To Kartik< Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re:Accident schematic)

[Guest guest]

Brilliant Mr. Sharma. You seem to follow the lines drawn by Shri K.N.Rao. It

works well. Sat is PK with 7 karaka scheme. Give your Jaimini analysis also.

Now one question. What to conclude when indication by Rasi and Navamsa are not

confirmed in D-chart. Please give your opinion.

 

Praveen Kumar (Mumbai)

-

Sharma

vedic astrology

19, 03, 2005 8:45 PM

[vedic astrology] To Kartik< Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re:Accident schematic)

Mr. KartikHere's my analysis.The whole point of this excercise was to see the D1

and other Divisional chart promise (According to Mr. Karthik). I will take the

natives Rasi/Navamsa first.Sat-Moon from 2001 Sept to 2003 May. Fifth house

indications. Saturn MD lord is in 12th house, also happens to be fifth lord for

this libra lagna native. Tenth lord in fifth is very good for studies. But see

what MD lord is promising - 12th house. And he is doing higher studies in US.

Navams lagna is capricorn, In Navamsa Moon is exlated-hence he will do very

well in his studies (and alos fourth/kendra compared to Rasi chart). See the

nakshatra of moon -poorvabhadra ruled by jupiter and this jupiter is in 12th

house. Jupiter as lord of 3/6 will give some competitive spirit, hard work. So

bottom line from only Rasi/Navamsa: Education in a foreign country with lot of

hard work, competition and eventually leading to distinction. He must have come

to US with Assistanship (please confirm yes or no).Let's see D24

(Chaturvimsamsa) for higher learning. Lagna is Taurus, Saturn (4/5 lord of

rasi) is in 11th house of gains, aspecting fifth house. Even D24 fifth lord-Mer

is well placed. So overall it is a very good period for education. Remember it

is already confirmed by Rasi/Navamsa chart.Take 18:09:40 as birth time

(according to Shri Narasimhas's software, the cool feature I like). Lagna moves

to Aries. And it is picture of educational set back, or at best poor

performance. This contradicts our Rasi/Navams analysis.So let me summarize:

Rasi/Navamsa is promising a good period -educationally. D24 Lagna will change

within 3 minutes. If it is 18:09 it is bad period for education (contrary to

Rasi/Navamsa). If it is 18:12, it is good period (confirmning Rasi/Navamsa

promise).Bottom line: pick Rasi/Navamsa analysis and predict good period.

Ignore D24, if you give Rasi/Navamsa 3 points of importance each, give D24 1

point of importance onlyHope this is the kind of analysis that you had hoped

for Mr. KartikPS: For lack of time I have not done, Jaimini analysis. Saturn is

PK in Jaimini. Sharma vedic astrology, "amoebabhu"

<amoebabhu> wrote:> > Dear Praveenji,> I have tried to answer your

questions in detail as follows > (please tell me as to how you come to your

conclusions as I am > strongly interested in understanding predictive

astrology) :> The native is male.> 1.) TOB : 18:12 (hospital records), DOB :

04/30/1981> 2.) Margin of error : +/- 6 minutes> 3.) Nature : Fair minded,

balanced, lazy, changing interests> Physical features : 6ft, athletic

build.> 4.) Education : Engineering (07/1998-05/2002)> Masters

(2002/08- present) with fellowship (changed > to science instead of

engineering)> Moved to the US in the 1st week of 08/02.> 5.)

Parents Profession : Father (High position Engineer/Manager in > Defense),

Mother (Housewife & does social service, highly respected).> 6.) Parents Health

: Father is diabetic (some health problems for > about a year since Jan 2004)>

Please let me know if more details are required.> Regards,> Kartik> > > --- In

vedic astrology, Praveen Kumar > <chunnu2001@v...> wrote:> >

Please give following details:> > 1) Source of TOB, that is recorded

meticulously, hospital record, > rectified etc.> > 2) Margin of error

possible.> > 3) Some past trends / facts / events, may be other than you want >

to ask about. You may write about your nature, education, > profession, marriage

/ spouse if married / relationship, good / bad > periods of past, parents'

profession / status, health etc.> > > > I expect at least the sex of the

native. However, with given data, > 5th house is activated. Hence, it may not

be good for children / > studies etc. Now, the native being just 20 then, we

conclude that > the period was not good for studies. This is mainly from Rasi

chart. > If the native is a female, the other possibility is involvement in a >

typical love affair wherein issues related with pregnancy are also > involved.

This is my impression, prima-facie.> > > > Praveen Kumar (Mumbai) > > > >

- > > amoebabhu > > To:

vedic astrology > > 19, 03, 2005 8:59 AM> > Subject:

[vedic astrology] Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re: > Accident schematic)> > >

> > > > > Dear Panditji,> > That was a lot of food for thought, I

havent considered > it > > that way and does open an interesting line of

thinking (in my > mind > > at least). For further clarification Panditji I

would like your > > opinion on an example in which the divisional charts and

the > natal > > chart showed conflicting results (in my humble opinion) in

two > time > > periods and I wanted to know as to what your opinion would be

> > (essentially as to how you would interpret this). The example > is :> >

DOB : 04/30/1981 > > Time : 18:12 +/- 6 mins (100%) (I have fixed a time of

birth > but > > then I am not sure about this, if required I will e-mail you

the > > details of some incidents to fix the time of birth)> > Place :

Hyderabad, India> > The times I am talking about are 07/30/2001-2003.> >

and also the native is expecting some results (good/bad) in the > next > >

couple of months and according to me the divisional charts > showed > >

different results from the natal chart ( I might be completely > > wrong).> >

Please do not consider this as a test, this purely for my > > understanding

and I would appreciate it if you would show me as > to > > how you would

decipher this.> > Regards,> > Kartik> > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, Panditji > <navagraha@g...> > > wrote:> >

> namaste,> > > > > > Someone just sent me this. I am posting it here. The

gentleman > who> > > posted this is vijaydas_pradeep. I have not asked his >

permission to> > > post it here but I thought this is in context with various

> > divisional> > > and other techniques we are debating. My apologies to

Mr. > pradeep > > if I> > > am taking too many liberties here.> > > > >

> ---> > > This mail only address my concerns regarding technical points. > >

> I think we are missing the essence. Techniques that ease our > > >

calculation are a boon. No one disagrees. For that reason we > use > > >

software. But Jyotish is not about technical sophistication. > > > > > >

When we have a door and steps to enter a house why should we > use > > our> >

> acrobatic skills and climb through the sewage pipe, at the > building> > >

rear? After knowing the basics (purpose of door and steps) one > can > > > try

climbing through sewage for a change.> > > > > > But what is happening. One

is not aware of the basics and goes > > > directly to sewage pipe. Many go

directly to dashamsha > whenever > > > professional matters are to be

ascertained, even without > knowing > > how > > > dashamsha is derived.

Many believe dashamsha as a division of > the > > > 10th house & Navamsha as

a division of the 9th house. I got > > private > > > mails. This is

certainly a bad trend.> > > > > > It is true that dash ''amsha'' is for

professional matters, > but > > > there is no classical reference sanctioning

the usage of it as > a > > > chart. Moreover astronomically it is impossible.

As per Shri > > > Narasimha sage has not even given the amsha tattwas - just

the > > lords > > > alone!!! - How can we find AL, 9TH from it,Artha

trikonas etc > in > > > divisionals, when considering it as a chart itself is

against > > > rules?. > > > > > > If we start stretching our legs before

we sit, we will fall.> > > Unfortunately some techniques are taking one away

from basics. > If > > we > > > have a good foundation, any number of floors

can be erected on > > top. > > > If our basement is weak, irrespective of

how many techniques > we > > > have, the structures can only collapse. One

can keep and open > mind > > > and pick the good from all sources. It is not

necessary to > accept > > > all from one place and leave the rest. I can

learn from you > and > > vice > > > versa may be one of the best

approaches. Please see this in > the > > > right spirit. I respect knowledge

from all,but do not accept > > > anything blindly.> > > > > > Thanks> >

> Pradeep> > > -----> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:04:24

-0500, Panditji <navagraha@g...> > > wrote:> > > > Namaste Kartik,> > > >

> > > > Excellent question. Everything is derived from rashi and it > >

trumps all> > > > the charts. I do look at the divisional lagna and planets

in > it > > or the> > > > 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not go

