Guest guest Posted July 21, 2005 Report Share Posted July 21, 2005 Dear Kid & Pradeep, .... Just because someone is a Keralite, doesn't make him a scholar. It is just plain invalid logic! I am a Keralite myself and proud of it ... but that doesnt prove anything ... states Andhra Pradesh and Orissa have a great history of parampara of Astrology too! Just my 2cents. On another note: Yesterday we celebrated Guru Poornima at my Guru's house Narasimha's house, first by expressing our affection in the form of a compilation (transcripts of 45 lessons done till date) in a book format with CD, and then participating in the Satya Narayana Vratam. Thank You Narasimha & Sanjayji! Warm Regards Narayan vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > Dear shri Kid > > Thanks for your kind words. > It is a privilige and blessing to have a lineage of learned scholars > showing path. > Kind regds > Pradeep > vedic astrology, kid kid <astrokkid> wrote: > > Dear Pradeep, > > Now I Know for sure that you are a keralite. No wonder you display > deep erudition and scholarship in the ongoing debate.From Vararuchi- > via-- Sangamagrama Madhava-to Prof A R Rajaraja Verma to Dr KV Sharma > to Dr N E Muthuswami, the state of kerala had produced a lineage of > outstanding scholars in astrology.Initially, I mistook your > intentions; and I am sorry for that.Now, I presume, you are a person > encaged in dispassionate study.Keep it up > > Regards > > KID > > vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > Dear shri Kid > > > > I was referring to K.C.Keshavapillai author of Jyothisha > > Gurubhoothan.Kerala. > > > > Thanks > > Pradeep > > > > vedic astrology, kid kid <astrokkid> > > wrote: > > > Pradeep, > > > "Keshava pillai has clearly said - Vargas are thinking about > > > divisions of lagna and planets.The examples i have quoted from > > > parashara too reveals the same." > > > KID--Which Kesavapillai are you referring ? > > > Please reply > > > KID > > > > > > vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > Dear respected members > > > > > > sutabhAvanavAMshAchcha sthirasantatikArakAt.h | > > > evaM trishAMshakuNDalyAmapi yogaM vichintayet.h || 30|| > > > > > > All of us know the importance of panchama bahava in > > > rajayoga,Mahrajayoga etc.Sthira Santhatikaraka is Jupiter.Thus 5th > > > lord and Jupiter and their amshas are ofcourse important.We all > > know > > > where to see the panchama bhava.Sage parashara too has explained > > to > > > us the relevance of 5th bhava and its amshas under yogas for > > > afluence. > > > > > > Suta bhava navamshacha is thus clearly the navamsha of 5th lord - > > > and shri Narasimha too agree - though he uses the word > > > ambiguity.Now sage says similarly, see the above from > > > trishamshakundali.It is nothing but to see the 5th lords and > > > jupiters position there.Shri Narasimha is intelligently tilting > > the > > > priority. > > > > > > There are numerous such shlokas under jaimini sutras, karakamsha > > > etc,referring to aspects involving amshas.We know the difference > > in > > > opinion amongst scholars regarding where to see these from,ie > > Rashi > > > or Navamsha.If one study the works in whole considering the gola > > and > > > ganita part along with the shlokas ,there is no chance for > > > ambiguity.I have always said by chart - we do not mean drawing - > > but > > > analysis with bhavas.The word kundali does not mean we have to see > > > bhavas there. > > > Parashara muni has clearly said where to see 12 Bhavas(because he > > > uses bhava lords along with their navamsha ,drekkana,shstyamsha > > > etc).We cannot find a single shloka where, bhava is mentioned in > > > vargamshas. > > > > > > I thank shri narasimhas encouragement,but nothing was haste.Apart > > > from my discretion,( ofcourse within my limitations),i had also > > > listened to scholars like Late Santhanam(who can never be haste > > as > > > he has translated the whole BPHS), Subbu Rao, K.C.KeshavaPillai > > > etc.Keshava pillai has clearly said - Vargas are thinking about > > > divisions of lagna and planets.The examples i have quoted from > > > parashara too reveals the same. > > > > > > Thus this does not stop us from answering the basic question.The > > > lagna shadvargake shloka and Hora.Can we see houses from HORA as > > per > > > sage Parashara's definition.Can we see aspect as per the much > > > praised shloka.Thus let us ponder together and answer than getting > > > over with intelligent interpretations. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Start your day with - make it your home page > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology chart Vedic astrology Dasa Astrology horoscope Astrology > software > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 Dear Shri Iyer Being a keralite doesnt prove anything.Neither being from any other.I feel knowledge has no name or boundary. I feel in his first mail Kid did not write off knowledge from any other state.He was just proud about his heritage.Kindly read his first mail.I feel one can be proud about his/her paramapara unless he belittle others. Thus it was not necessary for you to aggravate an environment of regionalism ,which is not good for anyone,even if it helps you to devalue the debated points based on parasharas teachings.i have debated what i have felt based on facts.I do not want all the hard work i have done to be lost between regionalism and similar emotions.I feel being the list moderator you are aware of this better than me. Kind regds Pradeep vedic astrology, "naaraayana_iyer" <jaimini.upadesa@g...