Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Dear G. Singh, In one of your messages I have seen the following statement: "The biggest challenge in Jyotish is make judgment about the behavior of a planet. Whether a planet will give good or bad results during its dasha or bhukti, and when these good or bad results will fructify for the native. I have seen sometimes very experienced astrologers make mistake in this judgment" To think that a planet will give only good or only bad results is a primary mistake. The same planet will give both good and bad results. For example if sun is in Asc, as per Bhrigu suthram: "Arogyam bhavathi. Pitha prakrithiH. Nethra rogee. Medhavee sadacharo va. Ushnodaravan. MoorkhaH puthrahenaH. Theekshna budhi. Alpabhashee prevasaseelaH sukhee." Meaning if sun is in the Asc, then he will be healthy, hot natured, would have some eye disease, good memory, good conduct, with good digestive power, harsh, childless (with out a son or who losses a child), and brilliant. Of these - health, good memory, good conduct, good digestive power, brilliance etc are good results. While - eye disease, harshness, loss of child etc are bad results. Therefore trying to ascertain a planet or bhava as good or bad (benefic or malefic) is against the primary rules given by ancient seers who visualized this system of knowledge. Again you says: "Most of the time an astrology student has one guru. I do not have any guru. I studied astrology with 20 different astrologers, and learnt their techniques. Every astrologer is different, and knows some good stuff. I spent lot of money, used to do my own chart readings with very famous astrologers. They will record my reading, and send me those tapes. During my reading I will ask astrology questions, and tried to learn their process and techniques, how they came up with predictions. After spending 5, 6 months with one astrologer, I will learn everything that astrologer has to offer. Then I will move on to the next astrologer." Before going further please strengthen your fundamentals. There are many fundamental mistakes a true learner of astrology or even learned ones may commit. Points to remember: ------------------- 1: classifying Planets/Bhavas/Rasis/Nakshatras as benefic/malefic will not help much in actual prediction (i.e. in locating the actual results). 2: General rules just helps to avoid the starting trouble! Results are very specific and depends on specific rules. Learning (and prediction) path is from General to specific. With warm regards, Sreenadh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 I DO NOT BLINDLY BELIEVE EVERYTHING WRITTEN IN BHRIGU OR ASTROLOGY BOOKS. I APPLY THOSE TECHNIQUES THAT WORK IN REAL LIFE. SO PLEASE DON'T BLINDLY BELIEVE EVERYTHING WRITTERN IN BOOKS BECAUSE IT DOESN'T WORK MOST OF THE TIME AND YOU WILL MAKE MISTAKES. IF YOU TAKE ONE PLANET WE CAN STUDY IT WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD FOR A CHART. BUT THAT PLANET ALONE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE RESULTS. IF THE BHUKTI LORD IS EVIL AND THE TRANSITS ARE NOT HELPING THE NATIVE, YOU MAY GET BAD RESULTS DURING A GOOD PLANET'S MAHADASHA. THERE ARE SO MANY SCENARIOS. BUT WHEN WE DO NATAL READING WE TRY TO DETERMINE WHICH PLANET IS STRONG AND GOOD FOR THE NATIVE AND WHICH PLANET IS BAD FOR THE NATIVE. I DO NOT NEED ANY ADVICE ON FUNDAMENTALS FROM YOU. PLEASE KEEP YOUR ADVICE TO YOURSELF. G. SINGH Before going further please strengthen your fundamentals. There > are many fundamental mistakes a true learner of astrology or even > learned ones may commit. > Points to remember: > ------------------- > 1: classifying Planets/Bhavas/Rasis/Nakshatras as benefic/malefic > will not help much in actual prediction (i.e. in locating the actual > results). > 2: General rules just helps to avoid the starting trouble! Results > are very specific and depends on specific rules. Learning (and > prediction) path is from General to specific. For example if sun is in Asc, as per Bhrigu suthram: > "Arogyam bhavathi. Pitha prakrithiH. Nethra rogee. Medhavee > sadacharo va. Ushnodaravan. MoorkhaH puthrahenaH. Theekshna budhi. > Alpabhashee prevasaseelaH sukhee." > Meaning if sun is in the Asc, then he will be healthy, hot natured, vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid> wrote: > Dear G. Singh, > In one of your messages I have seen the following statement: > "The biggest challenge in Jyotish is make judgment about the behavior > of a planet. Whether a planet will give good or bad results during its > dasha or bhukti, and when these good or bad results will fructify for > the native. I have seen sometimes very experienced astrologers make > mistake in this judgment" > To think that a planet will give only good or only bad results is a > primary mistake. The same planet will give both good and bad results. > For example if sun is in Asc, as per Bhrigu suthram: > "Arogyam bhavathi. Pitha prakrithiH. Nethra rogee. Medhavee > sadacharo va. Ushnodaravan. MoorkhaH puthrahenaH. Theekshna budhi. > Alpabhashee prevasaseelaH sukhee." > Meaning if sun is in the Asc, then he will be healthy, hot natured, > would have some eye disease, good memory, good conduct, with good > digestive power, harsh, childless (with out a son or who losses a > child), and brilliant. > Of these - health, good memory, good conduct, good digestive power, > brilliance etc are good results. > While - eye disease, harshness, loss of child etc are bad results. > Therefore trying to ascertain a planet or bhava as good or bad > (benefic or malefic) is against the primary rules given by ancient > seers who visualized this system of knowledge. > Again you says: > "Most of the time an astrology student has one guru. I do not have > any guru. I studied astrology with 20 different astrologers, and > learnt their techniques. Every astrologer is different, and knows some > good stuff. I spent lot of money, used to do my own chart readings > with very famous astrologers. They will record my reading, and send me > those tapes. During my reading I will ask astrology questions, and > tried to learn their process and techniques, how they came up with > predictions. After spending 5, 6 months with one astrologer, I will > learn everything that astrologer has to offer. Then I will move on to > the next astrologer." > Before going further please strengthen your fundamentals. There > are many fundamental mistakes a true learner of astrology or even > learned ones may commit. > Points to remember: > ------------------- > 1: classifying Planets/Bhavas/Rasis/Nakshatras as benefic/malefic > will not help much in actual prediction (i.e. in locating the actual > results). > 2: General rules just helps to avoid the starting trouble! Results > are very specific and depends on specific rules. Learning (and > prediction) path is from General to specific. > > With warm regards, > Sreenadh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 PLEASE ..... PLEASE..... This site is so beautiful, so respectful, it mad even a casual person like to talk to others with a 'ji' attached at the end of their names So, please do not bring the standard of this site low. No animosity, no anger, no hatred, no AHAM, no comdomnation. We are all just one, if we insult another person, we are insulting ourselves. I know the final bad effect of that to all concerned. Please accept my humble apologies if I have hurt anybody's feelings by writing this. hbk1hbk_2100 wrote: > > I DO NOT BLINDLY BELIEVE EVERYTHING WRITTEN IN BHRIGU OR ASTROLOGY > BOOKS. I APPLY THOSE TECHNIQUES THAT WORK IN REAL LIFE. SO PLEASE > DON'T BLINDLY BELIEVE EVERYTHING WRITTERN IN BOOKS BECAUSE IT DOESN'T > WORK MOST OF THE TIME AND YOU WILL MAKE MISTAKES. > > IF YOU TAKE ONE PLANET WE CAN STUDY IT WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD FOR > A CHART. BUT THAT PLANET ALONE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE > RESULTS. IF THE BHUKTI LORD IS EVIL AND THE TRANSITS ARE NOT HELPING > THE NATIVE, YOU MAY GET BAD RESULTS DURING A GOOD PLANET'S MAHADASHA. > THERE ARE SO MANY SCENARIOS. > > BUT WHEN WE DO NATAL READING WE TRY TO DETERMINE WHICH PLANET IS > STRONG AND GOOD FOR THE NATIVE AND WHICH PLANET IS BAD FOR THE > NATIVE. > > I DO NOT NEED ANY ADVICE ON FUNDAMENTALS FROM YOU. PLEASE KEEP YOUR > ADVICE TO YOURSELF. > > G. SINGH > > > Before going further please strengthen your fundamentals. There > > are many fundamental mistakes a true learner of astrology or even > > learned ones may commit. > > Points to remember: > > ------------------- > > 1: classifying Planets/Bhavas/Rasis/Nakshatras as benefic/malefic > > will not help much in actual prediction (i.e. in locating the > actual > > results). > > 2: General rules just helps to avoid the starting trouble! > Results > > are very specific and depends on specific rules. Learning (and > > prediction) path is from General to specific. > > > > > > For example if sun is in Asc, as per Bhrigu suthram: > > "Arogyam bhavathi. Pitha prakrithiH. Nethra rogee. Medhavee > > sadacharo va. Ushnodaravan. MoorkhaH puthrahenaH. Theekshna budhi. > > Alpabhashee prevasaseelaH sukhee." > > Meaning if sun is in the Asc, then he will be healthy, hot > natured, > > > > vedic astrology, "Sreenadh" <sreelid> > wrote: > > Dear G. Singh, > > In one of your messages I have seen the following statement: > > "The biggest challenge in Jyotish is make judgment about the > behavior > > of a planet. Whether a planet will give good or bad results during > its > > dasha or bhukti, and when these good or bad results will fructify > for > > the native. I have seen sometimes very experienced astrologers make > > mistake in this judgment" > > To think that a planet will give only good or only bad results is > a > > primary mistake. The same planet will give both good and bad > results. > > For example if sun is in Asc, as per Bhrigu suthram: > > "Arogyam bhavathi. Pitha prakrithiH. Nethra rogee. Medhavee > > sadacharo va. Ushnodaravan. MoorkhaH puthrahenaH. Theekshna budhi. > > Alpabhashee prevasaseelaH sukhee." > > Meaning if sun is in the Asc, then he will be healthy, hot > natured, > > would have some eye disease, good memory, good conduct, with good > > digestive power, harsh, childless (with out a son or who losses a > > child), and brilliant. > > Of these - health, good memory, good conduct, good digestive > power, > > brilliance etc are good results. > > While - eye disease, harshness, loss of child etc are bad results. > > Therefore trying to ascertain a planet or bhava as good or bad > > (benefic or malefic) is against the primary rules given by ancient > > seers who visualized this system of knowledge. > > Again you says: > > "Most of the time an astrology student has one guru. I do not have > > any guru. I studied astrology with 20 different astrologers, and > > learnt their techniques. Every astrologer is different, and knows > some > > good stuff. I spent lot of money, used to do my own chart readings > > with very famous astrologers. They will record my reading, and send > me > > those tapes. During my reading I will ask astrology questions, and > > tried to learn their process and techniques, how they came up with > > predictions. After spending 5, 6 months with one astrologer, I will > > learn everything that astrologer has to offer. Then I will move on > to > > the next astrologer." > > Before going further please strengthen your fundamentals. There > > are many fundamental mistakes a true learner of astrology or even > > learned ones may commit. > > Points to remember: > > ------------------- > > 1: classifying Planets/Bhavas/Rasis/Nakshatras as benefic/malefic > > will not help much in actual prediction (i.e. in locating the > actual > > results). > > 2: General rules just helps to avoid the starting trouble! > Results > > are very specific and depends on specific rules. Learning (and > > prediction) path is from General to specific. > > > > With warm regards, > > Sreenadh > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > Astrology chart > </gads?t=ms&k=Astrology+chart&w1=Astrology+chart&w2=Astro\ logy+reading&w3=Vedic+astrology&w4=Divination+tool&c=4&s=86&.sig=FNydvv6ThywF3M1\ yP6dYsQ> > Astrology reading > </gads?t=ms&k=Astrology+reading&w1=Astrology+chart&w2=Ast\ rology+reading&w3=Vedic+astrology&w4=Divination+tool&c=4&s=86&.sig=HTjjyN6BdIN6P\ UU3eZpNsA> > Vedic astrology > </gads?t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Astrology+chart&w2=Astro\ logy+reading&w3=Vedic+astrology&w4=Divination+tool&c=4&s=86&.sig=bb607gnl9ZM7K0K\ 2EpO-zw> > > Divination tool > </gads?t=ms&k=Divination+tool&w1=Astrology+chart&w2=Astro\ logy+reading&w3=Vedic+astrology&w4=Divination+tool&c=4&s=86&.sig=6cpJ0GKgllBz30I\ iYxTDKg> > > > > > > * Visit your group "vedic astrology > <vedic astrology>" on the web. > > * > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology?subject=Un> > > * Terms of > Service <>. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.