Guest guest Posted June 30, 2005 Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 Dear Shri Anil and Panditji I am pretty sure that the Top Brass have clearly understood the invalidity.But unless and until it comes from their mouth,the students are not going to accept.Such is the institutionalisation. It is ofcourse difficult from their part too,to rewrite all those established theories.But as shri K.N.Raoji has said,it is the willingness to accept and learn from ones mistakes,that marks greatness.We will wait for that day.Until then let us play our humble part. We are ready to see Navamsha strength for Rashi ''matters''.But navamsha ''neechahanga''(i dont know what is this) is only for navamsha matters.Otherwise Brilliant students are blindly accepting these inconsitencies.We are far far from non duality or advaita, as long as we treat amshas as seperate entities. Thanks Pradeep vedic astrology, Panditji <navagraha@g...> wrote: > Namaste, > > I fully agree with your sentiments. I have harped on this point for > sometime now. If one uses too many parameters and too many charts( It > is debatable whether the sages have mentioned use of divisions as > charts anyway) one will end up with every graha capable of giving > results of every single house, either in rashi or from arudh in rashi, > from naisargika karaka, chara karaka,add to this rashi drishti,3 kinds > of navanshas as the picture gets so fuzzy one can justify any KNOWN > event in any kundali. When one extends this to divisions and uses them > as charts as well this is compounded even further. Then add to this > tithi pravesh chart and its divisional charts the confusion is raised > to the n th degree. If one uses judiciously a few parameters and time > tested and researched techniques most questions people have can be > answered to a reasonable satisfaction. > > ... > > On 6/30/05, Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > > > I am aware that there are many learned Gurus in this forum and the objective > > of this email is not to undermine their achievements and their talents and > > methodologies. > > > > But I get a feeling are we not making Astrological Analysis too complex for > > new learners ? I know by using some very basic principles like Aspects , > > Nakshtras , Vishottari Mahadasha , Owners of houses , owners of Rashis and > > their placements and strengths along with transits one can do predictions > > quite accurately. > > > > The part of India we belong we never use complex rules , Division charts , > > Many types of Mahadasha , Arudha lagna etc etc but probably reach same > > destination by using more easy to understand principles. And the consistency > > of this basic rules to give correct results is very high. > > > > Just as an example only by looking at aspects , we can tell about mentality > > , attitudes , psychological profile etc quite accurately. > > > > The reason in writing this thoughts is because I believe astrology can be > > very meaningfully used as a tool to show directions and give guidelines > > which coupled with logical thinking one can take appropriate decisions > > easily. It is therefore essential that even new learners are able to use it > > with little efforts. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Anil Gogate > > > > > > > > > > Group info: > > vedic astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > > vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 Dear Raghunatha ji Thanks for your mail. My mail heading itself has got the answer.It has to come from the Guru for you to beleive. Thanks Pradeep vedic astrology, "Raghunatha RaoNemani" <raon1008> wrote: > Om Krishna Guru > > Namaste Pradeep, > > You have said very correctly, "Until then let us play our > humble part." . Let me add a bit more: let us learn/explore > and try to understand various methods by giving respect to > those Sages/Gurus and their teachings. > > Regards > Raghunatha Rao > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > Dear Shri Anil and Panditji > > > > I am pretty sure that the Top Brass have clearly understood the > > invalidity.But unless and until it comes from their mouth,the > students > > are not going to accept.Such is the institutionalisation. > > > > It is ofcourse difficult from their part too,to rewrite all those > > established theories.But as shri K.N.Raoji has said,it is the > > willingness to accept and learn from ones mistakes,that marks > > greatness.We will wait for that day.Until then let us play our > humble > > part................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.