > > 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not go jumping

to

> > divisional

> > > > and use it as a chart with houses. I can not say parashara

> said

> > to use

> > > > it as a separate chart. ( I do not want to get into

pedantic

> > argument

> > > > about it, I have not seen evidence that parashar said to

use

> > > > divisional as a separate chart) Also the divisional

> influence is

> > a

> > > > Tertiary influence and NOT the primary one. So divisional

1-

> 7

> > axis is

> > > > to be used to look for tertiary facors. If the primary

> factors

> > are

> > > > adverse, I don't care how strong a divisional chart is it

is

> not

> > going

> > > > to give great results.Yes if a graha is debilited in rashi

> but

> > exalted

> > > > in navansh then his strength is improved and it is one of

the

> > > > strengths ( not THE strength).

> > > >

> > > > Now about twins, every one talks about it in connection

with

> > > > divisionals. As for me I treat twins as an exception and

do

> not

> > go

> > > > formulating rules for exceptions, thats a dangerous habit.

I

> am

> > happy

> > > > if I can make good predictions in 75 percent of the cases.

> Also

> > I have

> > > > seen that navansha lagna if it changes can make facial

> features

> > > > different in twins. Anyway people say there are 100s or

> 1000s of

> > > > people born on the same day and time and place. This is a

> > conjecture,

> > > > go and find hospital records and show me statistical

record

> of

> > how

> > > > many births tooks place at the same place and same time.

> > > >

> > > > Talking about Parashar. He has given avataars ..he says

Moon

> is

> > > > Krishna, Sun is Ram..and Budh is Budhha. So is this the

> parashar

> > who

> > > > was son of vyas ? He did not say future avataar of budhh,

so

> that

> > > > shloka could mean that this was written at a much later

date

> or

> > it was

> > > > added to the original text at a later date.He never

mentions

> > about

> > > > kalaki avataar. There is a classic , I forget the name,(

> Hart

> > Defaw

> > > > mentionsi t).It is written in this classic "When budh is

in

> > quadrant

> > > > from Sun.." Now we know thats anastronomical

immpossibility.

> > > >

> > > > Anyway the point is one has to be careful in deciphering

> what

> > was said

> > > > in ancient texts. There are controversies in many areas of

> > jyotish and

> > > > in interpretation of classics. My point is to use methods

> that

> > have

> > > > been tested on many many horoscopes. I will be really

> surprised

> > that

> > > > people have calculated so many divisional charts in the

> past.

> > May be

> > > > for well to do who could pay money to have these elaborate

> > charts made

> > > > precomputer era. For most the charts were done Lagna

rashi,

> Moon

> > > > rashi, and navansh( Even this was added only if a client

> > insisted). In

> > > > the north or may be south it was customary. it is not so

in

> the

> > > > western part of India.

> > > >

> > > > Anyway

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:22:59 -0000, amoebabhu

> <amoebabhu>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Panditji,

> > > > > I have a question (and I do not believe in

> > personalized

> > > > > arguements so nothing in what I will say will have any

> personal

> > > > > connotations). If we were to focus on rashi charts and

not

> > give much

> > > > > of consideration to divisionals, then would it not be

true

> > that a

> > > > > large number of people (a relative terminology) would

end

> up

> > with

> > > > > the same horoscope and one might be a king and the other

a

> > pauper (

> > > > > a theoretical comparison).Also what about twins?

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > > Kartik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, Panditji

> > <navagraha@g...>

> > > > >

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > Namaste Narayan,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Looks like you are taking sides to defend something

that

> has

> > not

> > > > > been

> > > > > > attacked. I know what parashara said in BPHS. He

> mentioned

> > about

> > > > > > divisions and if you say it was in vogue since the day

> of

> > parashar

> > > > > you

> > > > > > must be really looooong in tooth. You are talking as

if

> you

> > just

> > > > > had a

> > > > > > conversation with him. I stand by my statement that

> > divisional

> > > > > came in

> > > > > > vogue after the advent of computers and now even a

> novice

> > with one

> > > > > day

> > > > > > of training or less can put them up and can write off

> pages

> > about

> > > > > > which planet is where in which varga and from what

rashi

> > dasha he

> > > > > is

> > > > > > in what house. Whether there are houses in divisional

> charts

> > is a

> > > > > > debate in itself. I do not know sanjay rath and my

> intention

> > was

> > > > > not

> > > > > > to question his teachings or his grand fathers', as I

do

> not

> > know

> > > > > his

> > > > > > teachings. What I commented is based on what I have

seen

> a

> > few on

> > > > > the

> > > > > > list who say they are beginners just go on and on

about

> > divisionals

> > > > > > and dashas in divisionals as if there was no tomorrow.

I

> put

> > out my

> > > > > > opinion for others to read, they can make their own

> > judgements

> > > > > about

> > > > > > whatever technique they want to use. If you want to

use

> 5

> > kinds of

> > > > > > dashas and 5 kinds of lagnas to arrive at a correct

> > prediction, all

> > > > > > the power to you. I am presenting what I feel is a

> approach

> > that

> > > > > has

> > > > > > worked for me. Let others be judge of those methods. I

> am not

> > > > > forcing

> > > > > > any technique down anyone's throat. I do have an

opinion

> and

> > an

> > > > > > methodology( Which is not invented by me, but has been

> > taught by

> > > > > great

> > > > > > astrologers like KN RAo, Nandan Chirmulay, BV

> Raman..etc.),

> > why

> > > > > should

> > > > > > you or anyone feel threatened by it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > People ask questions on this list and if I have time

and

> > > > > inclination I

> > > > > > answer to the best of my ability. While doing so, I

feel

> I

> > have to

> > > > > put

> > > > > > my opinions out there for people on the list to read.

I

> have

> > not

> > > > > > criticized any astrologer on the list, thats not my

> style.

> > But if I

> > > > > > have differences of opinion with a methodology I voice

> my

> > opinion.

> > > > > Let

> > > > > > the members of the list decide what they want to use.

> Your

> > methods

> > > > > may

> > > > > > be good for you, why are you threatened if someone

puts

> out

> > there

> > > > > > views on the subject.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:15:35 -0000, naaraayana_iyer

> > > > > > <narayan.iyer@g...> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Namaste Panditji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Panditji <navagraha@g...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > These principles are a work in progress. It would

> > surprise me

> > > > > if

> > > > > > > > they have been tested on tons of charts.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As with any field of knowledge, there are always

> > principles,

> > > > > idioms,

> > > > > > > patterns, which will be formed and would be

subjected

> to

> > > > > testing! On

> > > > > > > what basis did you jump to conclusion that these

> > principles have

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > been tested adequately?? It could be entirely

probable

> that

> > > > > these

> > > > > > > principles are a "work in progress", for that matter

no

> > > > > principles

> > > > > > > work 100% and research is required! It could also be

> > entirely

> > > > > > > probable that the chart could need some

rectification.

> One

> > > > > should

> > > > > > > have an open mind. For that matter, even your

> principles

> > are

> > > > > > > subjected to testing and cannot be relied upon! If

> thats

> > the

> > > > > matter,

> > > > > > > then you would be an "Expert/Rishi"

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To begin with the divisionals came

> > > > > > > > into vogue after the advent of computer programs

> which

> > made

> > > > > > > > calculation of them fast. In the precomputer

days,by

> the

> > time

> > > > > one

> > > > > > > > calculated all these accurately and verified, the

> jatak

> > would

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > been long gone. So this phenomenon is from the

past

> few

> > years

> > > > > and I

> > > > > > > > don't see evidence of its unversal applicability

or

> even

> > > > > > > > applicability

> > > > > > > > in 75 percent of the cases. I am sure there will

be

> one

> > or two

> > > > > > > charts

> > > > > > > > where it will fit perfectly. But as they say here

in

> the

> > great

> > > > > cold

> > > > > > > > north, "One Robin does not make a spring".