jumping to > > divisional> > > > and use it as a chart with houses. I can

not say parashara > said > > to use> > > > it as a separate chart. ( I do

not want to get into pedantic > > argument> > > > about it, I have not seen

evidence that parashar said to use> > > > divisional as a separate chart) Also

the divisional > influence is > > a> > > > Tertiary influence and NOT the

primary one. So divisional 1-> 7 > > axis is> > > > to be used to look for

tertiary facors. If the primary > factors > > are> > > > adverse, I don't

care how strong a divisional chart is it is > not > > going> > > > to give

great results.Yes if a graha is debilited in rashi > but > > exalted> > > >

in navansh then his strength is improved and it is one of the> > > > strengths

( not THE strength).> > > > > > > > Now about twins, every one talks about

it in connection with> > > > divisionals. As for me I treat twins as an

exception and do > not > > go> > > > formulating rules for exceptions,

thats a dangerous habit. I > am > > happy> > > > if I can make good

predictions in 75 percent of the cases. > Also > > I have> > > > seen that

navansha lagna if it changes can make facial > features> > > > different in

twins. Anyway people say there are 100s or > 1000s of> > > > people born on

the same day and time and place. This is a > > conjecture,> > > > go and

find hospital records and show me statistical record > of > > how> > > >

many births tooks place at the same place and same time.> > > > > > > >

Talking about Parashar. He has given avataars ..he says Moon > is> > > >

Krishna, Sun is Ram..and Budh is Budhha. So is this the > parashar > > who> >

> > was son of vyas ? He did not say future avataar of budhh, so > that> > >

> shloka could mean that this was written at a much later date > or > > it

was> > > > added to the original text at a later date.He never mentions > >

about> > > > kalaki avataar. There is a classic , I forget the name,( > Hart >

> Defaw> > > > mentionsi t).It is written in this classic "When budh is in >

> quadrant> > > > from Sun.." Now we know thats anastronomical

immpossibility.> > > > > > > > Anyway the point is one has to be careful in

deciphering > what > > was said> > > > in ancient texts. There are

controversies in many areas of > > jyotish and> > > > in interpretation of

classics. My point is to use methods > that > > have> > > > been tested on

many many horoscopes. I will be really > surprised > > that> > > > people

have calculated so many divisional charts in the > past. > > May be> > > >

for well to do who could pay money to have these elaborate > > charts made> >

> > precomputer era. For most the charts were done Lagna rashi, > Moon> > >

> rashi, and navansh( Even this was added only if a client > > insisted). In>

> > > the north or may be south it was customary. it is not so in > the> > >

> western part of India.> > > > > > > > Anyway> > > > > > > > ...> > >

> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:22:59 -0000, amoebabhu >

<amoebabhu> > > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Panditji,> > > > >

I have a question (and I do not believe in > > personalized> > > > >

arguements so nothing in what I will say will have any > personal> > > > >

connotations). If we were to focus on rashi charts and not > > give much> >

> > > of consideration to divisionals, then would it not be true > > that a> >

> > > large number of people (a relative terminology) would end > up > >

with> > > > > the same horoscope and one might be a king and the other a > >

pauper (> > > > > a theoretical comparison).Also what about twins?> > > > >

Regards,> > > > > Kartik> > > > >> > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, Panditji > > <navagraha@g...>> > > > >> >

> > > wrote:> > > > > > Namaste Narayan,> > > > > >> > > > > > Looks like

you are taking sides to defend something that > has > > not> > > > > been> >

> > > > attacked. I know what parashara said in BPHS. He > mentioned > >

about> > > > > > divisions and if you say it was in vogue since the day > of

> > parashar> > > > > you> > > > > > must be really looooong in tooth.

