Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 When you want to cross river (seek knowledge) use a boat (guru) till you reach the other bank (knowing). But once you reach there you are not expected to carry along the boat with you in the further journey. Gurus are like flowing rive. You drink as much water as you can depending on your capcity and thrist. Rajeev Upadhye - vijayadas_pradeep vedic astrology Friday, July 01, 2005 12:26 PM [vedic astrology] Re: one thought Dear shri BharatYour views are highly respectable.My views are no different,and thosewho have been reading for long too would agree.We should be prepared to accept good from everywhere and rejectunwanted.Discretion is important.As you have said,certain changes are visible,but long way to go.ThanksPradeep--- In vedic astrology, "bharateiya" <bharateiya>wrote:> --- In vedic astrology, Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...> wrote:> > Dear Jimbo,> > > Namaskaar Sri Anil, Sri Pradeep, Sri Punditji and others> > I am neither part of SJCC or BVB but I read books of both Sri K. N.> Rao and Sri Sanjay Rath. Instead of wanting to change either Sri Rao> or Sri Rath or debate about them, I focus on learning. If any of their> principle seem inconsistent, I reject it. > > I do not think others follow their Gurus blindly. I have seen Sri> Narasimha hold on to what he thinks is right and yet is respectful> towards both Sri Rao and Sri Rath. There are other astrologers here> who are insightful and knowledgeable. > > As the Veda say, be like the Hamsa - see what is milk and what is> water. Without sermonizing further, I remain> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > > > > > Giving newer and complex tools is fine. But question remains whether> these complex theories have been proved beyond doubt in predicting> accurately ? It is many a times easy to give a "post facto Analysis"> but how many times it has been used to predict before the event has> taken place ? How much research have been done to prove authenticity> of these theories ? > > > > Like in medicine they say "Double blind placebo based" research is> best one to prove the medicine; has similar research been done in> predicting using these tools ? ( and not justifying a known event in> a horoscope )> > > > I am not arguing here "our Theory" vs "Yours" but my point is many> simple theories have been found to give very consistent results and> are very easy to understand and teach. Like I have never ever seen> failure for predicting implications of certain aspects Like Moon -> Rahu Conjunction , Mars - Merc Conjunction or Square , Moon - Neptune> opposition or Moon - Herschel - Square etc etc and this list of very> simple tools and techniques where we have got very consistent result> is very high.> > > > I think a stage has come to honestly review these theories and> discard the ones which have not withstood test of time. Otherwise a> cult or a group would get developed which has fallen in it's own love> but missing very fundamental points.> > > > Regards,> > > > Anil > > - > > jimbo_dexter1 > > To: vedic astrology > > Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:22 PM> > [vedic astrology] Re: one thought> > > > > > Mr. Anil > > > > You are wasting your time making these suggestions.We at SJCwant to > > give as many tools as possible to our students, sisyas. We want to > > equip them with the latest books, research and software to helpthem > > make a correct prediction every single time.> > > > Jimbo Dexter> > > > > > --- In vedic astrology, Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...> > > wrote:> > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > I am aware that there are many learned Gurus in this forum andthe > > objective of this email is not to undermine their achievements and > > their talents and methodologies.> > > > > > But I get a feeling are we not making Astrological Analysis too > > complex for new learners ? I know by using some very basic > > principles like Aspects , Nakshtras , Vishottari Mahadasha , Owners > > of houses , owners of Rashis and their placements and strengths > > along with transits one can do predictions quite accurately. > > > > > > The part of India we belong we never use complex rules , Division > > charts , Many types of Mahadasha , Arudha lagna etc etc butprobably > > reach same destination by using more easy to understand principles. > > And the consistency of this basic rules to give correct results is > > very high.> > > > > > Just as an example only by looking at aspects , we can tell about > > mentality , attitudes , psychological profile etc quite accurately.> > > > > > The reason in writing this thoughts is because I believeastrology > > can be very meaningfully used as a tool to show directions and give > > guidelines which coupled with logical thinking one can take > > appropriate decisions easily. It is therefore essential that even > > new learners are able to use it with little efforts. > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > Anil Gogate> > > > > > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail tovedic astrology-> > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > a.. Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web.> > > > b.. To from this group, send an email to:> > vedic astrology> > > > c.. Terms of> Service. > > > > > >>Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.