Base of Astrology

[Guest guest]

Now a days we speak mostly about things we doesn't know!! Stephen Hawking is a

good scientist, but still most of theories still remains to be proved and before

that he himself discareded some of them like the string theory!! If i am right,

once he was after the boot-strap theory, then after the string theory, and now

back to the bigbang theoty!! Einsteen was verified later by the experimental

scientists - let it be E=MC2 or some thing else. But in Stephen Hawking's case

it is not so till now. "If there was a mechanism to draw the vectors of energy

received at a particular point of time, with their magnitudes, by all the

concerned grahas, we can give out the possibility of further events in the Cone

of Time Space Continuim." Dear friend, you are using technical terms. But has

anybody proved it - don't put your whole weight on unproved arguments.... Do

you want to say that the rishis (saints) created astrology after studies all

these science. Don't be

baised. I never asked "Who controls time?", but rather i was giving a simily. It

goes like this : watch shows time - but doesn't controls it. similarly planets

shows destiny - still doesn't controls it. One sanskrit verse by varahamihira

says that - planets are just the indicaters destiny (suchaka in sanskrit).

2) Karma:

Karma, Atman all are concepts created by human minds. Don't do the mistake

of mixing up concepts and reality (in your words 'truth' that hides behind).

Like the divisions of time like hour-minute-sec, nadi-vinadi etc, they exist

only in our mind. Like the time is unaffect by these divisions, the truth is

unafftect by our mental concepts such as karma and atman. Still worse, we don't

and can't have any verification tool for such concept. Unproved and unprovable

arguments betray the true seeker - always..... On darwin - let it be evolution

or devolution, why the astrologer's are mostly against it. At least, when

making things (mere) mental exercise, can't we atleast find some arguments that

is not against the scientific foundation of evolution (into good or to bad )

3) "By believing or not believing in gravity, if one jumps out of the window

from a height, one is sure to fall. Let people believe what they want to,

Jyotish's character does not change." Good!! you excaped without answering the

qustion!! But still I agree with you, you said it right. Still our duty

remains....... If astrology is closer to holistic approch, we should be able to

elaborate why it is..........

Expecting more from you, with love and regards,

sreenadh

 

 

 

Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard.