Some General Questions

[Guest guest]

Namastae Swamiji:

 

I have below few questions. Kindly help to understand.

 

1. When an astrological chart is unique for every being,

is "Collective Karma" theory true? In other words, when an accident or

some kinda natural disaster happens, flocks of people die. Does this

mean all their lives are bound to end by these "events"? A train

accident happens, and in some cases, two coaches get badly hit and

people die. Does this mean all these people who died in these two

coaches destined to die collectively?

 

2. While identifying the Trine and Quadrant lords are straightforward

from the chart, malefic and benefic attributes are often not explained

clearly in books. Are there any thumb rules to easily idetify?

 

3. By definition, Lagnadhibadhi can never harm or rather never be

malefic, regardless of his current position in the chart. Is this

statement true? So, even if Lagnadhibadhi is in 6th or 8th or 12th

house, he will not be malefic (perhaps he may not be aiding "good"

things, but he cannot be a malefic).

 

4. Actual ecliptic covers more than the 12 houses. Why can't all these

be taken for better accuracy? Are there any school o fthoughts

supporting this perspective?

 

5. The usual tie that comes between a scientist and an astrologer is

on "measurable quantities". For instance the "influence" of the

planets as quantified by astrologers is non-measurable, while a

scientist looks for measureable quantities. Are there evidences of

famous scientists accepting these meta-physical phenomena? I know of

Einstien himself referring to "nature" in several places. But without

any prejudice, are there any incidents whereina a scientist supports

or at least shown to give attention to astrology?

 

Thank you and warm regards

Birdie