You are talking as if > you > > just> > > > > had a> > > > > >

conversation with him. I stand by my statement that > > divisional> > > > >

came in> > > > > > vogue after the advent of computers and now even a > novice

> > with one> > > > > day> > > > > > of training or less can put them up

and can write off > pages > > about> > > > > > which planet is where in

which varga and from what rashi > > dasha he> > > > > is> > > > > > in

what house. Whether there are houses in divisional > charts > > is a> > > >

> > debate in itself. I do not know sanjay rath and my > intention > > was> >

> > > not> > > > > > to question his teachings or his grand fathers', as I do

> not > > know> > > > > his> > > > > > teachings. What I commented is

based on what I have seen > a > > few on> > > > > the> > > > > > list who

say they are beginners just go on and on about > > divisionals> > > > > >

and dashas in divisionals as if there was no tomorrow. I > put > > out my> >

> > > > opinion for others to read, they can make their own > > judgements> >

> > > about> > > > > > whatever technique they want to use. If you want to

use > 5 > > kinds of> > > > > > dashas and 5 kinds of lagnas to arrive at a

correct > > prediction, all> > > > > > the power to you. I am presenting

what I feel is a > approach > > that> > > > > has> > > > > > worked for

me. Let others be judge of those methods. I > am not> > > > > forcing> > >

> > > any technique down anyone's throat. I do have an opinion > and > > an>

> > > > > methodology( Which is not invented by me, but has been > > taught

by> > > > > great> > > > > > astrologers like KN RAo, Nandan Chirmulay, BV >

Raman..etc.), > > why> > > > > should> > > > > > you or anyone feel

threatened by it.> > > > > >> > > > > > People ask questions on this list

and if I have time and> > > > > inclination I> > > > > > answer to the best

of my ability. While doing so, I feel > I > > have to> > > > > put> > > >

> > my opinions out there for people on the list to read. I > have > > not> >

> > > > criticized any astrologer on the list, thats not my > style. > > But

if I> > > > > > have differences of opinion with a methodology I voice > my >

> opinion.> > > > > Let> > > > > > the members of the list decide what

they want to use. > Your > > methods> > > > > may> > > > > > be good for

you, why are you threatened if someone puts > out > > there> > > > > >

views on the subject.> > > > > >> > > > > > Regards> > > > > >> > > > >

> ...> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:15:35 -0000,

naaraayana_iyer> > > > > > <narayan.iyer@g...> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > >

> > > Namaste Panditji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Panditji

<navagraha@g...> wrote:> > > > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > These principles are a work in progress. It would > > surprise me> > > >

> if> > > > > > > > they have been tested on tons of charts.> > > > > > >>

> > > > > > As with any field of knowledge, there are always > >

principles,> > > > > idioms,> > > > > > > patterns, which will be formed

and would be subjected > to> > > > > testing! On> > > > > > > what basis

did you jump to conclusion that these > > principles have> > > > > not> >

> > > > > been tested adequately?? It could be entirely probable > that> > > >

> these> > > > > > > principles are a "work in progress", for that matter no>

> > > > principles> > > > > > > work 100% and research is required! It

could also be > > entirely> > > > > > > probable that the chart could need

some rectification. > One> > > > > should> > > > > > > have an open mind.

For that matter, even your > principles > > are> > > > > > > subjected to

testing and cannot be relied upon! If > thats > > the> > > > > matter,> >

> > > > > then you would be an "Expert/Rishi"> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > To begin with the divisionals came> > > > > > > > into vogue after

the advent of computer programs > which > > made> > > > > > > > calculation

of them fast. In the precomputer days,by > the > > time> > > > > one> > >

> > > > > calculated all these accurately and verified, the > jatak > > would>

> > > > have> > > > > > > > been long gone. So this phenomenon is from the

past > few > > years> > > > > and I> > > > > > > > don't see evidence of

its unversal applicability or > even> > > > > > > > applicability> > > > >

> > > in 75 percent of the cases. I am sure there will be > one > > or two> >

> > > > > charts> > > > > > > > where it will fit perfectly. But as they say

here in > the > > great> > > > > cold> > > > > > > > north, "One Robin

does not make a spring".> > > > > > >> > > > > > > For your esteemed

information, Divisionals were in > vogue > > since> > > > > the> > > > >

> > days of Parasara, infact, right at the start, he > defined > > and> > >

> > gave> > > > > > > meaninings to all divisionals upto D-60 or Shastiamsa! >

Are > > you> > > > > > > saying that Maharishis defined it and talked about

it > so > > that we> > > > > can> > > > > > > pass our idle time or do

you think they had nothing > better > > to> > > > > do???> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > Even in the past, AStrologers have gone into the > depths of> > >