> wrote: > Dear Kid & Pradeep, > > .... Just because someone is a Keralite, doesn't make him a > scholar. It is just plain invalid logic! I am a Keralite myself and > proud of it ... but that doesnt prove anything ... states Andhra > Pradesh and Orissa have a great history of parampara of Astrology > too! > > Just my 2cents. > > On another note: Yesterday we celebrated Guru Poornima at my Guru's > house Narasimha's house, first by expressing our affection in the > form of a compilation (transcripts of 45 lessons done till date) in > a book format with CD, and then participating in the Satya Narayana > Vratam. > > Thank You Narasimha & Sanjayji! > > Warm Regards > Narayan > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > Dear shri Kid > > > > Thanks for your kind words. > > It is a privilige and blessing to have a lineage of learned > scholars > > showing path. > > Kind regds > > Pradeep > > vedic astrology, kid kid <astrokkid> > wrote: > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > Now I Know for sure that you are a keralite. No wonder you > display > > deep erudition and scholarship in the ongoing debate.From > Vararuchi- > > via-- Sangamagrama Madhava-to Prof A R Rajaraja Verma to Dr KV > Sharma > > to Dr N E Muthuswami, the state of kerala had produced a lineage > of > > outstanding scholars in astrology.Initially, I mistook your > > intentions; and I am sorry for that.Now, I presume, you are a > person > > encaged in dispassionate study.Keep it up > > > Regards > > > KID > > > vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > Dear shri Kid > > > > > > I was referring to K.C.Keshavapillai author of Jyothisha > > > Gurubhoothan.Kerala. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Pradeep > > > > > > vedic astrology, kid kid <astrokkid> > > > wrote: > > > > Pradeep, > > > > "Keshava pillai has clearly said - Vargas are thinking about > > > > divisions of lagna and planets.The examples i have quoted > from > > > > parashara too reveals the same." > > > > KID--Which Kesavapillai are you referring ? > > > > Please reply > > > > KID > > > > > > > > vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > Dear respected members > > > > > > > > sutabhAvanavAMshAchcha sthirasantatikArakAt.h | > > > > evaM trishAMshakuNDalyAmapi yogaM vichintayet.h || 30|| > > > > > > > > All of us know the importance of panchama bahava in > > > > rajayoga,Mahrajayoga etc.Sthira Santhatikaraka is Jupiter.Thus > 5th > > > > lord and Jupiter and their amshas are ofcourse important.We > all > > > know > > > > where to see the panchama bhava.Sage parashara too has > explained > > > to > > > > us the relevance of 5th bhava and its amshas under yogas for > > > > afluence. > > > > > > > > Suta bhava navamshacha is thus clearly the navamsha of 5th > lord - > > > > and shri Narasimha too agree - though he uses the word > > > > ambiguity.Now sage says similarly, see the above from > > > > trishamshakundali.It is nothing but to see the 5th lords and > > > > jupiters position there.Shri Narasimha is intelligently > tilting > > > the > > > > priority. > > > > > > > > There are numerous such shlokas under jaimini sutras, > karakamsha > > > > etc,referring to aspects involving amshas.We know the > difference > > > in > > > > opinion amongst scholars regarding where to see these from,ie > > > Rashi > > > > or Navamsha.If one study the works in whole considering the > gola > > > and > > > > ganita part along with the shlokas ,there is no chance for > > > > ambiguity.I have always said by chart - we do not mean > drawing - > > > but > > > > analysis with bhavas.The word kundali does not mean we have to > see > > > > bhavas there. > > > > Parashara muni has clearly said where to see 12 Bhavas(because > he > > > > uses bhava lords along with their > navamsha ,drekkana,shstyamsha > > > > etc).We cannot find a single shloka where, bhava is mentioned > in > > > > vargamshas. > > > > > > > > I thank shri narasimhas encouragement,but nothing was > haste.Apart > > > > from my discretion,( ofcourse within my limitations),i had > also > > > > listened to scholars like Late Santhanam(who can never be > haste > > > as > > > > he has translated the whole BPHS), Subbu Rao, > K.C.KeshavaPillai > > > > etc.Keshava pillai has clearly said - Vargas are thinking > about > > > > divisions of lagna and planets.The examples i have quoted > from > > > > parashara too reveals the same. > > > > > > > > Thus this does not stop us from answering the basic > question.The > > > > lagna shadvargake shloka and Hora.Can we see houses from HORA > as > > > per > > > > sage Parashara's definition.Can we see aspect as per the much > > > > praised shloka.Thus let us ponder together and answer than > getting > > > > over with intelligent interpretations. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > Terms > of > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Start your day with - make it your home page > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology chart Vedic astrology Dasa Astrology horoscope > Astrology > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.