Guest guest Posted June 22, 2005 Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 Dear Yuri, Whether USNO calculations are accurate or not, the issue of apparent Sun position is not so simple. Your example for Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (5:03:58 local time) is calculated for +20°C and normal atmospheric pressure (1013 mBar). The city is 2201 feet (671 meters) above sea level and if you set geopos[2]:= 671; atpress:= 0; the time will be 05:04:26. Also the temperature affects the rising time for apparent position significantly (about 1 minute difference for T= -20°C). IMHO the true position (without refraction) should be used to avoid ambiguity because we don't take the birth place temperature and elevation above the sea into consideration. Bogdan www.astromagus.com - <khmelevsky > With accordance to the Swiss Ephemeris, that should be "the tip of the > Sun's disk appears to be on the eastern horizon", but not "the tip of > Sun's disk is truly on the eastern horizon". If that is for "the tip > of the Sun's disk appears to be on the eastern horizon", that is OK. > > >From the other side, I did met some complains about U.S. Naval > Observatory Astronomical Applications Department calculation accuracy > in several astrology forums just several days ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.