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > For your esteemed information, Divisionals were in

> vogue

> > since

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > days of Parasara, infact, right at the start, he

> defined

> > and

> > > > > gave

> > > > > > > meaninings to all divisionals upto D-60 or

Shastiamsa!

> Are

> > you

> > > > > > > saying that Maharishis defined it and talked about

it

> so

> > that we

> > > > > can

> > > > > > > pass our idle time or do you think they had nothing

> better

> > to

> > > > > do???

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Even in the past, AStrologers have gone into the

> depths of

> > > > > > > calculation, for example Pt Jagannath Rath,

> grandfather of

> > Pt

> > > > > Sanjay

> > > > > > > Rath, used to MANUALLY calculate all divisions,

> and ... you

> > > > > would be

> > > > > > > surprised, dasas upto deha level, which is the 6

> levels

> > deep!

> > > > > > > Ofcourse, these calculations consume a lot of time,

> and

> > hence,

> > > > > they

> > > > > > > would limit themselves to a couple of charts. Most

of

> the

> > times,

> > > > > > > these charts are prepared in advance.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Ofcourse, there are Astrologers who would restrict

> > themselves to

> > > > > > > Rasi & Navamsa and make accurate predictions, and

they

> do

> > rely a

> > > > > lot

> > > > > > > on their intuition. If we restrict ourselves to Rasi

&

> > Navamsa,

> > > > > we

> > > > > > > better hope and pray for good solid intuition! Oh

> yes ...

> > by the

> > > > > > > way ... even those who restrict themselves to Rasi &

> > Navamsa,

> > > > > > > flexibly twist their principles to suit the results,

> if not

> > > > > lagna,

> > > > > > > then chandra lagna ... so on and so forth!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Point is ... serious minded & honest research is

> required

> > to

> > > > > come up

> > > > > > > with principles and then these should be tested

> > thoroughly. SJC

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > in the process of doing it ... although there is no

> formal

> > > > > process

> > > > > > > for it. We will be taking this matter seriously in

the

> > coming

> > > > > years!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Another point, Pt Sanjay Rath doesn't like to spoon

> > feed ... he

> > > > > > > likes/expects his student to think thoroughly, to

whet

> > their

> > > > > > > intelligence! Nothing comes easy ... Adversity

breeds

> > CHARACTER!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > New parameters are introduced to fit the event

which

> is

> > > > > already

> > > > > > > known.

> > > > > > > > On this list some time back one had an example of

> > father's

> > > > > death.

> > > > > > > For

> > > > > > > > that they used 7th from 9th from sun in

> dwadashansha. Now

> > > > > why ? Why

> > > > > > > > not 7th from 9th from ravi in rashi chart ?Then

why

> not

> > 2nd

> > > > > from

> > > > > > > 9th

> > > > > > > > from ravi. Then one can use arudh lagna of d-12 if

> one

> > does

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > find

> > > > > > > > it there , then aurdh of 9th in rashi then arudh

of

> 9th

> > in D-

> > > > > 12. It

> > > > > > > > can get confusing very fast.This way one can cover

> all 12

> > > > > rashis

> > > > > > > and I

> > > > > > > > am sure the graha whose dasha you are running at

the

> > time of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > known

> > > > > > > > event will be there in one of those.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am sure, not even Maharishi Jaimini was spoonfed!!

> He

> > too must

> > > > > > > have exprimented, just like Pt. Sanjay Rath, KN Rao

> and

> > come up

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > idioms & principles. And as I said before, I am not

> sure,

> > if

> > > > > even

> > > > > > > you have a fool-proof methodology of predicting

> events,

> > without

> > > > > > > beating around the bush!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My point is ,test priciples on charts you have and

> > develop a

> > > > > > > > consistent principle applicable to atleast 75

percent

> > > > > cases.Then

> > > > > > > make

> > > > > > > > it a principle. Do not make rules as you go based

on

> the

> > chart

> > > > > you

> > > > > > > > have in front of you.BTW there are principles that

> have

> > been

> > > > > > > developed

> > > > > > > > by peope like KN Rao, BV Raman, master those

first.