> > > > calculation, for example Pt Jagannath Rath, > grandfather of > > Pt>

> > > > Sanjay> > > > > > > Rath, used to MANUALLY calculate all divisions,

> and ... you> > > > > would be> > > > > > > surprised, dasas upto deha

level, which is the 6 > levels > > deep!> > > > > > > Ofcourse, these

calculations consume a lot of time, > and > > hence,> > > > > they> > > >

> > > would limit themselves to a couple of charts. Most of > the > > times,>

> > > > > > these charts are prepared in advance.> > > > > > >> > > > > >

> Ofcourse, there are Astrologers who would restrict > > themselves to> > >

> > > > Rasi & Navamsa and make accurate predictions, and they > do > > rely

a> > > > > lot> > > > > > > on their intuition. If we restrict ourselves to

Rasi & > > Navamsa,> > > > > we> > > > > > > better hope and pray for good

solid intuition! Oh > yes ... > > by the> > > > > > > way ... even those who

restrict themselves to Rasi & > > Navamsa,> > > > > > > flexibly twist their

principles to suit the results, > if not> > > > > lagna,> > > > > > > then

chandra lagna ... so on and so forth!> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Point is

.... serious minded & honest research is > required > > to> > > > > come up>

> > > > > > with principles and then these should be tested > > thoroughly.

SJC> > > > > is> > > > > > > in the process of doing it ... although there

is no > formal> > > > > process> > > > > > > for it. We will be taking this

matter seriously in the > > coming> > > > > years!> > > > > > >> > > > >

> > Another point, Pt Sanjay Rath doesn't like to spoon > > feed ... he> > >

> > > > likes/expects his student to think thoroughly, to whet > > their> >

> > > > > intelligence! Nothing comes easy ... Adversity breeds > >

CHARACTER!> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > New

parameters are introduced to fit the event which > is> > > > > already> > >

> > > > known.> > > > > > > > On this list some time back one had an example

of > > father's> > > > > death.> > > > > > > For> > > > > > > > that

they used 7th from 9th from sun in > dwadashansha. Now> > > > > why ? Why> >

> > > > > > not 7th from 9th from ravi in rashi chart ?Then why > not > >

2nd> > > > > from> > > > > > > 9th> > > > > > > > from ravi. Then one can

use arudh lagna of d-12 if > one > > does> > > > > not> > > > > > > find>

> > > > > > > it there , then aurdh of 9th in rashi then arudh of > 9th > >

in D-> > > > > 12. It> > > > > > > > can get confusing very fast.This way

one can cover > all 12> > > > > rashis> > > > > > > and I> > > > > > > >

am sure the graha whose dasha you are running at the > > time of> > > > >

the> > > > > > > known> > > > > > > > event will be there in one of those.>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > I am sure, not even Maharishi Jaimini was

spoonfed!! > He > > too must> > > > > > > have exprimented, just like Pt.

Sanjay Rath, KN Rao > and > > come up> > > > > with> > > > > > > idioms &

principles. And as I said before, I am not > sure, > > if> > > > > even> >

> > > > > you have a fool-proof methodology of predicting > events, > >

without> > > > > > > beating around the bush!> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > My point is ,test priciples on charts you have

and > > develop a> > > > > > > > consistent principle applicable to atleast

75 percent> > > > > cases.Then> > > > > > > make> > > > > > > > it a

principle. Do not make rules as you go based on > the > > chart> > > > >

you> > > > > > > > have in front of you.BTW there are principles that > have

> > been> > > > > > > developed> > > > > > > > by peope like KN Rao, BV

Raman, master those first. > > Trust me> > > > > they> > > > > > > work>

> > > > > > > in majority of cases> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >

> > Principles, should especially be tested on the basis of> > > > >

probability,> > > > > > > like Narasimha said, if the likelihood of an event

> > happening is> > > > > high> > > > > > > and if you give a numerous

paramters explaining the > event, > > these> > > > > > > principles are not

probabalistically valid, although > they > > may be> > > > > > >

statistacally valid!!> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Like explaining, the chara

dasa aspecting chara > Bhratri > > Karak> > > > > caused> > > > > > >

birth of siblings!! I consider that an incomplete and > a > > totally> > >

> > > > inadequate research!> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Warm Regards> > >

> > > > Narayan> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:02:57 -0000, mikefranc01> > > > >

<mtravass@t...>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > >

> > > > > > Hi Narasimha,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I applied the

same logic in my chart and it shows > > something> > > > > else.> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > The time when my car was almost totaled (March >

1993,) > > I was> > > > > > > running> > > > > > > > > Cn-Li Narayana

dasa of D16, 4th from A4.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The second time

I met with an accident was in Dec > 1996 > > and I> > > > > was> > > > > >

> > > running Aq-Li Narayana dasa of D16.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

Both the accidents took place in zone 4:00:00 > (East of > > GMT).> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > I cannot apply any of the principles that you >

stated > > in your> > > > > > > email> > > > > > > > > unless there are

others, which can be applied, and > you > > did> > > > > not> > > > > > >

state.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Could you assist here?> > > > > >

> > >> > > > > > > > > Mike> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

November 14, 1963> > > > > > > > > Time: 14:03:00> > > > > > > >

> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> > > > > > > > > Place: 73 E 55'

00", 15 N 18' 00"> > > > > > > > > Margao, Goa, India> >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "Narasimha > > P.V.R.> > >

> > Rao"> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <pvr@c...> wrote:> > > > > > >

> > > -> > > > > > > > > > Narasimha P.V.R.

Rao> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:53 PM> > > > > > > > > > Subject:

Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re: Accident > > schematic)> > > > > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Sanjay Prabhakaran,> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > > > > > D16 is the chart for all Sukha and Hence Cars > come

> > under> > > > > > > this.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >

Here is some jist for analysing all yogas> > > > > (combinations) in> > >

> > > > D16> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1. A4 is to be

considered for Cars. Here A4 > > should be> > > > > > > taken in> > > > >

> > > > D16.> > > > > > > > > > > 2. 6th and 8th house cause worries and >

anxieties> > > > > > > respectively,> > > > > > > > > in D16 they> > > >

> > > > > > > will show for matters related to cars and > > other> > >

> > sukha.> > > > > > > > > > > 3. Marakas to sign of A4 will destroy the

car.> > > > > > > > > > > Marakas primarily being 2nd and 7th.> > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Now for Dasas which will activate the

Yoga's > > mentioned> > > > > above.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > Add badhaka sthana in shodasamsa also as a > potential> > > > > problem>

> > > > > > sign.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > My birthdata is:

4th April 1970, 5:47:13 pm > (IST),> > > > > > > Machilipatnam,> > > > > >

> > > India> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I had a vehicular

accident on 5th December 1996 > at > > 6:30 pm> > > > > > > (EST),> > > >

> > > > > Wilmington, MA. I was not hurt, but the car > > was "totalled".> >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > As per D-16 Narayana dasa, this happened in

Li-Ta> > > > > antardasa.> > > > > > > In my> > > > > > > > > D-16, Ta is

the badhaka sthana and contains > 3rd/12th > > lord> > > > > > > Mercury

and> > > > > > > > > nodes. It is the 12th house from A4, showing the > loss

> > of a> > > > > > > vehicle.> > > > > > > > > It is also the 8th house

from the 4th house, > showing> > > > > problems in> > > > > > > > > sukha.>

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Those who are into the three parts of

