Guest guest Posted July 19, 2005 Report Share Posted July 19, 2005 Dear respected members sutabhAvanavAMshAchcha sthirasantatikArakAt.h | evaM trishAMshakuNDalyAmapi yogaM vichintayet.h || 30|| All of us know the importance of panchama bahava in rajayoga,Mahrajayoga etc.Sthira Santhatikaraka is Jupiter.Thus 5th lord and Jupiter and their amshas are ofcourse important.We all know where to see the panchama bhava.Sage parashara too has explained to us the relevance of 5th bhava and its amshas under yogas for afluence. Suta bhava navamshacha is thus clearly the navamsha of 5th lord - and shri Narasimha too agree - though he uses the word ambiguity.Now sage says similarly, see the above from trishamshakundali.It is nothing but to see the 5th lords and jupiters position there.Shri Narasimha is intelligently tilting the priority. There are numerous such shlokas under jaimini sutras, karakamsha etc,referring to aspects involving amshas.We know the difference in opinion amongst scholars regarding where to see these from,ie Rashi or Navamsha.If one study the works in whole considering the gola and ganita part along with the shlokas ,there is no chance for ambiguity.I have always said by chart - we do not mean drawing - but analysis with bhavas.The word kundali does not mean we have to see bhavas there. Parashara muni has clearly said where to see 12 Bhavas(because he uses bhava lords along with their navamsha ,drekkana,shstyamsha etc).We cannot find a single shloka where, bhava is mentioned in vargamshas. I thank shri narasimhas encouragement,but nothing was haste.Apart from my discretion,( ofcourse within my limitations),i had also listened to scholars like Late Santhanam(who can never be haste as he has translated the whole BPHS), Subbu Rao, K.C.KeshavaPillai etc.Keshava pillai has clearly said - Vargas are thinking about divisions of lagna and planets.The examples i have quoted from parashara too reveals the same. Thus this does not stop us from answering the basic question.The lagna shadvargake shloka and Hora.Can we see houses from HORA as per sage Parashara's definition.Can we see aspect as per the much praised shloka.Thus let us ponder together and answer than getting over with intelligent interpretations. Thanks Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.