> > Trust me

> > > > > they

> > > > > > > work

> > > > > > > > in majority of cases

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Principles, should especially be tested on the basis

of

> > > > > probability,

> > > > > > > like Narasimha said, if the likelihood of an event

> > happening is

> > > > > high

> > > > > > > and if you give a numerous paramters explaining the

> event,

> > these

> > > > > > > principles are not probabalistically valid, although

> they

> > may be

> > > > > > > statistacally valid!!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Like explaining, the chara dasa aspecting chara

> Bhratri

> > Karak

> > > > > caused

> > > > > > > birth of siblings!! I consider that an incomplete

and

> a

> > totally

> > > > > > > inadequate research!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Warm Regards

> > > > > > > Narayan

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:02:57 -0000, mikefranc01

> > > > > <mtravass@t...>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Hi Narasimha,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I applied the same logic in my chart and it

shows

> > something

> > > > > else.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > The time when my car was almost totaled (March

> 1993,)

> > I was

> > > > > > > running

> > > > > > > > > Cn-Li Narayana dasa of D16, 4th from A4.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > The second time I met with an accident was in

Dec

> 1996

> > and I

> > > > > was

> > > > > > > > > running Aq-Li Narayana dasa of D16.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Both the accidents took place in zone 4:00:00

> (East of

> > GMT).

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I cannot apply any of the principles that you

> stated

> > in your

> > > > > > > email

> > > > > > > > > unless there are others, which can be applied,

and

> you

> > did

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > state.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Could you assist here?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Mike

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > November 14, 1963

> > > > > > > > > Time: 14:03:00

> > > > > > > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

> > > > > > > > > Place: 73 E 55' 00", 15 N 18' 00"

> > > > > > > > > Margao, Goa, India

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic-

astrology, "Narasimha

> > P.V.R.

> > > > > Rao"

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > <pvr@c...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > > > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:53 PM

> > > > > > > > > > Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re:

Accident

> > schematic)

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Sanjay Prabhakaran,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > D16 is the chart for all Sukha and Hence

Cars

> come

> > under

> > > > > > > this.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Here is some jist for analysing all yogas

> > > > > (combinations) in

> > > > > > > D16

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > 1. A4 is to be considered for Cars. Here

A4

> > should be

> > > > > > > taken in

> > > > > > > > > D16.

> > > > > > > > > > > 2. 6th and 8th house cause worries and

> anxieties

> > > > > > > respectively,

> > > > > > > > > in D16 they

> > > > > > > > > > > will show for matters related to cars

and

> > other

> > > > > sukha.

> > > > > > > > > > > 3. Marakas to sign of A4 will destroy the

car.

> > > > > > > > > > > Marakas primarily being 2nd and 7th.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Now for Dasas which will activate the Yoga's

> > mentioned

> > > > > above.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Add badhaka sthana in shodasamsa also as a

> potential

> > > > > problem

> > > > > > > sign.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > My birthdata is: 4th April 1970, 5:47:13 pm

> (IST),

> > > > > > > Machilipatnam,

> > > > > > > > > India

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I had a vehicular accident on 5th December

1996

> at

> > 6:30 pm

> > > > > > > (EST),

> > > > > > > > > Wilmington, MA. I was not hurt, but the car

> > was "totalled".

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > As per D-16 Narayana dasa, this happened in Li-

Ta

> > > > > antardasa.

> > > > > > > In my

> > > > > > > > > D-16, Ta is the badhaka sthana and contains

> 3rd/12th

> > lord

> > > > > > > Mercury and

> > > > > > > > > nodes. It is the 12th house from A4, showing the

> loss

> > of a

> > > > > > > vehicle.