rule of > > Narayana> > > > > dasa> > > > > > > > > interpretation can

test that too. Mahadasa sign Li > is a> > > > > > > seershodaya> > > > > >

> > > rasi. So it gives its results in the first one-> third. > > Its> > >

> > lord> > > > > > > Venus> > > > > > > > > is also in a seershodaya rasi

(Le). So he gives > his > > results> > > > > in> > > > > > > the> > > >

> > > > > second one-third. The last one-third gives the > results > > of> >

> > > > > occupants> > > > > > > > > and aspectors. There are four candidates

and they > are > > Venus,> > > > > > > Rahu,> > > > > > > > > Ketu and

Mercury in the order of longitudes. We > divide > > the> > > > > last> >

> > > > > one-> > > > > > > > > third of the dasa into 4 equal parts and give

them > to > > these> > > > > 4> > > > > > > planets> > > > > > > > > in

this order. The result of Rahu's aspect on > mahadasa > > sign> > > > > is>

> > > > > > given> > > > > > > > > in Oct 1996-Aug 1997. Rahu is the 8th

lord, > occupies > > badhaka> > > > > > > sthana> > > > > > > > > and

aspects the 4th house of vehicles Libra. So > the > > sub-> > > > > period>

> > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > question resulted in vehicle problems. Not

only > did I > > have> > > > > an> > > > > > > > > accident in Dec 1996,

but the new car I bought in > Jan > > 1997> > > > > > > suffered> > > > >

> > > > too. It was hit by people twice when it was parked > in a> > > > >

parking> > > > > > > lot.> > > > > > > > > I did not see who hit it, but

someone hit it > twice. > > After> > > > > these> > > > > > > > >

repeated incidents, I sold that "unlucky" car and > > bought> > > > >

another> > > > > > > new> > > > > > > > > car in Sept 1997. All these are

due to the sub-> period > > giving> > > > > the> > > > > > > > > results

of Rahu's aspect on Li. It so happened > that the> > > > > > > antardasa was>

> > > > > > > > also of Ta, which contains Rahu.> > > > > > > > > >> > > >

> > > > > > As per Vimsottari dasa also, it was Mercury-Ketu > > antardasa.> >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > In my annual Tithi Pravesha chart of

1996-97, D-> 16 > > had Leo> > > > > > > rising,> > > > > > > > > lagna

lord Sun in 6h (!!) with 6th lord Saturn, > Rahu > > and> > > > > Ketu.> >

> > > > > Saturn-> > > > > > > > > Saturn antardasa as per annual Tithi

Ashtottari > dasa > > was> > > > > running> > > > > > > from> > > > > >

> > > Dec 3 to Dec 6. Accident was on Dec 5!> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > The technique of Tithi Pravesha never seizes to > > amaze me!> > > > >

> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > May Jupiter's light shine on us,> > > > > > > >

> > Narasimha> > > > > > > > > >

----------------> ----> > ------> > > > >

----> > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3):> > > >

> http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > > > > > > > > > Free Jyotish software

(Windows):> > > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org> > > > > > > > > > SJC

website: http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > > > > > > > >

----------------> ----> > ------> > > > >

----> > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Archives:

vedic-> astrology> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > Group info: vedic-> > > > > > >

astrology/info.html> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri >

Krishnaarpanamastu > > ||> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >

> > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > ________________________________> > > > > > > > >

Groups Links> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To visit your group on the

web, go to:> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology/>

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an

email to:> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology> > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the

> > Terms of> > > > > > > Service.> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >

> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Archives:

vedic astrology> > > > > > >> > > > > > >

Group info: vedic-> > > > > astrology/info.html>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ....... May

Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > > > >> > > > > > > || Om Tat

Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > ||> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>

> > > > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > Children International> > > > > > > Would you give Hope to a

Child in need?> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Girl> > > >

> > > And Give Her Hope> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Boy> > > > > > >

And Change His Life> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Learn More> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > ________________________________> > > > > > > Links>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > vedic astrology/> > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

vedic astrology> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Your

use of is subject to the > Terms of> > > > > Service.> >

> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Archives:

vedic astrology> > > > >> > > > > Group info:

vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > > > >> > >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> >

> > > > >> > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine

on us .......> > > > >> > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Sponsor>

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > ________________________________>

> > > > Links> > > > >> > > > > To visit your group on the

web, go to:> > > > > vedic astrology/> > > >

>> > > > > > > > > >

vedic astrology> > > > >> > > > > Your use of

is subject to the Terms > of > > Service.> > > >> > >

> > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >

> Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > > >

To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > >

....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > Sponsor > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

->

-----------> > Links> > > > a.. To visit your group on the

web, go to:> > vedic astrology/> > > >

b.. > >

vedic astrology> > > > c.. Your use of

is subject to the Terms > of Service.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......