> > > > > > > > > It is also the 8th house from the 4th house,

> showing

> > > > > problems in

> > > > > > > > > sukha.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Those who are into the three parts of rule of

> > Narayana

> > > > > dasa

> > > > > > > > > interpretation can test that too. Mahadasa sign

Li

> is a

> > > > > > > seershodaya

> > > > > > > > > rasi. So it gives its results in the first one-

> third.

> > Its

> > > > > lord

> > > > > > > Venus

> > > > > > > > > is also in a seershodaya rasi (Le). So he gives

> his

> > results

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > second one-third. The last one-third gives the

> results

> > of

> > > > > > > occupants

> > > > > > > > > and aspectors. There are four candidates and

they

> are

> > Venus,

> > > > > > > Rahu,

> > > > > > > > > Ketu and Mercury in the order of longitudes. We

> divide

> > the

> > > > > last

> > > > > > > one-

> > > > > > > > > third of the dasa into 4 equal parts and give

them

> to

> > these

> > > > > 4

> > > > > > > planets

> > > > > > > > > in this order. The result of Rahu's aspect on

> mahadasa

> > sign

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > given

> > > > > > > > > in Oct 1996-Aug 1997. Rahu is the 8th lord,

> occupies

> > badhaka

> > > > > > > sthana

> > > > > > > > > and aspects the 4th house of vehicles Libra. So

> the

> > sub-

> > > > > period

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > question resulted in vehicle problems. Not only

> did I

> > have

> > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > accident in Dec 1996, but the new car I bought

in

> Jan

> > 1997

> > > > > > > suffered

> > > > > > > > > too. It was hit by people twice when it was

parked

> in a

> > > > > parking

> > > > > > > lot.

> > > > > > > > > I did not see who hit it, but someone hit it

> twice.

> > After

> > > > > these

> > > > > > > > > repeated incidents, I sold that "unlucky" car

and

> > bought

> > > > > another

> > > > > > > new

> > > > > > > > > car in Sept 1997. All these are due to the sub-

> period

> > giving

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > results of Rahu's aspect on Li. It so happened

> that the

> > > > > > > antardasa was

> > > > > > > > > also of Ta, which contains Rahu.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > As per Vimsottari dasa also, it was Mercury-

Ketu

> > antardasa.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > In my annual Tithi Pravesha chart of 1996-97,

D-

> 16

> > had Leo

> > > > > > > rising,

> > > > > > > > > lagna lord Sun in 6h (!!) with 6th lord Saturn,

> Rahu

> > and

> > > > > Ketu.

> > > > > > > Saturn-

> > > > > > > > > Saturn antardasa as per annual Tithi Ashtottari

> dasa

> > was

> > > > > running

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > Dec 3 to Dec 6. Accident was on Dec 5!

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > The technique of Tithi Pravesha never seizes

to

> > amaze me!

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> > > > > > > > > > Narasimha

> > > > > > > > > > --------------

--

> ----

> > ------

> > > > > ----

> > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3):

> > > > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> > > > > > > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows):

> > > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> > > > > > > > > > SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

> > > > > > > > > > --------------

--

> ----

> > ------

> > > > > ----

> > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic-

> astrology

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > > > > > > astrology/info.html

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

> Krishnaarpanamastu

> > ||

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Sponsor

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > > > > > Links

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology/

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the

 

> > Terms of

> > > > > > > Service.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Archives: vedic-

astrology

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > > > > astrology/info.html

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu

> ||

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sponsor

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Children International

> > > > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Girl

> > > > > > > And Give Her Hope

> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Boy

> > > > > > > And Change His Life

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Learn More

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > > > Links

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology/

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> Terms of

> > > > > Service.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Group info: vedic-

> > astrology/info.html

> > > > >

> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

> >

> > > > >

> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sponsor

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > Links

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology/

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > >

> > > > > Terms

> of

> > Service.

> > > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Group info: vedic-

> astrology/info.html

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

>

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sponsor

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------

--

> -----------

> > Links

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology/

> >

> > b..

> > vedic astrology

> >

> > c.. Terms

> of Service.